Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Texas

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Administrative & Support Services
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Texas
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Texas

0.0%
60.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Texas Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Texas

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Green Valley Farms 53.0% 4.4% (+48.6)#1 4.1% (+48.8)#47
2. Cedar Point 50.9% 4.4% (+46.5)#2 4.1% (+46.8)#55
3. Lozano 44.5% 4.4% (+40.1)#3 4.1% (+40.4)#80
4. Perrin 41.3% 4.4% (+36.9)#4 4.1% (+37.2)#98
5. Fifth Street 38.3% 4.4% (+33.9)#5 4.1% (+34.2)#115
6. South Toledo Bend 37.7% 4.4% (+33.3)#6 4.1% (+33.6)#118
7. Lakeview 34.6% 4.4% (+30.2)#7 4.1% (+30.5)#129
8. Butterfield 33.8% 4.4% (+29.4)#8 4.1% (+29.6)#137
9. Amistad 32.4% 4.4% (+28.0)#9 4.1% (+28.3)#150
10. Edroy 31.4% 4.4% (+26.9)#10 4.1% (+27.2)#166
11. Sun Valley 29.5% 4.4% (+25.1)#11 4.1% (+25.4)#190
12. Loma Vista 29.5% 4.4% (+25.1)#12 4.1% (+25.3)#193
13. San Carlos I 29.4% 4.4% (+25.0)#13 4.1% (+25.3)#194
14. Trent 28.8% 4.4% (+24.4)#14 4.1% (+24.7)#210
15. Wildwood 28.7% 4.4% (+24.3)#15 4.1% (+24.5)#213
16. Sandia 28.1% 4.4% (+23.6)#16 4.1% (+23.9)#223
17. Union Grove 26.6% 4.4% (+22.2)#17 4.1% (+22.4)#247
18. Thunderbird Bay 25.3% 4.4% (+20.8)#18 4.1% (+21.1)#270
19. Kingsbury 23.5% 4.4% (+19.1)#19 4.1% (+19.4)#324
20. Myrtle Springs 22.7% 4.4% (+18.3)#20 4.1% (+18.6)#354
21. Cape Royale 22.4% 4.4% (+18.0)#21 4.1% (+18.2)#362
22. Rowena 22.1% 4.4% (+17.7)#22 4.1% (+18.0)#371
23. Granjeno 21.6% 4.4% (+17.2)#23 4.1% (+17.5)#388
24. Villa Pancho 21.3% 4.4% (+16.9)#24 4.1% (+17.2)#398
25. Palisades 21.2% 4.4% (+16.8)#25 4.1% (+17.1)#400
26. Hilltop Lakes 20.9% 4.4% (+16.5)#26 4.1% (+16.8)#409
27. Sargent 20.8% 4.4% (+16.3)#27 4.1% (+16.6)#413
28. San Felipe 20.3% 4.4% (+15.8)#28 4.1% (+16.1)#430
29. Tilden 19.5% 4.4% (+15.1)#29 4.1% (+15.3)#462
30. Ranchitos East 19.4% 4.4% (+14.9)#30 4.1% (+15.2)#468
31. Las Lomitas 19.4% 4.4% (+14.9)#31 4.1% (+15.2)#471
32. Western Lake 18.7% 4.4% (+14.3)#32 4.1% (+14.6)#500
33. Browndell 18.5% 4.4% (+14.1)#33 4.1% (+14.4)#504
34. Bloomington 18.3% 4.4% (+13.8)#34 4.1% (+14.1)#522
35. Campo Verde 18.2% 4.4% (+13.8)#35 4.1% (+14.1)#526
36. Emhouse 17.9% 4.4% (+13.5)#36 4.1% (+13.8)#547
37. Scissors 17.8% 4.4% (+13.4)#37 4.1% (+13.6)#555
38. Rosharon 17.7% 4.4% (+13.3)#38 4.1% (+13.6)#558
39. Kempner 17.7% 4.4% (+13.3)#39 4.1% (+13.6)#559
40. Latexo 17.6% 4.4% (+13.2)#40 4.1% (+13.5)#564
41. Porter Heights 17.5% 4.4% (+13.1)#41 4.1% (+13.3)#577
42. Von Ormy 16.7% 4.4% (+12.3)#42 4.1% (+12.6)#627
43. E Lopez 16.2% 4.4% (+11.8)#43 4.1% (+12.1)#672
44. Tool 16.2% 4.4% (+11.7)#44 4.1% (+12.0)#675
45. Hilltop Cdp Frio County 15.9% 4.4% (+11.5)#45 4.1% (+11.8)#691
46. Yancey 15.9% 4.4% (+11.5)#46 4.1% (+11.8)#692
47. Bruni 15.8% 4.4% (+11.4)#47 4.1% (+11.7)#696
48. Austwell 15.8% 4.4% (+11.4)#48 4.1% (+11.6)#701
49. Preston 15.7% 4.4% (+11.3)#49 4.1% (+11.6)#705
50. Los Indios 15.6% 4.4% (+11.2)#50 4.1% (+11.4)#725
51. Plum Grove 15.4% 4.4% (+11.0)#51 4.1% (+11.3)#746
52. Cade Lakes 15.1% 4.4% (+10.7)#52 4.1% (+10.9)#782
