	City	Female Poverty	vs State	vs National
1.	Twinsburg Heights	100.0%	17.0% (+83.0)#1	14.5% (+85.5)#88
2.	Mckinley Heights	100.0%	17.0% (+83.0)#2	14.5% (+85.5)#92
3.	Vienna Center	100.0%	17.0% (+83.0)#3	14.5% (+85.5)#144
4.	Neapolis	100.0%	17.0% (+83.0)#4	14.5% (+85.5)#154
5.	Sardis	100.0%	17.0% (+83.0)#5	14.5% (+85.5)#229
6.	Stewart	100.0%	17.0% (+83.0)#6	14.5% (+85.5)#265
7.	Port William	100.0%	17.0% (+83.0)#7	14.5% (+85.5)#285
8.	Milton Center	100.0%	17.0% (+83.0)#8	14.5% (+85.5)#379
9.	Broughton	100.0%	17.0% (+83.0)#9	14.5% (+85.5)#563
10.	Neville	100.0%	17.0% (+83.0)#10	14.5% (+85.5)#592
11.	Rendville	100.0%	17.0% (+83.0)#11	14.5% (+85.5)#626
12.	Centerville Thurman	100.0%	17.0% (+83.0)#12	14.5% (+85.5)#627
13.	Octa	100.0%	17.0% (+83.0)#13	14.5% (+85.5)#638
14.	Antioch	100.0%	17.0% (+83.0)#14	14.5% (+85.5)#646
15.	Fairview	100.0%	17.0% (+83.0)#15	14.5% (+85.5)#654
16.	Scio	90.0%	17.0% (+73.0)#16	14.5% (+75.5)#738
17.	West Elkton	85.0%	17.0% (+68.0)#17	14.5% (+70.5)#814
18.	Murray City	84.6%	17.0% (+67.6)#18	14.5% (+70.1)#821
19.	New Boston	81.9%	17.0% (+64.9)#19	14.5% (+67.4)#880
20.	Friendship	81.5%	17.0% (+64.5)#20	14.5% (+67.0)#891
21.	Trimble	80.6%	17.0% (+63.7)#21	14.5% (+66.2)#908
22.	Bowerston	80.0%	17.0% (+63.0)#22	14.5% (+65.5)#923
23.	Haydenville	80.0%	17.0% (+63.0)#23	14.5% (+65.5)#925
24.	Roswell	76.9%	17.0% (+59.9)#24	14.5% (+62.4)#1,020
25.	Holloway	72.7%	17.0% (+55.7)#25	14.5% (+58.2)#1,126
26.	Corning	71.4%	17.0% (+54.5)#26	14.5% (+56.9)#1,165
27.	Fairfield Beach	67.4%	17.0% (+50.5)#27	14.5% (+52.9)#1,316
28.	Alger	67.3%	17.0% (+50.3)#28	14.5% (+52.8)#1,325
29.	Madison Place	67.1%	17.0% (+50.1)#29	14.5% (+52.6)#1,333
30.	New Haven Cdp Huron County	66.7%	17.0% (+49.7)#30	14.5% (+52.2)#1,355
31.	Beallsville	66.7%	17.0% (+49.7)#31	14.5% (+52.2)#1,361
32.	Zoar	66.7%	17.0% (+49.7)#32	14.5% (+52.2)#1,386
33.	Patterson	66.7%	17.0% (+49.7)#33	14.5% (+52.2)#1,391
34.	Fort Mckinley	64.2%	17.0% (+47.3)#34	14.5% (+49.7)#1,503
35.	New Bloomington	63.6%	17.0% (+46.7)#35	14.5% (+49.1)#1,523
36.	Dillonvale	63.4%	17.0% (+46.4)#36	14.5% (+48.9)#1,536
37.	Lockbourne	63.2%	17.0% (+46.2)#37	14.5% (+48.7)#1,548
38.	Franklin Furnace	62.8%	17.0% (+45.8)#38	14.5% (+48.3)#1,559
39.	Empire	62.5%	17.0% (+45.5)#39	14.5% (+48.0)#1,583
40.	Rarden	62.5%	17.0% (+45.5)#40	14.5% (+48.0)#1,591
41.	Windham	62.4%	17.0% (+45.5)#41	14.5% (+47.9)#1,598
42.	Aberdeen	62.2%	17.0% (+45.2)#42	14.5% (+47.7)#1,602
43.	Jeffersonville	60.0%	17.0% (+43.0)#43	14.5% (+45.5)#1,683
44.	Cygnet	60.0%	17.0% (+43.0)#44	14.5% (+45.5)#1,692
45.	Harbor View	60.0%	17.0% (+43.0)#45	14.5% (+45.5)#1,716
46.	Kirby	60.0%	17.0% (+43.0)#46	14.5% (+45.5)#1,730
47.	Bolindale	59.8%	17.0% (+42.9)#47	14.5% (+45.3)#1,731
48.	Seaman	59.7%	17.0% (+42.8)#48	14.5% (+45.2)#1,734
49.	Derby	58.9%	17.0% (+42.0)#49	14.5% (+44.5)#1,772
50.	Matamoras	58.3%	17.0% (+41.3)#50	14.5% (+43.8)#1,826
51.	Urbancrest	58.1%	17.0% (+41.1)#51	14.5% (+43.6)#1,836
52.	Malta	57.9%	17.0% (+40.9)#52	14.5% (+43.4)#1,849
53.	Rogers	57.9%	17.0% (+40.9)#53	14.5% (+43.4)#1,852
54.	New Holland	57.6%	17.0% (+40.6)#54	14.5% (+43.1)#1,864
55.	Gratiot	57.1%	17.0% (+40.2)#55	14.5% (+42.6)#1,901
56.	Granville South	56.5%	17.0% (+39.5)#56	14.5% (+42.0)#1,944
