Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in South Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Administrative & Support Services
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in South Carolina

0.0%
50.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in South Carolina Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in South Carolina

City % Employed vs State vs National
1.Gifford46.5%4.8%(+41.7)#14.1%(+42.4)#72
2.Mulberry42.9%4.8%(+38.0)#24.1%(+38.7)#87
3.Peak41.2%4.8%(+36.3)#34.1%(+37.0)#100
4.Estill33.4%4.8%(+28.5)#44.1%(+29.2)#138
5.Jamestown31.9%4.8%(+27.1)#54.1%(+27.8)#160
6.Manville29.0%4.8%(+24.2)#64.1%(+24.9)#203
7.Watts Mills27.9%4.8%(+23.1)#74.1%(+23.8)#225
8.South Sumter24.4%4.8%(+19.5)#84.1%(+20.2)#303
9.Princeton23.6%4.8%(+18.8)#94.1%(+19.5)#322
10.Lobeco23.0%4.8%(+18.2)#104.1%(+18.9)#345
11.The Cliffs Valley22.3%4.8%(+17.4)#114.1%(+18.1)#364
12.Wisacky21.0%4.8%(+16.2)#124.1%(+16.9)#407
13.Warrenville19.9%4.8%(+15.0)#134.1%(+15.7)#446
14.Seabrook18.9%4.8%(+14.0)#144.1%(+14.7)#489
15.Southern Shops18.6%4.8%(+13.8)#154.1%(+14.5)#502
16.Luray18.3%4.8%(+13.4)#164.1%(+14.1)#520
17.Eutawville17.6%4.8%(+12.8)#174.1%(+13.5)#569
18.Windsor17.5%4.8%(+12.7)#184.1%(+13.4)#572
19.Andrews16.6%4.8%(+11.8)#194.1%(+12.5)#639
20.Fairview Crossroads16.6%4.8%(+11.7)#204.1%(+12.4)#641
21.Timmonsville15.8%4.8%(+11.0)#214.1%(+11.7)#695
22.Newry15.6%4.8%(+10.8)#224.1%(+11.5)#719
23.Debordieu Colony15.6%4.8%(+10.7)#234.1%(+11.4)#726
24.Bowman15.3%4.8%(+10.5)#244.1%(+11.2)#765
25.Branchville14.4%4.8%(+9.60)#254.1%(+10.3)#872
26.Gayle Mill14.4%4.8%(+9.60)#264.1%(+10.3)#873
27.Ware Shoals13.9%4.8%(+9.05)#274.1%(+9.75)#958
28.Graniteville13.8%4.8%(+8.93)#284.1%(+9.63)#976
29.Burnettown13.6%4.8%(+8.76)#294.1%(+9.45)#1,019
30.Enoree13.6%4.8%(+8.72)#304.1%(+9.42)#1,025
31.Greeleyville13.1%4.8%(+8.26)#314.1%(+8.95)#1,098
32.Lowrys13.0%4.8%(+8.12)#324.1%(+8.81)#1,126
33.Society Hill12.7%4.8%(+7.87)#334.1%(+8.56)#1,173
34.Elgin12.6%4.8%(+7.74)#344.1%(+8.44)#1,193
35.Perry12.4%4.8%(+7.55)#354.1%(+8.24)#1,229
36.East Sumter12.4%4.8%(+7.52)#364.1%(+8.21)#1,231
37.Norway12.2%4.8%(+7.37)#374.1%(+8.06)#1,265
38.Ridgeland12.2%4.8%(+7.35)#384.1%(+8.04)#1,272
39.Arthurtown12.0%4.8%(+7.12)#394.1%(+7.81)#1,319
40.East Camden11.9%4.8%(+7.03)#404.1%(+7.73)#1,340
41.Livingston11.8%4.8%(+6.92)#414.1%(+7.61)#1,365
42.Wedgefield11.4%4.8%(+6.53)#424.1%(+7.23)#1,449
43.Saluda11.4%4.8%(+6.52)#434.1%(+7.22)#1,452
44.Donalds10.9%4.8%(+6.11)#444.1%(+6.80)#1,570
45.Hardeeville10.9%4.8%(+6.04)#454.1%(+6.73)#1,591
46.Mayesville10.9%4.8%(+6.01)#464.1%(+6.71)#1,600
47.Surfside Beach10.8%4.8%(+5.95)#474.1%(+6.64)#1,615
48.Parker10.8%4.8%(+5.91)#484.1%(+6.60)#1,627
49.Batesburg Leesville10.7%4.8%(+5.82)#494.1%(+6.51)#1,646
50.Gray Court10.6%4.8%(+5.78)#504.1%(+6.47)#1,659
51.Harleyville10.5%4.8%(+5.68)#514.1%(+6.38)#1,683
52.Ulmer10.5%4.8%(+5.68)#524.1%(+6.38)#1,689
