Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Kentucky

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Female 25-34
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Kentucky
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Kentucky

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Kentucky Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Kentucky

City Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. Cumberland 100.0% 18.9% (+81.1)#1 14.5% (+85.5)#9
2. Ironville 100.0% 18.9% (+81.1)#2 14.5% (+85.5)#123
3. Mcdowell 100.0% 18.9% (+81.1)#3 14.5% (+85.5)#182
4. Salt Lick 100.0% 18.9% (+81.1)#4 14.5% (+85.5)#237
5. Pathfork 100.0% 18.9% (+81.1)#5 14.5% (+85.5)#282
6. Mccarr 100.0% 18.9% (+81.1)#6 14.5% (+85.5)#326
7. Worthville 100.0% 18.9% (+81.1)#7 14.5% (+85.5)#355
8. Rochester 100.0% 18.9% (+81.1)#8 14.5% (+85.5)#389
9. Farmington 100.0% 18.9% (+81.1)#9 14.5% (+85.5)#412
10. South Carrollton 100.0% 18.9% (+81.1)#10 14.5% (+85.5)#429
11. Hiseville 100.0% 18.9% (+81.1)#11 14.5% (+85.5)#519
12. Blackey 100.0% 18.9% (+81.1)#12 14.5% (+85.5)#527
13. Sanders 92.1% 18.9% (+73.2)#13 14.5% (+77.6)#716
14. Beattyville 88.0% 18.9% (+69.1)#14 14.5% (+73.5)#765
15. Jenkins 85.7% 18.9% (+66.9)#15 14.5% (+71.2)#794
16. Berry 85.7% 18.9% (+66.9)#16 14.5% (+71.2)#802
17. Russell Springs 85.4% 18.9% (+66.5)#17 14.5% (+70.9)#811
18. Mckee 80.0% 18.9% (+61.1)#18 14.5% (+65.5)#916
19. Sandy Hook 80.0% 18.9% (+61.1)#19 14.5% (+65.5)#917
20. Grayson 79.7% 18.9% (+60.9)#20 14.5% (+65.2)#941
21. Salyersville 74.8% 18.9% (+55.9)#21 14.5% (+60.3)#1,087
22. Clay City 74.3% 18.9% (+55.4)#22 14.5% (+59.8)#1,088
23. Loyall 72.4% 18.9% (+53.6)#23 14.5% (+57.9)#1,139
24. Eubank 71.4% 18.9% (+52.6)#24 14.5% (+56.9)#1,166
25. Millersburg 70.8% 18.9% (+52.0)#25 14.5% (+56.3)#1,191
26. Junction City 70.3% 18.9% (+51.4)#26 14.5% (+55.8)#1,213
27. Artemus 69.8% 18.9% (+51.0)#27 14.5% (+55.3)#1,227
28. Burkesville 69.6% 18.9% (+50.7)#28 14.5% (+55.1)#1,234
29. Sacramento 68.6% 18.9% (+49.8)#29 14.5% (+54.1)#1,268
30. Glencoe 66.7% 18.9% (+47.8)#30 14.5% (+52.2)#1,367
31. Hindman 66.1% 18.9% (+47.3)#31 14.5% (+51.6)#1,437
32. Hawesville 65.7% 18.9% (+46.8)#32 14.5% (+51.2)#1,449
33. Smithfield 63.6% 18.9% (+44.8)#33 14.5% (+49.1)#1,528
34. Annville 62.9% 18.9% (+44.0)#34 14.5% (+48.4)#1,557
35. Irvine 62.3% 18.9% (+43.4)#35 14.5% (+47.8)#1,599
36. Mount Sterling 62.1% 18.9% (+43.3)#36 14.5% (+47.6)#1,604
37. Summer Shade 60.9% 18.9% (+42.0)#37 14.5% (+46.4)#1,657
38. Earlington 60.6% 18.9% (+41.8)#38 14.5% (+46.1)#1,666
39. Beechmont 60.0% 18.9% (+41.1)#39 14.5% (+45.5)#1,688
40. Van Lear 59.1% 18.9% (+40.2)#40 14.5% (+44.6)#1,763
41. Ekron 58.3% 18.9% (+39.5)#41 14.5% (+43.8)#1,823
42. Prestonsburg 58.1% 18.9% (+39.3)#42 14.5% (+43.6)#1,832
43. Coal Run Village 57.7% 18.9% (+38.8)#43 14.5% (+43.2)#1,863
44. Drakesboro 57.1% 18.9% (+38.3)#44 14.5% (+42.6)#1,891
45. Auxier 55.7% 18.9% (+36.9)#45 14.5% (+41.2)#1,986
46. Martin 55.7% 18.9% (+36.9)#46 14.5% (+41.2)#1,987
47. Catlettsburg 54.1% 18.9% (+35.2)#47 14.5% (+39.6)#2,136
48. Frenchburg 53.6% 18.9% (+34.7)#48 14.5% (+39.1)#2,174
49. Brownsville 53.5% 18.9% (+34.6)#49 14.5% (+39.0)#2,182
50. Dixon 53.3% 18.9% (+34.5)#50 14.5% (+38.8)#2,188
51. Dawson Springs 53.2% 18.9% (+34.4)#51 14.5% (+38.7)#2,202
