Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Iowa

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Female 25-34
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Iowa
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Iowa

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Iowa Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Iowa

City Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. Holiday Lake 100.0% 13.6% (+86.4)#1 14.5% (+85.5)#240
2. Little Sioux 100.0% 13.6% (+86.4)#2 14.5% (+85.5)#390
3. Osterdock 100.0% 13.6% (+86.4)#3 14.5% (+85.5)#433
4. Bridgewater 100.0% 13.6% (+86.4)#4 14.5% (+85.5)#510
5. St Anthony 100.0% 13.6% (+86.4)#5 14.5% (+85.5)#569
6. Toronto 100.0% 13.6% (+86.4)#6 14.5% (+85.5)#588
7. Coburg 100.0% 13.6% (+86.4)#7 14.5% (+85.5)#651
8. Cotter 100.0% 13.6% (+86.4)#8 14.5% (+85.5)#689
9. Henderson 90.9% 13.6% (+77.4)#9 14.5% (+76.4)#731
10. Kirkville 88.9% 13.6% (+75.3)#10 14.5% (+74.4)#751
11. Woodburn 87.5% 13.6% (+73.9)#11 14.5% (+73.0)#777
12. Alexander 83.3% 13.6% (+69.8)#12 14.5% (+68.8)#856
13. Fredonia 82.5% 13.6% (+68.9)#13 14.5% (+68.0)#869
14. Ferguson 81.8% 13.6% (+68.3)#14 14.5% (+67.3)#886
15. Andover 76.9% 13.6% (+63.4)#15 14.5% (+62.4)#1,023
16. Bradgate 75.0% 13.6% (+61.4)#16 14.5% (+60.5)#1,077
17. Meservey 73.7% 13.6% (+60.1)#17 14.5% (+59.2)#1,102
18. Lansing 71.8% 13.6% (+58.2)#18 14.5% (+57.3)#1,154
19. Prairieburg 71.4% 13.6% (+57.9)#19 14.5% (+56.9)#1,175
20. Calumet 71.4% 13.6% (+57.9)#20 14.5% (+56.9)#1,176
21. Maysville 70.6% 13.6% (+57.0)#21 14.5% (+56.1)#1,201
22. Ireton 66.7% 13.6% (+53.1)#22 14.5% (+52.2)#1,353
23. Burr Oak 66.7% 13.6% (+53.1)#23 14.5% (+52.2)#1,381
24. Wadena 63.6% 13.6% (+50.1)#24 14.5% (+49.1)#1,525
25. Hillsboro 63.6% 13.6% (+50.1)#25 14.5% (+49.1)#1,530
26. Oakville 61.5% 13.6% (+48.0)#26 14.5% (+47.0)#1,635
27. Grandview 60.0% 13.6% (+46.4)#27 14.5% (+45.5)#1,693
28. Grant 60.0% 13.6% (+46.4)#28 14.5% (+45.5)#1,726
29. Lehigh 58.3% 13.6% (+44.8)#29 14.5% (+43.8)#1,814
30. Lorimor 58.3% 13.6% (+44.8)#30 14.5% (+43.8)#1,816
31. Hancock 58.3% 13.6% (+44.8)#31 14.5% (+43.8)#1,819
32. Cushing 57.1% 13.6% (+43.6)#32 14.5% (+42.6)#1,902
33. Rake 57.1% 13.6% (+43.6)#33 14.5% (+42.6)#1,907
34. Burchinal 57.1% 13.6% (+43.6)#34 14.5% (+42.6)#1,913
35. What Cheer 56.0% 13.6% (+42.4)#35 14.5% (+41.5)#1,975
36. St Marys 55.6% 13.6% (+42.0)#36 14.5% (+41.1)#2,010
37. Allison 54.7% 13.6% (+41.2)#37 14.5% (+40.2)#2,075
38. Union 52.9% 13.6% (+39.4)#38 14.5% (+38.4)#2,227
39. Estherville 52.8% 13.6% (+39.2)#39 14.5% (+38.3)#2,238
40. Postville 52.2% 13.6% (+38.7)#40 14.5% (+37.7)#2,277
41. Farmersburg 50.0% 13.6% (+36.4)#41 14.5% (+35.5)#2,466
42. Bayard 50.0% 13.6% (+36.4)#42 14.5% (+35.5)#2,469
43. Quimby 50.0% 13.6% (+36.4)#43 14.5% (+35.5)#2,477
44. Steamboat Rock 50.0% 13.6% (+36.4)#44 14.5% (+35.5)#2,506
45. Cincinnati 50.0% 13.6% (+36.4)#45 14.5% (+35.5)#2,513
46. Davis City 50.0% 13.6% (+36.4)#46 14.5% (+35.5)#2,516
47. Harcourt 50.0% 13.6% (+36.4)#47 14.5% (+35.5)#2,522
48. Panorama Park 50.0% 13.6% (+36.4)#48 14.5% (+35.5)#2,554
49. Unionville 50.0% 13.6% (+36.4)#49 14.5% (+35.5)#2,564
50. Promise City 50.0% 13.6% (+36.4)#50 14.5% (+35.5)#2,580
51. Mondamin 47.4% 13.6% (+33.8)#51 14.5% (+32.9)#2,773
