Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Arizona

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Female 25-34
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Arizona
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Arizona

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Arizona Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Arizona

City Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. Rio Verde 100.0% 15.2% (+84.8)#1 14.5% (+85.5)#8
2. Scenic 100.0% 15.2% (+84.8)#2 14.5% (+85.5)#19
3. Congress 100.0% 15.2% (+84.8)#3 14.5% (+85.5)#37
4. Cibecue 100.0% 15.2% (+84.8)#4 14.5% (+85.5)#43
5. Strawberry 100.0% 15.2% (+84.8)#5 14.5% (+85.5)#79
6. Komatke 100.0% 15.2% (+84.8)#6 14.5% (+85.5)#111
7. Round Valley 100.0% 15.2% (+84.8)#7 14.5% (+85.5)#185
8. Turkey Creek 100.0% 15.2% (+84.8)#8 14.5% (+85.5)#202
9. Aguila 100.0% 15.2% (+84.8)#9 14.5% (+85.5)#244
10. San Miguel 100.0% 15.2% (+84.8)#10 14.5% (+85.5)#272
11. Chloride 100.0% 15.2% (+84.8)#11 14.5% (+85.5)#291
12. Carrizo 100.0% 15.2% (+84.8)#12 14.5% (+85.5)#293
13. Crystal Beach 100.0% 15.2% (+84.8)#13 14.5% (+85.5)#296
14. San Simon 100.0% 15.2% (+84.8)#14 14.5% (+85.5)#342
15. Sehili 100.0% 15.2% (+84.8)#15 14.5% (+85.5)#424
16. Poston 100.0% 15.2% (+84.8)#16 14.5% (+85.5)#440
17. Alpine 100.0% 15.2% (+84.8)#17 14.5% (+85.5)#455
18. Drysdale 100.0% 15.2% (+84.8)#18 14.5% (+85.5)#476
19. Deer Creek 100.0% 15.2% (+84.8)#19 14.5% (+85.5)#489
20. Hard Rock 100.0% 15.2% (+84.8)#20 14.5% (+85.5)#499
21. Anegam 100.0% 15.2% (+84.8)#21 14.5% (+85.5)#504
22. Sweet Water Village 100.0% 15.2% (+84.8)#22 14.5% (+85.5)#506
23. Oxbow Estates 100.0% 15.2% (+84.8)#23 14.5% (+85.5)#514
24. Wahak Hotrontk 100.0% 15.2% (+84.8)#24 14.5% (+85.5)#648
25. Picacho 92.9% 15.2% (+77.6)#25 14.5% (+78.4)#712
26. Dewey Humboldt 87.7% 15.2% (+72.5)#26 14.5% (+73.2)#769
27. Whitecone 86.0% 15.2% (+70.8)#27 14.5% (+71.6)#792
28. Naco 83.3% 15.2% (+68.1)#28 14.5% (+68.8)#842
29. Sanders 81.2% 15.2% (+66.0)#29 14.5% (+66.8)#898
30. Green Valley 79.9% 15.2% (+64.6)#30 14.5% (+65.4)#939
31. Round Rock 78.6% 15.2% (+63.4)#31 14.5% (+64.1)#966
32. Nelson 77.9% 15.2% (+62.7)#32 14.5% (+63.4)#977
33. Mammoth 73.7% 15.2% (+58.5)#33 14.5% (+59.2)#1,097
34. Klagetoh 72.2% 15.2% (+57.0)#34 14.5% (+57.7)#1,144
35. Bowie 69.2% 15.2% (+54.0)#35 14.5% (+54.7)#1,247
36. Claypool 67.7% 15.2% (+52.5)#36 14.5% (+53.2)#1,307
37. Ehrenberg 66.7% 15.2% (+51.4)#37 14.5% (+52.2)#1,344
38. Low Mountain 66.7% 15.2% (+51.4)#38 14.5% (+52.2)#1,351
39. Gila Bend 65.9% 15.2% (+50.7)#39 14.5% (+51.4)#1,443
40. Central Heights Midland City 65.3% 15.2% (+50.1)#40 14.5% (+50.9)#1,468
41. Burnside 62.5% 15.2% (+47.3)#41 14.5% (+48.0)#1,571
42. Chilchinbito 62.3% 15.2% (+47.0)#42 14.5% (+47.8)#1,601
43. Tacna 61.9% 15.2% (+46.7)#43 14.5% (+47.4)#1,615
44. Second Mesa 61.8% 15.2% (+46.6)#44 14.5% (+47.3)#1,616
45. Greasewood 61.5% 15.2% (+46.3)#45 14.5% (+47.0)#1,632
46. Pisinemo 61.4% 15.2% (+46.1)#46 14.5% (+46.9)#1,640
47. White Mountain Lake 60.5% 15.2% (+45.2)#47 14.5% (+46.0)#1,671
48. Canyon Day 57.3% 15.2% (+42.0)#48 14.5% (+42.8)#1,878
49. Black Canyon City 55.8% 15.2% (+40.6)#49 14.5% (+41.4)#1,980
50. Seven Mile 55.3% 15.2% (+40.1)#50 14.5% (+40.8)#2,022
51. Window Rock 55.1% 15.2% (+39.9)#51 14.5% (+40.6)#2,040
