Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Wisconsin

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Professional & Scientific Services
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Wisconsin
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Wisconsin

0.0%
30.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Wisconsin Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Wisconsin

City % Employed vs State vs National
1.Angelica26.9%5.4%(+21.5)#17.8%(+19.1)#384
2.Edmund25.7%5.4%(+20.3)#27.8%(+17.9)#433
3.Shopiere21.4%5.4%(+16.0)#37.8%(+13.6)#726
4.Chenequa19.5%5.4%(+14.1)#47.8%(+11.6)#954
5.Verona18.0%5.4%(+12.5)#57.8%(+10.1)#1,169
6.Shorewood Hills17.7%5.4%(+12.3)#67.8%(+9.86)#1,218
7.Waunakee17.6%5.4%(+12.1)#77.8%(+9.71)#1,254
8.Middleton16.7%5.4%(+11.2)#87.8%(+8.81)#1,454
9.Maple Bluff16.2%5.4%(+10.8)#97.8%(+8.34)#1,559
10.Kieler16.1%5.4%(+10.7)#107.8%(+8.24)#1,583
11.Ixonia14.9%5.4%(+9.44)#117.8%(+7.03)#1,909
12.Fitchburg14.6%5.4%(+9.12)#127.8%(+6.70)#2,004
13.Thiensville14.5%5.4%(+9.10)#137.8%(+6.69)#2,009
14.Bayside14.4%5.4%(+8.96)#147.8%(+6.55)#2,043
15.Mequon14.4%5.4%(+8.92)#157.8%(+6.51)#2,053
16.Woodford13.8%5.4%(+8.36)#167.8%(+5.95)#2,233
17.Oconomowoc Lake13.7%5.4%(+8.30)#177.8%(+5.89)#2,250
18.Nashotah13.7%5.4%(+8.28)#187.8%(+5.87)#2,265
19.Lauderdale Lakes13.6%5.4%(+8.21)#197.8%(+5.80)#2,287
20.River Hills13.2%5.4%(+7.72)#207.8%(+5.30)#2,489
21.Madison13.0%5.4%(+7.53)#217.8%(+5.11)#2,561
22.French Island12.9%5.4%(+7.52)#227.8%(+5.10)#2,568
23.Brookfield12.9%5.4%(+7.51)#237.8%(+5.10)#2,570
24.Mount Horeb12.3%5.4%(+6.85)#247.8%(+4.43)#2,863
25.Mountain12.2%5.4%(+6.74)#257.8%(+4.33)#2,916
26.Rubicon12.2%5.4%(+6.73)#267.8%(+4.31)#2,918
27.Glendale12.2%5.4%(+6.72)#277.8%(+4.31)#2,924
28.Fontana On Geneva Lake11.7%5.4%(+6.25)#287.8%(+3.84)#3,165
29.Greendale11.6%5.4%(+6.14)#297.8%(+3.73)#3,217
30.North Hudson11.5%5.4%(+6.10)#307.8%(+3.68)#3,242
31.Prairie Du Sac11.4%5.4%(+6.00)#317.8%(+3.59)#3,288
32.Fox Point11.1%5.4%(+5.71)#327.8%(+3.29)#3,437
33.Sun Prairie11.1%5.4%(+5.62)#337.8%(+3.20)#3,492
34.Shorewood10.9%5.4%(+5.42)#347.8%(+3.01)#3,618
35.Stockholm10.7%5.4%(+5.28)#357.8%(+2.87)#3,705
36.Lake Camelot10.6%5.4%(+5.15)#367.8%(+2.73)#3,788
37.Monona10.5%5.4%(+5.02)#377.8%(+2.60)#3,876
38.Lac La Belle10.4%5.4%(+5.01)#387.8%(+2.60)#3,879
39.Richfield10.3%5.4%(+4.88)#397.8%(+2.46)#3,971
40.Whiting10.2%5.4%(+4.76)#407.8%(+2.34)#4,046
41.Delafield10.1%5.4%(+4.68)#417.8%(+2.26)#4,093
42.Hartland10.0%5.4%(+4.61)#427.8%(+2.19)#4,127
43.Goodman10.0%5.4%(+4.57)#437.8%(+2.15)#4,162
44.Thornton10.0%5.4%(+4.57)#447.8%(+2.15)#4,168
45.Cross Plains9.9%5.4%(+4.51)#457.8%(+2.09)#4,195
46.Mercer9.9%5.4%(+4.42)#467.8%(+2.01)#4,256
47.Algoma9.8%5.4%(+4.37)#477.8%(+1.95)#4,293
48.Lake Koshkonong9.8%5.4%(+4.37)#487.8%(+1.95)#4,294
49.Waukau9.7%5.4%(+4.22)#497.8%(+1.81)#4,398
50.Okauchee Lake9.6%5.4%(+4.14)#507.8%(+1.72)#4,469
51.Waterloo9.5%5.4%(+4.10)#517.8%(+1.68)#4,501
