Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Montana

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Female 25-34
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Montana
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Montana

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Montana Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Montana

City Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. Philipsburg 100.0% 14.0% (+86.0)#1 14.5% (+85.5)#96
2. Havre North 100.0% 14.0% (+86.0)#2 14.5% (+85.5)#106
3. White Haven 100.0% 14.0% (+86.0)#3 14.5% (+85.5)#131
4. Black Eagle 100.0% 14.0% (+86.0)#4 14.5% (+85.5)#137
5. Terry 100.0% 14.0% (+86.0)#5 14.5% (+85.5)#189
6. Emigrant 100.0% 14.0% (+86.0)#6 14.5% (+85.5)#268
7. Lima 100.0% 14.0% (+86.0)#7 14.5% (+85.5)#356
8. Rimrock Colony 100.0% 14.0% (+86.0)#8 14.5% (+85.5)#461
9. Turtle Lake 100.0% 14.0% (+86.0)#9 14.5% (+85.5)#470
10. Garrison 100.0% 14.0% (+86.0)#10 14.5% (+85.5)#477
11. Rollins 100.0% 14.0% (+86.0)#11 14.5% (+85.5)#480
12. New Rockport Colony 100.0% 14.0% (+86.0)#12 14.5% (+85.5)#523
13. Birch Creek Colony 100.0% 14.0% (+86.0)#13 14.5% (+85.5)#536
14. Camrose Colony 100.0% 14.0% (+86.0)#14 14.5% (+85.5)#589
15. Radersburg 100.0% 14.0% (+86.0)#15 14.5% (+85.5)#605
16. Pleasant Valley Colony 100.0% 14.0% (+86.0)#16 14.5% (+85.5)#652
17. Pondera Colony 100.0% 14.0% (+86.0)#17 14.5% (+85.5)#660
18. Big Stone Colony 100.0% 14.0% (+86.0)#18 14.5% (+85.5)#673
19. Reserve 100.0% 14.0% (+86.0)#19 14.5% (+85.5)#679
20. Sage Creek Colony 100.0% 14.0% (+86.0)#21 14.5% (+85.5)#684
21. Cascade Colony 100.0% 14.0% (+86.0)#22 14.5% (+85.5)#685
22. Martinsdale Colony 100.0% 14.0% (+86.0)#23 14.5% (+85.5)#686
23. Golden Valley Colony 100.0% 14.0% (+86.0)#24 14.5% (+85.5)#693
24. Loring Colony 100.0% 14.0% (+86.0)#25 14.5% (+85.5)#694
25. Riverview Colony 89.5% 14.0% (+75.5)#26 14.5% (+75.0)#744
26. Turner Colony 88.5% 14.0% (+74.5)#27 14.5% (+74.0)#757
27. Heron 87.9% 14.0% (+73.9)#28 14.5% (+73.4)#767
28. Boneau 84.6% 14.0% (+70.6)#29 14.5% (+70.1)#822
29. Wyola 84.6% 14.0% (+70.6)#30 14.5% (+70.1)#823
30. Joplin 83.3% 14.0% (+69.3)#31 14.5% (+68.8)#853
31. Arlee 81.8% 14.0% (+67.8)#32 14.5% (+67.3)#883
32. Starr School 77.3% 14.0% (+63.3)#33 14.5% (+62.8)#1,003
33. Savage 76.9% 14.0% (+62.9)#34 14.5% (+62.4)#1,018
34. Dixon 76.9% 14.0% (+62.9)#35 14.5% (+62.4)#1,019
35. Judith Gap 75.0% 14.0% (+61.0)#36 14.5% (+60.5)#1,078
36. Poplar 73.1% 14.0% (+59.1)#37 14.5% (+58.6)#1,115
37. Troy 72.7% 14.0% (+58.7)#38 14.5% (+58.2)#1,123
38. Pine Creek 70.6% 14.0% (+56.6)#39 14.5% (+56.1)#1,200
39. Plains 70.4% 14.0% (+56.4)#40 14.5% (+55.9)#1,209
40. Piltzville 68.8% 14.0% (+54.8)#41 14.5% (+54.3)#1,266
41. Hot Springs 66.7% 14.0% (+52.7)#42 14.5% (+52.2)#1,352
42. Hays 64.4% 14.0% (+50.4)#43 14.5% (+50.0)#1,492
43. Crow Agency 63.1% 14.0% (+49.1)#44 14.5% (+48.6)#1,553
44. Geraldine 62.5% 14.0% (+48.5)#45 14.5% (+48.0)#1,579
45. Old Agency 60.0% 14.0% (+46.0)#46 14.5% (+45.5)#1,723
46. Fort Belknap Agency 59.8% 14.0% (+45.8)#47 14.5% (+45.3)#1,732
47. Pablo 58.0% 14.0% (+44.0)#48 14.5% (+43.5)#1,842
48. Ponderosa Pines 55.6% 14.0% (+41.6)#49 14.5% (+41.1)#1,995
49. St Pierre 55.0% 14.0% (+41.0)#50 14.5% (+40.5)#2,056
50. Browning 54.1% 14.0% (+40.1)#51 14.5% (+39.6)#2,135
