Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in South Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Administrative & Support Services
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in South Dakota

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in South Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in South Dakota

City % Employed vs State vs National
1.Artas73.3%2.6%(+70.7)#14.1%(+69.2)#23
2.Little Eagle41.7%2.6%(+39.1)#24.1%(+37.5)#94
3.Rowena39.3%2.6%(+36.7)#34.1%(+35.1)#110
4.Seneca28.6%2.6%(+26.0)#44.1%(+24.4)#216
5.Parmelee20.6%2.6%(+18.0)#54.1%(+16.4)#419
6.Fairburn17.6%2.6%(+15.1)#64.1%(+13.5)#566
7.Allen17.1%2.6%(+14.5)#74.1%(+12.9)#600
8.Ashland Heights15.6%2.6%(+13.0)#84.1%(+11.5)#722
9.South Shore15.6%2.6%(+13.0)#94.1%(+11.4)#727
10.Leola15.4%2.6%(+12.8)#104.1%(+11.3)#748
11.New Witten15.2%2.6%(+12.6)#114.1%(+11.0)#776
12.Lebanon14.9%2.6%(+12.3)#124.1%(+10.7)#812
13.Antelope14.3%2.6%(+11.7)#134.1%(+10.1)#895
14.Sherman14.3%2.6%(+11.7)#144.1%(+10.1)#906
15.Bruce13.4%2.6%(+10.8)#154.1%(+9.24)#1,048
16.Oglala12.9%2.6%(+10.3)#164.1%(+8.72)#1,142
17.Oelrichs12.7%2.6%(+10.2)#174.1%(+8.60)#1,167
18.Wakonda11.4%2.6%(+8.79)#184.1%(+7.23)#1,447
19.Wolsey11.2%2.6%(+8.58)#194.1%(+7.02)#1,497
20.Forestburg11.1%2.6%(+8.52)#204.1%(+6.96)#1,523
21.Batesland10.0%2.6%(+7.41)#214.1%(+5.85)#1,911
22.Bison9.4%2.6%(+6.82)#224.1%(+5.27)#2,159
23.Cresbard9.3%2.6%(+6.71)#234.1%(+5.15)#2,211
24.Wonderland Homes9.2%2.6%(+6.63)#244.1%(+5.07)#2,254
25.Buffalo Gap7.8%2.6%(+5.25)#254.1%(+3.69)#3,120
26.White7.5%2.6%(+4.86)#264.1%(+3.31)#3,443
27.Mountain Plains7.3%2.6%(+4.70)#274.1%(+3.14)#3,599
28.Java7.1%2.6%(+4.55)#284.1%(+2.99)#3,757
29.Rapid Valley6.8%2.6%(+4.21)#294.1%(+2.66)#4,091
30.Oacoma6.8%2.6%(+4.17)#304.1%(+2.61)#4,135
31.Mcintosh6.5%2.6%(+3.93)#314.1%(+2.37)#4,421
32.Agency Village6.5%2.6%(+3.91)#324.1%(+2.35)#4,438
33.Centerville6.5%2.6%(+3.88)#334.1%(+2.33)#4,468
34.Green Valley6.5%2.6%(+3.86)#344.1%(+2.30)#4,497
35.Pine Lakes Addition6.3%2.6%(+3.73)#354.1%(+2.17)#4,671
36.Wessington Springs6.1%2.6%(+3.50)#364.1%(+1.94)#4,993
37.Peever6.0%2.6%(+3.41)#374.1%(+1.85)#5,149
38.Parker6.0%2.6%(+3.39)#384.1%(+1.83)#5,174
39.Custer5.8%2.6%(+3.26)#394.1%(+1.70)#5,384
40.Arlington5.6%2.6%(+3.04)#404.1%(+1.48)#5,730
41.Bonesteel5.6%2.6%(+3.03)#414.1%(+1.47)#5,767
42.Cavour5.6%2.6%(+2.96)#424.1%(+1.41)#5,884
43.Astoria5.6%2.6%(+2.96)#434.1%(+1.41)#5,886
44.Porcupine5.4%2.6%(+2.81)#444.1%(+1.26)#6,171
45.Stratford5.4%2.6%(+2.81)#454.1%(+1.26)#6,186
46.Lead5.4%2.6%(+2.81)#464.1%(+1.25)#6,190
47.Britton5.4%2.6%(+2.79)#474.1%(+1.23)#6,221
48.Mclaughlin5.3%2.6%(+2.69)#484.1%(+1.13)#6,426
49.Bristol5.2%2.6%(+2.59)#494.1%(+1.04)#6,644
50.Piedmont5.0%2.6%(+2.42)#504.1%(+0.859)#7,033
51.Camp Crook5.0%2.6%(+2.41)#514.1%(+0.850)#7,067
52.Clark4.9%2.6%(+2.31)#524.1%(+0.750)#7,280
53.Harrisburg4.9%2.6%(+2.29)#534.1%(+0.731)#7,331
