Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Georgia

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Female 25-34
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Georgia
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Georgia

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Georgia Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Georgia

City Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. Edison 100.0% 16.1% (+83.9)#1 14.5% (+85.5)#56
2. Collins 100.0% 16.1% (+83.9)#2 14.5% (+85.5)#162
3. Leslie 100.0% 16.1% (+83.9)#3 14.5% (+85.5)#180
4. Midville 100.0% 16.1% (+83.9)#4 14.5% (+85.5)#212
5. Mineral Bluff 100.0% 16.1% (+83.9)#5 14.5% (+85.5)#241
6. Morganton 100.0% 16.1% (+83.9)#6 14.5% (+85.5)#289
7. Wenona 100.0% 16.1% (+83.9)#7 14.5% (+85.5)#345
8. Kite 100.0% 16.1% (+83.9)#8 14.5% (+85.5)#367
9. Nunez 100.0% 16.1% (+83.9)#9 14.5% (+85.5)#409
10. Rayle 100.0% 16.1% (+83.9)#10 14.5% (+85.5)#413
11. Du Pont 100.0% 16.1% (+83.9)#11 14.5% (+85.5)#452
12. De Soto 100.0% 16.1% (+83.9)#12 14.5% (+85.5)#606
13. Sharon 100.0% 16.1% (+83.9)#13 14.5% (+85.5)#647
14. Sky Valley 95.0% 16.1% (+78.9)#14 14.5% (+80.5)#705
15. Roberta 91.5% 16.1% (+75.4)#15 14.5% (+77.0)#721
16. Bronwood 88.9% 16.1% (+72.8)#16 14.5% (+74.4)#750
17. Surrency 83.3% 16.1% (+67.3)#17 14.5% (+68.8)#851
18. Lexington 82.9% 16.1% (+66.8)#18 14.5% (+68.4)#864
19. Eulonia 82.3% 16.1% (+66.2)#19 14.5% (+67.8)#872
20. Gibson 81.8% 16.1% (+65.7)#20 14.5% (+67.3)#882
21. Enigma 81.6% 16.1% (+65.6)#21 14.5% (+67.1)#888
22. Jakin 81.2% 16.1% (+65.2)#22 14.5% (+66.8)#899
23. Ambrose 81.0% 16.1% (+64.9)#23 14.5% (+66.5)#901
24. Gumbranch 80.0% 16.1% (+63.9)#24 14.5% (+65.5)#918
25. Buckhead 80.0% 16.1% (+63.9)#25 14.5% (+65.5)#930
26. Warm Springs 78.9% 16.1% (+62.9)#26 14.5% (+64.5)#956
27. Faceville 76.9% 16.1% (+60.9)#27 14.5% (+62.4)#1,022
28. Abbeville 76.8% 16.1% (+60.7)#28 14.5% (+62.3)#1,024
29. Gordon 76.3% 16.1% (+60.2)#29 14.5% (+61.8)#1,036
30. Danville 75.0% 16.1% (+58.9)#30 14.5% (+60.5)#1,073
31. Shellman 74.2% 16.1% (+58.1)#31 14.5% (+59.7)#1,089
32. Buena Vista 74.0% 16.1% (+57.9)#32 14.5% (+59.5)#1,092
33. Warrenton 72.4% 16.1% (+56.3)#33 14.5% (+57.9)#1,140
34. Lake Park 72.1% 16.1% (+56.0)#34 14.5% (+57.6)#1,146
35. Millen 72.0% 16.1% (+55.9)#35 14.5% (+57.5)#1,148
36. Hephzibah 69.6% 16.1% (+53.6)#36 14.5% (+55.1)#1,233
37. Plainville 69.5% 16.1% (+53.4)#37 14.5% (+55.0)#1,239
38. Dutch Island 69.3% 16.1% (+53.2)#38 14.5% (+54.8)#1,243
39. Molena 69.0% 16.1% (+52.9)#39 14.5% (+54.5)#1,258
40. Nicholls 68.3% 16.1% (+52.2)#40 14.5% (+53.8)#1,280
41. Graham 66.7% 16.1% (+50.6)#41 14.5% (+52.2)#1,349
42. Arabi 66.7% 16.1% (+50.6)#42 14.5% (+52.2)#1,350
43. Sasser 66.7% 16.1% (+50.6)#43 14.5% (+52.2)#1,366
44. Norwood 66.7% 16.1% (+50.6)#44 14.5% (+52.2)#1,377
45. Haralson 66.7% 16.1% (+50.6)#45 14.5% (+52.2)#1,380
46. Jacksonville 66.7% 16.1% (+50.6)#46 14.5% (+52.2)#1,408
47. Soperton 66.3% 16.1% (+50.2)#47 14.5% (+51.8)#1,431
48. Hazlehurst 65.5% 16.1% (+49.4)#48 14.5% (+51.0)#1,460
49. Meigs 65.2% 16.1% (+49.1)#49 14.5% (+50.7)#1,470
50. Woodbury 65.0% 16.1% (+48.9)#50 14.5% (+50.5)#1,477
51. Oliver 60.9% 16.1% (+44.8)#51 14.5% (+46.4)#1,658
