Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Kansas

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Girls 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Kansas
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Kansas

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Kansas Map

Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Kansas

City Child Poverty (Girls) vs State vs National
1. Bern 100.0% 14.7% (+85.3)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#456
2. Bendena 100.0% 14.7% (+85.3)#2 17.0% (+83.0)#464
3. Wright 100.0% 14.7% (+85.3)#3 17.0% (+83.0)#533
4. Bogue 100.0% 14.7% (+85.3)#4 17.0% (+83.0)#549
5. Culver 100.0% 14.7% (+85.3)#5 17.0% (+83.0)#576
6. Bartlett 100.0% 14.7% (+85.3)#6 17.0% (+83.0)#580
7. Matfield Green 100.0% 14.7% (+85.3)#7 17.0% (+83.0)#616
8. Shallow Water 100.0% 14.7% (+85.3)#8 17.0% (+83.0)#617
9. Mahaska 100.0% 14.7% (+85.3)#9 17.0% (+83.0)#631
10. Wilmore 100.0% 14.7% (+85.3)#10 17.0% (+83.0)#661
11. Cedar 100.0% 14.7% (+85.3)#11 17.0% (+83.0)#681
12. Mildred 100.0% 14.7% (+85.3)#12 17.0% (+83.0)#682
13. Fairview 93.8% 14.7% (+79.0)#13 17.0% (+76.8)#712
14. Circleville 91.7% 14.7% (+76.9)#14 17.0% (+74.7)#733
15. Hunter 87.0% 14.7% (+72.2)#15 17.0% (+70.0)#827
16. Redfield 84.6% 14.7% (+69.9)#16 17.0% (+67.6)#891
17. Burns 83.3% 14.7% (+68.6)#17 17.0% (+66.4)#923
18. Wilroads Gardens 81.3% 14.7% (+66.6)#18 17.0% (+64.4)#986
19. Randall 80.4% 14.7% (+65.6)#19 17.0% (+63.4)#1,009
20. Weir 80.0% 14.7% (+65.3)#20 17.0% (+63.0)#1,018
21. Narka 80.0% 14.7% (+65.3)#21 17.0% (+63.0)#1,038
22. Arcadia 78.9% 14.7% (+64.2)#22 17.0% (+62.0)#1,073
23. Mulberry 75.8% 14.7% (+61.0)#23 17.0% (+58.8)#1,177
24. Cassoday 75.0% 14.7% (+60.3)#24 17.0% (+58.0)#1,226
25. Lewis 73.5% 14.7% (+58.7)#25 17.0% (+56.5)#1,281
26. Niotaze 73.3% 14.7% (+58.6)#26 17.0% (+56.4)#1,290
27. Havensville 72.7% 14.7% (+58.0)#27 17.0% (+55.8)#1,329
28. Lebanon 68.8% 14.7% (+54.0)#28 17.0% (+51.8)#1,526
29. Palmer 68.2% 14.7% (+53.4)#29 17.0% (+51.2)#1,553
30. Admire 68.0% 14.7% (+53.3)#30 17.0% (+51.0)#1,563
31. Mapleton 66.7% 14.7% (+51.9)#31 17.0% (+49.7)#1,633
32. Raymond 66.7% 14.7% (+51.9)#32 17.0% (+49.7)#1,653
33. Galesburg 66.7% 14.7% (+51.9)#33 17.0% (+49.7)#1,659
34. New Albany 66.7% 14.7% (+51.9)#34 17.0% (+49.7)#1,667
35. Franklin 65.2% 14.7% (+50.5)#35 17.0% (+48.3)#1,741
36. Elk City 64.0% 14.7% (+49.3)#36 17.0% (+47.0)#1,811
37. Linn Valley 63.6% 14.7% (+48.9)#37 17.0% (+46.7)#1,833
38. Powhattan 61.5% 14.7% (+46.8)#38 17.0% (+44.6)#1,988
39. Hamilton 60.0% 14.7% (+45.3)#39 17.0% (+43.0)#2,093
40. Kickapoo Site 1 60.0% 14.7% (+45.3)#40 17.0% (+43.0)#2,103
41. Vining 60.0% 14.7% (+45.3)#41 17.0% (+43.0)#2,107
42. Longford 60.0% 14.7% (+45.3)#42 17.0% (+43.0)#2,108
43. Manter 59.3% 14.7% (+44.5)#43 17.0% (+42.3)#2,144
44. Allen 58.3% 14.7% (+43.6)#44 17.0% (+41.4)#2,238
45. White City 57.5% 14.7% (+42.8)#45 17.0% (+40.5)#2,292
46. White Cloud 57.1% 14.7% (+42.4)#46 17.0% (+40.2)#2,334
47. Kickapoo Site 7 57.1% 14.7% (+42.4)#47 17.0% (+40.2)#2,336
48. Lenora 56.2% 14.7% (+41.5)#48 17.0% (+39.3)#2,397
49. Chetopa 56.2% 14.7% (+41.4)#49 17.0% (+39.2)#2,401
50. Bison 55.6% 14.7% (+40.8)#50 17.0% (+38.6)#2,479
