Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Professional & Scientific Services
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Oklahoma

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Oklahoma

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Yeager 82.1% 5.3% (+76.8)#1 7.8% (+74.2)#25
2. Gowen 66.7% 5.3% (+61.4)#2 7.8% (+58.8)#32
3. Platter 52.9% 5.3% (+47.7)#3 7.8% (+45.1)#62
4. Ixl 30.8% 5.3% (+25.5)#4 7.8% (+22.9)#262
5. Elm Grove 29.3% 5.3% (+24.0)#5 7.8% (+21.4)#300
6. Hanson 28.2% 5.3% (+22.9)#6 7.8% (+20.4)#325
7. Bison 27.8% 5.3% (+22.5)#7 7.8% (+19.9)#347
8. Murphy 27.7% 5.3% (+22.4)#8 7.8% (+19.8)#352
9. Deer Lick 27.5% 5.3% (+22.2)#9 7.8% (+19.7)#360
10. Christie 24.4% 5.3% (+19.1)#10 7.8% (+16.5)#498
11. Bearden 24.1% 5.3% (+18.9)#11 7.8% (+16.3)#514
12. Terlton 22.2% 5.3% (+16.9)#12 7.8% (+14.4)#651
13. Fargo 20.0% 5.3% (+14.7)#13 7.8% (+12.2)#877
14. Lequire 20.0% 5.3% (+14.7)#14 7.8% (+12.2)#881
15. Nichols Hills 19.6% 5.3% (+14.3)#15 7.8% (+11.7)#938
16. Kremlin 19.5% 5.3% (+14.2)#16 7.8% (+11.6)#953
17. Woodlawn Park 18.9% 5.3% (+13.6)#17 7.8% (+11.0)#1,044
18. Evening Shade 18.6% 5.3% (+13.3)#18 7.8% (+10.7)#1,076
19. Cleora 17.7% 5.3% (+12.4)#19 7.8% (+9.84)#1,227
20. Liberty 17.1% 5.3% (+11.9)#20 7.8% (+9.30)#1,340
21. Baron 17.0% 5.3% (+11.7)#21 7.8% (+9.12)#1,379
22. Douglas 16.7% 5.3% (+11.4)#22 7.8% (+8.82)#1,450
23. Dry Creek 16.2% 5.3% (+10.9)#23 7.8% (+8.33)#1,561
24. Sequoyah 15.3% 5.3% (+10.1)#24 7.8% (+7.49)#1,784
25. Elmer 15.0% 5.3% (+9.72)#25 7.8% (+7.15)#1,861
26. River Bottom 14.8% 5.3% (+9.49)#26 7.8% (+6.93)#1,943
27. Francis 14.6% 5.3% (+9.30)#27 7.8% (+6.74)#1,988
28. Hoffman 13.8% 5.3% (+8.51)#28 7.8% (+5.95)#2,234
29. Watonga 13.5% 5.3% (+8.19)#29 7.8% (+5.62)#2,356
30. Paradise Hill 13.3% 5.3% (+8.05)#30 7.8% (+5.49)#2,414
31. Zion 13.3% 5.3% (+8.05)#31 7.8% (+5.49)#2,418
32. Gould 13.2% 5.3% (+7.88)#32 7.8% (+5.31)#2,487
33. Notchietown 12.9% 5.3% (+7.59)#33 7.8% (+5.02)#2,598
34. Texanna 12.4% 5.3% (+7.15)#34 7.8% (+4.58)#2,794
35. Oaks 12.1% 5.3% (+6.84)#35 7.8% (+4.27)#2,945
36. Cleo Springs 12.0% 5.3% (+6.68)#36 7.8% (+4.12)#3,018
37. Turley 11.9% 5.3% (+6.62)#37 7.8% (+4.05)#3,060
38. Lake Aluma 11.1% 5.3% (+5.83)#38 7.8% (+3.26)#3,463
39. Grainola 11.1% 5.3% (+5.83)#39 7.8% (+3.26)#3,464
40. Fletcher 10.8% 5.3% (+5.55)#40 7.8% (+2.99)#3,630
41. Gregory 10.5% 5.3% (+5.19)#41 7.8% (+2.63)#3,859
42. Davidson 10.1% 5.3% (+4.82)#42 7.8% (+2.25)#4,100
43. Edmond 10.1% 5.3% (+4.80)#43 7.8% (+2.24)#4,109
44. Maysville 10.0% 5.3% (+4.74)#44 7.8% (+2.17)#4,141
45. Silo 9.8% 5.3% (+4.53)#45 7.8% (+1.97)#4,284
46. Covington 9.5% 5.3% (+4.22)#46 7.8% (+1.65)#4,536
47. Tupelo 9.4% 5.3% (+4.12)#47 7.8% (+1.55)#4,610
48. Cole 9.3% 5.3% (+4.02)#48 7.8% (+1.45)#4,699
49. Lebanon 9.1% 5.3% (+3.81)#49 7.8% (+1.24)#4,878
50. Kildare 9.1% 5.3% (+3.81)#50 7.8% (+1.24)#4,886
51. Briartown 8.7% 5.3% (+3.41)#51 7.8% (+0.848)#5,247
52. Leach 8.1% 5.3% (+2.86)#52 7.8% (+0.292)#5,750
53. Deer Creek 8.1% 5.3% (+2.83)#53 7.8% (+0.261)#5,793
