Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Indiana

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Girls 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Indiana
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Indiana

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Indiana Map

Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Indiana

City Child Poverty (Girls) vs State vs National
1. Lewis 100.0% 16.6% (+83.4)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#145
2. Hanna 100.0% 16.6% (+83.4)#2 17.0% (+83.0)#161
3. Dubois 100.0% 16.6% (+83.4)#3 17.0% (+83.0)#209
4. Prairie Creek 100.0% 16.6% (+83.4)#4 17.0% (+83.0)#288
5. Abington 100.0% 16.6% (+83.4)#5 17.0% (+83.0)#293
6. Burnett 100.0% 16.6% (+83.4)#6 17.0% (+83.0)#350
7. Millville 100.0% 16.6% (+83.4)#7 17.0% (+83.0)#363
8. Adams 100.0% 16.6% (+83.4)#8 17.0% (+83.0)#367
9. Alford 100.0% 16.6% (+83.4)#9 17.0% (+83.0)#374
10. Deer Creek 100.0% 16.6% (+83.4)#10 17.0% (+83.0)#396
11. Pence 100.0% 16.6% (+83.4)#11 17.0% (+83.0)#400
12. Eugene 100.0% 16.6% (+83.4)#12 17.0% (+83.0)#405
13. Billtown 100.0% 16.6% (+83.4)#13 17.0% (+83.0)#430
14. Grayford 100.0% 16.6% (+83.4)#14 17.0% (+83.0)#470
15. Linn Grove 100.0% 16.6% (+83.4)#15 17.0% (+83.0)#490
16. Otisco 100.0% 16.6% (+83.4)#16 17.0% (+83.0)#496
17. Pleasantville 100.0% 16.6% (+83.4)#17 17.0% (+83.0)#566
18. Lake Holiday Hideaway 95.0% 16.6% (+78.4)#18 17.0% (+78.0)#701
19. Alamo 91.7% 16.6% (+75.1)#19 17.0% (+74.7)#734
20. Mount Etna 90.0% 16.6% (+73.4)#20 17.0% (+73.0)#762
21. Rockville 80.3% 16.6% (+63.8)#21 17.0% (+63.4)#1,010
22. English 78.7% 16.6% (+62.1)#22 17.0% (+61.7)#1,084
23. Mauckport 72.7% 16.6% (+56.2)#23 17.0% (+55.8)#1,332
24. Poneto 72.2% 16.6% (+55.7)#24 17.0% (+55.2)#1,352
25. Newberry 69.2% 16.6% (+52.7)#25 17.0% (+52.3)#1,504
26. La Paz 66.7% 16.6% (+50.1)#26 17.0% (+49.7)#1,621
27. Patriot 66.7% 16.6% (+50.1)#27 17.0% (+49.7)#1,636
28. Coal 66.7% 16.6% (+50.1)#28 17.0% (+49.7)#1,661
29. Laconia 66.7% 16.6% (+50.1)#29 17.0% (+49.7)#1,665
30. Kimmell 66.3% 16.6% (+49.7)#30 17.0% (+49.3)#1,687
31. Roachdale 65.9% 16.6% (+49.3)#31 17.0% (+48.9)#1,706
32. Thayer 64.3% 16.6% (+47.7)#32 17.0% (+47.3)#1,780
33. Boswell 64.0% 16.6% (+47.5)#33 17.0% (+47.1)#1,806
34. Jasonville 63.8% 16.6% (+47.3)#34 17.0% (+46.9)#1,826
35. Roseland 62.9% 16.6% (+46.3)#35 17.0% (+45.9)#1,876
36. Laurel 62.6% 16.6% (+46.1)#36 17.0% (+45.6)#1,893
37. Russellville 62.3% 16.6% (+45.8)#37 17.0% (+45.3)#1,926
38. Williamsburg 61.6% 16.6% (+45.1)#38 17.0% (+44.7)#1,970
39. Kewanna 61.5% 16.6% (+45.0)#39 17.0% (+44.6)#1,977
40. Crows Nest 61.5% 16.6% (+45.0)#40 17.0% (+44.6)#1,987
41. New Salisbury 61.2% 16.6% (+44.6)#41 17.0% (+44.2)#1,999
42. Springport 61.1% 16.6% (+44.6)#42 17.0% (+44.1)#2,007
43. Hatfield 60.7% 16.6% (+44.2)#43 17.0% (+43.7)#2,029
44. Hudson 60.5% 16.6% (+43.9)#44 17.0% (+43.5)#2,045
45. Spring Grove 60.5% 16.6% (+43.9)#45 17.0% (+43.5)#2,051
46. Matthews 58.3% 16.6% (+41.8)#46 17.0% (+41.4)#2,231
47. Boston 58.3% 16.6% (+41.8)#47 17.0% (+41.4)#2,240
48. Mount Ayr 58.3% 16.6% (+41.8)#48 17.0% (+41.4)#2,244
49. Kempton 58.1% 16.6% (+41.5)#49 17.0% (+41.1)#2,260
50. Ambia 57.6% 16.6% (+41.0)#50 17.0% (+40.6)#2,286
51. Peru 55.4% 16.6% (+38.9)#51 17.0% (+38.5)#2,486
52. Crane 55.0% 16.6% (+38.4)#52 17.0% (+38.0)#2,522
