Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Wisconsin

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Girls 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Wisconsin
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Wisconsin

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Wisconsin Map

Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Wisconsin

City Child Poverty (Girls) vs State vs National
1. Elcho 100.0% 13.5% (+86.5)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#352
2. Franks Field 100.0% 13.5% (+86.5)#2 17.0% (+83.0)#504
3. Big Foot Prairie 100.0% 13.5% (+86.5)#3 17.0% (+83.0)#527
4. Barronett 100.0% 13.5% (+86.5)#4 17.0% (+83.0)#548
5. Conrath 100.0% 13.5% (+86.5)#5 17.0% (+83.0)#557
6. Chelsea 100.0% 13.5% (+86.5)#6 17.0% (+83.0)#559
7. Paac Ciinak 100.0% 13.5% (+86.5)#7 17.0% (+83.0)#586
8. Middle Village 87.5% 13.5% (+74.0)#8 17.0% (+70.5)#819
9. White Lake 78.9% 13.5% (+65.5)#9 17.0% (+62.0)#1,074
10. Radisson 78.0% 13.5% (+64.6)#10 17.0% (+61.1)#1,103
11. Ceex Haci 77.8% 13.5% (+64.3)#11 17.0% (+60.8)#1,115
12. Browns Lake 75.8% 13.5% (+62.3)#12 17.0% (+58.8)#1,175
13. Sister Bay 75.6% 13.5% (+62.2)#13 17.0% (+58.7)#1,182
14. Ogdensburg 75.0% 13.5% (+61.5)#14 17.0% (+58.0)#1,220
15. Lake Tomahawk 75.0% 13.5% (+61.5)#15 17.0% (+58.0)#1,221
16. Birch Hill 73.7% 13.5% (+60.2)#16 17.0% (+56.7)#1,275
17. Woodman 71.4% 13.5% (+58.0)#17 17.0% (+54.5)#1,394
18. Cable 69.6% 13.5% (+56.1)#18 17.0% (+52.6)#1,486
19. Marquette 68.9% 13.5% (+55.4)#19 17.0% (+51.9)#1,517
20. Soldiers Grove 68.6% 13.5% (+55.1)#20 17.0% (+51.6)#1,533
21. Embarrass 64.1% 13.5% (+50.6)#21 17.0% (+47.1)#1,805
22. Markesan 63.8% 13.5% (+50.3)#22 17.0% (+46.8)#1,828
23. Keshena 62.3% 13.5% (+48.9)#23 17.0% (+45.3)#1,924
24. Reserve 61.5% 13.5% (+48.1)#24 17.0% (+44.6)#1,981
25. Kellnersville 61.1% 13.5% (+47.6)#25 17.0% (+44.1)#2,005
26. New Post 60.0% 13.5% (+46.5)#26 17.0% (+43.0)#2,091
27. Frederic 59.8% 13.5% (+46.3)#27 17.0% (+42.8)#2,119
28. Iron River 59.1% 13.5% (+45.6)#28 17.0% (+42.1)#2,156
29. Zoar 59.1% 13.5% (+45.6)#29 17.0% (+42.1)#2,162
30. New Odanah 57.5% 13.5% (+44.0)#30 17.0% (+40.5)#2,294
31. Minong 57.4% 13.5% (+43.9)#31 17.0% (+40.4)#2,301
32. Dellwood 57.1% 13.5% (+43.7)#32 17.0% (+40.2)#2,311
33. Pulcifer 57.1% 13.5% (+43.7)#33 17.0% (+40.2)#2,329
34. Edmund 55.6% 13.5% (+42.1)#34 17.0% (+38.6)#2,478
35. Mole Lake 55.4% 13.5% (+41.9)#35 17.0% (+38.4)#2,490
36. Mission 53.3% 13.5% (+39.9)#36 17.0% (+36.4)#2,687
37. Rewey 53.3% 13.5% (+39.9)#37 17.0% (+36.4)#2,692
38. Hancock 52.9% 13.5% (+39.5)#38 17.0% (+36.0)#2,741
39. Fairchild 52.1% 13.5% (+38.6)#39 17.0% (+35.1)#2,823
40. Cobb 51.2% 13.5% (+37.8)#40 17.0% (+34.2)#2,902
41. La Farge 51.2% 13.5% (+37.7)#41 17.0% (+34.2)#2,904
42. Oxford 50.0% 13.5% (+36.5)#42 17.0% (+33.0)#3,015
43. Fairwater 50.0% 13.5% (+36.5)#43 17.0% (+33.0)#3,037
44. Nichols 50.0% 13.5% (+36.5)#44 17.0% (+33.0)#3,055
45. Boulder Junction 50.0% 13.5% (+36.5)#45 17.0% (+33.0)#3,070
46. Boaz 50.0% 13.5% (+36.5)#46 17.0% (+33.0)#3,093
47. Pine River 50.0% 13.5% (+36.5)#47 17.0% (+33.0)#3,098
48. Pepin 48.4% 13.5% (+34.9)#48 17.0% (+31.4)#3,246
49. Rock Springs 48.4% 13.5% (+34.9)#49 17.0% (+31.4)#3,247
50. Lake Sherwood 46.7% 13.5% (+33.2)#50 17.0% (+29.7)#3,469
51. North Freedom 46.5% 13.5% (+33.0)#51 17.0% (+29.5)#3,497
