Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Girls 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma

City Child Poverty (Girls) vs State vs National
1.Cedar Crest100.0%20.8%(+79.2)#117.0%(+83.0)#291
2.Colony100.0%20.8%(+79.2)#217.0%(+83.0)#424
3.Whitesboro100.0%20.8%(+79.2)#417.0%(+83.0)#435
4.Bee100.0%20.8%(+79.2)#517.0%(+83.0)#436
5.Box100.0%20.8%(+79.2)#617.0%(+83.0)#452
6.Murphy100.0%20.8%(+79.2)#717.0%(+83.0)#454
7.Martha100.0%20.8%(+79.2)#817.0%(+83.0)#467
8.Moyers100.0%20.8%(+79.2)#917.0%(+83.0)#495
9.Platter100.0%20.8%(+79.2)#1017.0%(+83.0)#509
10.Ratliff City100.0%20.8%(+79.2)#1117.0%(+83.0)#521
11.Smithville100.0%20.8%(+79.2)#1217.0%(+83.0)#531
12.Hoyt100.0%20.8%(+79.2)#1317.0%(+83.0)#532
13.Blue100.0%20.8%(+79.2)#1417.0%(+83.0)#536
14.Atwood100.0%20.8%(+79.2)#1517.0%(+83.0)#540
15.Cowlington100.0%20.8%(+79.2)#1617.0%(+83.0)#543
16.Mulberry100.0%20.8%(+79.2)#1717.0%(+83.0)#585
17.New Alluwe100.0%20.8%(+79.2)#1817.0%(+83.0)#594
18.Hendrix100.0%20.8%(+79.2)#1917.0%(+83.0)#604
19.Emet100.0%20.8%(+79.2)#2017.0%(+83.0)#625
20.Whippoorwill100.0%20.8%(+79.2)#2117.0%(+83.0)#634
21.Ashland100.0%20.8%(+79.2)#2217.0%(+83.0)#638
22.Badger Lee100.0%20.8%(+79.2)#2317.0%(+83.0)#642
23.Bunch100.0%20.8%(+79.2)#2417.0%(+83.0)#655
24.Douglas100.0%20.8%(+79.2)#2517.0%(+83.0)#663
25.Rosston100.0%20.8%(+79.2)#2617.0%(+83.0)#666
26.Amorita100.0%20.8%(+79.2)#2717.0%(+83.0)#672
27.Piney100.0%20.8%(+79.2)#2817.0%(+83.0)#674
28.Friendship100.0%20.8%(+79.2)#2917.0%(+83.0)#680
29.Bell86.3%20.8%(+65.4)#3017.0%(+69.3)#843
30.Dacoma83.3%20.8%(+62.5)#3117.0%(+66.4)#929
31.Eldorado83.0%20.8%(+62.1)#3217.0%(+66.0)#936
32.Boley80.0%20.8%(+59.2)#3317.0%(+63.0)#1,017
33.Lebanon78.9%20.8%(+58.1)#3417.0%(+62.0)#1,075
34.Yeager77.8%20.8%(+56.9)#3517.0%(+60.8)#1,112
35.Loyal77.8%20.8%(+56.9)#3617.0%(+60.8)#1,113
36.Monroe75.0%20.8%(+54.2)#3717.0%(+58.0)#1,228
37.Burbank75.0%20.8%(+54.2)#3817.0%(+58.0)#1,229
38.Bowring75.0%20.8%(+54.2)#3917.0%(+58.0)#1,233
39.Blanco75.0%20.8%(+54.2)#4017.0%(+58.0)#1,234
40.Langston73.6%20.8%(+52.8)#4117.0%(+56.6)#1,276
41.Spavinaw73.1%20.8%(+52.2)#4217.0%(+56.1)#1,300
42.Glencoe72.9%20.8%(+52.1)#4317.0%(+55.9)#1,309
43.Tyrone72.8%20.8%(+52.0)#4417.0%(+55.9)#1,316
44.Carlisle72.7%20.8%(+51.9)#4517.0%(+55.8)#1,322
45.Peoria71.4%20.8%(+50.6)#4617.0%(+54.5)#1,398
46.Avard71.4%20.8%(+50.6)#4717.0%(+54.5)#1,399
47.Tenkiller71.0%20.8%(+50.1)#4817.0%(+54.0)#1,421
48.Hastings70.0%20.8%(+49.2)#4917.0%(+53.0)#1,465
49.Elm Grove68.4%20.8%(+47.6)#5017.0%(+51.4)#1,544
50.Hallett66.7%20.8%(+45.8)#5117.0%(+49.7)#1,660
51.Hitchita66.7%20.8%(+45.8)#5217.0%(+49.7)#1,668
52.Bluejacket65.2%20.8%(+44.4)#5317.0%(+48.2)#1,742
