Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in North Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Female 25-34
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in North Carolina

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in North Carolina Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in North Carolina

City Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. Broad Creek 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#1 14.5% (+85.5)#14
2. Sea Breeze 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#2 14.5% (+85.5)#35
3. Silver City 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#3 14.5% (+85.5)#109
4. Light Oak 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#4 14.5% (+85.5)#136
5. Frisco 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#5 14.5% (+85.5)#141
6. Gloucester 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#6 14.5% (+85.5)#186
7. Roper 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#7 14.5% (+85.5)#187
8. Ivanhoe 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#8 14.5% (+85.5)#207
9. Hiddenite 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#9 14.5% (+85.5)#267
10. Kelford 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#10 14.5% (+85.5)#297
11. Elrod 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#11 14.5% (+85.5)#304
12. Shannon 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#12 14.5% (+85.5)#321
13. Norman 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#13 14.5% (+85.5)#400
14. Hamilton 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#14 14.5% (+85.5)#411
15. Bowmore 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#15 14.5% (+85.5)#614
16. Seven Springs 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#16 14.5% (+85.5)#691
17. Brunswick 95.3% 15.8% (+79.5)#17 14.5% (+80.8)#702
18. Conetoe 93.9% 15.8% (+78.1)#18 14.5% (+79.4)#709
19. Plymouth 90.8% 15.8% (+75.0)#19 14.5% (+76.3)#735
20. Warrenton 87.9% 15.8% (+72.1)#20 14.5% (+73.4)#766
21. Columbia 83.7% 15.8% (+67.9)#21 14.5% (+69.2)#838
22. Hoffman 81.9% 15.8% (+66.2)#22 14.5% (+67.5)#879
23. Hot Springs 81.5% 15.8% (+65.7)#23 14.5% (+67.0)#892
24. Biscoe 81.4% 15.8% (+65.6)#24 14.5% (+66.9)#894
25. Fairplains 80.6% 15.8% (+64.8)#25 14.5% (+66.1)#909
26. Mooresboro 78.9% 15.8% (+63.2)#26 14.5% (+64.5)#957
27. Belhaven 77.8% 15.8% (+62.0)#27 14.5% (+63.3)#980
28. Harkers Island 76.8% 15.8% (+61.0)#28 14.5% (+62.3)#1,025
29. Maury 73.3% 15.8% (+57.6)#29 14.5% (+58.8)#1,107
30. Jaars 73.3% 15.8% (+57.6)#30 14.5% (+58.8)#1,108
31. Scotland Neck 70.7% 15.8% (+54.9)#31 14.5% (+56.2)#1,197
32. Tryon 70.4% 15.8% (+54.7)#32 14.5% (+55.9)#1,207
33. Robbins 70.2% 15.8% (+54.4)#33 14.5% (+55.7)#1,215
34. Rennert 69.1% 15.8% (+53.3)#34 14.5% (+54.6)#1,255
35. Bolton 67.6% 15.8% (+51.8)#35 14.5% (+53.1)#1,311
36. Vandemere 66.7% 15.8% (+50.9)#36 14.5% (+52.2)#1,385
37. Calypso 65.5% 15.8% (+49.7)#37 14.5% (+51.0)#1,458
38. Ramseur 63.3% 15.8% (+47.5)#38 14.5% (+48.8)#1,541
39. Teachey 63.2% 15.8% (+47.4)#39 14.5% (+48.7)#1,546
40. La Grange 62.8% 15.8% (+47.0)#40 14.5% (+48.3)#1,562
41. Jackson 62.5% 15.8% (+46.7)#41 14.5% (+48.0)#1,568
42. Brogden 61.1% 15.8% (+45.4)#42 14.5% (+46.6)#1,649
43. Cherokee 60.8% 15.8% (+45.0)#43 14.5% (+46.3)#1,660
44. Elizabethtown 60.3% 15.8% (+44.5)#44 14.5% (+45.8)#1,677
45. Walstonburg 60.0% 15.8% (+44.2)#45 14.5% (+45.5)#1,704
46. Arrowhead Beach 59.8% 15.8% (+44.0)#46 14.5% (+45.3)#1,733
47. Bridgeton 59.5% 15.8% (+43.7)#47 14.5% (+45.0)#1,741