52. Claxton 60.4% 16.1% (+44.3)#52 14.5% (+45.9)#1,673
53. Cobbtown 59.1% 16.1% (+43.0)#53 14.5% (+44.6)#1,761
54. Unionville 59.0% 16.1% (+42.9)#54 14.5% (+44.5)#1,764
55. Canon 59.0% 16.1% (+42.9)#55 14.5% (+44.5)#1,770
56. East Ellijay 58.7% 16.1% (+42.6)#56 14.5% (+44.2)#1,796
57. Comer 58.4% 16.1% (+42.3)#57 14.5% (+43.9)#1,806
58. Pineview 58.1% 16.1% (+42.0)#58 14.5% (+43.6)#1,837
59. Cordele 57.9% 16.1% (+41.9)#59 14.5% (+43.4)#1,843
60. Quitman 57.9% 16.1% (+41.8)#60 14.5% (+43.4)#1,845
61. Tignall 57.9% 16.1% (+41.8)#61 14.5% (+43.4)#1,847
62. Mendes 57.9% 16.1% (+41.8)#62 14.5% (+43.4)#1,853
63. Blairsville 57.8% 16.1% (+41.7)#63 14.5% (+43.3)#1,855
64. Bowdon 57.6% 16.1% (+41.5)#64 14.5% (+43.1)#1,866
65. Byromville 57.1% 16.1% (+41.1)#65 14.5% (+42.6)#1,886
66. Newton 57.1% 16.1% (+41.1)#66 14.5% (+42.6)#1,888
67. Alma 57.0% 16.1% (+41.0)#67 14.5% (+42.6)#1,915
68. Fort Valley 56.9% 16.1% (+40.8)#68 14.5% (+42.4)#1,922
69. Fort Gaines 55.6% 16.1% (+39.5)#69 14.5% (+41.1)#1,994
70. Manchester 55.0% 16.1% (+38.9)#70 14.5% (+40.5)#2,050
71. Daisy 55.0% 16.1% (+38.9)#71 14.5% (+40.5)#2,058
72. Monroe 54.3% 16.1% (+38.2)#72 14.5% (+39.8)#2,119
73. Louisville 54.3% 16.1% (+38.2)#73 14.5% (+39.8)#2,120
74. Jasper 54.3% 16.1% (+38.2)#74 14.5% (+39.8)#2,122
75. Experiment 53.8% 16.1% (+37.8)#75 14.5% (+39.4)#2,142
76. Trenton 53.8% 16.1% (+37.8)#76 14.5% (+39.4)#2,143
77. Butler 53.7% 16.1% (+37.7)#77 14.5% (+39.2)#2,160
78. Cadwell 52.9% 16.1% (+36.9)#78 14.5% (+38.4)#2,223
79. West Point 52.3% 16.1% (+36.2)#79 14.5% (+37.8)#2,276
80. Sparks 52.0% 16.1% (+35.9)#80 14.5% (+37.5)#2,295
81. Morven 51.4% 16.1% (+35.3)#81 14.5% (+36.9)#2,339
82. Fairmount 51.1% 16.1% (+35.0)#82 14.5% (+36.6)#2,348
83. Oak Park 51.1% 16.1% (+35.0)#83 14.5% (+36.6)#2,353
84. Broxton 50.9% 16.1% (+34.8)#84 14.5% (+36.4)#2,363
85. Waco 50.6% 16.1% (+34.5)#85 14.5% (+36.1)#2,377
86. Thomaston 50.3% 16.1% (+34.2)#86 14.5% (+35.8)#2,393
87. Pelham 50.3% 16.1% (+34.2)#87 14.5% (+35.8)#2,395
88. Pearson 50.0% 16.1% (+33.9)#88 14.5% (+35.5)#2,405
89. Ray City 50.0% 16.1% (+33.9)#89 14.5% (+35.5)#2,422
90. Coolidge 50.0% 16.1% (+33.9)#90 14.5% (+35.5)#2,436
91. Pavo 50.0% 16.1% (+33.9)#91 14.5% (+35.5)#2,439
92. Helen 50.0% 16.1% (+33.9)#92 14.5% (+35.5)#2,452
93. Stapleton 50.0% 16.1% (+33.9)#93 14.5% (+35.5)#2,467
94. Rentz 50.0% 16.1% (+33.9)#94 14.5% (+35.5)#2,499
95. Ranger 50.0% 16.1% (+33.9)#95 14.5% (+35.5)#2,586
96. Cleveland 49.8% 16.1% (+33.7)#96 14.5% (+35.3)#2,594
97. Dawson 49.7% 16.1% (+33.6)#97 14.5% (+35.2)#2,601
98. Fitzgerald 48.4% 16.1% (+32.4)#98 14.5% (+33.9)#2,678
99. Sylvester 48.2% 16.1% (+32.1)#99 14.5% (+33.7)#2,694
100. Stillmore 48.1% 16.1% (+32.1)#100 14.5% (+33.7)#2,698

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Georgia?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Georgia are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Georgia?
Edison has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Georgia with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in the State of Georgia?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Georgia is 16.1%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in the United States is 14.5%.