Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Ohio

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Girls 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Ohio
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Ohio

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Ohio Map

Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Ohio

City Child Poverty (Girls) vs State vs National
1. Pleasant Grove 100.0% 18.7% (+81.3)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#37
2. Suffield 100.0% 18.7% (+81.3)#2 17.0% (+83.0)#52
3. Kingsville 100.0% 18.7% (+81.3)#3 17.0% (+83.0)#112
4. Friendship 100.0% 18.7% (+81.3)#4 17.0% (+83.0)#154
5. Ai 100.0% 18.7% (+81.3)#5 17.0% (+83.0)#163
6. Madison Place 100.0% 18.7% (+81.3)#6 17.0% (+83.0)#165
7. Hamburg 100.0% 18.7% (+81.3)#7 17.0% (+83.0)#218
8. Brownsville 100.0% 18.7% (+81.3)#8 17.0% (+83.0)#223
9. Petersburg 100.0% 18.7% (+81.3)#9 17.0% (+83.0)#234
10. Stewart 100.0% 18.7% (+81.3)#10 17.0% (+83.0)#241
11. Flat Rock 100.0% 18.7% (+81.3)#11 17.0% (+83.0)#265
12. Lewistown 100.0% 18.7% (+81.3)#13 17.0% (+83.0)#439
13. East Fultonham 100.0% 18.7% (+81.3)#14 17.0% (+83.0)#440
14. Cecil 100.0% 18.7% (+81.3)#15 17.0% (+83.0)#457
15. Connorville 100.0% 18.7% (+81.3)#16 17.0% (+83.0)#510
16. Milledgeville 100.0% 18.7% (+81.3)#17 17.0% (+83.0)#546
17. Rendville 100.0% 18.7% (+81.3)#18 17.0% (+83.0)#617
18. Antioch 100.0% 18.7% (+81.3)#19 17.0% (+83.0)#635
19. New Bloomington 93.5% 18.7% (+74.9)#20 17.0% (+76.6)#715
20. Nellie 90.0% 18.7% (+71.3)#21 17.0% (+73.0)#760
21. Gambier 87.5% 18.7% (+68.8)#22 17.0% (+70.5)#817
22. North Robinson 85.7% 18.7% (+67.0)#23 17.0% (+68.7)#857
23. Haydenville 85.1% 18.7% (+66.4)#24 17.0% (+68.1)#876
24. Fairfield Beach 84.6% 18.7% (+65.9)#25 17.0% (+67.6)#886
25. Chauncey 84.6% 18.7% (+65.9)#26 17.0% (+67.6)#887
26. South Canal 84.4% 18.7% (+65.7)#27 17.0% (+67.4)#893
27. Holloway 82.7% 18.7% (+64.0)#28 17.0% (+65.7)#947
28. Skyline Acres 81.1% 18.7% (+62.4)#29 17.0% (+64.1)#990
29. Reno Beach 80.0% 18.7% (+61.3)#30 17.0% (+63.0)#1,019
30. Dunlap 79.7% 18.7% (+61.0)#31 17.0% (+62.7)#1,044
31. Old Washington 79.5% 18.7% (+60.8)#32 17.0% (+62.5)#1,051
32. Mingo Junction 78.9% 18.7% (+60.3)#33 17.0% (+62.0)#1,072
33. Dillonvale 78.0% 18.7% (+59.4)#34 17.0% (+61.1)#1,102
34. Jeffersonville 77.9% 18.7% (+59.2)#35 17.0% (+60.9)#1,108
35. Linndale 76.9% 18.7% (+58.2)#36 17.0% (+59.9)#1,142
36. Kunkle 76.0% 18.7% (+57.3)#37 17.0% (+59.0)#1,169
37. Sarahsville 75.0% 18.7% (+56.3)#38 17.0% (+58.0)#1,230
38. Urbancrest 73.5% 18.7% (+54.8)#39 17.0% (+56.5)#1,280
39. Scio 71.2% 18.7% (+52.5)#40 17.0% (+54.2)#1,405
40. Russells Point 71.0% 18.7% (+52.3)#41 17.0% (+54.0)#1,418
41. Lore City 71.0% 18.7% (+52.3)#42 17.0% (+54.0)#1,420
42. South Mount Vernon 70.9% 18.7% (+52.2)#43 17.0% (+53.9)#1,426
43. Manchester 70.7% 18.7% (+52.0)#44 17.0% (+53.7)#1,433
44. Mifflin 70.0% 18.7% (+51.3)#45 17.0% (+53.0)#1,461
45. Bergholz 69.7% 18.7% (+51.0)#46 17.0% (+52.7)#1,481
46. Highland Holiday 67.6% 18.7% (+48.9)#47 17.0% (+50.7)#1,571
47. West Union 67.1% 18.7% (+48.4)#48 17.0% (+50.1)#1,597
48. Windham 67.0% 18.7% (+48.4)#49 17.0% (+50.1)#1,598
49. Owensville 66.7% 18.7% (+48.0)#50 17.0% (+49.7)#1,615
50. Centerville Thurman 66.7% 18.7% (+48.0)#51 17.0% (+49.7)#1,670
