Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Arizona

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Administrative & Support Services
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Arizona
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Arizona

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Arizona Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Arizona

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Flowing Springs 100.0% 5.4% (+94.6)#1 4.1% (+95.9)#6
2. Freedom Acres 59.3% 5.4% (+53.9)#2 4.1% (+55.1)#33
3. Oljato Monument Valley 54.5% 5.4% (+49.2)#3 4.1% (+50.4)#41
4. Wittmann 52.0% 5.4% (+46.6)#4 4.1% (+47.8)#51
5. East Globe 43.0% 5.4% (+37.7)#5 4.1% (+38.9)#85
6. Bouse 32.2% 5.4% (+26.8)#6 4.1% (+28.0)#153
7. Sonoita 29.2% 5.4% (+23.9)#7 4.1% (+25.1)#201
8. Munds Park 26.4% 5.4% (+21.1)#8 4.1% (+22.3)#250
9. Dudleyville 26.4% 5.4% (+21.0)#9 4.1% (+22.2)#252
10. Carrizo 24.3% 5.4% (+19.0)#10 4.1% (+20.2)#304
11. Arizona Village 23.7% 5.4% (+18.4)#11 4.1% (+19.6)#316
12. J-Six Ranchettes 23.7% 5.4% (+18.4)#12 4.1% (+19.6)#317
13. Spring Valley 22.0% 5.4% (+16.6)#13 4.1% (+17.8)#376
14. Elfrida 21.9% 5.4% (+16.5)#14 4.1% (+17.7)#381
15. Winkelman 21.7% 5.4% (+16.4)#15 4.1% (+17.6)#384
16. Arlington 21.2% 5.4% (+15.8)#16 4.1% (+17.0)#402
17. Gila Crossing 20.5% 5.4% (+15.1)#17 4.1% (+16.3)#424
18. Maricopa Colony 19.7% 5.4% (+14.4)#18 4.1% (+15.6)#454
19. Hotevilla Bacavi 18.4% 5.4% (+13.0)#19 4.1% (+14.2)#514
20. Stanfield 18.1% 5.4% (+12.7)#20 4.1% (+13.9)#539
21. Solomon 16.5% 5.4% (+11.2)#21 4.1% (+12.4)#647
22. Quartzsite 16.3% 5.4% (+10.9)#22 4.1% (+12.1)#665
23. Ash Fork 16.0% 5.4% (+10.6)#23 4.1% (+11.9)#684
24. Steamboat 15.5% 5.4% (+10.1)#24 4.1% (+11.3)#741
25. Mayer 15.2% 5.4% (+9.80)#25 4.1% (+11.0)#775
26. Round Valley 14.4% 5.4% (+9.05)#26 4.1% (+10.3)#882
27. Stotonic Village 14.3% 5.4% (+8.93)#27 4.1% (+10.1)#899
28. Catalina 13.9% 5.4% (+8.54)#28 4.1% (+9.74)#959
29. Flowing Wells 13.6% 5.4% (+8.27)#29 4.1% (+9.47)#1,013
30. Patagonia 13.3% 5.4% (+7.94)#30 4.1% (+9.14)#1,066
31. Sedona 12.8% 5.4% (+7.48)#31 4.1% (+8.69)#1,147
32. Peach Springs 12.6% 5.4% (+7.27)#32 4.1% (+8.47)#1,189
33. Red Mesa 12.6% 5.4% (+7.21)#33 4.1% (+8.42)#1,196
34. Gila Bend 12.2% 5.4% (+6.85)#34 4.1% (+8.06)#1,267
35. Guadalupe 12.1% 5.4% (+6.77)#35 4.1% (+7.97)#1,281
36. Summit 12.1% 5.4% (+6.72)#36 4.1% (+7.92)#1,296
37. South Tucson 11.1% 5.4% (+5.79)#37 4.1% (+7.00)#1,504
38. Centennial Park 11.1% 5.4% (+5.74)#38 4.1% (+6.94)#1,529
39. Tolleson 11.0% 5.4% (+5.67)#39 4.1% (+6.87)#1,547
40. Cactus Flats 10.8% 5.4% (+5.49)#40 4.1% (+6.70)#1,603
41. Tolani Lake 10.7% 5.4% (+5.30)#41 4.1% (+6.50)#1,649
42. Beaver Dam 10.1% 5.4% (+4.77)#42 4.1% (+5.97)#1,850
43. Lechee 9.4% 5.4% (+4.06)#43 4.1% (+5.27)#2,155
44. Arizona City 9.3% 5.4% (+3.92)#44 4.1% (+5.12)#2,230
45. Poston 9.2% 5.4% (+3.88)#45 4.1% (+5.08)#2,248
46. Coolidge 8.9% 5.4% (+3.59)#46 4.1% (+4.80)#2,405
47. Avra Valley 8.6% 5.4% (+3.29)#47 4.1% (+4.50)#2,589
48. Tombstone 8.6% 5.4% (+3.29)#48 4.1% (+4.49)#2,590
49. Tucson Estates 8.6% 5.4% (+3.28)#49 4.1% (+4.48)#2,594
50. Sacaton 8.5% 5.4% (+3.13)#50 4.1% (+4.34)#2,689
51. San Manuel 8.2% 5.4% (+2.86)#51 4.1% (+4.07)#2,863
52. El Mirage 8.0% 5.4% (+2.68)#52 4.1% (+3.88)#2,971