52. Kimballton 47.4% 13.6% (+33.8)#52 14.5% (+32.9)#2,780
53. Soldier 46.7% 13.6% (+33.1)#53 14.5% (+32.2)#2,864
54. Thor 46.2% 13.6% (+32.6)#54 14.5% (+31.7)#2,923
55. Hazleton 45.8% 13.6% (+32.3)#55 14.5% (+31.3)#2,950
56. West Chester 45.5% 13.6% (+31.9)#56 14.5% (+31.0)#2,996
57. Moorland 44.4% 13.6% (+30.9)#57 14.5% (+30.0)#3,130
58. Bloomfield 44.3% 13.6% (+30.7)#58 14.5% (+29.8)#3,143
59. Eddyville 44.0% 13.6% (+30.5)#59 14.5% (+29.5)#3,160
60. Albert City 43.8% 13.6% (+30.2)#60 14.5% (+29.3)#3,190
61. Bancroft 43.3% 13.6% (+29.8)#61 14.5% (+28.8)#3,250
62. Calmar 43.2% 13.6% (+29.7)#62 14.5% (+28.7)#3,261
63. Brooklyn 43.0% 13.6% (+29.4)#63 14.5% (+28.5)#3,282
64. Dayton 42.9% 13.6% (+29.3)#64 14.5% (+28.4)#3,295
65. Wyoming 42.9% 13.6% (+29.3)#65 14.5% (+28.4)#3,302
66. Gravity 42.9% 13.6% (+29.3)#66 14.5% (+28.4)#3,332
67. Castalia 42.9% 13.6% (+29.3)#67 14.5% (+28.4)#3,336
68. Burt 42.4% 13.6% (+28.9)#68 14.5% (+27.9)#3,374
69. Granville 41.7% 13.6% (+28.1)#69 14.5% (+27.2)#3,466
70. Marquette 41.5% 13.6% (+27.9)#70 14.5% (+27.0)#3,495
71. Rolfe 41.2% 13.6% (+27.6)#71 14.5% (+26.7)#3,532
72. Kellogg 41.2% 13.6% (+27.6)#72 14.5% (+26.7)#3,533
73. Moorhead 40.9% 13.6% (+27.4)#73 14.5% (+26.4)#3,581
74. Melcher Dallas 40.7% 13.6% (+27.2)#74 14.5% (+26.2)#3,592
75. Centerville 40.0% 13.6% (+26.4)#75 14.5% (+25.5)#3,679
76. Churdan 40.0% 13.6% (+26.4)#76 14.5% (+25.5)#3,708
77. Pisgah 40.0% 13.6% (+26.4)#77 14.5% (+25.5)#3,734
78. Bristow 40.0% 13.6% (+26.4)#78 14.5% (+25.5)#3,750
79. Coppock 40.0% 13.6% (+26.4)#79 14.5% (+25.5)#3,774
80. Exira 39.4% 13.6% (+25.8)#80 14.5% (+24.9)#3,832
81. Armstrong 39.4% 13.6% (+25.8)#81 14.5% (+24.9)#3,833
82. Allerton 39.3% 13.6% (+25.7)#82 14.5% (+24.8)#3,849
83. Oxford Junction 38.9% 13.6% (+25.3)#83 14.5% (+24.4)#3,914
84. Milton 38.9% 13.6% (+25.3)#84 14.5% (+24.4)#3,915
85. Toledo 38.8% 13.6% (+25.2)#85 14.5% (+24.3)#3,932
86. Dow City 38.5% 13.6% (+24.9)#86 14.5% (+24.0)#3,973
87. Brighton 38.3% 13.6% (+24.7)#87 14.5% (+23.8)#4,003
88. Atlantic 38.1% 13.6% (+24.6)#88 14.5% (+23.6)#4,024
89. Batavia 38.1% 13.6% (+24.5)#89 14.5% (+23.6)#4,032
90. Farmington 37.5% 13.6% (+23.9)#90 14.5% (+23.0)#4,119
91. Orient 37.5% 13.6% (+23.9)#91 14.5% (+23.0)#4,126
92. Renwick 37.5% 13.6% (+23.9)#92 14.5% (+23.0)#4,140
93. Luana 37.5% 13.6% (+23.9)#93 14.5% (+23.0)#4,143
94. Garden Grove 37.5% 13.6% (+23.9)#94 14.5% (+23.0)#4,149
95. Keystone 36.9% 13.6% (+23.3)#95 14.5% (+22.4)#4,226
96. Blakesburg 36.8% 13.6% (+23.3)#96 14.5% (+22.3)#4,243
97. Havelock 36.4% 13.6% (+22.8)#97 14.5% (+21.9)#4,340
98. Sibley 36.3% 13.6% (+22.7)#98 14.5% (+21.8)#4,350
99. Lakeside 36.2% 13.6% (+22.7)#99 14.5% (+21.7)#4,369
100. Oelwein 36.1% 13.6% (+22.5)#100 14.5% (+21.6)#4,389

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Iowa?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Iowa are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
90.9%
#10
88.9%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Iowa?
Holiday Lake has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Iowa with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in the State of Iowa?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Iowa is 13.6%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in the United States is 14.5%.