Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Texas

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Girls 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Texas
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Texas

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Texas Map

Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Texas

City Child Poverty (Girls) vs State vs National
1. Carrizo Hill 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#41
2. Las Quintas Fronterizas 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#2 17.0% (+83.0)#51
3. Mi Ranchito Estate 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#3 17.0% (+83.0)#55
4. Alice Acres 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#4 17.0% (+83.0)#64
5. Fabrica 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#5 17.0% (+83.0)#75
6. Linn 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#6 17.0% (+83.0)#106
7. Horseshoe Bend 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#7 17.0% (+83.0)#107
8. Hilltop Lakes 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#8 17.0% (+83.0)#111
9. La Tina Ranch 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#9 17.0% (+83.0)#116
10. Grangerland 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#10 17.0% (+83.0)#123
11. Sabinal 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#11 17.0% (+83.0)#135
12. Bristol 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#12 17.0% (+83.0)#146
13. Santa Maria 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#13 17.0% (+83.0)#149
14. East Alto Bonito 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#14 17.0% (+83.0)#166
15. Sandy Hollow Escondidas 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#15 17.0% (+83.0)#172
16. Banquete 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#16 17.0% (+83.0)#189
17. Chula Vista Cdp Zavala County 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#17 17.0% (+83.0)#204
18. Santa Rosa 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#18 17.0% (+83.0)#217
19. Redfield 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#19 17.0% (+83.0)#233
20. Eugenio Saenz 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#20 17.0% (+83.0)#253
21. Hilltop Cdp Starr County 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#21 17.0% (+83.0)#281
22. La Esperanza 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#22 17.0% (+83.0)#294
23. Butterfield 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#23 17.0% (+83.0)#318
24. La Presa 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#24 17.0% (+83.0)#326
25. Loma Grande 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#25 17.0% (+83.0)#342
26. Mound 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#26 17.0% (+83.0)#349
27. North Escobares 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#27 17.0% (+83.0)#361
28. Sheridan 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#28 17.0% (+83.0)#370
29. La Paloma Addition 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#29 17.0% (+83.0)#381
30. Jolly 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#30 17.0% (+83.0)#408
31. Kingsbury 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#31 17.0% (+83.0)#412
32. Airport Road Addition 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#33 17.0% (+83.0)#422
33. Melvin 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#34 17.0% (+83.0)#423
34. Richards 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#35 17.0% (+83.0)#477
35. Chula Vista Cdp Cameron County 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#36 17.0% (+83.0)#479
36. Loma Vista 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#37 17.0% (+83.0)#488
37. El Quiote 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#38 17.0% (+83.0)#492
38. Damon 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#39 17.0% (+83.0)#503
39. Rangerville 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#40 17.0% (+83.0)#508
40. O Brien 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#41 17.0% (+83.0)#545
