Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in North Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Girls 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in North Carolina

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in North Carolina Map

Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in North Carolina

City Child Poverty (Girls) vs State vs National
1. Cordova 100.0% 19.2% (+80.8)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#36
2. Barker Heights 100.0% 19.2% (+80.8)#2 17.0% (+83.0)#63
3. Silver City 100.0% 19.2% (+80.8)#3 17.0% (+83.0)#93
4. Pinnacle 100.0% 19.2% (+80.8)#4 17.0% (+83.0)#108
5. Ivanhoe 100.0% 19.2% (+80.8)#5 17.0% (+83.0)#191
6. Marshallberg 100.0% 19.2% (+80.8)#6 17.0% (+83.0)#196
7. Vandemere 100.0% 19.2% (+80.8)#7 17.0% (+83.0)#334
8. Parmele 94.4% 19.2% (+75.3)#8 17.0% (+77.5)#706
9. Edenton 93.9% 19.2% (+74.7)#9 17.0% (+76.9)#709
10. Greenevers 88.4% 19.2% (+69.2)#10 17.0% (+71.4)#799
11. Middleburg 87.5% 19.2% (+68.3)#11 17.0% (+70.5)#818
12. Bonnetsville 87.3% 19.2% (+68.1)#12 17.0% (+70.3)#824
13. Louisburg 86.2% 19.2% (+67.0)#13 17.0% (+69.2)#846
14. Arrowhead Beach 86.1% 19.2% (+66.9)#14 17.0% (+69.2)#847
15. Conetoe 85.0% 19.2% (+65.8)#15 17.0% (+68.0)#877
16. Garland 84.4% 19.2% (+65.2)#16 17.0% (+67.4)#894
17. Dudley 81.0% 19.2% (+61.8)#17 17.0% (+64.0)#993
18. Saratoga 80.0% 19.2% (+60.8)#18 17.0% (+63.0)#1,024
19. Fountain 80.0% 19.2% (+60.8)#19 17.0% (+63.0)#1,026
20. Norman 80.0% 19.2% (+60.8)#20 17.0% (+63.0)#1,030
21. Clarkton 79.4% 19.2% (+60.2)#21 17.0% (+62.4)#1,055
22. Fairmont 78.3% 19.2% (+59.1)#22 17.0% (+61.3)#1,094
23. Castalia 78.3% 19.2% (+59.1)#23 17.0% (+61.3)#1,097
24. Tabor City 78.2% 19.2% (+59.0)#24 17.0% (+61.3)#1,098
25. Belhaven 77.8% 19.2% (+58.6)#25 17.0% (+60.8)#1,109
26. Benson 77.6% 19.2% (+58.5)#26 17.0% (+60.7)#1,116
27. Brunswick 76.8% 19.2% (+57.6)#27 17.0% (+59.8)#1,146
28. Maury 76.3% 19.2% (+57.1)#28 17.0% (+59.3)#1,158
29. Varnamtown 74.3% 19.2% (+55.1)#29 17.0% (+57.3)#1,256
30. Andrews 73.2% 19.2% (+54.0)#30 17.0% (+56.2)#1,295
31. Fairplains 73.0% 19.2% (+53.8)#31 17.0% (+56.0)#1,306
32. Hobgood 72.7% 19.2% (+53.5)#32 17.0% (+55.8)#1,325
33. Fallston 72.0% 19.2% (+52.8)#33 17.0% (+55.1)#1,359
34. Wilson S Mills 71.6% 19.2% (+52.4)#34 17.0% (+54.6)#1,378
35. Hot Springs 71.4% 19.2% (+52.2)#35 17.0% (+54.5)#1,387
36. Biscoe 70.8% 19.2% (+51.6)#36 17.0% (+53.8)#1,430
37. Mcfarlan 70.6% 19.2% (+51.4)#37 17.0% (+53.6)#1,438
38. Fremont 70.4% 19.2% (+51.2)#38 17.0% (+53.4)#1,443
39. Tar Heel 70.0% 19.2% (+50.8)#39 17.0% (+53.0)#1,466
40. Troy 69.9% 19.2% (+50.7)#40 17.0% (+52.9)#1,472
41. Roxboro 69.8% 19.2% (+50.6)#41 17.0% (+52.8)#1,476
42. Murfreesboro 69.5% 19.2% (+50.3)#42 17.0% (+52.5)#1,488
43. Ramseur 69.3% 19.2% (+50.1)#43 17.0% (+52.3)#1,495
44. New London 68.8% 19.2% (+49.6)#44 17.0% (+51.8)#1,520
45. Robbins 67.5% 19.2% (+48.3)#45 17.0% (+50.5)#1,581
46. Teachey 67.3% 19.2% (+48.2)#46 17.0% (+50.4)#1,589
47. Hamilton 66.7% 19.2% (+47.5)#47 17.0% (+49.7)#1,643
48. Woodlawn 64.3% 19.2% (+45.1)#48 17.0% (+47.3)#1,778
49. South Rosemary 62.7% 19.2% (+43.5)#49 17.0% (+45.7)#1,889
50. Elizabethtown 62.6% 19.2% (+43.5)#50 17.0% (+45.7)#1,892
51. Red Springs 62.5% 19.2% (+43.3)#51 17.0% (+45.5)#1,898
52. Rich Square 62.5% 19.2% (+43.3)#52 17.0% (+45.5)#1,901