51. Chase 55.2% 14.7% (+40.4)#51 17.0% (+38.2)#2,508
52. Almena 54.5% 14.7% (+39.8)#52 17.0% (+37.6)#2,560
53. Hepler 53.8% 14.7% (+39.1)#53 17.0% (+36.9)#2,643
54. Horton 53.5% 14.7% (+38.8)#54 17.0% (+36.5)#2,674
55. Alden 53.3% 14.7% (+38.6)#55 17.0% (+36.4)#2,699
56. Coffeyville 53.3% 14.7% (+38.6)#56 17.0% (+36.3)#2,701
57. Catharine 52.5% 14.7% (+37.8)#57 17.0% (+35.5)#2,789
58. Thayer 51.1% 14.7% (+36.3)#58 17.0% (+34.1)#2,914
59. Phillipsburg 50.8% 14.7% (+36.1)#59 17.0% (+33.8)#2,936
60. Cedar Vale 50.5% 14.7% (+35.8)#60 17.0% (+33.5)#2,955
61. Hanston 50.0% 14.7% (+35.3)#61 17.0% (+33.0)#3,039
62. Mccune 50.0% 14.7% (+35.3)#62 17.0% (+33.0)#3,041
63. Dorrance 50.0% 14.7% (+35.3)#63 17.0% (+33.0)#3,069
64. Morland 50.0% 14.7% (+35.3)#64 17.0% (+33.0)#3,091
65. Herndon 50.0% 14.7% (+35.3)#65 17.0% (+33.0)#3,100
66. Hunnewell 50.0% 14.7% (+35.3)#66 17.0% (+33.0)#3,117
67. Humboldt 47.8% 14.7% (+33.1)#67 17.0% (+30.8)#3,318
68. Kickapoo Tribal Center 46.2% 14.7% (+31.4)#68 17.0% (+29.2)#3,547
69. Lakin 45.9% 14.7% (+31.2)#69 17.0% (+29.0)#3,569
70. Logan 45.8% 14.7% (+31.0)#70 17.0% (+28.8)#3,595
71. Colony 45.5% 14.7% (+30.7)#71 17.0% (+28.5)#3,631
72. Rosalia 45.5% 14.7% (+30.7)#72 17.0% (+28.5)#3,642
73. Cullison 45.5% 14.7% (+30.7)#73 17.0% (+28.5)#3,645
74. Hope 45.3% 14.7% (+30.6)#74 17.0% (+28.4)#3,657
75. Sedan 45.2% 14.7% (+30.5)#75 17.0% (+28.3)#3,661
76. Cawker City 44.7% 14.7% (+30.0)#76 17.0% (+27.8)#3,723
77. Leroy 44.4% 14.7% (+29.7)#77 17.0% (+27.5)#3,762
78. Quenemo 44.4% 14.7% (+29.7)#78 17.0% (+27.5)#3,767
79. Partridge 43.8% 14.7% (+29.0)#79 17.0% (+26.8)#3,868
80. Leon 43.5% 14.7% (+28.7)#80 17.0% (+26.5)#3,910
81. Alton 42.9% 14.7% (+28.1)#81 17.0% (+25.9)#4,019
82. Soldier 42.9% 14.7% (+28.1)#82 17.0% (+25.9)#4,026
83. Halstead 42.8% 14.7% (+28.0)#83 17.0% (+25.8)#4,034
84. Fontana 42.1% 14.7% (+27.4)#84 17.0% (+25.1)#4,118
85. Pittsburg 40.3% 14.7% (+25.6)#85 17.0% (+23.3)#4,395
86. Toronto 40.0% 14.7% (+25.3)#86 17.0% (+23.0)#4,472
87. Agra 40.0% 14.7% (+25.3)#87 17.0% (+23.0)#4,475
88. Burr Oak 40.0% 14.7% (+25.3)#88 17.0% (+23.0)#4,485
89. Plevna 40.0% 14.7% (+25.3)#89 17.0% (+23.0)#4,487
90. Stark 40.0% 14.7% (+25.3)#90 17.0% (+23.0)#4,492
91. Howard 39.7% 14.7% (+25.0)#91 17.0% (+22.7)#4,529
92. Iola 39.2% 14.7% (+24.5)#92 17.0% (+22.3)#4,614
93. Moline 38.9% 14.7% (+24.1)#93 17.0% (+21.9)#4,667
94. Eureka 38.7% 14.7% (+24.0)#94 17.0% (+21.7)#4,692
95. Harper 38.5% 14.7% (+23.7)#95 17.0% (+21.5)#4,735
96. Attica 38.5% 14.7% (+23.7)#96 17.0% (+21.5)#4,740
97. Elkhart 38.3% 14.7% (+23.6)#97 17.0% (+21.3)#4,770
98. Macksville 37.9% 14.7% (+23.2)#98 17.0% (+21.0)#4,841
99. Glen Elder 36.6% 14.7% (+21.8)#99 17.0% (+19.6)#5,122
100. Enterprise 36.5% 14.7% (+21.8)#100 17.0% (+19.6)#5,130

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Kansas?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Kansas are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Kansas?
Bern has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Kansas with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the State of Kansas?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Kansas is 14.7%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 17.0%.