Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Florida

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Administrative & Support Services
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Florida
States
Florida Cities
Altamonte SpringsApopkaArcadiaBoca RatonBonita SpringsBoynton BeachBradentonBrandonBrooksvilleCape CoralCasselberryClearwaterClermontCocoaCoral SpringsCrestviewCrystal RiverDade CityDavenportDaytona BeachDeerfield BeachDefuniak SpringsDelandDelray BeachDeltonaDunnellonEdgewaterEnglewoodEustisFort LauderdaleFort MyersFort PierceFort Walton BeachGainesvilleGulf BreezeHialeahHolidayHollywoodHomesteadHomosassaHudsonInvernessJacksonvilleJupiterKissimmeeLake CityLake WalesLake WorthLakelandLand O LakesLargoLeesburgLehigh AcresLive OakLongwoodLutzMariannaMelbourneMerritt IslandMiamiMiami BeachMiltonNaplesNew Port RicheyNew Smyrna BeachNorth Fort MyersNorth PortOcalaOkeechobeeOpa LockaOrange ParkOrlandoOrmond BeachOviedoPalm BayPalm Beach GardensPalm CoastPalm HarborPanama CityPanama City BeachPensacolaPerryPinellas ParkPlant CityPompano BeachPort CharlottePort OrangePort Saint LuciePunta GordaQuincyRiverviewSaint AugustineSaint CloudSaint PetersburgSanfordSarasotaSebastianSebringSeminoleSpring HillStuartTallahasseeTampaTarpon SpringsThe VillagesTitusvilleValricoVeniceVero BeachWesley ChapelWest Palm BeachWinter HavenWinter ParkZephyrhills
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Florida

0.0%
50.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Florida Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Florida

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Lake Lindsey 49.1% 5.9% (+43.2)#1 4.1% (+44.9)#64
2. Juno Ridge 32.1% 5.9% (+26.2)#2 4.1% (+27.9)#157
3. Steinhatchee 31.8% 5.9% (+26.0)#3 4.1% (+27.7)#162
4. Black Hammock 30.2% 5.9% (+24.3)#4 4.1% (+26.0)#183
5. Caryville 28.1% 5.9% (+22.2)#5 4.1% (+23.9)#222
6. Boulevard Gardens 25.4% 5.9% (+19.5)#6 4.1% (+21.2)#268
7. Manatee Road 24.4% 5.9% (+18.5)#7 4.1% (+20.3)#300
8. Wacissa 23.2% 5.9% (+17.3)#8 4.1% (+19.1)#333
9. Rio 21.9% 5.9% (+16.0)#9 4.1% (+17.7)#380
10. Fidelis 21.9% 5.9% (+16.0)#10 4.1% (+17.7)#382
11. Lake Kathryn 20.7% 5.9% (+14.8)#11 4.1% (+16.5)#415
12. St James City 20.7% 5.9% (+14.8)#12 4.1% (+16.5)#417
13. Limestone Creek 19.9% 5.9% (+14.0)#13 4.1% (+15.7)#444
14. Campbellton 19.7% 5.9% (+13.9)#14 4.1% (+15.6)#452
15. Fellsmere 19.1% 5.9% (+13.2)#15 4.1% (+14.9)#484
16. Pomona Park 18.3% 5.9% (+12.4)#16 4.1% (+14.1)#521
17. Canal Point 18.2% 5.9% (+12.3)#17 4.1% (+14.1)#527
18. Midway Cdp Seminole County 18.2% 5.9% (+12.3)#18 4.1% (+14.0)#529