53. Williamston 61.9% 19.2% (+42.7)#53 17.0% (+44.9)#1,950
54. Woodland 61.8% 19.2% (+42.6)#54 17.0% (+44.8)#1,960
55. Atlantic 61.1% 19.2% (+41.9)#55 17.0% (+44.1)#2,003
56. Gibson 60.8% 19.2% (+41.6)#56 17.0% (+43.8)#2,023
57. Dana 60.8% 19.2% (+41.6)#57 17.0% (+43.8)#2,025
58. Bridgeton 60.6% 19.2% (+41.4)#58 17.0% (+43.6)#2,041
59. Momeyer 60.5% 19.2% (+41.3)#59 17.0% (+43.6)#2,042
60. Brogden 60.5% 19.2% (+41.3)#60 17.0% (+43.5)#2,043
61. Bayboro 60.4% 19.2% (+41.2)#61 17.0% (+43.4)#2,055
62. Manns Harbor 59.7% 19.2% (+40.5)#62 17.0% (+42.8)#2,120
63. Jackson Heights 59.1% 19.2% (+39.9)#63 17.0% (+42.1)#2,155
64. Maxton 58.5% 19.2% (+39.3)#64 17.0% (+41.6)#2,210
65. Pembroke 58.2% 19.2% (+39.1)#65 17.0% (+41.3)#2,247
66. Mount Gilead 58.2% 19.2% (+39.0)#66 17.0% (+41.2)#2,250
67. Snow Hill 57.9% 19.2% (+38.7)#67 17.0% (+40.9)#2,263
68. Rockingham 57.3% 19.2% (+38.1)#68 17.0% (+40.3)#2,304
69. South Weldon 56.9% 19.2% (+37.7)#69 17.0% (+39.9)#2,344
70. Winton 56.7% 19.2% (+37.5)#70 17.0% (+39.7)#2,369
71. Lucama 55.9% 19.2% (+36.7)#71 17.0% (+39.0)#2,433
72. Old Hundred 55.6% 19.2% (+36.4)#72 17.0% (+38.6)#2,471
73. Mount Olive 54.3% 19.2% (+35.1)#73 17.0% (+37.3)#2,586
74. West Marion 53.3% 19.2% (+34.1)#74 17.0% (+36.4)#2,682
75. Rutherford College 52.8% 19.2% (+33.6)#75 17.0% (+35.9)#2,750
76. Morganton 52.5% 19.2% (+33.3)#76 17.0% (+35.5)#2,790
77. Swannanoa 52.4% 19.2% (+33.2)#77 17.0% (+35.5)#2,795
78. Watha 52.2% 19.2% (+33.0)#78 17.0% (+35.2)#2,817
79. Forest City 52.1% 19.2% (+32.9)#79 17.0% (+35.1)#2,821
80. Cherokee 51.7% 19.2% (+32.5)#80 17.0% (+34.7)#2,858
81. Hertford 51.3% 19.2% (+32.1)#81 17.0% (+34.3)#2,895
82. Wentworth 50.9% 19.2% (+31.7)#82 17.0% (+33.9)#2,928
83. Kings Mountain 50.1% 19.2% (+30.9)#83 17.0% (+33.1)#2,983
84. Mount Airy 50.1% 19.2% (+30.9)#84 17.0% (+33.1)#2,985
85. Gaston 50.0% 19.2% (+30.8)#85 17.0% (+33.0)#3,004
86. Dover 50.0% 19.2% (+30.8)#86 17.0% (+33.0)#3,025
87. Haw River 49.6% 19.2% (+30.4)#87 17.0% (+32.6)#3,152
88. St Pauls 49.5% 19.2% (+30.4)#88 17.0% (+32.6)#3,156
89. Reidsville 49.3% 19.2% (+30.2)#89 17.0% (+32.4)#3,163
90. Hoffman 49.1% 19.2% (+29.9)#90 17.0% (+32.2)#3,171
91. Tarboro 48.4% 19.2% (+29.2)#91 17.0% (+31.4)#3,252
92. Simpson 48.3% 19.2% (+29.1)#92 17.0% (+31.3)#3,263
93. Littleton 48.2% 19.2% (+29.0)#93 17.0% (+31.2)#3,269
94. Kinston 48.1% 19.2% (+28.9)#94 17.0% (+31.1)#3,292
95. Vanceboro 48.0% 19.2% (+28.8)#95 17.0% (+31.0)#3,296
96. Wilkesboro 47.8% 19.2% (+28.6)#96 17.0% (+30.8)#3,323
97. Cricket 46.9% 19.2% (+27.7)#97 17.0% (+29.9)#3,430
98. Fruitland 46.9% 19.2% (+27.7)#98 17.0% (+29.9)#3,438
99. Atlantic Beach 46.9% 19.2% (+27.7)#99 17.0% (+29.9)#3,439
100. East Rockingham 46.8% 19.2% (+27.6)#100 17.0% (+29.8)#3,448

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in North Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in North Carolina are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
94.4%
#9
93.9%
#10
88.4%
What city has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in North Carolina?
Cordova has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in North Carolina with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the State of North Carolina?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in North Carolina is 19.2%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 17.0%.