Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Nebraska

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Administrative & Support Services
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Nebraska
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Nebraska

0.0%
50.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Nebraska Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Nebraska

City % Employed vs State vs National
1.Cushing44.0%3.4%(+40.6)#14.1%(+39.9)#82
2.Nickerson30.5%3.4%(+27.2)#24.1%(+26.4)#179
3.Lewiston28.6%3.4%(+25.2)#34.1%(+24.4)#217
4.Herman25.8%3.4%(+22.5)#44.1%(+21.7)#263
5.Elk Creek23.0%3.4%(+19.6)#54.1%(+18.8)#346
6.Strang20.0%3.4%(+16.6)#64.1%(+15.9)#443
7.Leshara18.2%3.4%(+14.8)#74.1%(+14.0)#534
8.Rogers15.4%3.4%(+12.0)#84.1%(+11.2)#759
9.Reynolds14.7%3.4%(+11.4)#94.1%(+10.6)#838
10.Melia13.7%3.4%(+10.4)#104.1%(+9.58)#992
11.Cook12.6%3.4%(+9.25)#114.1%(+8.45)#1,192
12.Holmesville12.1%3.4%(+8.77)#124.1%(+7.97)#1,287
13.Ithaca11.3%3.4%(+7.91)#134.1%(+7.12)#1,471
14.Wood Lake11.1%3.4%(+7.76)#144.1%(+6.96)#1,525
15.Talmage11.0%3.4%(+7.62)#154.1%(+6.83)#1,559
16.Kennard10.5%3.4%(+7.13)#164.1%(+6.34)#1,703
17.Cordova10.4%3.4%(+7.06)#174.1%(+6.27)#1,735
18.Berwyn10.4%3.4%(+7.06)#184.1%(+6.27)#1,737
19.Newman Grove10.1%3.4%(+6.77)#194.1%(+5.98)#1,846
20.Davey10.0%3.4%(+6.65)#204.1%(+5.85)#1,905
21.Elgin9.6%3.4%(+6.26)#214.1%(+5.47)#2,063
22.Melbeta9.1%3.4%(+5.74)#224.1%(+4.94)#2,321
23.Jansen9.1%3.4%(+5.74)#234.1%(+4.94)#2,327
24.Scotia8.9%3.4%(+5.58)#244.1%(+4.79)#2,412
25.Oakdale8.6%3.4%(+5.29)#254.1%(+4.49)#2,591
26.Avoca8.2%3.4%(+4.83)#264.1%(+4.03)#2,881
27.Waterloo8.1%3.4%(+4.78)#274.1%(+3.99)#2,904
28.Holbrook8.1%3.4%(+4.75)#284.1%(+3.96)#2,923
29.Colon8.1%3.4%(+4.71)#294.1%(+3.91)#2,957
30.Kimball8.1%3.4%(+4.71)#304.1%(+3.91)#2,958
31.Malmo7.9%3.4%(+4.54)#314.1%(+3.74)#3,072
32.Palmyra7.8%3.4%(+4.49)#324.1%(+3.70)#3,111
33.Smithfield7.5%3.4%(+4.15)#334.1%(+3.35)#3,399
34.Firth7.4%3.4%(+4.07)#344.1%(+3.27)#3,479
35.Republican City7.4%3.4%(+4.05)#354.1%(+3.26)#3,492
36.Fairmont7.2%3.4%(+3.85)#364.1%(+3.05)#3,682
37.Bee7.1%3.4%(+3.79)#374.1%(+2.99)#3,749
38.Gering6.9%3.4%(+3.57)#384.1%(+2.77)#3,973
39.Springview6.7%3.4%(+3.31)#394.1%(+2.52)#4,232
40.Decatur6.6%3.4%(+3.28)#404.1%(+2.49)#4,279
41.Weston6.5%3.4%(+3.15)#414.1%(+2.35)#4,440
42.Litchfield6.3%3.4%(+2.93)#424.1%(+2.14)#4,721
43.Mitchell6.2%3.4%(+2.87)#434.1%(+2.07)#4,806
44.Washington6.2%3.4%(+2.85)#444.1%(+2.05)#4,835
45.Hooper6.1%3.4%(+2.78)#454.1%(+1.98)#4,933
46.Superior6.0%3.4%(+2.64)#464.1%(+1.84)#5,160
47.Bayard5.9%3.4%(+2.52)#474.1%(+1.72)#5,351
48.Gretna5.9%3.4%(+2.50)#484.1%(+1.70)#5,382
49.Chappell5.8%3.4%(+2.45)#494.1%(+1.65)#5,452
50.Overton5.7%3.4%(+2.38)#504.1%(+1.58)#5,569
51.Clarks5.7%3.4%(+2.36)#514.1%(+1.56)#5,596
52.Chapman5.5%3.4%(+2.10)#524.1%(+1.30)#6,087
53.Glenwood5.3%3.4%(+1.95)#534.1%(+1.16)#6,387
