Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Michigan

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Professional & Scientific Services
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Michigan
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Michigan

0.0%
40.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Michigan Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Michigan

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Trufant 33.9% 6.0% (+27.9)#1 7.8% (+26.0)#198
2. Emmett 31.5% 6.0% (+25.5)#2 7.8% (+23.7)#247
3. Michiana 31.1% 6.0% (+25.1)#3 7.8% (+23.3)#253
4. Grand Beach 26.9% 6.0% (+20.9)#4 7.8% (+19.0)#385
5. Bergland 25.5% 6.0% (+19.5)#5 7.8% (+17.7)#442
6. Beverly Hills 23.1% 6.0% (+17.1)#6 7.8% (+15.3)#573
7. Advance 22.8% 6.0% (+16.8)#7 7.8% (+14.9)#602
8. Fulton 22.2% 6.0% (+16.2)#8 7.8% (+14.4)#649
9. Grosse Pointe Farms 22.1% 6.0% (+16.1)#9 7.8% (+14.3)#658
10. Pleasant Ridge 21.7% 6.0% (+15.7)#10 7.8% (+13.9)#691
11. Eastport 21.7% 6.0% (+15.7)#11 7.8% (+13.9)#698
12. Franklin 20.8% 6.0% (+14.8)#12 7.8% (+12.9)#806
13. Barton Hills 19.3% 6.0% (+13.3)#13 7.8% (+11.4)#975
14. Northville 18.9% 6.0% (+12.9)#14 7.8% (+11.1)#1,036
15. Bloomfield Hills 17.7% 6.0% (+11.7)#15 7.8% (+9.84)#1,228
16. Birmingham 17.7% 6.0% (+11.7)#16 7.8% (+9.82)#1,235
17. Orchard Lake Village 17.4% 6.0% (+11.4)#17 7.8% (+9.60)#1,284
18. Mears 16.5% 6.0% (+10.5)#18 7.8% (+8.69)#1,473
19. Sylvan Lake 16.5% 6.0% (+10.5)#19 7.8% (+8.68)#1,479
20. Huntington Woods 15.5% 6.0% (+9.45)#20 7.8% (+7.61)#1,744
21. Royal Oak 15.4% 6.0% (+9.36)#21 7.8% (+7.52)#1,780
22. Ferndale 15.2% 6.0% (+9.20)#22 7.8% (+7.36)#1,807
23. Copper Harbor 14.8% 6.0% (+8.81)#23 7.8% (+6.97)#1,924
24. Ferrysburg 14.5% 6.0% (+8.52)#24 7.8% (+6.67)#2,018
25. Berkley 14.2% 6.0% (+8.18)#25 7.8% (+6.34)#2,113
26. East Grand Rapids 14.2% 6.0% (+8.17)#26 7.8% (+6.33)#2,118
27. Glen Arbor 14.2% 6.0% (+8.15)#27 7.8% (+6.31)#2,121
28. Grosse Pointe Park 14.1% 6.0% (+8.13)#28 7.8% (+6.29)#2,133
29. Farmington 14.1% 6.0% (+8.07)#29 7.8% (+6.23)#2,150
30. Dexter 14.0% 6.0% (+8.00)#30 7.8% (+6.15)#2,177
31. Troy 13.6% 6.0% (+7.63)#31 7.8% (+5.79)#2,292
32. Village Of Clarkston 13.2% 6.0% (+7.24)#32 7.8% (+5.40)#2,448
33. Chums Corner 13.2% 6.0% (+7.15)#33 7.8% (+5.31)#2,483
34. Keego Harbor 13.1% 6.0% (+7.07)#34 7.8% (+5.23)#2,518
35. Grosse Pointe 13.1% 6.0% (+7.05)#35 7.8% (+5.21)#2,524
36. Bingham Farms 12.8% 6.0% (+6.80)#36 7.8% (+4.96)#2,616
37. Presque Isle Harbor 12.8% 6.0% (+6.77)#37 7.8% (+4.93)#2,626
38. Novi 12.7% 6.0% (+6.71)#38 7.8% (+4.87)#2,658
39. Clawson 12.7% 6.0% (+6.69)#39 7.8% (+4.85)#2,674
40. Paw Paw Lake 12.7% 6.0% (+6.67)#40 7.8% (+4.83)#2,680
41. Forest Hills 12.6% 6.0% (+6.58)#41 7.8% (+4.74)#2,715
42. Cross Village 12.5% 6.0% (+6.49)#42 7.8% (+4.65)#2,766
43. Farmington Hills 12.4% 6.0% (+6.40)#43 7.8% (+4.56)#2,805
44. Lake Michigan Beach 12.3% 6.0% (+6.29)#44 7.8% (+4.45)#2,857
45. Plymouth 12.1% 6.0% (+6.08)#45 7.8% (+4.24)#2,964
46. Honor 12.1% 6.0% (+6.06)#46 7.8% (+4.22)#2,969
47. Grosse Pointe Woods 12.0% 6.0% (+6.04)#47 7.8% (+4.20)#2,976
48. Village Of Grosse Pointe Shores 11.8% 6.0% (+5.82)#48 7.8% (+3.98)#3,099
49. Douglas 11.8% 6.0% (+5.80)#49 7.8% (+3.96)#3,111
50. Ann Arbor 11.5% 6.0% (+5.51)#50 7.8% (+3.67)#3,252