19. Archer 17.6% 5.9% (+11.8)#19 4.1% (+13.5)#562
20. Southeast Arcadia 17.6% 5.9% (+11.7)#20 4.1% (+13.4)#571
21. Crescent City 17.4% 5.9% (+11.5)#21 4.1% (+13.2)#585
22. Silver Springs 16.9% 5.9% (+11.0)#22 4.1% (+12.8)#616
23. Acacia Villas 16.7% 5.9% (+10.9)#23 4.1% (+12.6)#625
24. Lake Worth Beach 16.6% 5.9% (+10.8)#24 4.1% (+12.5)#638
25. Zellwood 16.2% 5.9% (+10.3)#25 4.1% (+12.1)#674
26. Harold 16.1% 5.9% (+10.2)#26 4.1% (+12.0)#676
27. Bradley Junction 15.9% 5.9% (+10.1)#27 4.1% (+11.8)#690
28. Harlem Heights 15.8% 5.9% (+9.95)#28 4.1% (+11.7)#694
29. Pine Air 15.7% 5.9% (+9.86)#29 4.1% (+11.6)#706
30. Quincy 15.4% 5.9% (+9.54)#30 4.1% (+11.3)#749
31. Schall Circle 15.3% 5.9% (+9.43)#31 4.1% (+11.2)#764
32. White City 15.0% 5.9% (+9.15)#32 4.1% (+10.9)#787
33. Milton 14.9% 5.9% (+9.03)#33 4.1% (+10.8)#808
34. Pahokee 14.8% 5.9% (+8.94)#34 4.1% (+10.7)#821
35. Lacoochee 14.8% 5.9% (+8.89)#35 4.1% (+10.6)#828
36. Suncoast Estates 14.7% 5.9% (+8.85)#36 4.1% (+10.6)#834
37. Miramar Beach 14.7% 5.9% (+8.79)#37 4.1% (+10.5)#840
38. Astatula 14.7% 5.9% (+8.78)#38 4.1% (+10.5)#841
39. Loughman 14.5% 5.9% (+8.64)#39 4.1% (+10.4)#861
40. Tice 14.5% 5.9% (+8.61)#40 4.1% (+10.3)#865
41. Stacey Street 14.5% 5.9% (+8.60)#41 4.1% (+10.3)#866
42. Chuluota 14.4% 5.9% (+8.56)#42 4.1% (+10.3)#874
43. Weeki Wachee Gardens 14.4% 5.9% (+8.54)#43 4.1% (+10.3)#879
44. Masaryktown 14.4% 5.9% (+8.51)#44 4.1% (+10.2)#886
45. Orangetree 14.4% 5.9% (+8.48)#45 4.1% (+10.2)#888
46. On Top Of The World 14.4% 5.9% (+8.48)#46 4.1% (+10.2)#890
47. Indiantown 14.2% 5.9% (+8.27)#47 4.1% (+10.0)#921
48. Pine Island Center 14.1% 5.9% (+8.27)#48 4.1% (+10.00)#923
49. Yankeetown 14.1% 5.9% (+8.22)#49 4.1% (+9.95)#930
50. Naples Manor 14.1% 5.9% (+8.22)#50 4.1% (+9.95)#931
51. Union Park 14.1% 5.9% (+8.19)#51 4.1% (+9.92)#936
52. Goulds 14.0% 5.9% (+8.09)#52 4.1% (+9.82)#947
53. Immokalee 13.9% 5.9% (+8.03)#53 4.1% (+9.76)#956
54. Naranja 13.9% 5.9% (+7.98)#54 4.1% (+9.71)#963
55. Florida City 13.8% 5.9% (+7.90)#55 4.1% (+9.63)#973
56. Washington Park 13.8% 5.9% (+7.90)#56 4.1% (+9.63)#974
57. Fort Myers Shores 13.8% 5.9% (+7.89)#57 4.1% (+9.62)#978
58. Taft 13.8% 5.9% (+7.88)#58 4.1% (+9.61)#980
59. Hillsboro Pines 13.6% 5.9% (+7.76)#59 4.1% (+9.49)#1,006
60. Clewiston 13.6% 5.9% (+7.74)#60 4.1% (+9.47)#1,014
61. Five Points 13.5% 5.9% (+7.64)#61 4.1% (+9.37)#1,031
62. Seminole Manor 13.5% 5.9% (+7.58)#62 4.1% (+9.31)#1,039
63. Fussels Corner 13.4% 5.9% (+7.50)#63 4.1% (+9.23)#1,049
64. White Springs 13.2% 5.9% (+7.34)#64 4.1% (+9.07)#1,075
65. Montura 13.2% 5.9% (+7.30)#65 4.1% (+9.03)#1,084
