Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Administrative & Support Services
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Oklahoma

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Oklahoma

City % Employed vs State vs National
1.Nelagoney66.7%3.6%(+63.0)#14.1%(+62.5)#29
2.Amorita46.2%3.6%(+42.5)#24.1%(+42.0)#73
3.Brush Creek40.2%3.6%(+36.6)#34.1%(+36.0)#108
4.Tullahassee37.5%3.6%(+33.9)#44.1%(+33.4)#119
5.Manitou25.0%3.6%(+21.4)#54.1%(+20.9)#277
6.Elohim25.0%3.6%(+21.4)#64.1%(+20.9)#288
7.Middleberg24.2%3.6%(+20.6)#74.1%(+20.1)#306
8.Warwick23.2%3.6%(+19.6)#84.1%(+19.0)#334
9.Valley Park22.2%3.6%(+18.6)#94.1%(+18.1)#370
10.Meno21.7%3.6%(+18.1)#104.1%(+17.5)#387
11.Tuskahoma21.4%3.6%(+17.8)#114.1%(+17.3)#395
12.Sportmans Shores20.8%3.6%(+17.2)#124.1%(+16.7)#411
13.Grand Lake Towne19.2%3.6%(+15.6)#134.1%(+15.1)#476
14.Carlisle18.3%3.6%(+14.7)#144.1%(+14.2)#517
15.Whitesboro17.9%3.6%(+14.3)#154.1%(+13.8)#548
16.Eldon16.7%3.6%(+13.0)#164.1%(+12.5)#630
17.Brooksville15.8%3.6%(+12.2)#174.1%(+11.6)#703
18.Washita15.6%3.6%(+11.9)#184.1%(+11.4)#728
19.Cromwell15.4%3.6%(+11.8)#194.1%(+11.2)#755
20.Welty14.9%3.6%(+11.3)#204.1%(+10.7)#810
21.Skedee14.3%3.6%(+10.7)#214.1%(+10.1)#907
22.Rocky13.6%3.6%(+10.0)#224.1%(+9.49)#1,008
23.Mallard Bay12.7%3.6%(+9.08)#234.1%(+8.55)#1,177
24.Langley12.2%3.6%(+8.54)#244.1%(+8.01)#1,275
25.Marland12.0%3.6%(+8.38)#254.1%(+7.85)#1,311
26.Cedar Crest11.5%3.6%(+7.92)#264.1%(+7.39)#1,419
27.Spencer11.4%3.6%(+7.77)#274.1%(+7.23)#1,446
28.River Bottom11.4%3.6%(+7.75)#284.1%(+7.21)#1,453
29.Taloga11.1%3.6%(+7.49)#294.1%(+6.96)#1,514
30.Haywood11.1%3.6%(+7.49)#304.1%(+6.96)#1,515
31.Thackerville10.9%3.6%(+7.33)#314.1%(+6.80)#1,572
32.Moffett10.5%3.6%(+6.91)#324.1%(+6.38)#1,691
33.Swink10.5%3.6%(+6.91)#334.1%(+6.38)#1,693
34.Pump Back10.5%3.6%(+6.85)#344.1%(+6.32)#1,715
35.Mountain Park10.4%3.6%(+6.78)#354.1%(+6.25)#1,744
36.Hoffman10.3%3.6%(+6.73)#364.1%(+6.20)#1,766
37.Kingfisher10.3%3.6%(+6.71)#374.1%(+6.17)#1,773
38.Taft10.3%3.6%(+6.64)#384.1%(+6.11)#1,799
39.Mulhall10.2%3.6%(+6.55)#394.1%(+6.02)#1,829
40.Evening Shade10.0%3.6%(+6.38)#404.1%(+5.85)#1,900
41.Soper10.0%3.6%(+6.38)#414.1%(+5.85)#1,903
42.Fittstown10.0%3.6%(+6.38)#424.1%(+5.85)#1,916
43.Elmer10.0%3.6%(+6.38)#434.1%(+5.85)#1,918
44.Gage9.9%3.6%(+6.25)#444.1%(+5.72)#1,964
45.White Oak9.9%3.6%(+6.24)#454.1%(+5.71)#1,968
46.Tyrone9.6%3.6%(+5.97)#464.1%(+5.43)#2,084
47.Milburn9.5%3.6%(+5.91)#474.1%(+5.37)#2,109
48.Little Rock9.5%3.6%(+5.91)#484.1%(+5.37)#2,112
49.Cowlington9.5%3.6%(+5.91)#494.1%(+5.37)#2,113
50.Leon9.5%3.6%(+5.91)#504.1%(+5.37)#2,115
51.Cayuga9.4%3.6%(+5.76)#514.1%(+5.23)#2,183
52.Roland9.2%3.6%(+5.56)#524.1%(+5.03)#2,274
53.Loco9.1%3.6%(+5.47)#534.1%(+4.94)#2,331