52. Juda 46.4% 13.5% (+32.9)#52 17.0% (+29.4)#3,513
53. Abrams 46.2% 13.5% (+32.7)#53 17.0% (+29.2)#3,537
54. Neshkoro 46.0% 13.5% (+32.5)#54 17.0% (+29.0)#3,564
55. Bagley 45.5% 13.5% (+32.0)#55 17.0% (+28.5)#3,633
56. Chetek 44.9% 13.5% (+31.4)#56 17.0% (+27.9)#3,695
57. Dodge 44.4% 13.5% (+31.0)#57 17.0% (+27.5)#3,777
58. Mattoon 43.3% 13.5% (+29.9)#58 17.0% (+26.4)#3,928
59. Dallas 43.2% 13.5% (+29.8)#59 17.0% (+26.3)#3,945
60. Avoca 43.2% 13.5% (+29.7)#60 17.0% (+26.2)#3,954
61. Cumberland 42.9% 13.5% (+29.4)#61 17.0% (+25.9)#3,985
62. Hawkins 42.6% 13.5% (+29.1)#62 17.0% (+25.6)#4,055
63. Dalton 42.5% 13.5% (+29.0)#63 17.0% (+25.5)#4,066
64. North Fond Du Lac 42.4% 13.5% (+28.9)#64 17.0% (+25.4)#4,073
65. Lyndon Station 41.9% 13.5% (+28.5)#65 17.0% (+25.0)#4,139
66. Boyd 41.8% 13.5% (+28.4)#66 17.0% (+24.8)#4,154
67. Friendship 40.6% 13.5% (+27.2)#67 17.0% (+23.6)#4,341
68. Marion 40.0% 13.5% (+26.5)#68 17.0% (+23.0)#4,440
69. Stetsonville 38.5% 13.5% (+25.0)#69 17.0% (+21.5)#4,739
70. Bowler 38.5% 13.5% (+25.0)#70 17.0% (+21.5)#4,747
71. Almena 38.3% 13.5% (+24.9)#71 17.0% (+21.4)#4,769
72. Endeavor 38.1% 13.5% (+24.6)#72 17.0% (+21.1)#4,812
73. Eland 37.5% 13.5% (+24.0)#73 17.0% (+20.5)#4,927
74. Athens 37.3% 13.5% (+23.8)#74 17.0% (+20.3)#4,974
75. Norwalk 37.3% 13.5% (+23.8)#75 17.0% (+20.3)#4,979
76. Suring 36.8% 13.5% (+23.4)#76 17.0% (+19.9)#5,072
77. Milladore 35.3% 13.5% (+21.8)#77 17.0% (+18.3)#5,394
78. St Croix Falls 35.0% 13.5% (+21.5)#78 17.0% (+18.0)#5,446
79. Mazomanie 34.6% 13.5% (+21.1)#79 17.0% (+17.6)#5,530
80. Cassville 34.5% 13.5% (+21.1)#80 17.0% (+17.6)#5,548
81. Richland Center 34.5% 13.5% (+21.0)#81 17.0% (+17.5)#5,554
82. Ironton 34.5% 13.5% (+21.0)#82 17.0% (+17.5)#5,562
83. Nekoosa 34.4% 13.5% (+21.0)#83 17.0% (+17.5)#5,570
84. Chief Lake 33.9% 13.5% (+20.4)#84 17.0% (+16.9)#5,703
85. Laona 33.8% 13.5% (+20.3)#85 17.0% (+16.8)#5,719
86. Milwaukee 33.5% 13.5% (+20.1)#86 17.0% (+16.6)#5,766
87. Stoddard 33.3% 13.5% (+19.9)#87 17.0% (+16.4)#5,813
88. New Auburn 33.3% 13.5% (+19.9)#88 17.0% (+16.4)#5,827
89. Cazenovia 33.3% 13.5% (+19.9)#89 17.0% (+16.4)#5,868
90. Abbotsford 32.8% 13.5% (+19.4)#90 17.0% (+15.9)#6,014
91. Kiel 32.6% 13.5% (+19.1)#91 17.0% (+15.6)#6,069
92. Camp Douglas 32.2% 13.5% (+18.7)#92 17.0% (+15.2)#6,164
93. Strum 31.7% 13.5% (+18.2)#93 17.0% (+14.7)#6,268
94. Berlin 30.8% 13.5% (+17.4)#94 17.0% (+13.9)#6,465
95. Egg Harbor 30.8% 13.5% (+17.3)#95 17.0% (+13.8)#6,492
96. Hilbert 30.5% 13.5% (+17.0)#96 17.0% (+13.5)#6,555
97. Siren 30.4% 13.5% (+17.0)#97 17.0% (+13.5)#6,577
98. Wauzeka 30.2% 13.5% (+16.8)#98 17.0% (+13.3)#6,624
99. Cochrane 30.2% 13.5% (+16.8)#99 17.0% (+13.3)#6,629
100. Mellen 30.0% 13.5% (+16.5)#100 17.0% (+13.0)#6,685

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Wisconsin?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Wisconsin are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
87.5%
#7
78.9%
#8
78.0%
#9
75.8%
#10
75.6%
What city has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Wisconsin?
Elcho has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Wisconsin with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the State of Wisconsin?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Wisconsin is 13.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 17.0%.