66. Fairview Shores 13.0% 5.9% (+7.15)#66 4.1% (+8.88)#1,117
67. Lake Helen 12.9% 5.9% (+6.99)#67 4.1% (+8.72)#1,143
68. Bay Hill 12.9% 5.9% (+6.99)#68 4.1% (+8.72)#1,144
69. Brownsville 12.7% 5.9% (+6.82)#69 4.1% (+8.55)#1,178
70. South Apopka 12.6% 5.9% (+6.69)#70 4.1% (+8.42)#1,197
71. Lake Alfred 12.5% 5.9% (+6.67)#71 4.1% (+8.40)#1,198
72. Springhill 12.5% 5.9% (+6.62)#72 4.1% (+8.35)#1,209
73. Oak Ridge 12.3% 5.9% (+6.40)#73 4.1% (+8.13)#1,247
74. Chattahoochee 12.2% 5.9% (+6.34)#74 4.1% (+8.07)#1,261
75. Wabasso 12.1% 5.9% (+6.19)#75 4.1% (+7.92)#1,297
76. Big Pine Key 12.0% 5.9% (+6.08)#76 4.1% (+7.81)#1,318
77. Westgate 11.9% 5.9% (+6.07)#77 4.1% (+7.80)#1,323
78. Mulat 11.9% 5.9% (+6.05)#78 4.1% (+7.78)#1,329
79. Royal Palm Estates 11.9% 5.9% (+5.99)#79 4.1% (+7.72)#1,341
80. Rainbow Park 11.9% 5.9% (+5.97)#80 4.1% (+7.70)#1,345
81. Rainbow Lakes Estates 11.8% 5.9% (+5.96)#81 4.1% (+7.69)#1,347
82. Bagdad 11.8% 5.9% (+5.90)#82 4.1% (+7.63)#1,358
83. Palm Beach Shores 11.8% 5.9% (+5.89)#83 4.1% (+7.61)#1,359
84. Cedar Grove 11.7% 5.9% (+5.85)#84 4.1% (+7.58)#1,373
85. Broadview Park 11.7% 5.9% (+5.82)#85 4.1% (+7.55)#1,380
86. Cocoa West 11.7% 5.9% (+5.79)#86 4.1% (+7.52)#1,385
87. St George Island 11.6% 5.9% (+5.76)#87 4.1% (+7.49)#1,397
88. San Castle 11.6% 5.9% (+5.70)#88 4.1% (+7.43)#1,405
89. Cleveland 11.6% 5.9% (+5.68)#89 4.1% (+7.41)#1,413
90. Gibsonton 11.6% 5.9% (+5.68)#90 4.1% (+7.41)#1,414
91. Lake Belvedere Estates 11.5% 5.9% (+5.66)#91 4.1% (+7.39)#1,418
92. Wildwood 11.2% 5.9% (+5.33)#92 4.1% (+7.06)#1,491
93. Fort White 11.2% 5.9% (+5.27)#93 4.1% (+7.00)#1,502
94. Bayshore Gardens 11.1% 5.9% (+5.22)#94 4.1% (+6.95)#1,528
95. Palm Springs 11.1% 5.9% (+5.19)#95 4.1% (+6.92)#1,535
96. Lake Sarasota 11.0% 5.9% (+5.13)#96 4.1% (+6.86)#1,550
97. South Highpoint 11.0% 5.9% (+5.12)#97 4.1% (+6.85)#1,555
98. Sky Lake 11.0% 5.9% (+5.09)#98 4.1% (+6.82)#1,560
99. Webster 11.0% 5.9% (+5.08)#99 4.1% (+6.81)#1,562
100. Hilliard 10.9% 5.9% (+5.02)#100 4.1% (+6.75)#1,584

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Florida?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Florida are:
#1
49.1%
#2
32.1%
#3
31.8%
#4
30.2%
#5
28.1%
#6
25.4%
#7
24.4%
#8
23.2%
#9
21.9%
#10
21.9%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Florida?
Lake Lindsey has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Florida with 49.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the State of Florida?
Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Florida is 5.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the United States is 4.1%.