53.Peggs64.2%20.8%(+43.3)#5417.0%(+47.2)#1,795
54.Mulhall63.6%20.8%(+42.8)#5517.0%(+46.7)#1,839
55.Dustin63.4%20.8%(+42.5)#5617.0%(+46.4)#1,849
56.Indianola63.3%20.8%(+42.5)#5717.0%(+46.4)#1,850
57.Waurika63.2%20.8%(+42.4)#5817.0%(+46.2)#1,856
58.Boynton62.5%20.8%(+41.7)#5917.0%(+45.5)#1,911
59.Dripping Springs62.5%20.8%(+41.7)#6017.0%(+45.5)#1,916
60.Heavener62.5%20.8%(+41.6)#6117.0%(+45.5)#1,917
61.Texhoma62.4%20.8%(+41.5)#6217.0%(+45.4)#1,920
62.Vici62.2%20.8%(+41.3)#6317.0%(+45.2)#1,934
63.Peavine61.9%20.8%(+41.1)#6417.0%(+44.9)#1,953
64.Simms61.7%20.8%(+40.8)#6517.0%(+44.7)#1,966
65.Twin Oaks60.0%20.8%(+39.2)#6617.0%(+43.0)#2,090
66.Freedom60.0%20.8%(+39.2)#6717.0%(+43.0)#2,095
67.Flint Creek59.8%20.8%(+39.0)#6817.0%(+42.8)#2,115
68.Oaks59.1%20.8%(+38.3)#6917.0%(+42.1)#2,158
69.Kiowa58.6%20.8%(+37.7)#7017.0%(+41.6)#2,207
70.White Eagle58.1%20.8%(+37.3)#7117.0%(+41.1)#2,254
71.Langley57.9%20.8%(+37.1)#7217.0%(+40.9)#2,266
72.Lawrence Creek57.1%20.8%(+36.3)#7317.0%(+40.2)#2,333
73.Hoffman57.1%20.8%(+36.3)#7417.0%(+40.2)#2,335
74.Elohim57.1%20.8%(+36.3)#7517.0%(+40.2)#2,338
75.Carmen56.8%20.8%(+35.9)#7617.0%(+39.8)#2,361
76.Bennington56.0%20.8%(+35.2)#7717.0%(+39.0)#2,416
77.Kaw City56.0%20.8%(+35.2)#7817.0%(+39.0)#2,418
78.Braggs56.0%20.8%(+35.2)#7917.0%(+39.0)#2,421
79.Hardesty55.6%20.8%(+34.7)#8017.0%(+38.6)#2,470
80.Wapanucka55.4%20.8%(+34.6)#8117.0%(+38.5)#2,487
81.Shady Point55.3%20.8%(+34.5)#8217.0%(+38.3)#2,498
82.Panama54.8%20.8%(+34.0)#8317.0%(+37.9)#2,535
83.Eakly54.0%20.8%(+33.2)#8417.0%(+37.0)#2,614
84.Reydon53.8%20.8%(+33.0)#8517.0%(+36.9)#2,640
85.Foss53.8%20.8%(+33.0)#8617.0%(+36.9)#2,641
86.Spiro53.8%20.8%(+32.9)#8717.0%(+36.8)#2,650
87.Custer City53.7%20.8%(+32.9)#8817.0%(+36.8)#2,652
88.Roosevelt53.3%20.8%(+32.5)#8917.0%(+36.4)#2,690
89.Wetumka53.1%20.8%(+32.2)#9017.0%(+36.1)#2,725
90.Dewey52.9%20.8%(+32.0)#9117.0%(+35.9)#2,749
91.Drummond52.8%20.8%(+32.0)#9217.0%(+35.9)#2,751
92.Dougherty52.6%20.8%(+31.8)#9317.0%(+35.7)#2,778
93.Wainwright52.6%20.8%(+31.8)#9417.0%(+35.7)#2,779
94.Colbert52.5%20.8%(+31.7)#9517.0%(+35.6)#2,781
95.Tishomingo52.5%20.8%(+31.7)#9617.0%(+35.6)#2,783
96.Rocky Mountain52.5%20.8%(+31.6)#9717.0%(+35.5)#2,792
97.Lowrey52.1%20.8%(+31.2)#9817.0%(+35.1)#2,825
98.Okeene51.9%20.8%(+31.1)#9917.0%(+34.9)#2,842
99.Grandfield51.7%20.8%(+30.9)#10017.0%(+34.8)#2,856
100.Colcord51.5%20.8%(+30.6)#10117.0%(+34.5)#2,880

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma?
Cedar Crest has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the State of Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma is 20.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 17.0%.