54.Richland5.3%3.4%(+1.91)#544.1%(+1.11)#6,491
55.Broken Bow5.2%3.4%(+1.88)#554.1%(+1.09)#6,545
56.Loup City5.2%3.4%(+1.84)#564.1%(+1.04)#6,633
57.Maywood5.2%3.4%(+1.82)#574.1%(+1.02)#6,661
58.Mead5.0%3.4%(+1.65)#584.1%(+0.850)#7,049
59.Ashland5.0%3.4%(+1.61)#594.1%(+0.816)#7,129
60.Milford5.0%3.4%(+1.61)#604.1%(+0.810)#7,143
61.Uehling4.9%3.4%(+1.52)#614.1%(+0.728)#7,344
62.Shubert4.9%3.4%(+1.51)#624.1%(+0.711)#7,382
63.Omaha4.8%3.4%(+1.42)#634.1%(+0.621)#7,591
64.Wood River4.8%3.4%(+1.41)#644.1%(+0.619)#7,595
65.Salem4.8%3.4%(+1.41)#654.1%(+0.612)#7,627
66.Oxford4.6%3.4%(+1.27)#664.1%(+0.476)#7,968
67.South Sioux City4.6%3.4%(+1.27)#674.1%(+0.476)#7,969
68.Winslow4.6%3.4%(+1.24)#684.1%(+0.448)#8,044
69.North Platte4.6%3.4%(+1.24)#694.1%(+0.442)#8,052
70.Farwell4.5%3.4%(+1.19)#704.1%(+0.396)#8,194
71.Maskell4.5%3.4%(+1.19)#714.1%(+0.396)#8,195
72.Beemer4.5%3.4%(+1.15)#724.1%(+0.357)#8,281
73.Wausa4.5%3.4%(+1.12)#734.1%(+0.328)#8,366
74.Offutt Afb4.4%3.4%(+1.03)#744.1%(+0.234)#8,640
75.Bennington4.3%3.4%(+0.994)#754.1%(+0.198)#8,741
76.Waterbury4.3%3.4%(+0.994)#764.1%(+0.198)#8,768
77.Elwood4.3%3.4%(+0.947)#774.1%(+0.151)#8,924
78.Valentine4.2%3.4%(+0.889)#784.1%(+0.093)#9,095
79.Bloomfield4.2%3.4%(+0.881)#794.1%(+0.085)#9,122
80.Chalco4.2%3.4%(+0.864)#804.1%(+0.068)#9,172
81.Scribner4.2%3.4%(+0.860)#814.1%(+0.064)#9,184
82.Prosser4.2%3.4%(+0.813)#824.1%(+0.017)#9,344
83.Bellevue4.1%3.4%(+0.784)#834.1%(-0.012)#9,419
84.Ainsworth4.1%3.4%(+0.766)#844.1%(-0.030)#9,466
85.Seward4.1%3.4%(+0.758)#854.1%(-0.038)#9,487
86.Marquette4.1%3.4%(+0.744)#864.1%(-0.051)#9,522
87.Bloomington4.1%3.4%(+0.728)#874.1%(-0.068)#9,588
88.South Bend4.1%3.4%(+0.728)#884.1%(-0.068)#9,590
89.Hampton4.1%3.4%(+0.720)#894.1%(-0.076)#9,610
90.Murdock4.1%3.4%(+0.711)#904.1%(-0.085)#9,631
91.Winnebago4.1%3.4%(+0.705)#914.1%(-0.091)#9,646
92.Wahoo4.0%3.4%(+0.601)#924.1%(-0.195)#10,008
93.Mclean3.9%3.4%(+0.593)#934.1%(-0.202)#10,038
94.West Point3.9%3.4%(+0.553)#944.1%(-0.243)#10,150
95.Dunbar3.8%3.4%(+0.492)#954.1%(-0.304)#10,354
96.Ayr3.8%3.4%(+0.492)#964.1%(-0.304)#10,358
97.Blair3.8%3.4%(+0.401)#974.1%(-0.395)#10,679
98.Macy3.7%3.4%(+0.311)#984.1%(-0.485)#11,000
99.Brule3.6%3.4%(+0.296)#994.1%(-0.500)#11,058
100.Creighton3.6%3.4%(+0.289)#1004.1%(-0.507)#11,078

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Nebraska?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Nebraska are:
#1
44.0%
#2
30.5%
#3
28.6%
#4
25.8%
#5
23.0%
#6
20.0%
#7
18.2%
#8
15.4%
#9
14.7%
#10
12.6%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Nebraska?
Cushing has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Nebraska with 44.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the State of Nebraska?
Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Nebraska is 3.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the United States is 4.1%.