Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Wisconsin

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Female 25-34
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Wisconsin
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Wisconsin

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Wisconsin Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Wisconsin

City Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. Middle Village 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#2 14.5% (+85.5)#398
2. Edmund 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#3 14.5% (+85.5)#401
3. Zoar 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#4 14.5% (+85.5)#436
4. Big Foot Prairie 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#5 14.5% (+85.5)#541
5. Pella 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#6 14.5% (+85.5)#549
6. Argonne 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#7 14.5% (+85.5)#578
7. Conrath 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#8 14.5% (+85.5)#579
8. Paac Ciinak 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#9 14.5% (+85.5)#611
9. Wabeno 88.0% 13.1% (+74.9)#10 14.5% (+73.5)#764
10. Lake Tomahawk 85.0% 13.1% (+71.9)#11 14.5% (+70.5)#813
11. Doylestown 83.3% 13.1% (+70.2)#12 14.5% (+68.8)#855
12. Clayton 80.0% 13.1% (+66.9)#13 14.5% (+65.5)#926
13. Amberg 77.8% 13.1% (+64.7)#14 14.5% (+63.3)#991
14. Kennan 75.0% 13.1% (+61.9)#15 14.5% (+60.5)#1,079
15. Colby 72.5% 13.1% (+59.4)#16 14.5% (+58.0)#1,134
16. Gilman 70.8% 13.1% (+57.7)#17 14.5% (+56.3)#1,193
17. Cassville 68.8% 13.1% (+55.6)#18 14.5% (+54.3)#1,265
18. Soldiers Grove 68.0% 13.1% (+54.9)#19 14.5% (+53.5)#1,296
19. Elcho 66.7% 13.1% (+53.6)#20 14.5% (+52.2)#1,387
20. Boaz 66.7% 13.1% (+53.6)#21 14.5% (+52.2)#1,403
21. Chelsea 66.7% 13.1% (+53.6)#22 14.5% (+52.2)#1,420
22. Dellwood 62.5% 13.1% (+49.4)#23 14.5% (+48.0)#1,569
23. Radisson 61.5% 13.1% (+48.4)#24 14.5% (+47.0)#1,633
24. Ironton 60.0% 13.1% (+46.9)#25 14.5% (+45.5)#1,700
25. Cable 60.0% 13.1% (+46.9)#26 14.5% (+45.5)#1,710
26. Arkdale 57.1% 13.1% (+44.0)#27 14.5% (+42.6)#1,904
27. Hancock 56.8% 13.1% (+43.6)#28 14.5% (+42.3)#1,928
28. Sand Pillow 56.2% 13.1% (+43.1)#29 14.5% (+41.8)#1,963
29. Bagley 55.6% 13.1% (+42.4)#30 14.5% (+41.1)#2,001
30. Dalton 55.6% 13.1% (+42.4)#31 14.5% (+41.1)#2,005
31. Crivitz 55.1% 13.1% (+42.0)#32 14.5% (+40.6)#2,044
32. White Lake 54.2% 13.1% (+41.1)#33 14.5% (+39.7)#2,131
33. Norwalk 54.0% 13.1% (+40.9)#34 14.5% (+39.5)#2,139
34. Laona 53.8% 13.1% (+40.7)#35 14.5% (+39.4)#2,147
35. Hager City 53.8% 13.1% (+40.7)#36 14.5% (+39.4)#2,154
36. Oakdale 50.0% 13.1% (+36.9)#37 14.5% (+35.5)#2,492
37. Eland 50.0% 13.1% (+36.9)#38 14.5% (+35.5)#2,498
38. Gratiot 50.0% 13.1% (+36.9)#39 14.5% (+35.5)#2,530
39. Mount Sterling 50.0% 13.1% (+36.9)#40 14.5% (+35.5)#2,531
40. Millston 50.0% 13.1% (+36.9)#41 14.5% (+35.5)#2,551
41. Frederic 48.8% 13.1% (+35.7)#42 14.5% (+34.3)#2,652
42. Couderay 47.1% 13.1% (+33.9)#43 14.5% (+32.6)#2,808
43. Burlington 45.5% 13.1% (+32.3)#44 14.5% (+31.0)#2,977
44. Endeavor 45.0% 13.1% (+31.9)#45 14.5% (+30.5)#3,034
45. Gresham 44.4% 13.1% (+31.3)#46 14.5% (+30.0)#3,110
46. Almena 44.0% 13.1% (+30.9)#47 14.5% (+29.5)#3,164
47. Forestville 43.8% 13.1% (+30.6)#48 14.5% (+29.3)#3,195
48. Abrams 43.5% 13.1% (+30.4)#49 14.5% (+29.0)#3,235
49. Wheeler 42.9% 13.1% (+29.7)#50 14.5% (+28.4)#3,327