54.Ethan4.9%2.6%(+2.29)#544.1%(+0.728)#7,345
55.Elkton4.9%2.6%(+2.28)#554.1%(+0.722)#7,360
56.Kenel4.8%2.6%(+2.25)#564.1%(+0.689)#7,423
57.Avon4.8%2.6%(+2.17)#574.1%(+0.612)#7,611
58.De Smet4.7%2.6%(+2.09)#584.1%(+0.529)#7,828
59.Letcher4.7%2.6%(+2.06)#594.1%(+0.501)#7,915
60.Blackhawk4.6%2.6%(+1.98)#604.1%(+0.424)#8,103
61.Rapid City4.6%2.6%(+1.97)#614.1%(+0.418)#8,117
62.Baltic4.4%2.6%(+1.81)#624.1%(+0.249)#8,591
63.Tyndall4.4%2.6%(+1.78)#634.1%(+0.218)#8,691
64.Elk Point4.3%2.6%(+1.72)#644.1%(+0.161)#8,880
65.Geddes4.2%2.6%(+1.63)#654.1%(+0.076)#9,152
66.Waubay4.2%2.6%(+1.60)#664.1%(+0.046)#9,237
67.Pierpont4.2%2.6%(+1.57)#674.1%(+0.017)#9,342
68.Martin4.2%2.6%(+1.56)#684.1%(+0.007)#9,362
69.Freeman4.1%2.6%(+1.55)#694.1%(-0.008)#9,405
70.Murdo4.1%2.6%(+1.51)#704.1%(-0.049)#9,514
71.Gregory4.0%2.6%(+1.44)#714.1%(-0.122)#9,752
72.Box Elder4.0%2.6%(+1.42)#724.1%(-0.134)#9,798
73.Yale4.0%2.6%(+1.41)#734.1%(-0.150)#9,860
74.Alcester3.9%2.6%(+1.35)#744.1%(-0.202)#10,033
75.Marion3.9%2.6%(+1.29)#754.1%(-0.271)#10,244
76.Castlewood3.8%2.6%(+1.24)#764.1%(-0.314)#10,395
77.Deadwood3.8%2.6%(+1.22)#774.1%(-0.335)#10,463
78.Northville3.8%2.6%(+1.20)#784.1%(-0.352)#10,524
79.Mobridge3.8%2.6%(+1.18)#794.1%(-0.379)#10,624
80.Johnson Siding3.7%2.6%(+1.16)#804.1%(-0.400)#10,697
81.Lower Brule3.7%2.6%(+1.07)#814.1%(-0.491)#11,018
82.Brandon3.7%2.6%(+1.06)#824.1%(-0.492)#11,029
83.Rosebud3.6%2.6%(+1.06)#834.1%(-0.500)#11,053
84.Trent3.6%2.6%(+1.02)#844.1%(-0.535)#11,189
85.Bryant3.5%2.6%(+0.896)#854.1%(-0.661)#11,643
86.Sisseton3.5%2.6%(+0.876)#864.1%(-0.682)#11,732
87.Summerset3.3%2.6%(+0.745)#874.1%(-0.812)#12,213
88.Brandt3.3%2.6%(+0.741)#884.1%(-0.816)#12,244
89.Lennox3.3%2.6%(+0.712)#894.1%(-0.845)#12,346
90.Sioux Falls3.3%2.6%(+0.665)#904.1%(-0.892)#12,510
91.Kranzburg3.2%2.6%(+0.633)#914.1%(-0.924)#12,624
92.Whitewood3.0%2.6%(+0.455)#924.1%(-1.10)#13,240
93.Redfield3.0%2.6%(+0.432)#934.1%(-1.13)#13,347
94.Armour3.0%2.6%(+0.407)#944.1%(-1.15)#13,449
95.Colton3.0%2.6%(+0.363)#954.1%(-1.19)#13,622
96.Canistota2.9%2.6%(+0.273)#964.1%(-1.28)#13,961
97.Strandburg2.9%2.6%(+0.264)#974.1%(-1.29)#14,009
98.Crooks2.8%2.6%(+0.237)#984.1%(-1.32)#14,104
99.Pollock2.8%2.6%(+0.224)#994.1%(-1.33)#14,160
100.Belle Fourche2.8%2.6%(+0.223)#1004.1%(-1.33)#14,166

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in South Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in South Dakota are:
#1
73.3%
#2
41.7%
#3
28.6%
#4
20.6%
#5
17.6%
#6
17.1%
#7
15.6%
#8
15.6%
#9
15.4%
#10
15.2%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in South Dakota?
Artas has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in South Dakota with 73.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the State of South Dakota?
Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in South Dakota is 2.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the United States is 4.1%.