Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in North Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Girls 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in North Dakota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in North Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in North Dakota

City Child Poverty (Girls) vs State vs National
1. East Dunseith 100.0% 11.8% (+88.2)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#186
2. New Leipzig 100.0% 11.8% (+88.2)#2 17.0% (+83.0)#409
3. Ruthville 100.0% 11.8% (+88.2)#3 17.0% (+83.0)#442
4. Sanborn 100.0% 11.8% (+88.2)#4 17.0% (+83.0)#466
5. Maxbass 100.0% 11.8% (+88.2)#5 17.0% (+83.0)#529
6. Solen 100.0% 11.8% (+88.2)#6 17.0% (+83.0)#571
7. Souris 100.0% 11.8% (+88.2)#7 17.0% (+83.0)#612
8. Luverne 100.0% 11.8% (+88.2)#8 17.0% (+83.0)#660
9. Hansboro 100.0% 11.8% (+88.2)#9 17.0% (+83.0)#673
10. Warwick 90.9% 11.8% (+79.1)#10 17.0% (+73.9)#747
11. Bowdon 88.9% 11.8% (+77.1)#11 17.0% (+71.9)#787
12. Springbrook 88.9% 11.8% (+77.1)#12 17.0% (+71.9)#794
13. Fort Yates 81.8% 11.8% (+70.0)#13 17.0% (+64.8)#972
14. Montpelier 81.8% 11.8% (+70.0)#14 17.0% (+64.8)#973
15. Four Bears Village 79.7% 11.8% (+67.9)#15 17.0% (+62.7)#1,045
16. Maddock 75.0% 11.8% (+63.2)#16 17.0% (+58.0)#1,208
17. Hazelton 72.7% 11.8% (+60.9)#17 17.0% (+55.8)#1,328
18. Mandaree 72.5% 11.8% (+60.7)#18 17.0% (+55.6)#1,338
19. Cannon Ball 61.6% 11.8% (+49.8)#19 17.0% (+44.7)#1,968
20. Litchville 57.1% 11.8% (+45.4)#20 17.0% (+40.2)#2,327
21. Noonan 55.6% 11.8% (+43.8)#21 17.0% (+38.6)#2,481
22. Green Acres 50.8% 11.8% (+39.0)#22 17.0% (+33.8)#2,938
23. Mcville 50.0% 11.8% (+38.2)#23 17.0% (+33.0)#3,036
24. Esmond 50.0% 11.8% (+38.2)#24 17.0% (+33.0)#3,105
25. Lisbon 48.8% 11.8% (+37.0)#25 17.0% (+31.9)#3,197
26. Devils Lake 48.3% 11.8% (+36.5)#26 17.0% (+31.4)#3,256
27. Almont 46.2% 11.8% (+34.4)#27 17.0% (+29.2)#3,545
28. Parshall 45.3% 11.8% (+33.5)#28 17.0% (+28.4)#3,655
29. Fairmount 42.9% 11.8% (+31.1)#29 17.0% (+25.9)#4,004
30. Drake 39.4% 11.8% (+27.6)#30 17.0% (+22.4)#4,590
31. Ryder 37.5% 11.8% (+25.7)#31 17.0% (+20.5)#4,937
32. Hazen 37.2% 11.8% (+25.5)#32 17.0% (+20.3)#4,983
33. Pekin 36.4% 11.8% (+24.6)#33 17.0% (+19.4)#5,190
34. Minto 35.1% 11.8% (+23.3)#34 17.0% (+18.2)#5,421
35. Gackle 34.6% 11.8% (+22.8)#35 17.0% (+17.6)#5,533
36. Turtle Lake 34.4% 11.8% (+22.6)#36 17.0% (+17.4)#5,583
37. Halliday 34.2% 11.8% (+22.5)#37 17.0% (+17.3)#5,612
38. St John 33.3% 11.8% (+21.5)#38 17.0% (+16.4)#5,870
39. Fingal 33.3% 11.8% (+21.5)#39 17.0% (+16.4)#5,899
40. Fort Totten 33.0% 11.8% (+21.2)#40 17.0% (+16.0)#5,984
41. Ashley 32.5% 11.8% (+20.7)#41 17.0% (+15.5)#6,086
42. Lignite 32.1% 11.8% (+20.4)#42 17.0% (+15.2)#6,181
43. Finley 31.2% 11.8% (+19.5)#43 17.0% (+14.3)#6,373
44. Mooreton 31.2% 11.8% (+19.5)#44 17.0% (+14.3)#6,378
45. Upham 30.4% 11.8% (+18.6)#45 17.0% (+13.5)#6,585
46. Adams 30.4% 11.8% (+18.6)#46 17.0% (+13.5)#6,587
47. Selfridge 30.3% 11.8% (+18.5)#47 17.0% (+13.3)#6,612
48. Sheyenne 30.0% 11.8% (+18.2)#48 17.0% (+13.0)#6,704
49. Shell Valley 29.9% 11.8% (+18.2)#49 17.0% (+13.0)#6,720
50. Edgeley 29.6% 11.8% (+17.8)#50 17.0% (+12.6)#6,808
51. Elgin 29.2% 11.8% (+17.4)#51 17.0% (+12.2)#6,895
52. Havana 29.2% 11.8% (+17.4)#52 17.0% (+12.2)#6,909
