Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in North Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Administrative & Support Services
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in North Carolina

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in North Carolina Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in North Carolina

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Lumber Bridge 73.9% 4.3% (+69.6)#1 4.1% (+69.8)#22
2. Evergreen 53.6% 4.3% (+49.3)#2 4.1% (+49.4)#44
3. Dundarrach 52.9% 4.3% (+48.7)#3 4.1% (+48.8)#48
4. Old Hundred 50.0% 4.3% (+45.7)#4 4.1% (+45.9)#57
5. Goldston 48.2% 4.3% (+44.0)#5 4.1% (+44.1)#67
6. Potters Hill 41.2% 4.3% (+36.9)#6 4.1% (+37.0)#101
7. Wakulla 41.0% 4.3% (+36.7)#7 4.1% (+36.8)#103
8. Stokes 40.2% 4.3% (+35.9)#8 4.1% (+36.1)#107
9. Earl 35.7% 4.3% (+31.4)#9 4.1% (+31.5)#126
10. Pollocksville 34.8% 4.3% (+30.6)#10 4.1% (+30.7)#128
11. Moncure 33.1% 4.3% (+28.8)#11 4.1% (+28.9)#146
12. Boardman 31.5% 4.3% (+27.3)#12 4.1% (+27.4)#165
13. Smithtown 29.5% 4.3% (+25.3)#13 4.1% (+25.4)#188
14. Lowgap 26.2% 4.3% (+21.9)#14 4.1% (+22.0)#257
15. Cerro Gordo 24.5% 4.3% (+20.2)#15 4.1% (+20.3)#299
16. Leggett 23.5% 4.3% (+19.3)#16 4.1% (+19.4)#325
17. Toast 22.5% 4.3% (+18.2)#17 4.1% (+18.4)#358
18. Avon 20.6% 4.3% (+16.3)#18 4.1% (+16.4)#420
19. Bolton 16.6% 4.3% (+12.3)#19 4.1% (+12.4)#643
20. Sylva 16.4% 4.3% (+12.2)#20 4.1% (+12.3)#651
21. Cape Colony 16.1% 4.3% (+11.8)#21 4.1% (+11.9)#681
22. Haw River 16.0% 4.3% (+11.7)#22 4.1% (+11.9)#683
23. China Grove 15.7% 4.3% (+11.4)#23 4.1% (+11.5)#716
24. Saratoga 15.4% 4.3% (+11.2)#24 4.1% (+11.3)#747
25. Gerton 15.4% 4.3% (+11.1)#25 4.1% (+11.2)#754
26. Sandy Creek 15.3% 4.3% (+11.0)#26 4.1% (+11.1)#767
27. Cliffside 14.9% 4.3% (+10.7)#27 4.1% (+10.8)#799
28. Cove Creek 14.9% 4.3% (+10.7)#28 4.1% (+10.8)#801
29. Roper 14.5% 4.3% (+10.3)#29 4.1% (+10.4)#857
30. Red Springs 14.4% 4.3% (+10.2)#30 4.1% (+10.3)#877
31. Light Oak 14.0% 4.3% (+9.76)#31 4.1% (+9.87)#942
32. Mooresboro 14.0% 4.3% (+9.69)#32 4.1% (+9.80)#951
33. Marshall 13.9% 4.3% (+9.67)#33 4.1% (+9.79)#954
34. Ashley Heights 13.6% 4.3% (+9.34)#34 4.1% (+9.46)#1,018
35. Dana 13.4% 4.3% (+9.11)#35 4.1% (+9.22)#1,050
36. Everetts 13.1% 4.3% (+8.81)#36 4.1% (+8.93)#1,103
37. Chadbourn 12.9% 4.3% (+8.66)#37 4.1% (+8.78)#1,133
38. Cypress Landing 12.0% 4.3% (+7.72)#38 4.1% (+7.84)#1,315
39. Macon 11.9% 4.3% (+7.64)#39 4.1% (+7.75)#1,333
40. Norwood 11.8% 4.3% (+7.54)#40 4.1% (+7.66)#1,354
41. Highlands 11.7% 4.3% (+7.44)#41 4.1% (+7.56)#1,378
42. Rocky Point 11.6% 4.3% (+7.31)#42 4.1% (+7.42)#1,408
43. Emma 11.5% 4.3% (+7.20)#43 4.1% (+7.32)#1,429
44. Bostic 11.3% 4.3% (+7.00)#44 4.1% (+7.12)#1,470
45. Varnamtown 11.1% 4.3% (+6.82)#45 4.1% (+6.93)#1,532
46. Burgaw 11.1% 4.3% (+6.79)#46 4.1% (+6.91)#1,537
47. Hoffman 10.9% 4.3% (+6.65)#47 4.1% (+6.77)#1,577
48. Cedar Rock 10.8% 4.3% (+6.55)#48 4.1% (+6.66)#1,611
49. Aurora 10.7% 4.3% (+6.47)#49 4.1% (+6.58)#1,631
50. South Henderson 10.6% 4.3% (+6.37)#50 4.1% (+6.49)#1,650
51. Icard 10.6% 4.3% (+6.36)#51 4.1% (+6.47)#1,658
52. Calabash 10.6% 4.3% (+6.29)#52 4.1% (+6.40)#1,680
53. Bogue 10.4% 4.3% (+6.12)#53 4.1% (+6.24)#1,747