53. Milroy 54.5% 16.6% (+38.0)#53 17.0% (+37.6)#2,557
54. Dupont 54.5% 16.6% (+38.0)#54 17.0% (+37.6)#2,562
55. Gary 54.5% 16.6% (+38.0)#55 17.0% (+37.5)#2,573
56. Leiters Ford 53.6% 16.6% (+37.0)#56 17.0% (+36.6)#2,669
57. Michigantown 53.3% 16.6% (+36.8)#57 17.0% (+36.4)#2,684
58. Arcadia 52.9% 16.6% (+36.4)#58 17.0% (+36.0)#2,732
59. Amboy 52.9% 16.6% (+36.4)#59 17.0% (+36.0)#2,742
60. Switz City 52.9% 16.6% (+36.4)#60 17.0% (+36.0)#2,744
61. Pittsburg 52.4% 16.6% (+35.8)#61 17.0% (+35.4)#2,802
62. Campbellsburg 51.6% 16.6% (+35.0)#62 17.0% (+34.6)#2,869
63. Patoka 50.9% 16.6% (+34.4)#63 17.0% (+34.0)#2,925
64. Scottsburg 50.2% 16.6% (+33.6)#64 17.0% (+33.2)#2,979
65. Worthington 50.0% 16.6% (+33.4)#65 17.0% (+33.0)#2,993
66. Tri Lakes 50.0% 16.6% (+33.4)#66 17.0% (+33.0)#2,995
67. Orestes 50.0% 16.6% (+33.4)#67 17.0% (+33.0)#3,033
68. Staunton 50.0% 16.6% (+33.4)#68 17.0% (+33.0)#3,050
69. Losantville 50.0% 16.6% (+33.4)#69 17.0% (+33.0)#3,056
70. Hazleton 50.0% 16.6% (+33.4)#70 17.0% (+33.0)#3,062
71. Decker 50.0% 16.6% (+33.4)#71 17.0% (+33.0)#3,077
72. Livonia 50.0% 16.6% (+33.4)#72 17.0% (+33.0)#3,118
73. Crandall 48.7% 16.6% (+32.2)#73 17.0% (+31.7)#3,207
74. Aurora 48.2% 16.6% (+31.6)#74 17.0% (+31.2)#3,270
75. Orleans 48.1% 16.6% (+31.5)#75 17.0% (+31.1)#3,291
76. Merom 48.0% 16.6% (+31.4)#76 17.0% (+31.0)#3,300
77. Perrysville 47.4% 16.6% (+30.8)#77 17.0% (+30.4)#3,366
78. Napoleon 47.4% 16.6% (+30.8)#78 17.0% (+30.4)#3,369
79. Knox 47.4% 16.6% (+30.8)#79 17.0% (+30.4)#3,373
80. Lawrenceburg 47.2% 16.6% (+30.7)#80 17.0% (+30.3)#3,392
81. Loogootee 46.9% 16.6% (+30.3)#81 17.0% (+29.9)#3,437
82. Montpelier 46.8% 16.6% (+30.2)#82 17.0% (+29.8)#3,451
83. Pierceton 46.2% 16.6% (+29.6)#83 17.0% (+29.2)#3,530
84. Butler 45.9% 16.6% (+29.4)#84 17.0% (+28.9)#3,570
85. Schnellville 45.6% 16.6% (+29.1)#85 17.0% (+28.6)#3,611
86. Fountain City 45.5% 16.6% (+28.9)#86 17.0% (+28.5)#3,623
87. Jonesville 45.5% 16.6% (+28.9)#87 17.0% (+28.5)#3,639
88. Jonesboro 44.9% 16.6% (+28.3)#88 17.0% (+27.9)#3,699
89. Monroe City 44.7% 16.6% (+28.2)#89 17.0% (+27.7)#3,727
90. Long Beach 44.4% 16.6% (+27.9)#90 17.0% (+27.5)#3,754
91. Kentland 44.0% 16.6% (+27.5)#91 17.0% (+27.0)#3,825
92. Grissom Afb 43.9% 16.6% (+27.3)#92 17.0% (+26.9)#3,844
93. Walton 42.9% 16.6% (+26.3)#93 17.0% (+25.9)#3,996
94. Austin 42.2% 16.6% (+25.7)#94 17.0% (+25.2)#4,101
95. North Vernon 42.0% 16.6% (+25.5)#95 17.0% (+25.1)#4,129
96. Servia 42.0% 16.6% (+25.4)#96 17.0% (+25.0)#4,132
97. Seelyville 41.9% 16.6% (+25.4)#97 17.0% (+25.0)#4,138
98. Pine Village 41.4% 16.6% (+24.8)#98 17.0% (+24.4)#4,220
99. Mount Summit 41.3% 16.6% (+24.7)#99 17.0% (+24.3)#4,230
100. Marshall 41.2% 16.6% (+24.6)#100 17.0% (+24.2)#4,251

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Indiana?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Indiana are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
91.7%
#4
90.0%
#5
80.3%
#6
78.7%
#7
72.7%
#8
72.2%
#9
69.2%
#10
66.7%
What city has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Indiana?
Hanna has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Indiana with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the State of Indiana?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Indiana is 16.6%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 17.0%.