51. Parker School 53.3% 14.0% (+39.3)#52 14.5% (+38.8)#2,193
52. Sangrey 51.9% 14.0% (+37.9)#53 14.5% (+37.4)#2,301
53. Big Arm 51.1% 14.0% (+37.1)#54 14.5% (+36.6)#2,351
54. Red Lodge 50.6% 14.0% (+36.6)#55 14.5% (+36.1)#2,378
55. Ryegate 50.0% 14.0% (+36.0)#56 14.5% (+35.5)#2,497
56. Hinsdale 50.0% 14.0% (+36.0)#57 14.5% (+35.5)#2,502
57. Harlowton 49.5% 14.0% (+35.5)#58 14.5% (+35.0)#2,614
58. Clinton 48.3% 14.0% (+34.3)#59 14.5% (+33.8)#2,687
59. Valier 47.1% 14.0% (+33.1)#60 14.5% (+32.6)#2,799
60. Riverbend 46.7% 14.0% (+32.7)#61 14.5% (+32.2)#2,852
61. Chester 44.4% 14.0% (+30.4)#62 14.5% (+30.0)#3,105
62. Lame Deer 41.7% 14.0% (+27.7)#63 14.5% (+27.2)#3,454
63. Broadus 41.7% 14.0% (+27.7)#64 14.5% (+27.2)#3,464
64. Wolf Point 41.6% 14.0% (+27.6)#65 14.5% (+27.1)#3,482
65. Heart Butte 41.5% 14.0% (+27.5)#66 14.5% (+27.0)#3,494
66. King Arthur Park 40.0% 14.0% (+26.0)#67 14.5% (+25.5)#3,685
67. Paradise 40.0% 14.0% (+26.0)#68 14.5% (+25.5)#3,755
68. Helena Valley Southeast 39.9% 14.0% (+25.9)#69 14.5% (+25.4)#3,785
69. Rader Creek 37.5% 14.0% (+23.5)#70 14.5% (+23.0)#4,127
70. Anaconda Deer Lodge County 36.3% 14.0% (+22.3)#71 14.5% (+21.8)#4,353
71. Lewistown 35.1% 14.0% (+21.1)#72 14.5% (+20.6)#4,563
72. Polson 34.1% 14.0% (+20.1)#73 14.5% (+19.6)#4,745
73. Dillon 34.0% 14.0% (+20.0)#74 14.5% (+19.5)#4,754
74. Stevensville 33.3% 14.0% (+19.3)#75 14.5% (+18.8)#4,844
75. Busby 33.3% 14.0% (+19.3)#76 14.5% (+18.8)#4,917
76. Clyde Park 33.3% 14.0% (+19.3)#77 14.5% (+18.8)#4,949
77. Nashua 33.3% 14.0% (+19.3)#78 14.5% (+18.8)#4,951
78. Conrad 32.9% 14.0% (+18.9)#79 14.5% (+18.4)#5,088
79. Rocky Boy West 32.8% 14.0% (+18.8)#80 14.5% (+18.3)#5,095
80. Brockton 32.3% 14.0% (+18.3)#81 14.5% (+17.8)#5,189
81. Plentywood 32.0% 14.0% (+18.0)#82 14.5% (+17.5)#5,227
82. Marion 31.0% 14.0% (+17.0)#83 14.5% (+16.5)#5,463
83. Muddy 30.8% 14.0% (+16.8)#84 14.5% (+16.3)#5,501
84. Chinook 30.0% 14.0% (+16.0)#85 14.5% (+15.5)#5,648
85. Eureka 28.7% 14.0% (+14.7)#86 14.5% (+14.2)#5,970
86. Batavia 28.6% 14.0% (+14.6)#87 14.5% (+14.1)#6,020
87. Pryor 28.6% 14.0% (+14.6)#88 14.5% (+14.1)#6,021
88. Swan Lake 28.6% 14.0% (+14.6)#89 14.5% (+14.1)#6,048
89. Saco 28.6% 14.0% (+14.6)#90 14.5% (+14.1)#6,056
90. Olney 28.6% 14.0% (+14.6)#91 14.5% (+14.1)#6,069
91. Azure 27.8% 14.0% (+13.8)#92 14.5% (+13.3)#6,257
92. Lodge Pole 27.8% 14.0% (+13.8)#93 14.5% (+13.3)#6,267
93. Darby 27.3% 14.0% (+13.3)#94 14.5% (+12.8)#6,399
94. Victor 26.3% 14.0% (+12.3)#95 14.5% (+11.8)#6,654
95. South Browning 25.0% 14.0% (+11.0)#96 14.5% (+10.5)#7,016
96. Fromberg 25.0% 14.0% (+11.0)#97 14.5% (+10.5)#7,077
97. Baker 24.8% 14.0% (+10.8)#98 14.5% (+10.3)#7,184
98. Columbia Falls 24.6% 14.0% (+10.6)#99 14.5% (+10.1)#7,237
99. Ennis 24.4% 14.0% (+10.4)#100 14.5% (+9.90)#7,293
100. Vaughn 24.1% 14.0% (+10.1)#101 14.5% (+9.64)#7,373

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Montana?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Montana are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Montana?
Philipsburg has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Montana with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in the State of Montana?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Montana is 14.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in the United States is 14.5%.