50. Rudolph 41.4% 13.1% (+28.3)#51 14.5% (+26.9)#3,511
51. Elroy 40.9% 13.1% (+27.8)#52 14.5% (+26.4)#3,570
52. Fairchild 40.5% 13.1% (+27.4)#53 14.5% (+26.0)#3,627
53. Oconto Falls 39.2% 13.1% (+26.1)#54 14.5% (+24.7)#3,860
54. New Lisbon 39.2% 13.1% (+26.1)#55 14.5% (+24.7)#3,863
55. Port Wing 38.5% 13.1% (+25.4)#56 14.5% (+24.0)#3,981
56. Phillips 38.2% 13.1% (+25.0)#57 14.5% (+23.7)#4,020
57. Mercer 38.1% 13.1% (+25.0)#58 14.5% (+23.6)#4,034
58. Neopit 36.5% 13.1% (+23.4)#59 14.5% (+22.0)#4,299
59. Nichols 35.7% 13.1% (+22.6)#60 14.5% (+21.2)#4,455
60. Potter 35.7% 13.1% (+22.6)#61 14.5% (+21.2)#4,457
61. Siren 34.8% 13.1% (+21.7)#62 14.5% (+20.3)#4,628
62. Nekoosa 34.7% 13.1% (+21.6)#63 14.5% (+20.2)#4,640
63. Port Edwards 34.5% 13.1% (+21.4)#64 14.5% (+20.0)#4,666
64. La Farge 34.5% 13.1% (+21.4)#65 14.5% (+20.0)#4,674
65. St Joseph 34.5% 13.1% (+21.4)#66 14.5% (+20.0)#4,677
66. Sturtevant 33.9% 13.1% (+20.8)#67 14.5% (+19.4)#4,773
67. Kiel 33.8% 13.1% (+20.7)#68 14.5% (+19.3)#4,784
68. Potter Lake 33.3% 13.1% (+20.2)#69 14.5% (+18.8)#4,868
69. Lone Rock 33.3% 13.1% (+20.2)#70 14.5% (+18.8)#4,872
70. Wausaukee 33.3% 13.1% (+20.2)#71 14.5% (+18.8)#4,895
71. Unity 33.3% 13.1% (+20.2)#72 14.5% (+18.8)#4,929
72. Kellnersville 33.3% 13.1% (+20.2)#73 14.5% (+18.8)#4,967
73. Oregon 33.2% 13.1% (+20.1)#74 14.5% (+18.7)#5,049
74. Bohners Lake 33.0% 13.1% (+19.9)#75 14.5% (+18.5)#5,072
75. Algoma 32.6% 13.1% (+19.5)#76 14.5% (+18.1)#5,127
76. Ashland 32.5% 13.1% (+19.4)#77 14.5% (+18.0)#5,137
77. Park Falls 32.4% 13.1% (+19.3)#78 14.5% (+17.9)#5,157
78. Avoca 32.0% 13.1% (+18.9)#79 14.5% (+17.5)#5,236
79. Prentice 31.6% 13.1% (+18.5)#80 14.5% (+17.1)#5,319
80. Durand 31.5% 13.1% (+18.3)#81 14.5% (+17.0)#5,347
81. Eleva 31.4% 13.1% (+18.3)#82 14.5% (+16.9)#5,355
82. Mission 31.2% 13.1% (+18.1)#83 14.5% (+16.8)#5,396
83. Clear Lake 30.9% 13.1% (+17.8)#84 14.5% (+16.4)#5,467
84. Mindoro 30.8% 13.1% (+17.7)#85 14.5% (+16.3)#5,514
85. Boscobel 30.3% 13.1% (+17.1)#86 14.5% (+15.8)#5,613
86. Balsam Lake 30.0% 13.1% (+16.9)#87 14.5% (+15.5)#5,655
87. New Odanah 30.0% 13.1% (+16.9)#88 14.5% (+15.5)#5,666
88. Stetsonville 29.4% 13.1% (+16.3)#89 14.5% (+14.9)#5,798
89. Merrillan 29.4% 13.1% (+16.3)#90 14.5% (+14.9)#5,799
90. Racine 29.2% 13.1% (+16.1)#91 14.5% (+14.7)#5,848
91. Niagara 29.0% 13.1% (+15.9)#92 14.5% (+14.5)#5,894
92. Neosho 28.9% 13.1% (+15.8)#93 14.5% (+14.4)#5,928
93. Hurley 28.8% 13.1% (+15.7)#94 14.5% (+14.3)#5,952
94. Menomonie 28.5% 13.1% (+15.4)#95 14.5% (+14.0)#6,090
95. Fremont 28.3% 13.1% (+15.2)#96 14.5% (+13.8)#6,129
96. Keshena 28.3% 13.1% (+15.2)#97 14.5% (+13.8)#6,140
97. Rio 27.8% 13.1% (+14.7)#98 14.5% (+13.3)#6,250
98. Mattoon 27.8% 13.1% (+14.7)#99 14.5% (+13.3)#6,255
99. Lyons 27.5% 13.1% (+14.4)#100 14.5% (+13.0)#6,326
100. Egg Harbor 27.3% 13.1% (+14.2)#101 14.5% (+12.8)#6,412

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Wisconsin?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Wisconsin are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
88.0%
#8
85.0%
#9
83.3%
#10
80.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Wisconsin?
Middle Village has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Wisconsin with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in the State of Wisconsin?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Wisconsin is 13.1%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in the United States is 14.5%.