54. Grover 10.4% 4.3% (+6.10)#54 4.1% (+6.21)#1,756
55. Kelford 10.3% 4.3% (+6.08)#55 4.1% (+6.20)#1,760
56. Franklinton 10.3% 4.3% (+6.01)#56 4.1% (+6.13)#1,787
57. Woodland 10.3% 4.3% (+5.99)#57 4.1% (+6.11)#1,793
58. Kitty Hawk 10.2% 4.3% (+5.92)#58 4.1% (+6.04)#1,819
59. Hobgood 10.2% 4.3% (+5.89)#59 4.1% (+6.01)#1,836
60. Columbia 10.1% 4.3% (+5.79)#60 4.1% (+5.90)#1,880
61. Marshville 9.7% 4.3% (+5.45)#61 4.1% (+5.57)#2,026
62. Forest City 9.6% 4.3% (+5.37)#62 4.1% (+5.48)#2,060
63. Parkton 9.6% 4.3% (+5.33)#63 4.1% (+5.45)#2,077
64. Stony Point 9.6% 4.3% (+5.32)#64 4.1% (+5.43)#2,085
65. Mcadenville 9.5% 4.3% (+5.21)#65 4.1% (+5.32)#2,133
66. Silver Lake 9.4% 4.3% (+5.16)#66 4.1% (+5.27)#2,154
67. Cherry Branch 9.2% 4.3% (+4.97)#67 4.1% (+5.08)#2,243
68. Camden 9.2% 4.3% (+4.96)#68 4.1% (+5.07)#2,252
69. Green Level 9.0% 4.3% (+4.76)#69 4.1% (+4.88)#2,363
70. Castalia 9.0% 4.3% (+4.72)#70 4.1% (+4.84)#2,384
71. Beulaville 9.0% 4.3% (+4.71)#71 4.1% (+4.82)#2,388
72. Jonesville 8.9% 4.3% (+4.68)#72 4.1% (+4.80)#2,404
73. Wesley Chapel 8.9% 4.3% (+4.66)#73 4.1% (+4.78)#2,419
74. St Pauls 8.9% 4.3% (+4.64)#74 4.1% (+4.76)#2,425
75. Moyock 8.9% 4.3% (+4.61)#75 4.1% (+4.73)#2,452
76. Liberty 8.9% 4.3% (+4.61)#76 4.1% (+4.72)#2,455
77. Topsail Beach 8.9% 4.3% (+4.59)#77 4.1% (+4.70)#2,465
78. Harrells 8.8% 4.3% (+4.53)#78 4.1% (+4.64)#2,499
79. Sedalia 8.8% 4.3% (+4.50)#79 4.1% (+4.62)#2,514
80. Grifton 8.7% 4.3% (+4.47)#80 4.1% (+4.58)#2,535
81. Robbins 8.7% 4.3% (+4.42)#81 4.1% (+4.54)#2,568
82. Atlantic Beach 8.7% 4.3% (+4.39)#82 4.1% (+4.51)#2,584
83. Pine Knoll Shores 8.6% 4.3% (+4.29)#83 4.1% (+4.41)#2,644
84. Red Cross 8.4% 4.3% (+4.17)#84 4.1% (+4.28)#2,714
85. Shannon 8.3% 4.3% (+4.07)#85 4.1% (+4.18)#2,783
86. Franklinville 8.2% 4.3% (+3.97)#86 4.1% (+4.08)#2,847
87. Taylortown 8.2% 4.3% (+3.92)#87 4.1% (+4.03)#2,879
88. Piney Green 8.0% 4.3% (+3.70)#88 4.1% (+3.82)#3,011
89. Spring Lake 7.9% 4.3% (+3.61)#89 4.1% (+3.73)#3,085
90. Warsaw 7.9% 4.3% (+3.61)#90 4.1% (+3.72)#3,092
91. Cherryville 7.8% 4.3% (+3.58)#91 4.1% (+3.70)#3,113
92. Lake Park 7.7% 4.3% (+3.44)#92 4.1% (+3.56)#3,212
93. Grantsboro 7.7% 4.3% (+3.43)#93 4.1% (+3.54)#3,218
94. Bald Head Island 7.7% 4.3% (+3.43)#94 4.1% (+3.54)#3,227
95. Silver City 7.7% 4.3% (+3.40)#95 4.1% (+3.52)#3,252
96. Siler City 7.7% 4.3% (+3.39)#96 4.1% (+3.51)#3,264
97. Ayden 7.5% 4.3% (+3.28)#97 4.1% (+3.39)#3,350
98. Dillsboro 7.5% 4.3% (+3.24)#98 4.1% (+3.35)#3,396
99. Dallas 7.5% 4.3% (+3.22)#99 4.1% (+3.34)#3,408
100. Patterson Springs 7.5% 4.3% (+3.19)#100 4.1% (+3.30)#3,446

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in North Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in North Carolina are:
#1
73.9%
#2
53.6%
#3
52.9%
#4
50.0%
#5
48.2%
#6
41.2%
#7
41.0%
#8
40.2%
#9
35.7%
#10
34.8%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in North Carolina?
Lumber Bridge has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in North Carolina with 73.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the State of North Carolina?
Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in North Carolina is 4.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the United States is 4.1%.