Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in West Virginia

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Administrative & Support Services
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
West Virginia
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in West Virginia

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in West Virginia Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in West Virginia

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Twilight 100.0% 3.4% (+96.6)#1 4.1% (+95.9)#4
2. Switzer 63.3% 3.4% (+59.9)#2 4.1% (+59.2)#31
3. Cottageville 42.9% 3.4% (+39.4)#3 4.1% (+38.7)#88
4. Big Chimney 41.8% 3.4% (+38.4)#4 4.1% (+37.7)#93
5. Whitesville 31.2% 3.4% (+27.8)#5 4.1% (+27.1)#168
6. Greenview 29.0% 3.4% (+25.6)#6 4.1% (+24.8)#206
7. Gauley Bridge 28.6% 3.4% (+25.1)#7 4.1% (+24.4)#214
8. Accoville 25.5% 3.4% (+22.0)#8 4.1% (+21.3)#267
9. Hometown 25.0% 3.4% (+21.6)#9 4.1% (+20.9)#273
10. Blacksville 25.0% 3.4% (+21.6)#10 4.1% (+20.9)#285
11. Prince 23.5% 3.4% (+20.1)#11 4.1% (+19.4)#326
12. Albright 23.2% 3.4% (+19.7)#12 4.1% (+19.0)#336
13. Keystone 22.7% 3.4% (+19.3)#13 4.1% (+18.6)#355
14. Montcalm 19.1% 3.4% (+15.6)#14 4.1% (+14.9)#483
15. Lesage 17.1% 3.4% (+13.7)#15 4.1% (+13.0)#597
16. Bayard 15.4% 3.4% (+12.0)#16 4.1% (+11.2)#753
17. West Hamlin 15.3% 3.4% (+11.9)#17 4.1% (+11.1)#766
18. Justice Addition 14.9% 3.4% (+11.5)#18 4.1% (+10.8)#800
19. Frank 14.9% 3.4% (+11.5)#19 4.1% (+10.7)#811
20. Chauncey 14.8% 3.4% (+11.4)#20 4.1% (+10.7)#823
21. Oceana 14.6% 3.4% (+11.2)#21 4.1% (+10.5)#842
22. Hedgesville 14.6% 3.4% (+11.2)#22 4.1% (+10.5)#847
23. Newburg 14.0% 3.4% (+10.6)#23 4.1% (+9.89)#938
24. Gatewood 13.7% 3.4% (+10.3)#24 4.1% (+9.59)#985
25. Mineralwells 13.5% 3.4% (+10.0)#25 4.1% (+9.31)#1,038
26. Rock Cave 13.5% 3.4% (+10.0)#26 4.1% (+9.31)#1,040
27. Middleway 13.2% 3.4% (+9.81)#27 4.1% (+9.09)#1,073
28. Poca 13.1% 3.4% (+9.71)#28 4.1% (+8.98)#1,093
29. Malden 12.7% 3.4% (+9.23)#29 4.1% (+8.51)#1,183
30. Sylvester 12.5% 3.4% (+9.08)#30 4.1% (+8.35)#1,206
31. Wiley Ford 12.5% 3.4% (+9.03)#31 4.1% (+8.30)#1,221
32. War 12.2% 3.4% (+8.82)#32 4.1% (+8.10)#1,255
33. Monaville 12.1% 3.4% (+8.72)#33 4.1% (+7.99)#1,278
34. Reedy 12.1% 3.4% (+8.70)#34 4.1% (+7.97)#1,284
35. Franklin 12.0% 3.4% (+8.61)#35 4.1% (+7.88)#1,304
36. Scarbro 11.8% 3.4% (+8.34)#36 4.1% (+7.61)#1,362
37. Eleanor 11.2% 3.4% (+7.76)#37 4.1% (+7.03)#1,493
38. Chester 11.2% 3.4% (+7.76)#38 4.1% (+7.03)#1,494
39. Grant Town 11.0% 3.4% (+7.61)#39 4.1% (+6.88)#1,545
40. Craigsville 10.9% 3.4% (+7.53)#40 4.1% (+6.80)#1,567
41. Stanaford 10.9% 3.4% (+7.49)#41 4.1% (+6.76)#1,579
42. Sophia 10.9% 3.4% (+7.46)#42 4.1% (+6.74)#1,586
43. Brandywine 10.7% 3.4% (+7.24)#43 4.1% (+6.52)#1,643
44. Fairlea 10.5% 3.4% (+7.07)#44 4.1% (+6.34)#1,701
45. Mitchell Heights 9.9% 3.4% (+6.52)#45 4.1% (+5.80)#1,934
46. Pineville 9.8% 3.4% (+6.38)#46 4.1% (+5.65)#1,988
47. Mount Hope 9.7% 3.4% (+6.29)#47 4.1% (+5.57)#2,027
48. Wellsburg 9.7% 3.4% (+6.27)#48 4.1% (+5.54)#2,036
49. Barboursville 9.4% 3.4% (+5.95)#49 4.1% (+5.23)#2,181
50. Gassaway 9.2% 3.4% (+5.82)#50 4.1% (+5.09)#2,240
51. Piney View 8.8% 3.4% (+5.42)#51 4.1% (+4.70)#2,469
52. Washington 8.7% 3.4% (+5.25)#52 4.1% (+4.52)#2,574