53. Ajo 7.9% 5.4% (+2.54)#53 4.1% (+3.74)#3,068
54. Apache Junction 7.9% 5.4% (+2.51)#54 4.1% (+3.71)#3,106
55. Douglas 7.8% 5.4% (+2.45)#55 4.1% (+3.66)#3,139
56. Central Heights Midland City 7.7% 5.4% (+2.32)#56 4.1% (+3.52)#3,247
57. Fortuna Foothills 7.6% 5.4% (+2.28)#57 4.1% (+3.48)#3,287
58. Shongopovi 7.6% 5.4% (+2.27)#58 4.1% (+3.48)#3,289
59. Safford 7.6% 5.4% (+2.23)#59 4.1% (+3.43)#3,317
60. Grand Canyon Village 7.6% 5.4% (+2.21)#60 4.1% (+3.41)#3,331
61. Youngtown 7.5% 5.4% (+2.15)#61 4.1% (+3.36)#3,385
62. Aguila 7.5% 5.4% (+2.13)#62 4.1% (+3.33)#3,414
63. Swift Trail Junction 7.4% 5.4% (+2.07)#63 4.1% (+3.27)#3,478
64. Leupp 7.4% 5.4% (+2.03)#64 4.1% (+3.23)#3,516
65. Picture Rocks 7.4% 5.4% (+2.01)#65 4.1% (+3.22)#3,529
66. Cave Creek 7.3% 5.4% (+1.93)#66 4.1% (+3.13)#3,609
67. Casa Blanca 7.3% 5.4% (+1.90)#67 4.1% (+3.11)#3,621
68. Huachuca City 7.1% 5.4% (+1.70)#68 4.1% (+2.90)#3,851
69. Houck 7.0% 5.4% (+1.67)#69 4.1% (+2.87)#3,888
70. Cottonwood 7.0% 5.4% (+1.66)#70 4.1% (+2.87)#3,896
71. Willcox 6.9% 5.4% (+1.55)#71 4.1% (+2.76)#3,982
72. Pirtleville 6.9% 5.4% (+1.55)#72 4.1% (+2.75)#3,984
73. Dilkon 6.9% 5.4% (+1.51)#73 4.1% (+2.71)#4,029
74. Mescal 6.8% 5.4% (+1.44)#74 4.1% (+2.65)#4,098
75. Phoenix 6.6% 5.4% (+1.26)#75 4.1% (+2.47)#4,293
76. Sun City 6.6% 5.4% (+1.26)#76 4.1% (+2.46)#4,304
77. Prescott Valley 6.6% 5.4% (+1.25)#77 4.1% (+2.45)#4,316
78. Wall Lane 6.5% 5.4% (+1.13)#78 4.1% (+2.33)#4,464
79. Parks 6.5% 5.4% (+1.11)#79 4.1% (+2.31)#4,480
80. Glendale 6.4% 5.4% (+1.09)#80 4.1% (+2.29)#4,513
81. Tucson 6.3% 5.4% (+0.962)#81 4.1% (+2.17)#4,673
82. Mesa 6.2% 5.4% (+0.842)#82 4.1% (+2.05)#4,843
83. Drexel Heights 6.2% 5.4% (+0.836)#83 4.1% (+2.04)#4,850
84. Ak Chin Village 6.2% 5.4% (+0.800)#84 4.1% (+2.00)#4,899
85. Fountain Hills 6.1% 5.4% (+0.732)#85 4.1% (+1.94)#4,997
86. Wheatfields 6.1% 5.4% (+0.729)#86 4.1% (+1.93)#5,002
87. Bisbee 6.1% 5.4% (+0.726)#87 4.1% (+1.93)#5,006
88. Superior 6.0% 5.4% (+0.679)#88 4.1% (+1.88)#5,088
89. Wickenburg 6.0% 5.4% (+0.672)#89 4.1% (+1.88)#5,099
90. Sun Lakes 6.0% 5.4% (+0.606)#90 4.1% (+1.81)#5,210
91. Duncan 5.7% 5.4% (+0.360)#91 4.1% (+1.56)#5,594
92. Valencia West 5.6% 5.4% (+0.255)#92 4.1% (+1.46)#5,781
93. Three Points 5.6% 5.4% (+0.221)#93 4.1% (+1.43)#5,844
94. Naco 5.6% 5.4% (+0.215)#94 4.1% (+1.42)#5,856
95. Eloy 5.5% 5.4% (+0.188)#95 4.1% (+1.39)#5,911
96. Sanders 5.5% 5.4% (+0.154)#96 4.1% (+1.36)#5,976
97. Williams 5.5% 5.4% (+0.143)#97 4.1% (+1.35)#6,008
98. Shonto 5.5% 5.4% (+0.125)#98 4.1% (+1.33)#6,047
99. Miami 5.5% 5.4% (+0.108)#99 4.1% (+1.31)#6,072
100. Verde Village 5.4% 5.4% (+0.081)#100 4.1% (+1.29)#6,122

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Arizona?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Arizona are:
#1
100.0%
#2
59.3%
#3
54.5%
#4
52.0%
#5
43.0%
#6
32.2%
#7
29.2%
#8
26.4%
#9
26.4%
#10
24.3%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Arizona?
Flowing Springs has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Arizona with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the State of Arizona?
Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Arizona is 5.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the United States is 4.1%.