54.Maramec9.1%3.6%(+5.47)#544.1%(+4.94)#2,332
55.Texanna9.1%3.6%(+5.44)#554.1%(+4.90)#2,348
56.Mccord9.1%3.6%(+5.43)#564.1%(+4.90)#2,350
57.Arapaho8.9%3.6%(+5.29)#574.1%(+4.76)#2,427
58.Bowlegs8.9%3.6%(+5.25)#584.1%(+4.72)#2,457
59.Fairmont8.7%3.6%(+5.13)#594.1%(+4.60)#2,527
60.Baron8.5%3.6%(+4.87)#604.1%(+4.34)#2,690
61.Aline8.5%3.6%(+4.86)#614.1%(+4.32)#2,695
62.Burbank8.3%3.6%(+4.72)#624.1%(+4.18)#2,794
63.Keota8.3%3.6%(+4.67)#634.1%(+4.13)#2,818
64.Toppers8.2%3.6%(+4.61)#644.1%(+4.08)#2,849
65.Kenefic8.1%3.6%(+4.45)#654.1%(+3.91)#2,956
66.Sterling8.1%3.6%(+4.44)#664.1%(+3.91)#2,959
67.Dill City7.8%3.6%(+4.18)#674.1%(+3.65)#3,146
68.Taylor Ferry7.8%3.6%(+4.18)#684.1%(+3.65)#3,149
69.Wanette7.8%3.6%(+4.16)#694.1%(+3.63)#3,162
70.Waynoka7.7%3.6%(+4.10)#704.1%(+3.57)#3,205
71.Lawrence Creek7.7%3.6%(+4.07)#714.1%(+3.54)#3,229
72.Hominy7.7%3.6%(+4.06)#724.1%(+3.53)#3,239
73.Avant7.6%3.6%(+3.99)#734.1%(+3.46)#3,301
74.Ripley7.5%3.6%(+3.93)#744.1%(+3.40)#3,342
75.Kendrick7.5%3.6%(+3.88)#754.1%(+3.35)#3,400
76.Antlers7.5%3.6%(+3.87)#764.1%(+3.34)#3,410
77.Stratford7.4%3.6%(+3.83)#774.1%(+3.30)#3,453
78.Whitefield7.4%3.6%(+3.81)#784.1%(+3.28)#3,473
79.Etowah7.4%3.6%(+3.79)#794.1%(+3.26)#3,494
80.Lake Aluma7.4%3.6%(+3.79)#804.1%(+3.26)#3,496
81.Union City7.3%3.6%(+3.69)#814.1%(+3.15)#3,586
82.Cameron7.3%3.6%(+3.64)#824.1%(+3.11)#3,622
83.Bethany7.2%3.6%(+3.62)#834.1%(+3.09)#3,647
84.Comanche7.2%3.6%(+3.57)#844.1%(+3.04)#3,694
85.Indiahoma6.8%3.6%(+3.20)#854.1%(+2.67)#4,076
86.Fair Oaks6.8%3.6%(+3.20)#864.1%(+2.67)#4,078
87.Talala6.7%3.6%(+3.10)#874.1%(+2.57)#4,172
88.Pin Oak Acres6.7%3.6%(+3.07)#884.1%(+2.54)#4,197
89.Bristow6.7%3.6%(+3.07)#894.1%(+2.53)#4,204
90.Red Rock6.7%3.6%(+3.05)#904.1%(+2.52)#4,233
91.Sperry6.7%3.6%(+3.03)#914.1%(+2.50)#4,259
92.Nicoma Park6.6%3.6%(+3.02)#924.1%(+2.49)#4,277
93.Dibble6.5%3.6%(+2.90)#934.1%(+2.37)#4,410
94.Pensacola6.5%3.6%(+2.90)#944.1%(+2.37)#4,420
95.Billings6.5%3.6%(+2.89)#954.1%(+2.36)#4,436
96.Mangum6.5%3.6%(+2.88)#964.1%(+2.35)#4,444
97.Inola6.4%3.6%(+2.80)#974.1%(+2.26)#4,556
98.Del City6.4%3.6%(+2.78)#984.1%(+2.25)#4,572
99.Tonkawa Tribal Housing6.4%3.6%(+2.77)#994.1%(+2.23)#4,580
100.Murphy6.4%3.6%(+2.77)#1004.1%(+2.23)#4,585

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Oklahoma are:
#1
46.2%
#2
40.2%
#3
37.5%
#4
25.0%
#5
23.2%
#6
22.2%
#7
21.7%
#8
21.4%
#9
19.2%
#10
18.3%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Oklahoma?
Amorita has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Oklahoma with 46.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the State of Oklahoma?
Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Oklahoma is 3.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the United States is 4.1%.