41. Putnam 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#42 17.0% (+83.0)#574
42. Quesada 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#43 17.0% (+83.0)#600
43. Tierra Grande 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#44 17.0% (+83.0)#601
44. Sunset Cdp Starr County 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#45 17.0% (+83.0)#605
45. La Loma De Falcon 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#46 17.0% (+83.0)#626
46. Ramos 100.0% 19.7% (+80.3)#47 17.0% (+83.0)#667
47. Alto Bonito Heights 92.1% 19.7% (+72.4)#48 17.0% (+75.1)#728
48. Smiley 91.5% 19.7% (+71.8)#49 17.0% (+74.5)#736
49. Delmita 90.6% 19.7% (+70.9)#50 17.0% (+73.6)#751
50. Bledsoe 89.7% 19.7% (+70.0)#51 17.0% (+72.7)#770
51. Big Wells 89.4% 19.7% (+69.7)#52 17.0% (+72.4)#775
52. Rosanky 88.1% 19.7% (+68.4)#53 17.0% (+71.1)#805
53. Ricardo 87.6% 19.7% (+68.0)#54 17.0% (+70.7)#814
54. Batesville 87.4% 19.7% (+67.7)#55 17.0% (+70.4)#822
55. Fort Hancock 86.5% 19.7% (+66.8)#56 17.0% (+69.5)#838
56. Road Runner 86.0% 19.7% (+66.3)#57 17.0% (+69.0)#853
57. Garza Salinas Ii 85.7% 19.7% (+66.0)#58 17.0% (+68.7)#855
58. Paint Rock 85.5% 19.7% (+65.8)#59 17.0% (+68.5)#866
59. Bloomington 84.9% 19.7% (+65.3)#60 17.0% (+68.0)#882
60. Oak Ridge Town Cooke County 84.2% 19.7% (+64.5)#61 17.0% (+67.2)#898
61. Doolittle 84.0% 19.7% (+64.3)#62 17.0% (+67.0)#904
62. Perezville 83.9% 19.7% (+64.2)#63 17.0% (+66.9)#908
63. Mobile City 83.6% 19.7% (+63.9)#64 17.0% (+66.6)#914
64. Mcleod 83.3% 19.7% (+63.6)#65 17.0% (+66.4)#922
65. Abram 82.8% 19.7% (+63.1)#66 17.0% (+65.8)#944
66. Garwood 81.0% 19.7% (+61.3)#67 17.0% (+64.0)#995
67. Gary City 81.0% 19.7% (+61.3)#68 17.0% (+64.0)#997
68. Camp Wood 80.6% 19.7% (+60.9)#69 17.0% (+63.6)#1,005
69. Indian Hills 80.4% 19.7% (+60.7)#70 17.0% (+63.4)#1,008
70. Lockett 80.0% 19.7% (+60.3)#71 17.0% (+63.0)#1,025
71. Lamar 79.5% 19.7% (+59.8)#72 17.0% (+62.5)#1,052
72. Mount Calm 79.3% 19.7% (+59.6)#73 17.0% (+62.3)#1,058
73. Crowell 79.0% 19.7% (+59.3)#74 17.0% (+62.0)#1,071
74. Clarksville 78.2% 19.7% (+58.5)#75 17.0% (+61.2)#1,099
75. Buckholts 78.0% 19.7% (+58.3)#76 17.0% (+61.0)#1,106
76. Stinnett 77.4% 19.7% (+57.7)#77 17.0% (+60.4)#1,123
77. Sparks 77.0% 19.7% (+57.3)#78 17.0% (+60.1)#1,136
78. Driscoll 77.0% 19.7% (+57.3)#79 17.0% (+60.0)#1,137
79. North San Pedro 75.9% 19.7% (+56.2)#80 17.0% (+58.9)#1,174
80. Marfa 75.7% 19.7% (+56.0)#81 17.0% (+58.8)#1,179
81. Buchanan Lake Village 75.0% 19.7% (+55.3)#82 17.0% (+58.0)#1,203
82. Cuney 75.0% 19.7% (+55.3)#83 17.0% (+58.0)#1,223
83. Salida Del Sol Estates 74.6% 19.7% (+54.9)#84 17.0% (+57.6)#1,245
84. Valle Vista 74.4% 19.7% (+54.7)#85 17.0% (+57.4)#1,250
85. Lorenzo 73.9% 19.7% (+54.2)#86 17.0% (+56.9)#1,263
86. Runge 73.4% 19.7% (+53.7)#87 17.0% (+56.4)#1,286
87. South Padre Island 72.1% 19.7% (+52.4)#88 17.0% (+55.1)#1,357
88. Hale Center 71.9% 19.7% (+52.3)#89 17.0% (+55.0)#1,365
89. Gladewater 71.9% 19.7% (+52.2)#90 17.0% (+54.9)#1,368
90. Murchison 71.7% 19.7% (+52.0)#91 17.0% (+54.8)#1,374
91. Kenedy 71.0% 19.7% (+51.4)#92 17.0% (+54.1)#1,415
92. Woodson 70.3% 19.7% (+50.6)#93 17.0% (+53.3)#1,447
93. Salineno North 70.0% 19.7% (+50.3)#94 17.0% (+53.0)#1,469
94. Rock Island 69.2% 19.7% (+49.5)#95 17.0% (+52.3)#1,500
95. Monte Alto 69.1% 19.7% (+49.4)#96 17.0% (+52.1)#1,506
96. Wilson 68.8% 19.7% (+49.1)#97 17.0% (+51.8)#1,523
97. Llano Grande 68.4% 19.7% (+48.7)#98 17.0% (+51.4)#1,539
98. Asherton 68.1% 19.7% (+48.4)#99 17.0% (+51.1)#1,557
99. Coyote Flats 67.7% 19.7% (+48.1)#100 17.0% (+50.8)#1,567
100. Goodrich 67.7% 19.7% (+48.1)#101 17.0% (+50.8)#1,568

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Texas?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Texas are:
What city has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Texas?
Carrizo Hill has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Texas with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the State of Texas?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Texas is 19.7%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 17.0%.