57.	Moscow	56.2%	17.0% (+39.3)#57	14.5% (+41.8)#1,965
58.	Lower Salem	56.2%	17.0% (+39.3)#58	14.5% (+41.8)#1,966
59.	Fayette	56.1%	17.0% (+39.1)#59	14.5% (+41.6)#1,972
60.	Rawson	55.6%	17.0% (+38.6)#60	14.5% (+41.1)#1,996
61.	Pleasant Run Farm	55.4%	17.0% (+38.5)#61	14.5% (+40.9)#2,017
62.	Montpelier	54.8%	17.0% (+37.9)#62	14.5% (+40.3)#2,066
63.	Pitsburg	54.5%	17.0% (+37.6)#63	14.5% (+40.1)#2,094
64.	Clifton	53.8%	17.0% (+36.9)#64	14.5% (+39.4)#2,156
65.	Salineville	53.3%	17.0% (+36.4)#65	14.5% (+38.8)#2,187
66.	Russells Point	53.2%	17.0% (+36.2)#66	14.5% (+38.7)#2,205
67.	Convoy	53.2%	17.0% (+36.2)#67	14.5% (+38.7)#2,209
68.	Stony Prairie	53.0%	17.0% (+36.0)#68	14.5% (+38.5)#2,218
69.	Mcarthur	52.4%	17.0% (+35.4)#69	14.5% (+37.9)#2,266
70.	Rayland	52.4%	17.0% (+35.4)#70	14.5% (+37.9)#2,270
71.	Chauncey	52.3%	17.0% (+35.3)#71	14.5% (+37.8)#2,275
72.	Warren	52.2%	17.0% (+35.2)#72	14.5% (+37.7)#2,278
73.	Mantua	50.9%	17.0% (+34.0)#73	14.5% (+36.4)#2,359
74.	Lakeview	50.0%	17.0% (+33.0)#74	14.5% (+35.5)#2,417
75.	Malinta	50.0%	17.0% (+33.0)#75	14.5% (+35.5)#2,476
76.	Hemlock	50.0%	17.0% (+33.0)#76	14.5% (+35.5)#2,494
77.	Winesburg	50.0%	17.0% (+33.0)#77	14.5% (+35.5)#2,501
78.	Hollansburg	50.0%	17.0% (+33.0)#78	14.5% (+35.5)#2,504
79.	Montezuma	50.0%	17.0% (+33.0)#80	14.5% (+35.5)#2,570
80.	Sarahsville	50.0%	17.0% (+33.0)#81	14.5% (+35.5)#2,571
81.	Cambridge	49.8%	17.0% (+32.8)#82	14.5% (+35.3)#2,593
82.	Byesville	49.5%	17.0% (+32.6)#83	14.5% (+35.1)#2,609
83.	Ada	49.4%	17.0% (+32.4)#84	14.5% (+34.9)#2,616
84.	Garrettsville	49.3%	17.0% (+32.3)#85	14.5% (+34.8)#2,625
85.	Newburgh Heights	49.2%	17.0% (+32.2)#86	14.5% (+34.7)#2,629
86.	New Burlington	49.0%	17.0% (+32.1)#87	14.5% (+34.5)#2,634
87.	Perry	49.0%	17.0% (+32.0)#88	14.5% (+34.5)#2,636
88.	Bryan	48.5%	17.0% (+31.6)#89	14.5% (+34.1)#2,671
89.	Peebles	48.2%	17.0% (+31.3)#90	14.5% (+33.8)#2,690
90.	Youngstown	48.1%	17.0% (+31.1)#91	14.5% (+33.6)#2,701
91.	Hoytville	47.6%	17.0% (+30.6)#92	14.5% (+33.1)#2,748
92.	New Lebanon	47.5%	17.0% (+30.6)#93	14.5% (+33.0)#2,757
93.	Irondale	47.4%	17.0% (+30.4)#94	14.5% (+32.9)#2,779
94.	South Mount Vernon	47.3%	17.0% (+30.4)#95	14.5% (+32.8)#2,783
95.	Perrysville	47.3%	17.0% (+30.3)#96	14.5% (+32.8)#2,785
96.	Custar	47.1%	17.0% (+30.1)#97	14.5% (+32.6)#2,806
97.	Clarksville	46.9%	17.0% (+29.9)#98	14.5% (+32.4)#2,826
98.	Mount Healthy Heights	46.8%	17.0% (+29.8)#99	14.5% (+32.3)#2,830
99.	Minerva	46.6%	17.0% (+29.6)#100	14.5% (+32.1)#2,869
100.	Oakwood Village Paulding County	46.2%	17.0% (+29.2)#101	14.5% (+31.7)#2,907

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Ohio?

Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Ohio are:

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

#10

Neville

100.0%

What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Ohio?

Twinsburg Heights has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Ohio with 100.0%.

What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in the State of Ohio?

Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Ohio is 17.0%.

What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in the United States?

Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in the United States is 14.5%.