52. Chinle 54.5% 15.2% (+39.2)#52 14.5% (+40.0)#2,106
53. Bylas 54.3% 15.2% (+39.0)#53 14.5% (+39.8)#2,121
54. Dilkon 54.2% 15.2% (+38.9)#54 14.5% (+39.7)#2,126
55. Sells 53.6% 15.2% (+38.4)#55 14.5% (+39.1)#2,166
56. Cameron 52.1% 15.2% (+36.8)#56 14.5% (+37.6)#2,287
57. South Tucson 50.6% 15.2% (+35.4)#57 14.5% (+36.1)#2,375
58. Superior 50.0% 15.2% (+34.8)#58 14.5% (+35.5)#2,400
59. Red Mesa 50.0% 15.2% (+34.8)#59 14.5% (+35.5)#2,453
60. Jeddito 50.0% 15.2% (+34.8)#60 14.5% (+35.5)#2,519
61. Sacaton 49.7% 15.2% (+34.5)#61 14.5% (+35.2)#2,599
62. Camp Verde 49.7% 15.2% (+34.4)#62 14.5% (+35.2)#2,603
63. Taylor 49.0% 15.2% (+33.8)#63 14.5% (+34.5)#2,635
64. Cave Creek 48.6% 15.2% (+33.4)#64 14.5% (+34.1)#2,667
65. Cornfields 48.0% 15.2% (+32.8)#65 14.5% (+33.5)#2,716
66. Avra Valley 47.4% 15.2% (+32.2)#66 14.5% (+32.9)#2,765
67. Whiteriver 46.7% 15.2% (+31.5)#67 14.5% (+32.2)#2,843
68. Dateland 46.2% 15.2% (+30.9)#68 14.5% (+31.7)#2,910
69. Pinetop Lakeside 45.3% 15.2% (+30.1)#69 14.5% (+30.8)#3,005
70. Tsaile 44.4% 15.2% (+29.2)#70 14.5% (+30.0)#3,094
71. Wilhoit 43.9% 15.2% (+28.7)#71 14.5% (+29.4)#3,176
72. Peach Springs 43.1% 15.2% (+27.9)#72 14.5% (+28.6)#3,275
73. Rock Point 42.9% 15.2% (+27.6)#73 14.5% (+28.4)#3,308
74. Duncan 42.3% 15.2% (+27.1)#74 14.5% (+27.8)#3,386
75. Bisbee 42.2% 15.2% (+27.0)#75 14.5% (+27.7)#3,401
76. Peridot 42.0% 15.2% (+26.8)#76 14.5% (+27.5)#3,428
77. Fort Valley 41.5% 15.2% (+26.3)#77 14.5% (+27.0)#3,488
78. New Kingman Butler 41.2% 15.2% (+26.0)#78 14.5% (+26.7)#3,527
79. Sacaton Flats Village 40.7% 15.2% (+25.5)#79 14.5% (+26.2)#3,599
80. Rainbow City 40.4% 15.2% (+25.1)#80 14.5% (+25.9)#3,652
81. Nazlini 40.0% 15.2% (+24.8)#81 14.5% (+25.5)#3,712
82. Douglas 39.9% 15.2% (+24.7)#82 14.5% (+25.4)#3,777
83. Tees Toh 39.4% 15.2% (+24.2)#83 14.5% (+24.9)#3,838
84. Teec Nos Pos 38.5% 15.2% (+23.2)#84 14.5% (+24.0)#3,964
85. Hotevilla Bacavi 38.1% 15.2% (+22.9)#85 14.5% (+23.6)#4,030
86. Shonto 38.1% 15.2% (+22.9)#86 14.5% (+23.6)#4,037
87. Mcnary 38.0% 15.2% (+22.8)#87 14.5% (+23.5)#4,053
88. Lake Of The Woods 37.9% 15.2% (+22.7)#88 14.5% (+23.4)#4,062
89. Blackwater 37.9% 15.2% (+22.7)#89 14.5% (+23.4)#4,066
90. Pirtleville 37.7% 15.2% (+22.5)#90 14.5% (+23.2)#4,087
91. Nogales 37.2% 15.2% (+22.0)#91 14.5% (+22.7)#4,193
92. First Mesa 36.0% 15.2% (+20.8)#92 14.5% (+21.5)#4,401
93. Thatcher 36.0% 15.2% (+20.8)#93 14.5% (+21.5)#4,407
94. Guadalupe 35.8% 15.2% (+20.6)#94 14.5% (+21.3)#4,432
95. Casa Blanca 35.5% 15.2% (+20.3)#95 14.5% (+21.0)#4,494
96. Gila Crossing 35.4% 15.2% (+20.2)#96 14.5% (+20.9)#4,515
97. Summit 34.9% 15.2% (+19.7)#97 14.5% (+20.4)#4,608
98. Kaibab 34.8% 15.2% (+19.6)#98 14.5% (+20.3)#4,635
99. Moenkopi 34.1% 15.2% (+18.9)#99 14.5% (+19.7)#4,734
100. Shongopovi 33.3% 15.2% (+18.1)#100 14.5% (+18.8)#4,861

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Arizona?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Arizona are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Arizona?
Rio Verde has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Arizona with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in the State of Arizona?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Arizona is 15.2%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in the United States is 14.5%.