53. Skidmore 15.1% 4.4% (+10.7)#53 4.1% (+10.9)#784
54. Sunrise Shores 15.0% 4.4% (+10.5)#54 4.1% (+10.8)#795
55. Lingleville 14.9% 4.4% (+10.5)#55 4.1% (+10.8)#805
56. Jolly 14.9% 4.4% (+10.4)#56 4.1% (+10.7)#816
57. Fort Davis 14.8% 4.4% (+10.4)#57 4.1% (+10.7)#826
58. Sandy Point 14.6% 4.4% (+10.2)#58 4.1% (+10.5)#845
59. Cottonwood Shores 14.6% 4.4% (+10.2)#59 4.1% (+10.5)#848
60. Milam 14.6% 4.4% (+10.2)#60 4.1% (+10.4)#852
61. Rosanky 14.4% 4.4% (+10.00)#61 4.1% (+10.3)#880
62. Wellman 14.4% 4.4% (+10.00)#62 4.1% (+10.3)#881
63. Indian Lake 14.4% 4.4% (+9.94)#63 4.1% (+10.2)#891
64. Roby 14.2% 4.4% (+9.74)#64 4.1% (+10.0)#919
65. Morning Glory 14.1% 4.4% (+9.71)#65 4.1% (+9.98)#926
66. Charlotte 14.1% 4.4% (+9.68)#66 4.1% (+9.95)#932
67. Beauxart Gardens 14.0% 4.4% (+9.61)#67 4.1% (+9.87)#941
68. La Tina Ranch 14.0% 4.4% (+9.57)#68 4.1% (+9.83)#946
69. Road Runner 13.7% 4.4% (+9.31)#69 4.1% (+9.58)#988
70. Macdona 13.7% 4.4% (+9.31)#70 4.1% (+9.58)#989
71. Solis 13.7% 4.4% (+9.28)#71 4.1% (+9.55)#995
72. Manchaca 13.7% 4.4% (+9.27)#72 4.1% (+9.54)#996
73. Bolivar Peninsula 13.7% 4.4% (+9.25)#73 4.1% (+9.51)#1,000
74. Lasara 13.6% 4.4% (+9.23)#74 4.1% (+9.50)#1,002
75. Pendleton 13.6% 4.4% (+9.17)#75 4.1% (+9.43)#1,021
76. Bluetown 13.6% 4.4% (+9.16)#76 4.1% (+9.42)#1,024
77. Fairfield 13.5% 4.4% (+9.13)#77 4.1% (+9.40)#1,028
78. Hubbard 13.5% 4.4% (+9.07)#78 4.1% (+9.34)#1,035
79. Rio Bravo 13.5% 4.4% (+9.07)#79 4.1% (+9.33)#1,036
80. Cresson 13.4% 4.4% (+8.96)#80 4.1% (+9.22)#1,051
81. Celeste 13.4% 4.4% (+8.94)#81 4.1% (+9.21)#1,052
82. D Hanis 13.3% 4.4% (+8.92)#82 4.1% (+9.18)#1,054
83. Wilmer 13.2% 4.4% (+8.82)#83 4.1% (+9.08)#1,074
84. Hargill 13.1% 4.4% (+8.72)#84 4.1% (+8.99)#1,090
85. Brazoria 13.1% 4.4% (+8.64)#85 4.1% (+8.91)#1,104
86. Snook 12.6% 4.4% (+8.23)#86 4.1% (+8.50)#1,184
87. Benjamin 12.6% 4.4% (+8.23)#87 4.1% (+8.49)#1,186
88. Camargito 12.4% 4.4% (+7.99)#88 4.1% (+8.25)#1,228
89. Quail Creek 12.3% 4.4% (+7.84)#89 4.1% (+8.11)#1,253
90. Coffee City 12.2% 4.4% (+7.81)#90 4.1% (+8.07)#1,263
91. Groveton 12.0% 4.4% (+7.57)#91 4.1% (+7.84)#1,314
92. Golinda 12.0% 4.4% (+7.54)#92 4.1% (+7.80)#1,321
93. Olmito 11.9% 4.4% (+7.45)#93 4.1% (+7.72)#1,343
94. Petersburg 11.7% 4.4% (+7.32)#94 4.1% (+7.58)#1,370
95. Silverton 11.7% 4.4% (+7.26)#95 4.1% (+7.52)#1,384
96. Windcrest 11.6% 4.4% (+7.14)#96 4.1% (+7.40)#1,415
97. Ransom Canyon 11.5% 4.4% (+7.11)#97 4.1% (+7.37)#1,420
98. Shepherd 11.5% 4.4% (+7.05)#98 4.1% (+7.31)#1,431
99. Murillo 11.4% 4.4% (+7.03)#99 4.1% (+7.30)#1,435
100. West Tawakoni 11.4% 4.4% (+6.98)#100 4.1% (+7.25)#1,444

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Texas?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Texas are:
#1
53.0%
#2
50.9%
#3
44.5%
#4
41.3%
#5
38.3%
#6
37.7%
#7
34.6%
#8
33.8%
#9
32.4%
#10
31.4%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Texas?
Green Valley Farms has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Texas with 53.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the State of Texas?
Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Texas is 4.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the United States is 4.1%.