53. Shinnston 8.6% 3.4% (+5.16)#53 4.1% (+4.43)#2,627
54. Coal Fork 8.6% 3.4% (+5.16)#54 4.1% (+4.43)#2,628
55. Quinwood 8.3% 3.4% (+4.91)#55 4.1% (+4.18)#2,791
56. Moorefield 8.2% 3.4% (+4.81)#56 4.1% (+4.08)#2,845
57. Kanawha 8.2% 3.4% (+4.79)#57 4.1% (+4.06)#2,866
58. Newell 8.2% 3.4% (+4.76)#58 4.1% (+4.04)#2,875
59. Meadow Bridge 8.1% 3.4% (+4.68)#59 4.1% (+3.96)#2,920
60. Crab Orchard 8.0% 3.4% (+4.53)#60 4.1% (+3.81)#3,021
61. West Logan 7.9% 3.4% (+4.52)#61 4.1% (+3.80)#3,028
62. Rand 7.8% 3.4% (+4.36)#62 4.1% (+3.63)#3,158
63. Philippi 7.7% 3.4% (+4.26)#63 4.1% (+3.54)#3,237
64. Flemington 7.5% 3.4% (+4.10)#64 4.1% (+3.38)#3,365
65. Hurricane 7.4% 3.4% (+3.96)#65 4.1% (+3.23)#3,515
66. East Bank 7.4% 3.4% (+3.95)#66 4.1% (+3.23)#3,518
67. Mount Gay Shamrock 7.3% 3.4% (+3.92)#67 4.1% (+3.19)#3,553
68. Alum Creek 7.2% 3.4% (+3.79)#68 4.1% (+3.06)#3,671
69. Burnsville 7.2% 3.4% (+3.76)#69 4.1% (+3.03)#3,700
70. Davis 7.1% 3.4% (+3.64)#70 4.1% (+2.92)#3,828
71. Masontown 7.0% 3.4% (+3.59)#71 4.1% (+2.87)#3,893
72. Martinsburg 6.9% 3.4% (+3.46)#72 4.1% (+2.74)#4,008
73. Wardensville 6.8% 3.4% (+3.38)#73 4.1% (+2.65)#4,094
74. Rainelle 6.5% 3.4% (+3.11)#74 4.1% (+2.38)#4,389
75. Wayne 6.5% 3.4% (+3.05)#75 4.1% (+2.32)#4,470
76. St Albans 6.3% 3.4% (+2.89)#76 4.1% (+2.17)#4,677
77. Moundsville 6.0% 3.4% (+2.62)#77 4.1% (+1.90)#5,059
78. Mcmechen 5.9% 3.4% (+2.49)#78 4.1% (+1.76)#5,287
79. Madison 5.8% 3.4% (+2.38)#79 4.1% (+1.66)#5,448
80. Benwood 5.8% 3.4% (+2.33)#80 4.1% (+1.60)#5,525
81. Nutter Fort 5.7% 3.4% (+2.25)#81 4.1% (+1.52)#5,682
82. Shannondale 5.6% 3.4% (+2.21)#82 4.1% (+1.48)#5,741
83. Triadelphia 5.6% 3.4% (+2.20)#83 4.1% (+1.48)#5,753
84. Follansbee 5.3% 3.4% (+1.88)#84 4.1% (+1.16)#6,380
85. Belle 5.3% 3.4% (+1.87)#85 4.1% (+1.14)#6,412
86. Hinton 5.3% 3.4% (+1.86)#86 4.1% (+1.14)#6,421
87. Thomas 5.3% 3.4% (+1.84)#87 4.1% (+1.11)#6,467
88. Fairview 5.3% 3.4% (+1.84)#88 4.1% (+1.11)#6,478
89. Ranson Corporation 5.2% 3.4% (+1.73)#89 4.1% (+1.01)#6,689
90. Cedar Grove 5.2% 3.4% (+1.73)#90 4.1% (+1.00)#6,697
91. Ceredo 5.1% 3.4% (+1.67)#91 4.1% (+0.939)#6,848
92. Pine Grove 5.1% 3.4% (+1.64)#92 4.1% (+0.913)#6,899
93. Matewan 5.0% 3.4% (+1.58)#93 4.1% (+0.850)#7,050
94. Great Cacapon 5.0% 3.4% (+1.53)#94 4.1% (+0.801)#7,162
95. New Martinsville 4.8% 3.4% (+1.35)#95 4.1% (+0.624)#7,586
96. Kermit 4.8% 3.4% (+1.34)#96 4.1% (+0.612)#7,619
97. Mill Creek 4.7% 3.4% (+1.25)#97 4.1% (+0.526)#7,836
98. Carpendale 4.7% 3.4% (+1.23)#98 4.1% (+0.501)#7,905
99. Tornado 4.6% 3.4% (+1.14)#99 4.1% (+0.415)#8,130
100. Charles Town 4.5% 3.4% (+1.11)#100 4.1% (+0.382)#8,221

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in West Virginia?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in West Virginia are:
#1
100.0%
#2
63.3%
#3
41.8%
#4
31.2%
#5
29.0%
#6
28.6%
#7
25.5%
#8
25.0%
#9
25.0%
#10
23.5%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in West Virginia?
Twilight has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in West Virginia with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the State of West Virginia?
Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in West Virginia is 3.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the United States is 4.1%.