Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in North Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Administrative & Support Services
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in North Carolina

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in North Carolina Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in North Carolina

City % Employed vs State vs National
1.Lumber Bridge73.9%4.3%(+69.6)#14.1%(+69.8)#22
2.Evergreen53.6%4.3%(+49.3)#24.1%(+49.4)#44
3.Dundarrach52.9%4.3%(+48.7)#34.1%(+48.8)#48
4.Old Hundred50.0%4.3%(+45.7)#44.1%(+45.9)#57
5.Goldston48.2%4.3%(+44.0)#54.1%(+44.1)#67
6.Potters Hill41.2%4.3%(+36.9)#64.1%(+37.0)#101
7.Wakulla41.0%4.3%(+36.7)#74.1%(+36.8)#103
8.Stokes40.2%4.3%(+35.9)#84.1%(+36.1)#107
9.Earl35.7%4.3%(+31.4)#94.1%(+31.5)#126
10.Pollocksville34.8%4.3%(+30.6)#104.1%(+30.7)#128
11.Moncure33.1%4.3%(+28.8)#114.1%(+28.9)#146
12.Boardman31.5%4.3%(+27.3)#124.1%(+27.4)#165
13.Smithtown29.5%4.3%(+25.3)#134.1%(+25.4)#188
14.Lowgap26.2%4.3%(+21.9)#144.1%(+22.0)#257
15.Cerro Gordo24.5%4.3%(+20.2)#154.1%(+20.3)#299
16.Leggett23.5%4.3%(+19.3)#164.1%(+19.4)#325
17.Toast22.5%4.3%(+18.2)#174.1%(+18.4)#358
18.Avon20.6%4.3%(+16.3)#184.1%(+16.4)#420
19.Bolton16.6%4.3%(+12.3)#194.1%(+12.4)#643
20.Sylva16.4%4.3%(+12.2)#204.1%(+12.3)#651
21.Cape Colony16.1%4.3%(+11.8)#214.1%(+11.9)#681
22.Haw River16.0%4.3%(+11.7)#224.1%(+11.9)#683
23.China Grove15.7%4.3%(+11.4)#234.1%(+11.5)#716
24.Saratoga15.4%4.3%(+11.2)#244.1%(+11.3)#747
25.Gerton15.4%4.3%(+11.1)#254.1%(+11.2)#754
26.Sandy Creek15.3%4.3%(+11.0)#264.1%(+11.1)#767
27.Cliffside14.9%4.3%(+10.7)#274.1%(+10.8)#799
28.Cove Creek14.9%4.3%(+10.7)#284.1%(+10.8)#801
29.Roper14.5%4.3%(+10.3)#294.1%(+10.4)#857
30.Red Springs14.4%4.3%(+10.2)#304.1%(+10.3)#877
31.Light Oak14.0%4.3%(+9.76)#314.1%(+9.87)#942
32.Mooresboro14.0%4.3%(+9.69)#324.1%(+9.80)#951
33.Marshall13.9%4.3%(+9.67)#334.1%(+9.79)#954
34.Ashley Heights13.6%4.3%(+9.34)#344.1%(+9.46)#1,018
35.Dana13.4%4.3%(+9.11)#354.1%(+9.22)#1,050
36.Everetts13.1%4.3%(+8.81)#364.1%(+8.93)#1,103
37.Chadbourn12.9%4.3%(+8.66)#374.1%(+8.78)#1,133
38.Cypress Landing12.0%4.3%(+7.72)#384.1%(+7.84)#1,315
39.Macon11.9%4.3%(+7.64)#394.1%(+7.75)#1,333
40.Norwood11.8%4.3%(+7.54)#404.1%(+7.66)#1,354
41.Highlands11.7%4.3%(+7.44)#414.1%(+7.56)#1,378
42.Rocky Point11.6%4.3%(+7.31)#424.1%(+7.42)#1,408
43.Emma11.5%4.3%(+7.20)#434.1%(+7.32)#1,429
44.Bostic11.3%4.3%(+7.00)#444.1%(+7.12)#1,470
45.Varnamtown11.1%4.3%(+6.82)#454.1%(+6.93)#1,532
46.Burgaw11.1%4.3%(+6.79)#464.1%(+6.91)#1,537
47.Hoffman10.9%4.3%(+6.65)#474.1%(+6.77)#1,577
48.Cedar Rock10.8%4.3%(+6.55)#484.1%(+6.66)#1,611
49.Aurora10.7%4.3%(+6.47)#494.1%(+6.58)#1,631
50.South Henderson10.6%4.3%(+6.37)#504.1%(+6.49)#1,650
51.Icard10.6%4.3%(+6.36)#514.1%(+6.47)#1,658
52.Calabash10.6%4.3%(+6.29)#524.1%(+6.40)#1,680
53.Bogue10.4%4.3%(+6.12)#534.1%(+6.24)#1,747
54.Grover10.4%4.3%(+6.10)#544.1%(+6.21)#1,756
