Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Tacoma, WA

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Walk to Work
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBelarusBelizeBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLiberiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBelarusBelizeBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLiberiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tacoma
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Tacoma

19.5%
67.6%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Tacoma Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Tacoma, WA

Zip Code % Walk to Work vs State vs National
1. 98404 67.6% 31.9% (+35.7)#9 33.4% (+34.2)#297
2. 98446 58.4% 31.9% (+26.5)#33 33.4% (+25.0)#1,851
3. 98418 56.1% 31.9% (+24.2)#47 33.4% (+22.7)#2,556
4. 98408 54.4% 31.9% (+22.5)#58 33.4% (+21.0)#3,056
5. 98422 49.8% 31.9% (+17.9)#90 33.4% (+16.4)#4,623
6. 98407 45.1% 31.9% (+13.2)#124 33.4% (+11.7)#6,374
7. 98403 41.1% 31.9% (+9.20)#155 33.4% (+7.70)#7,933
8. 98409 36.4% 31.9% (+4.50)#212 33.4% (+3.00)#9,923
9. 98406 36.4% 31.9% (+4.50)#213 33.4% (+3.00)#9,928
10. 98466 35.5% 31.9% (+3.60)#225 33.4% (+2.10)#10,325
11. 98405 34.5% 31.9% (+2.60)#232 33.4% (+1.10)#10,758
12. 98444 32.3% 31.9% (+0.400)#253 33.4% (-1.10)#11,677
13. 98445 28.2% 31.9% (-3.70)#295 33.4% (-5.20)#13,274
14. 98402 25.8% 31.9% (-6.10)#313 33.4% (-7.60)#14,066
15. 98433 22.6% 31.9% (-9.30)#345 33.4% (-10.8)#15,067
16. 98416 20.6% 31.9% (-11.3)#356 33.4% (-12.8)#16,061
17. 98447 19.5% 31.9% (-12.4)#365 33.4% (-13.9)#16,482

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Tacoma, WA?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Tacoma, WA are:
#1
67.6%
#2
58.4%
#3
56.1%
#4
54.4%
#5
49.8%
#6
45.1%
#7
41.1%
#8
36.4%
#9
36.4%
#10
35.5%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Tacoma, WA?
98404 has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Tacoma, WA with 67.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Tacoma, WA?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Tacoma is 36.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Washington?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Washington is 31.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States is 33.4%.