Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in North Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Administrative & Support Services
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in North Dakota

0.0%
40.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in North Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in North Dakota

City % Employed vs State vs National
1.Grenora30.3%2.5%(+27.8)#14.1%(+26.2)#181
2.Arnegard20.0%2.5%(+17.5)#24.1%(+15.9)#435
3.Dodge18.8%2.5%(+16.2)#34.1%(+14.6)#498
4.Carpio17.3%2.5%(+14.8)#44.1%(+13.2)#589
5.Sibley16.7%2.5%(+14.1)#54.1%(+12.5)#637
6.Marmarth16.2%2.5%(+13.7)#64.1%(+12.1)#671
7.Alexander15.8%2.5%(+13.3)#74.1%(+11.6)#698
8.Shell Valley14.9%2.5%(+12.4)#84.1%(+10.8)#806
9.Rhame14.1%2.5%(+11.6)#94.1%(+9.93)#935
10.Wyndmere13.6%2.5%(+11.1)#104.1%(+9.47)#1,017
11.Deering12.2%2.5%(+9.72)#114.1%(+8.10)#1,258
12.Driscoll12.0%2.5%(+9.47)#124.1%(+7.85)#1,312
13.Lankin11.1%2.5%(+8.58)#134.1%(+6.96)#1,518
14.Medora10.7%2.5%(+8.14)#144.1%(+6.52)#1,644
15.North River10.5%2.5%(+8.00)#154.1%(+6.38)#1,692
16.Douglas10.3%2.5%(+7.82)#164.1%(+6.20)#1,767
17.Rolla9.8%2.5%(+7.32)#174.1%(+5.69)#1,973
18.Ryder9.8%2.5%(+7.23)#184.1%(+5.61)#2,013
19.East Dunseith9.4%2.5%(+6.91)#194.1%(+5.28)#2,151
20.Harmon9.0%2.5%(+6.48)#204.1%(+4.86)#2,374
21.Epping8.8%2.5%(+6.24)#214.1%(+4.62)#2,510
22.Apple Valley8.7%2.5%(+6.20)#224.1%(+4.58)#2,538
23.Great Bend8.7%2.5%(+6.17)#234.1%(+4.55)#2,564
24.Frontier7.8%2.5%(+5.32)#244.1%(+3.69)#3,118
25.Granville7.6%2.5%(+5.11)#254.1%(+3.49)#3,280
26.Lakota7.1%2.5%(+4.56)#264.1%(+2.94)#3,800
27.Berthold7.0%2.5%(+4.51)#274.1%(+2.89)#3,869
28.Towner7.0%2.5%(+4.47)#284.1%(+2.85)#3,910
29.Emerado6.2%2.5%(+3.72)#294.1%(+2.10)#4,761
30.Warwick6.2%2.5%(+3.72)#304.1%(+2.10)#4,774
31.Wing6.0%2.5%(+3.51)#314.1%(+1.88)#5,082
32.Fort Totten5.9%2.5%(+3.39)#324.1%(+1.77)#5,281
33.Menoken5.9%2.5%(+3.36)#334.1%(+1.73)#5,344
34.Ashley5.8%2.5%(+3.29)#344.1%(+1.67)#5,424
35.Des Lacs5.8%2.5%(+3.27)#354.1%(+1.65)#5,463
36.Hunter5.5%2.5%(+2.99)#364.1%(+1.37)#5,957
37.Gladstone5.5%2.5%(+2.95)#374.1%(+1.33)#6,048
38.Kulm5.4%2.5%(+2.84)#384.1%(+1.22)#6,240
39.White Shield5.3%2.5%(+2.79)#394.1%(+1.17)#6,350
40.Manvel5.2%2.5%(+2.64)#404.1%(+1.01)#6,677
41.Gackle5.0%2.5%(+2.47)#414.1%(+0.850)#7,056
42.Gardner4.9%2.5%(+2.35)#424.1%(+0.728)#7,350
43.Pick City4.7%2.5%(+2.12)#434.1%(+0.501)#7,917
44.Tappen4.5%2.5%(+1.98)#444.1%(+0.355)#8,289
45.Dawson4.3%2.5%(+1.82)#454.1%(+0.198)#8,767
46.Carson4.2%2.5%(+1.67)#464.1%(+0.046)#9,238
47.Lincoln4.0%2.5%(+1.49)#474.1%(-0.128)#9,777
48.Sawyer4.0%2.5%(+1.47)#484.1%(-0.150)#9,857
49.Haynes4.0%2.5%(+1.47)#494.1%(-0.150)#9,869
50.Arthur3.9%2.5%(+1.34)#504.1%(-0.279)#10,275
51.Walcott3.9%2.5%(+1.34)#514.1%(-0.279)#10,276
52.Bisbee3.8%2.5%(+1.32)#524.1%(-0.304)#10,365
53.Fargo3.8%2.5%(+1.31)#534.1%(-0.311)#10,381
54.Minot3.8%2.5%(+1.30)#544.1%(-0.327)#10,431