53.Winnsboro Mills10.5%4.8%(+5.67)#534.1%(+6.36)#1,696
54.Jefferson10.5%4.8%(+5.65)#544.1%(+6.35)#1,699
55.Arkwright10.5%4.8%(+5.63)#554.1%(+6.32)#1,709
56.Beech Island10.3%4.8%(+5.42)#564.1%(+6.11)#1,792
57.Cheraw10.2%4.8%(+5.35)#574.1%(+6.04)#1,818
58.Dalzell10.0%4.8%(+5.18)#584.1%(+5.87)#1,889
59.Liberty10.0%4.8%(+5.11)#594.1%(+5.81)#1,931
60.La France9.9%4.8%(+5.10)#604.1%(+5.80)#1,935
61.Adams Run9.8%4.8%(+4.98)#614.1%(+5.67)#1,983
62.Salem9.8%4.8%(+4.96)#624.1%(+5.65)#1,991
63.Vance9.8%4.8%(+4.96)#634.1%(+5.65)#1,993
64.Cash9.8%4.8%(+4.93)#644.1%(+5.62)#2,001
65.Ben Avon9.5%4.8%(+4.63)#654.1%(+5.33)#2,131
66.Lincolnville9.5%4.8%(+4.62)#664.1%(+5.31)#2,140
67.Bethune9.5%4.8%(+4.62)#674.1%(+5.31)#2,141
68.Dentsville9.3%4.8%(+4.50)#684.1%(+5.19)#2,190
69.Laurel Bay9.3%4.8%(+4.49)#694.1%(+5.19)#2,193
70.St Andrews9.3%4.8%(+4.46)#704.1%(+5.16)#2,208
71.Lesslie9.3%4.8%(+4.43)#714.1%(+5.12)#2,226
72.Welcome9.1%4.8%(+4.22)#724.1%(+4.92)#2,342
73.Socastee8.9%4.8%(+4.10)#734.1%(+4.80)#2,406
74.Mccoll8.9%4.8%(+4.05)#744.1%(+4.75)#2,436
75.Arcadia Lakes8.9%4.8%(+4.03)#754.1%(+4.72)#2,458
76.Paxville8.8%4.8%(+3.98)#764.1%(+4.67)#2,485
77.Murrells Inlet8.7%4.8%(+3.87)#774.1%(+4.57)#2,542
78.White Knoll8.7%4.8%(+3.85)#784.1%(+4.55)#2,551
79.Barnwell8.7%4.8%(+3.85)#794.1%(+4.54)#2,566
80.Winnsboro8.7%4.8%(+3.82)#804.1%(+4.51)#2,581
81.West Union8.6%4.8%(+3.75)#814.1%(+4.44)#2,623
82.Bucksport8.6%4.8%(+3.73)#824.1%(+4.42)#2,632
83.Kline8.6%4.8%(+3.73)#834.1%(+4.42)#2,636
84.Jackson8.5%4.8%(+3.64)#844.1%(+4.34)#2,688
85.Seven Oaks8.5%4.8%(+3.63)#854.1%(+4.33)#2,692
86.Arcadia8.5%4.8%(+3.62)#864.1%(+4.31)#2,698
87.Prosperity8.4%4.8%(+3.58)#874.1%(+4.28)#2,718
88.Gantt8.4%4.8%(+3.52)#884.1%(+4.21)#2,756
89.Valley Falls8.3%4.8%(+3.41)#894.1%(+4.11)#2,827
90.Hollywood8.2%4.8%(+3.38)#904.1%(+4.07)#2,855
91.Whitney8.2%4.8%(+3.34)#914.1%(+4.04)#2,878
92.Laurens8.2%4.8%(+3.33)#924.1%(+4.02)#2,887
93.Brookdale8.1%4.8%(+3.23)#934.1%(+3.92)#2,946
94.Great Falls7.9%4.8%(+3.10)#944.1%(+3.79)#3,034
95.Furman7.8%4.8%(+2.99)#954.1%(+3.68)#3,123
96.Lake View7.8%4.8%(+2.94)#964.1%(+3.64)#3,153
97.Pageland7.8%4.8%(+2.91)#974.1%(+3.60)#3,185
98.Beaufort7.7%4.8%(+2.91)#984.1%(+3.60)#3,186
99.Newport7.7%4.8%(+2.90)#994.1%(+3.59)#3,189
100.Trenton7.7%4.8%(+2.89)#1004.1%(+3.59)#3,193

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in South Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in South Carolina are:
#1
46.5%
#2
42.9%
#3
41.2%
#4
33.4%
#5
31.9%
#6
27.9%
#7
24.4%
#8
23.6%
#9
19.9%
#10
18.6%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in South Carolina?
Gifford has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in South Carolina with 46.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the State of South Carolina?
Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in South Carolina is 4.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the United States is 4.1%.