53. Bowman 27.5% 11.8% (+15.7)#53 17.0% (+10.5)#7,338
54. Belcourt 26.6% 11.8% (+14.8)#54 17.0% (+9.59)#7,619
55. Harvey 26.1% 11.8% (+14.3)#55 17.0% (+9.08)#7,767
56. Rugby 26.0% 11.8% (+14.2)#56 17.0% (+9.03)#7,783
57. Rolla 25.9% 11.8% (+14.1)#57 17.0% (+8.95)#7,812
58. Stanton 25.4% 11.8% (+13.6)#58 17.0% (+8.42)#7,986
59. Gladstone 25.0% 11.8% (+13.2)#59 17.0% (+8.02)#8,138
60. Mohall 24.3% 11.8% (+12.5)#60 17.0% (+7.35)#8,353
61. Granville 23.8% 11.8% (+12.0)#61 17.0% (+6.83)#8,505
62. Hope 23.7% 11.8% (+11.9)#62 17.0% (+6.71)#8,533
63. Mott 23.5% 11.8% (+11.7)#63 17.0% (+6.55)#8,588
64. Valley City 22.1% 11.8% (+10.3)#64 17.0% (+5.16)#9,077
65. Lakota 21.7% 11.8% (+9.92)#65 17.0% (+4.73)#9,224
66. Beach 21.7% 11.8% (+9.91)#66 17.0% (+4.72)#9,226
67. Fessenden 20.0% 11.8% (+8.21)#67 17.0% (+3.02)#9,837
68. Towner 20.0% 11.8% (+8.21)#68 17.0% (+3.02)#9,843
69. Edmore 20.0% 11.8% (+8.21)#69 17.0% (+3.02)#9,864
70. Center 19.4% 11.8% (+7.57)#70 17.0% (+2.38)#10,096
71. Scranton 19.2% 11.8% (+7.44)#71 17.0% (+2.25)#10,160
72. Ellendale 19.1% 11.8% (+7.33)#72 17.0% (+2.14)#10,199
73. Fargo 18.7% 11.8% (+6.95)#73 17.0% (+1.76)#10,338
74. Underwood 18.6% 11.8% (+6.78)#74 17.0% (+1.60)#10,385
75. Lincoln 18.0% 11.8% (+6.25)#75 17.0% (+1.06)#10,631
76. Washburn 16.9% 11.8% (+5.07)#76 17.0% (-0.116)#11,106
77. Powers Lake 16.7% 11.8% (+4.88)#77 17.0% (-0.309)#11,211
78. Crystal 16.7% 11.8% (+4.88)#78 17.0% (-0.309)#11,237
79. Alice 16.7% 11.8% (+4.88)#79 17.0% (-0.309)#11,242
80. Hankinson 15.9% 11.8% (+4.14)#80 17.0% (-1.05)#11,513
81. Grand Forks 15.7% 11.8% (+3.93)#81 17.0% (-1.26)#11,611
82. Cando 15.1% 11.8% (+3.28)#82 17.0% (-1.91)#11,931
83. Hoople 13.6% 11.8% (+1.85)#83 17.0% (-3.34)#12,597
84. Rolette 13.5% 11.8% (+1.73)#84 17.0% (-3.46)#12,659
85. Buxton 13.3% 11.8% (+1.55)#85 17.0% (-3.64)#12,740
86. Wyndmere 13.3% 11.8% (+1.47)#86 17.0% (-3.72)#12,787
87. Carson 13.0% 11.8% (+1.26)#87 17.0% (-3.93)#12,880
88. Milnor 12.9% 11.8% (+1.12)#88 17.0% (-4.07)#12,932
89. Medina 12.5% 11.8% (+0.713)#89 17.0% (-4.48)#13,155
90. Garrison 12.2% 11.8% (+0.408)#90 17.0% (-4.78)#13,299
91. Steele 12.2% 11.8% (+0.408)#91 17.0% (-4.78)#13,302
92. Bismarck 11.8% 11.8% (+0.016)#92 17.0% (-5.17)#13,486
93. Dunseith 11.6% 11.8% (-0.147)#93 17.0% (-5.34)#13,562
94. Golden Valley 10.7% 11.8% (-1.07)#94 17.0% (-6.26)#14,003
95. Jamestown 10.6% 11.8% (-1.19)#95 17.0% (-6.38)#14,068
96. Williston 10.5% 11.8% (-1.30)#96 17.0% (-6.49)#14,138
97. Linton 10.4% 11.8% (-1.40)#97 17.0% (-6.59)#14,191
98. Binford 10.0% 11.8% (-1.79)#98 17.0% (-6.98)#14,424
99. Watford City 9.9% 11.8% (-1.93)#99 17.0% (-7.12)#14,469
100. Wishek 9.8% 11.8% (-1.98)#100 17.0% (-7.17)#14,497

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in North Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in North Dakota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
90.9%
What city has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in North Dakota?
East Dunseith has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in North Dakota with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the State of North Dakota?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in North Dakota is 11.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 17.0%.