51. Union City 66.4% 18.7% (+47.7)#52 17.0% (+49.5)#1,679
52. Seaman 64.9% 18.7% (+46.2)#53 17.0% (+47.9)#1,756
53. Cygnet 64.5% 18.7% (+45.8)#54 17.0% (+47.5)#1,765
54. Sardinia 64.1% 18.7% (+45.4)#55 17.0% (+47.1)#1,798
55. Alger 64.0% 18.7% (+45.3)#56 17.0% (+47.0)#1,819
56. Syracuse 63.9% 18.7% (+45.2)#57 17.0% (+46.9)#1,823
57. New Holland 63.8% 18.7% (+45.1)#58 17.0% (+46.8)#1,829
58. Derby 63.6% 18.7% (+45.0)#59 17.0% (+46.7)#1,836
59. Coalton 63.6% 18.7% (+45.0)#60 17.0% (+46.7)#1,837
60. Mcarthur 62.8% 18.7% (+44.1)#61 17.0% (+45.8)#1,884
61. West Logan 62.5% 18.7% (+43.8)#62 17.0% (+45.5)#1,904
62. Warren 62.2% 18.7% (+43.5)#63 17.0% (+45.2)#1,933
63. West Lafayette 62.1% 18.7% (+43.4)#64 17.0% (+45.1)#1,941
64. Rosemount 61.0% 18.7% (+42.3)#65 17.0% (+44.0)#2,009
65. South Salem 60.7% 18.7% (+42.0)#66 17.0% (+43.7)#2,032
66. Gilboa 60.3% 18.7% (+41.7)#67 17.0% (+43.4)#2,064
67. Carrollton 59.2% 18.7% (+40.6)#68 17.0% (+42.3)#2,145
68. Lockland 59.0% 18.7% (+40.3)#69 17.0% (+42.0)#2,169
69. Empire 58.3% 18.7% (+39.7)#70 17.0% (+41.4)#2,239
70. Kipton 58.3% 18.7% (+39.7)#71 17.0% (+41.4)#2,241
71. Yorkville 58.0% 18.7% (+39.3)#72 17.0% (+41.0)#2,261
72. Aberdeen 57.5% 18.7% (+38.8)#73 17.0% (+40.5)#2,296
73. East Liverpool 57.5% 18.7% (+38.8)#74 17.0% (+40.5)#2,299
74. La Rue 57.4% 18.7% (+38.8)#75 17.0% (+40.5)#2,300
75. Amsterdam 56.5% 18.7% (+37.8)#76 17.0% (+39.5)#2,379
76. Midland 56.2% 18.7% (+37.6)#77 17.0% (+39.3)#2,395
77. Irondale 56.0% 18.7% (+37.3)#78 17.0% (+39.0)#2,417
78. Mount Healthy Heights 55.9% 18.7% (+37.2)#79 17.0% (+38.9)#2,441
79. Pomeroy 55.8% 18.7% (+37.1)#80 17.0% (+38.8)#2,452
80. Wolfhurst 55.6% 18.7% (+36.9)#81 17.0% (+38.6)#2,462
81. Stratton 55.6% 18.7% (+36.9)#82 17.0% (+38.6)#2,474
82. East Cleveland 55.4% 18.7% (+36.7)#83 17.0% (+38.4)#2,493
83. Dexter City 55.0% 18.7% (+36.3)#84 17.0% (+38.0)#2,526
84. Peebles 54.8% 18.7% (+36.1)#85 17.0% (+37.8)#2,545
85. Patterson 54.5% 18.7% (+35.9)#86 17.0% (+37.6)#2,566
86. Mantua 53.8% 18.7% (+35.2)#87 17.0% (+36.9)#2,627
87. Rogers 53.8% 18.7% (+35.2)#88 17.0% (+36.9)#2,638
88. Castine 53.8% 18.7% (+35.2)#89 17.0% (+36.9)#2,642
89. Oakwood Village Paulding County 53.4% 18.7% (+34.8)#90 17.0% (+36.5)#2,676
90. Youngstown 53.4% 18.7% (+34.7)#91 17.0% (+36.4)#2,678
91. Malta 53.3% 18.7% (+34.7)#92 17.0% (+36.4)#2,683
92. Malinta 53.3% 18.7% (+34.7)#93 17.0% (+36.4)#2,688
93. Port William 53.3% 18.7% (+34.7)#94 17.0% (+36.4)#2,689
94. Williamsport 53.1% 18.7% (+34.4)#95 17.0% (+36.1)#2,722
95. Crown City 53.0% 18.7% (+34.3)#96 17.0% (+36.0)#2,728
96. Greenfield 52.9% 18.7% (+34.2)#97 17.0% (+36.0)#2,745
97. Pleasant Hills 52.8% 18.7% (+34.1)#98 17.0% (+35.8)#2,757
98. The Plains 52.6% 18.7% (+34.0)#99 17.0% (+35.7)#2,770
99. Walton Hills 51.5% 18.7% (+32.8)#100 17.0% (+34.5)#2,874
100. Sabina 51.2% 18.7% (+32.6)#101 17.0% (+34.3)#2,900

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Ohio?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Ohio are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Ohio?
Pleasant Grove has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Ohio with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the State of Ohio?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Ohio is 18.7%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 17.0%.