51. Empire 11.5% 6.0% (+5.48)#51 7.8% (+3.64)#3,267
52. Crystal 11.4% 6.0% (+5.38)#52 7.8% (+3.54)#3,312
53. Millburg 11.2% 6.0% (+5.15)#53 7.8% (+3.30)#3,432
54. White Pine 11.0% 6.0% (+5.01)#54 7.8% (+3.17)#3,502
55. Hermansville 10.9% 6.0% (+4.88)#55 7.8% (+3.04)#3,588
56. Rochester Hills 10.7% 6.0% (+4.73)#56 7.8% (+2.89)#3,687
57. Madison Heights 10.6% 6.0% (+4.56)#57 7.8% (+2.72)#3,798
58. Henderson 10.6% 6.0% (+4.55)#58 7.8% (+2.71)#3,801
59. Auburn Hills 10.5% 6.0% (+4.54)#59 7.8% (+2.70)#3,816
60. Oak Park 10.4% 6.0% (+4.39)#60 7.8% (+2.55)#3,909
61. Brighton 10.3% 6.0% (+4.33)#61 7.8% (+2.49)#3,951
62. Chelsea 10.3% 6.0% (+4.33)#62 7.8% (+2.49)#3,952
63. Saugatuck 10.3% 6.0% (+4.32)#63 7.8% (+2.48)#3,962
64. Beulah 10.2% 6.0% (+4.20)#64 7.8% (+2.36)#4,040
65. South Haven 10.1% 6.0% (+4.09)#65 7.8% (+2.25)#4,106
66. Milford 10.0% 6.0% (+4.03)#66 7.8% (+2.19)#4,129
67. Kingsley 10.0% 6.0% (+4.01)#67 7.8% (+2.17)#4,145
68. Lakeport 9.9% 6.0% (+3.89)#68 7.8% (+2.05)#4,221
69. Okemos 9.9% 6.0% (+3.86)#69 7.8% (+2.02)#4,244
70. Walled Lake 9.8% 6.0% (+3.76)#70 7.8% (+1.92)#4,321
71. Lathrup Village 9.7% 6.0% (+3.66)#71 7.8% (+1.82)#4,391
72. Saline 9.6% 6.0% (+3.63)#72 7.8% (+1.79)#4,418
73. Lake Angelus 9.6% 6.0% (+3.62)#73 7.8% (+1.78)#4,424
74. Lamont 9.6% 6.0% (+3.58)#74 7.8% (+1.74)#4,447
75. Wixom 9.3% 6.0% (+3.24)#75 7.8% (+1.40)#4,739
76. Belleville 9.1% 6.0% (+3.12)#76 7.8% (+1.28)#4,840
77. Pinckney 9.1% 6.0% (+3.06)#77 7.8% (+1.22)#4,902
78. Level Park Oak Park 9.0% 6.0% (+3.04)#78 7.8% (+1.20)#4,929
79. Rochester 9.0% 6.0% (+3.02)#79 7.8% (+1.18)#4,937
80. Blissfield 9.0% 6.0% (+2.98)#80 7.8% (+1.14)#4,966
81. Traverse City 8.9% 6.0% (+2.93)#81 7.8% (+1.09)#5,019
82. Norwood 8.9% 6.0% (+2.88)#82 7.8% (+1.04)#5,065
83. Chatham 8.9% 6.0% (+2.88)#83 7.8% (+1.04)#5,067
84. Vicksburg 8.8% 6.0% (+2.84)#84 7.8% (+1.00)#5,105
85. Haslett 8.8% 6.0% (+2.83)#85 7.8% (+0.986)#5,119
86. Negaunee 8.7% 6.0% (+2.72)#86 7.8% (+0.874)#5,217
87. New Baltimore 8.7% 6.0% (+2.66)#87 7.8% (+0.819)#5,264
88. Gwinn 8.6% 6.0% (+2.63)#88 7.8% (+0.792)#5,288
89. Westwood 8.6% 6.0% (+2.59)#89 7.8% (+0.744)#5,331
90. Grand Haven 8.5% 6.0% (+2.51)#90 7.8% (+0.669)#5,395
91. Fenton 8.5% 6.0% (+2.49)#91 7.8% (+0.648)#5,407
92. Hancock 8.5% 6.0% (+2.46)#92 7.8% (+0.622)#5,424
93. West Ishpeming 8.5% 6.0% (+2.45)#93 7.8% (+0.610)#5,440
94. Beal City 8.4% 6.0% (+2.43)#94 7.8% (+0.586)#5,458
95. Spring Lake 8.4% 6.0% (+2.42)#95 7.8% (+0.579)#5,471
96. Twin Lake 8.4% 6.0% (+2.40)#96 7.8% (+0.558)#5,499
97. Harvey 8.4% 6.0% (+2.36)#97 7.8% (+0.520)#5,529
98. Oxford 8.4% 6.0% (+2.35)#98 7.8% (+0.512)#5,533
99. Elk Rapids 8.3% 6.0% (+2.33)#99 7.8% (+0.486)#5,555
100. Fairgrove 8.3% 6.0% (+2.33)#100 7.8% (+0.486)#5,560

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Michigan?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Michigan are:
#1
31.5%
#2
31.1%
#3
26.9%
#4
23.1%
#5
22.8%
#6
22.1%
#7
21.7%
#8
21.7%
#9
20.8%
#10
19.3%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Michigan?
Emmett has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Michigan with 31.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in the State of Michigan?
Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Michigan is 6.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in the United States is 7.8%.