54. Twin Oaks 7.9% 5.3% (+2.58)#54 7.8% (+0.010)#6,068
55. The Village 7.8% 5.3% (+2.52)#55 7.8% (-0.050)#6,135
56. Norman 7.8% 5.3% (+2.48)#56 7.8% (-0.087)#6,183
57. Norwood 7.7% 5.3% (+2.42)#57 7.8% (-0.143)#6,228
58. Whitesboro 7.7% 5.3% (+2.41)#58 7.8% (-0.155)#6,249
59. Wainwright 7.7% 5.3% (+2.41)#59 7.8% (-0.155)#6,253
60. Lawrence Creek 7.7% 5.3% (+2.41)#60 7.8% (-0.155)#6,255
61. Avant 7.6% 5.3% (+2.33)#61 7.8% (-0.239)#6,353
62. Mustang 7.4% 5.3% (+2.07)#62 7.8% (-0.497)#6,642
63. Bixby 7.3% 5.3% (+2.03)#63 7.8% (-0.532)#6,698
64. Newcastle 7.3% 5.3% (+2.03)#64 7.8% (-0.534)#6,701
65. Oklahoma City 7.3% 5.3% (+2.02)#65 7.8% (-0.546)#6,717
66. Pocasset 7.2% 5.3% (+1.97)#66 7.8% (-0.601)#6,775
67. Grove 7.2% 5.3% (+1.94)#67 7.8% (-0.626)#6,801
68. Shady Grove Cdp Mcintosh County 7.2% 5.3% (+1.91)#68 7.8% (-0.658)#6,843
69. North Enid 7.2% 5.3% (+1.88)#69 7.8% (-0.690)#6,875
70. Goldsby 7.1% 5.3% (+1.87)#70 7.8% (-0.699)#6,884
71. Hallett 7.1% 5.3% (+1.86)#71 7.8% (-0.705)#6,913
72. Cyril 7.1% 5.3% (+1.83)#72 7.8% (-0.733)#6,949
73. Slick 7.0% 5.3% (+1.74)#73 7.8% (-0.830)#7,073
74. Taylor Ferry 7.0% 5.3% (+1.71)#74 7.8% (-0.858)#7,112
75. Elgin 6.9% 5.3% (+1.64)#75 7.8% (-0.923)#7,213
76. Indiahoma 6.8% 5.3% (+1.54)#76 7.8% (-1.03)#7,342
77. Tulsa 6.8% 5.3% (+1.48)#77 7.8% (-1.09)#7,420
78. Sand Hill 6.7% 5.3% (+1.44)#78 7.8% (-1.12)#7,479
79. Owasso 6.7% 5.3% (+1.42)#79 7.8% (-1.15)#7,508
80. Waynoka 6.7% 5.3% (+1.39)#80 7.8% (-1.18)#7,557
81. Summit 6.7% 5.3% (+1.39)#81 7.8% (-1.18)#7,576
82. Watts 6.6% 5.3% (+1.30)#82 7.8% (-1.27)#7,695
83. Tiawah 6.5% 5.3% (+1.24)#83 7.8% (-1.33)#7,780
84. Moodys 6.5% 5.3% (+1.19)#84 7.8% (-1.37)#7,845
85. Welty 6.4% 5.3% (+1.10)#85 7.8% (-1.46)#7,961
86. Sportsmen Acres 6.4% 5.3% (+1.09)#86 7.8% (-1.47)#7,976
87. Union City 6.4% 5.3% (+1.09)#87 7.8% (-1.48)#7,986
88. Helena 6.3% 5.3% (+1.07)#88 7.8% (-1.50)#8,008
89. Moore 6.3% 5.3% (+1.02)#89 7.8% (-1.55)#8,074
90. Broken Arrow 6.3% 5.3% (+0.986)#90 7.8% (-1.58)#8,116
91. Randlett 6.1% 5.3% (+0.864)#91 7.8% (-1.70)#8,299
92. Oktaha 6.0% 5.3% (+0.753)#92 7.8% (-1.81)#8,473
93. Blanchard 6.0% 5.3% (+0.749)#93 7.8% (-1.82)#8,480
94. Medicine Park 6.0% 5.3% (+0.743)#94 7.8% (-1.82)#8,489
95. Piedmont 5.9% 5.3% (+0.605)#95 7.8% (-1.96)#8,713
96. Wellston 5.9% 5.3% (+0.601)#96 7.8% (-1.97)#8,723
97. Dibble 5.9% 5.3% (+0.588)#97 7.8% (-1.98)#8,755
98. Yukon 5.8% 5.3% (+0.539)#98 7.8% (-2.03)#8,826
99. Chandler 5.8% 5.3% (+0.526)#99 7.8% (-2.04)#8,848
100. Slaughterville 5.8% 5.3% (+0.474)#100 7.8% (-2.09)#8,936

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Oklahoma are:
#1
82.1%
#2
66.7%
#3
52.9%
#4
30.8%
#5
29.3%
#6
27.8%
#7
27.7%
#8
27.5%
#9
24.4%
#10
24.1%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Oklahoma?
Yeager has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Oklahoma with 82.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in the State of Oklahoma?
Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Oklahoma is 5.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in the United States is 7.8%.