55.Kelford10.3%4.3%(+6.08)#554.1%(+6.20)#1,760
56.Franklinton10.3%4.3%(+6.01)#564.1%(+6.13)#1,787
57.Woodland10.3%4.3%(+5.99)#574.1%(+6.11)#1,793
58.Kitty Hawk10.2%4.3%(+5.92)#584.1%(+6.04)#1,819
59.Hobgood10.2%4.3%(+5.89)#594.1%(+6.01)#1,836
60.Columbia10.1%4.3%(+5.79)#604.1%(+5.90)#1,880
61.Marshville9.7%4.3%(+5.45)#614.1%(+5.57)#2,026
62.Forest City9.6%4.3%(+5.37)#624.1%(+5.48)#2,060
63.Parkton9.6%4.3%(+5.33)#634.1%(+5.45)#2,077
64.Stony Point9.6%4.3%(+5.32)#644.1%(+5.43)#2,085
65.Mcadenville9.5%4.3%(+5.21)#654.1%(+5.32)#2,133
66.Silver Lake9.4%4.3%(+5.16)#664.1%(+5.27)#2,154
67.Cherry Branch9.2%4.3%(+4.97)#674.1%(+5.08)#2,243
68.Camden9.2%4.3%(+4.96)#684.1%(+5.07)#2,252
69.Green Level9.0%4.3%(+4.76)#694.1%(+4.88)#2,363
70.Castalia9.0%4.3%(+4.72)#704.1%(+4.84)#2,384
71.Beulaville9.0%4.3%(+4.71)#714.1%(+4.82)#2,388
72.Jonesville8.9%4.3%(+4.68)#724.1%(+4.80)#2,404
73.Wesley Chapel8.9%4.3%(+4.66)#734.1%(+4.78)#2,419
74.St Pauls8.9%4.3%(+4.64)#744.1%(+4.76)#2,425
75.Moyock8.9%4.3%(+4.61)#754.1%(+4.73)#2,452
76.Liberty8.9%4.3%(+4.61)#764.1%(+4.72)#2,455
77.Topsail Beach8.9%4.3%(+4.59)#774.1%(+4.70)#2,465
78.Harrells8.8%4.3%(+4.53)#784.1%(+4.64)#2,499
79.Sedalia8.8%4.3%(+4.50)#794.1%(+4.62)#2,514
80.Grifton8.7%4.3%(+4.47)#804.1%(+4.58)#2,535
81.Robbins8.7%4.3%(+4.42)#814.1%(+4.54)#2,568
82.Atlantic Beach8.7%4.3%(+4.39)#824.1%(+4.51)#2,584
83.Pine Knoll Shores8.6%4.3%(+4.29)#834.1%(+4.41)#2,644
84.Red Cross8.4%4.3%(+4.17)#844.1%(+4.28)#2,714
85.Shannon8.3%4.3%(+4.07)#854.1%(+4.18)#2,783
86.Franklinville8.2%4.3%(+3.97)#864.1%(+4.08)#2,847
87.Taylortown8.2%4.3%(+3.92)#874.1%(+4.03)#2,879
88.Piney Green8.0%4.3%(+3.70)#884.1%(+3.82)#3,011
89.Spring Lake7.9%4.3%(+3.61)#894.1%(+3.73)#3,085
90.Warsaw7.9%4.3%(+3.61)#904.1%(+3.72)#3,092
91.Cherryville7.8%4.3%(+3.58)#914.1%(+3.70)#3,113
92.Lake Park7.7%4.3%(+3.44)#924.1%(+3.56)#3,212
93.Grantsboro7.7%4.3%(+3.43)#934.1%(+3.54)#3,218
94.Bald Head Island7.7%4.3%(+3.43)#944.1%(+3.54)#3,227
95.Silver City7.7%4.3%(+3.40)#954.1%(+3.52)#3,252
96.Siler City7.7%4.3%(+3.39)#964.1%(+3.51)#3,264
97.Ayden7.5%4.3%(+3.28)#974.1%(+3.39)#3,350
98.Dillsboro7.5%4.3%(+3.24)#984.1%(+3.35)#3,396
99.Dallas7.5%4.3%(+3.22)#994.1%(+3.34)#3,408
100.Patterson Springs7.5%4.3%(+3.19)#1004.1%(+3.30)#3,446

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in North Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in North Carolina are:
#1
73.9%
#2
53.6%
#3
52.9%
#4
50.0%
#5
48.2%
#6
41.2%
#7
41.0%
#8
40.2%
#9
35.7%
#10
34.8%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in North Carolina?
Lumber Bridge has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in North Carolina with 73.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the State of North Carolina?
Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in North Carolina is 4.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the United States is 4.1%.