55.Davenport3.7%2.5%(+1.22)#554.1%(-0.400)#10,701
56.Fessenden3.6%2.5%(+1.11)#564.1%(-0.513)#11,102
57.Dickinson3.6%2.5%(+1.06)#574.1%(-0.566)#11,302
58.Mapleton3.5%2.5%(+0.997)#584.1%(-0.626)#11,517
59.Belcourt3.5%2.5%(+0.943)#594.1%(-0.680)#11,727
60.Garrison3.4%2.5%(+0.921)#604.1%(-0.702)#11,804
61.Larimore3.4%2.5%(+0.884)#614.1%(-0.739)#11,932
62.Steele3.4%2.5%(+0.841)#624.1%(-0.782)#12,103
63.Columbus3.3%2.5%(+0.806)#634.1%(-0.816)#12,246
64.Burlington3.3%2.5%(+0.801)#644.1%(-0.822)#12,261
65.Regent3.3%2.5%(+0.769)#654.1%(-0.853)#12,376
66.Cogswell3.2%2.5%(+0.698)#664.1%(-0.924)#12,628
67.Briarwood3.2%2.5%(+0.698)#674.1%(-0.924)#12,633
68.Devils Lake3.2%2.5%(+0.634)#684.1%(-0.989)#12,848
69.Oakes3.1%2.5%(+0.614)#694.1%(-1.01)#12,925
70.New Salem3.1%2.5%(+0.550)#704.1%(-1.07)#13,140
71.Selfridge3.0%2.5%(+0.503)#714.1%(-1.12)#13,326
72.Park River3.0%2.5%(+0.456)#724.1%(-1.17)#13,520
73.Cavalier2.9%2.5%(+0.414)#734.1%(-1.21)#13,675
74.Aneta2.9%2.5%(+0.414)#744.1%(-1.21)#13,688
75.Mott2.9%2.5%(+0.350)#754.1%(-1.27)#13,910
76.Velva2.9%2.5%(+0.330)#764.1%(-1.29)#13,986
77.West Fargo2.9%2.5%(+0.327)#774.1%(-1.30)#14,012
78.Kenmare2.8%2.5%(+0.308)#784.1%(-1.31)#14,082
79.Harvey2.8%2.5%(+0.278)#794.1%(-1.34)#14,198
80.Hazelton2.8%2.5%(+0.250)#804.1%(-1.37)#14,323
81.Hankinson2.7%2.5%(+0.222)#814.1%(-1.40)#14,428
82.Fairmount2.7%2.5%(+0.212)#824.1%(-1.41)#14,468
83.Turtle Lake2.6%2.5%(+0.104)#834.1%(-1.52)#14,893
84.Bismarck2.6%2.5%(+0.045)#844.1%(-1.58)#15,136
85.Cooperstown2.6%2.5%(+0.037)#854.1%(-1.59)#15,170
86.Abercrombie2.6%2.5%(+0.037)#864.1%(-1.59)#15,184
87.Mooreton2.6%2.5%(+0.037)#874.1%(-1.59)#15,187
88.Oxbow2.5%2.5%(-0.027)#884.1%(-1.65)#15,427
89.Adams2.4%2.5%(-0.146)#894.1%(-1.77)#15,883
90.Dunseith2.4%2.5%(-0.154)#904.1%(-1.78)#15,909
91.Mandaree2.4%2.5%(-0.174)#914.1%(-1.80)#15,981
92.Dazey2.2%2.5%(-0.305)#924.1%(-1.93)#16,493
93.Langdon2.2%2.5%(-0.375)#934.1%(-2.00)#16,746
94.Bottineau2.1%2.5%(-0.379)#944.1%(-2.00)#16,759
95.New Town2.1%2.5%(-0.382)#954.1%(-2.00)#16,771
96.Minot Afb2.1%2.5%(-0.392)#964.1%(-2.01)#16,804
97.Mandan2.1%2.5%(-0.393)#974.1%(-2.02)#16,814
98.Richardton2.1%2.5%(-0.395)#984.1%(-2.02)#16,819
99.Horace2.1%2.5%(-0.409)#994.1%(-2.03)#16,874
100.Grand Forks2.1%2.5%(-0.417)#1004.1%(-2.04)#16,913

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in North Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in North Dakota are:
#1
30.3%
#2
20.0%
#3
18.8%
#4
17.3%
#5
16.7%
#6
16.2%
#7
15.8%
#8
14.9%
#9
14.1%
#10
13.6%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in North Dakota?
Grenora has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in North Dakota with 30.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the State of North Dakota?
Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in North Dakota is 2.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the United States is 4.1%.