48. Wadesboro 59.3% 15.8% (+43.5)#48 14.5% (+44.8)#1,753
49. Southmont 58.8% 15.8% (+43.0)#49 14.5% (+44.3)#1,777
50. Woodland 58.8% 15.8% (+43.0)#50 14.5% (+44.3)#1,780
51. Greenevers 58.3% 15.8% (+42.6)#51 14.5% (+43.8)#1,812
52. Dobbins Heights 57.7% 15.8% (+42.0)#52 14.5% (+43.2)#1,858
53. Enochville 57.5% 15.8% (+41.7)#53 14.5% (+43.0)#1,870
54. Yanceyville 57.4% 15.8% (+41.7)#54 14.5% (+43.0)#1,872
55. Rowland 56.8% 15.8% (+41.0)#55 14.5% (+42.3)#1,924
56. Winton 56.8% 15.8% (+41.0)#56 14.5% (+42.3)#1,927
57. Shallotte 56.7% 15.8% (+40.9)#57 14.5% (+42.2)#1,929
58. Beulaville 56.6% 15.8% (+40.8)#58 14.5% (+42.1)#1,935
59. Hamlet 56.6% 15.8% (+40.8)#59 14.5% (+42.1)#1,940
60. Staley 56.2% 15.8% (+40.5)#60 14.5% (+41.8)#1,959
61. Edenton 55.9% 15.8% (+40.2)#61 14.5% (+41.5)#1,978
62. Lansing 55.6% 15.8% (+39.8)#62 14.5% (+41.1)#2,004
63. Lowell 55.5% 15.8% (+39.7)#63 14.5% (+41.0)#2,013
64. Spencer 55.5% 15.8% (+39.7)#64 14.5% (+41.0)#2,014
65. Forest City 54.4% 15.8% (+38.6)#65 14.5% (+39.9)#2,111
66. Hookerton 53.6% 15.8% (+37.8)#66 14.5% (+39.1)#2,175
67. Roseboro 53.4% 15.8% (+37.7)#67 14.5% (+39.0)#2,183
68. Cordova 53.2% 15.8% (+37.4)#68 14.5% (+38.7)#2,204
69. Dudley 53.2% 15.8% (+37.4)#69 14.5% (+38.7)#2,207
70. South Mills 52.1% 15.8% (+36.3)#70 14.5% (+37.6)#2,286
71. Tabor City 51.8% 15.8% (+36.0)#71 14.5% (+37.3)#2,309
72. Garland 51.7% 15.8% (+35.9)#72 14.5% (+37.2)#2,313
73. Ruffin 51.7% 15.8% (+35.9)#73 14.5% (+37.2)#2,314
74. Farmville 51.4% 15.8% (+35.6)#74 14.5% (+36.9)#2,335
75. Raeford 51.4% 15.8% (+35.6)#75 14.5% (+36.9)#2,336
76. Calabash 51.2% 15.8% (+35.5)#76 14.5% (+36.8)#2,343
77. Cricket 50.7% 15.8% (+34.9)#77 14.5% (+36.2)#2,372
78. Swansboro 50.4% 15.8% (+34.6)#78 14.5% (+35.9)#2,391
79. Murfreesboro 50.0% 15.8% (+34.2)#79 14.5% (+35.5)#2,401
80. Dortches 50.0% 15.8% (+34.2)#80 14.5% (+35.5)#2,427
81. Middleburg 50.0% 15.8% (+34.2)#81 14.5% (+35.5)#2,514
82. Troy 49.6% 15.8% (+33.8)#82 14.5% (+35.1)#2,607
83. Laurinburg 49.5% 15.8% (+33.7)#83 14.5% (+35.0)#2,613
84. Gibson 49.2% 15.8% (+33.4)#84 14.5% (+34.7)#2,628
85. Polkton 48.2% 15.8% (+32.4)#85 14.5% (+33.7)#2,692
86. Pinnacle 48.1% 15.8% (+32.3)#86 14.5% (+33.6)#2,706
87. Louisburg 48.0% 15.8% (+32.3)#87 14.5% (+33.5)#2,709
88. Mount Olive 47.9% 15.8% (+32.1)#88 14.5% (+33.4)#2,724
89. Wentworth 47.8% 15.8% (+32.0)#89 14.5% (+33.3)#2,736
90. Ansonville 47.5% 15.8% (+31.7)#90 14.5% (+33.0)#2,761
91. Snow Hill 47.1% 15.8% (+31.3)#91 14.5% (+32.6)#2,793
92. Hertford 46.9% 15.8% (+31.1)#92 14.5% (+32.4)#2,823
93. Red Springs 46.5% 15.8% (+30.7)#93 14.5% (+32.0)#2,874
94. Patterson Springs 46.4% 15.8% (+30.6)#94 14.5% (+31.9)#2,878
95. Webster 46.2% 15.8% (+30.4)#95 14.5% (+31.7)#2,905
96. Lucama 46.1% 15.8% (+30.3)#96 14.5% (+31.6)#2,930
97. Stoneville 45.7% 15.8% (+30.0)#97 14.5% (+31.3)#2,957
98. Foscoe 45.6% 15.8% (+29.8)#98 14.5% (+31.1)#2,971
99. Vanceboro 44.4% 15.8% (+28.7)#99 14.5% (+30.0)#3,102
100. Littleton 44.4% 15.8% (+28.7)#100 14.5% (+30.0)#3,111

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in North Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in North Carolina are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in North Carolina?
Broad Creek has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in North Carolina with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in the State of North Carolina?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in North Carolina is 15.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in the United States is 14.5%.