52. Elkhorn City 52.9% 18.9% (+34.0)#52 14.5% (+38.4)#2,232
53. Coldiron 52.6% 18.9% (+33.8)#53 14.5% (+38.1)#2,250
54. Livingston 52.6% 18.9% (+33.8)#54 14.5% (+38.1)#2,254
55. Marion 51.9% 18.9% (+33.0)#55 14.5% (+37.4)#2,297
56. Munfordville 51.8% 18.9% (+32.9)#56 14.5% (+37.3)#2,310
57. Morgantown 51.2% 18.9% (+32.3)#57 14.5% (+36.7)#2,346
58. Mortons Gap 50.9% 18.9% (+32.0)#58 14.5% (+36.4)#2,364
59. Columbus 50.0% 18.9% (+31.1)#59 14.5% (+35.5)#2,529
60. Fairview 50.0% 18.9% (+31.1)#60 14.5% (+35.5)#2,545
61. Blandville 50.0% 18.9% (+31.1)#61 14.5% (+35.5)#2,563
62. Fulton 49.8% 18.9% (+30.9)#62 14.5% (+35.3)#2,595
63. Horse Cave 49.7% 18.9% (+30.8)#63 14.5% (+35.2)#2,600
64. Flemingsburg 49.6% 18.9% (+30.7)#64 14.5% (+35.1)#2,606
65. Philpot 48.8% 18.9% (+30.0)#65 14.5% (+34.3)#2,651
66. Lynch 48.3% 18.9% (+29.4)#66 14.5% (+33.8)#2,688
67. West Point 48.2% 18.9% (+29.4)#67 14.5% (+33.7)#2,693
68. Scottsville 47.8% 18.9% (+28.9)#68 14.5% (+33.3)#2,735
69. Ages 47.4% 18.9% (+28.5)#69 14.5% (+32.9)#2,774
70. Campton 46.7% 18.9% (+27.8)#70 14.5% (+32.2)#2,861
71. Wingo 46.3% 18.9% (+27.4)#71 14.5% (+31.8)#2,888
72. Bonnieville 46.2% 18.9% (+27.3)#72 14.5% (+31.7)#2,918
73. Pineville 45.8% 18.9% (+27.0)#73 14.5% (+31.3)#2,947
74. Livermore 45.8% 18.9% (+27.0)#74 14.5% (+31.3)#2,948
75. Irvington 45.6% 18.9% (+26.8)#75 14.5% (+31.1)#2,967
76. Wayland 45.0% 18.9% (+26.1)#76 14.5% (+30.5)#3,037
77. Flatwoods 44.9% 18.9% (+26.0)#77 14.5% (+30.4)#3,046
78. Lewisburg 44.8% 18.9% (+26.0)#78 14.5% (+30.3)#3,050
79. Flat Lick 44.8% 18.9% (+26.0)#79 14.5% (+30.3)#3,052
80. Evarts 44.6% 18.9% (+25.8)#80 14.5% (+30.1)#3,076
81. Wickliffe 44.4% 18.9% (+25.6)#81 14.5% (+30.0)#3,106
82. Cave City 44.1% 18.9% (+25.3)#82 14.5% (+29.7)#3,156
83. Paintsville 44.0% 18.9% (+25.2)#83 14.5% (+29.5)#3,161
84. Corydon 43.3% 18.9% (+24.5)#84 14.5% (+28.8)#3,248
85. Smithland 43.3% 18.9% (+24.5)#85 14.5% (+28.8)#3,251
86. Leitchfield 43.1% 18.9% (+24.2)#86 14.5% (+28.6)#3,273
87. Brooks 42.9% 18.9% (+24.0)#87 14.5% (+28.4)#3,289
88. Park City 42.6% 18.9% (+23.8)#88 14.5% (+28.1)#3,356
89. Brodhead 42.3% 18.9% (+23.5)#89 14.5% (+27.8)#3,383
90. Centertown 42.3% 18.9% (+23.4)#90 14.5% (+27.8)#3,389
91. Silver Grove 41.7% 18.9% (+22.8)#91 14.5% (+27.2)#3,459
92. Farley 41.6% 18.9% (+22.7)#92 14.5% (+27.1)#3,481
93. Stanton 41.5% 18.9% (+22.7)#93 14.5% (+27.0)#3,485
94. Owingsville 41.2% 18.9% (+22.4)#94 14.5% (+26.7)#3,529
95. Warsaw 41.0% 18.9% (+22.1)#95 14.5% (+26.5)#3,566
96. Windy Hills 40.9% 18.9% (+22.0)#96 14.5% (+26.4)#3,584
97. Morganfield 40.7% 18.9% (+21.9)#97 14.5% (+26.2)#3,604
98. Barbourville 40.5% 18.9% (+21.6)#98 14.5% (+26.0)#3,635
99. Whitesburg 40.2% 18.9% (+21.4)#99 14.5% (+25.7)#3,663
100. Ferguson 40.0% 18.9% (+21.1)#100 14.5% (+25.5)#3,696

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Kentucky?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Kentucky are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Kentucky?
Cumberland has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Kentucky with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in the State of Kentucky?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Kentucky is 18.9%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in the United States is 14.5%.