52.Belleville9.5%5.4%(+4.07)#527.8%(+1.66)#4,527
53.Deforest9.5%5.4%(+4.04)#537.8%(+1.63)#4,552
54.Wauwatosa9.5%5.4%(+4.04)#547.8%(+1.62)#4,558
55.Belgium9.5%5.4%(+4.03)#557.8%(+1.62)#4,561
56.Cottage Grove9.5%5.4%(+4.02)#567.8%(+1.60)#4,569
57.Tustin9.4%5.4%(+4.00)#577.8%(+1.59)#4,589
58.St Peter9.4%5.4%(+3.95)#587.8%(+1.53)#4,627
59.Grand View9.4%5.4%(+3.94)#597.8%(+1.53)#4,638
60.Kimberly9.3%5.4%(+3.87)#607.8%(+1.46)#4,689
61.Greenbush9.3%5.4%(+3.83)#617.8%(+1.41)#4,730
62.Woodruff9.3%5.4%(+3.82)#627.8%(+1.41)#4,736
63.Whitefish Bay9.2%5.4%(+3.80)#637.8%(+1.39)#4,751
64.Chain O Lakes9.1%5.4%(+3.69)#647.8%(+1.27)#4,848
65.New Glarus9.0%5.4%(+3.55)#657.8%(+1.14)#4,972
66.Saukville8.9%5.4%(+3.48)#667.8%(+1.06)#5,050
67.Adams8.8%5.4%(+3.33)#677.8%(+0.912)#5,187
68.Merton8.7%5.4%(+3.24)#687.8%(+0.822)#5,260
69.Benton8.6%5.4%(+3.20)#697.8%(+0.789)#5,291
70.Twin Lakes8.6%5.4%(+3.17)#707.8%(+0.754)#5,323
71.Mcfarland8.5%5.4%(+3.11)#717.8%(+0.700)#5,368
72.Dodgeville8.5%5.4%(+3.03)#727.8%(+0.613)#5,436
73.Pewaukee8.4%5.4%(+3.00)#737.8%(+0.584)#5,463
74.Summit Lake8.3%5.4%(+2.90)#747.8%(+0.486)#5,575
75.Bonduel8.3%5.4%(+2.84)#757.8%(+0.430)#5,613
76.Lake Wisconsin8.1%5.4%(+2.68)#767.8%(+0.265)#5,781
77.Butte Des Morts8.1%5.4%(+2.67)#777.8%(+0.255)#5,799
78.Cedarburg8.1%5.4%(+2.64)#787.8%(+0.230)#5,832
79.Summit8.1%5.4%(+2.64)#797.8%(+0.222)#5,842
80.Muskego8.0%5.4%(+2.52)#807.8%(+0.104)#5,964
81.Powers Lake7.9%5.4%(+2.51)#817.8%(+0.093)#5,976
82.Oregon7.9%5.4%(+2.48)#827.8%(+0.068)#6,006
83.Mineral Point7.9%5.4%(+2.48)#837.8%(+0.061)#6,010
84.Elm Grove7.9%5.4%(+2.44)#847.8%(+0.029)#6,045
85.Greenville7.9%5.4%(+2.43)#857.8%(+0.020)#6,054
86.Grafton7.8%5.4%(+2.36)#867.8%(-0.056)#6,147
87.New Berlin7.8%5.4%(+2.34)#877.8%(-0.075)#6,165
88.Hobart7.7%5.4%(+2.29)#887.8%(-0.123)#6,211
89.Sussex7.5%5.4%(+2.10)#897.8%(-0.313)#6,428
90.Stoughton7.5%5.4%(+2.05)#907.8%(-0.362)#6,474
91.Brooklyn7.5%5.4%(+2.04)#917.8%(-0.371)#6,484
92.Suamico7.5%5.4%(+2.03)#927.8%(-0.381)#6,499
93.Fremont7.3%5.4%(+1.92)#937.8%(-0.499)#6,645
94.Auburndale7.3%5.4%(+1.88)#947.8%(-0.530)#6,687
95.Sayner7.3%5.4%(+1.88)#957.8%(-0.530)#6,692
96.Greenfield7.3%5.4%(+1.88)#967.8%(-0.531)#6,694
97.Lodi7.3%5.4%(+1.87)#977.8%(-0.545)#6,715
98.North Bay7.2%5.4%(+1.80)#987.8%(-0.619)#6,794
99.Egg Harbor7.2%5.4%(+1.78)#997.8%(-0.631)#6,810
100.Lake Nebagamon7.1%5.4%(+1.64)#1007.8%(-0.772)#7,005

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Wisconsin?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Wisconsin are:
#1
26.9%
#2
25.7%
#3
19.5%
#4
18.0%
#5
17.7%
#6
17.6%
#7
16.7%
#8
16.2%
#9
16.1%
#10
14.9%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Wisconsin?
Angelica has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Wisconsin with 26.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in the State of Wisconsin?
Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Wisconsin is 5.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in the United States is 7.8%.