Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Utah

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Professional & Scientific Services
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Utah
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Utah

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Utah Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Utah

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Cedar Highlands 100.0% 8.4% (+91.6)#1 7.8% (+92.2)#20
2. Kenilworth 79.7% 8.4% (+71.3)#2 7.8% (+71.9)#26
3. Dugway 40.3% 8.4% (+31.9)#3 7.8% (+32.4)#125
4. Brian Head 24.0% 8.4% (+15.6)#4 7.8% (+16.2)#519
5. Granite 23.3% 8.4% (+14.8)#5 7.8% (+15.4)#568
6. Brighton 22.2% 8.4% (+13.8)#6 7.8% (+14.4)#644
7. Peter 22.0% 8.4% (+13.6)#7 7.8% (+14.2)#664
8. Dammeron Valley 21.5% 8.4% (+13.1)#8 7.8% (+13.7)#719
9. Hoytsville 19.0% 8.4% (+10.6)#9 7.8% (+11.1)#1,026
10. Interlaken 18.2% 8.4% (+9.75)#10 7.8% (+10.3)#1,139
11. Fairfield 17.3% 8.4% (+8.88)#11 7.8% (+9.46)#1,310
12. Emigration Canyon 17.2% 8.4% (+8.73)#12 7.8% (+9.32)#1,336
13. Lehi 16.8% 8.4% (+8.39)#13 7.8% (+8.98)#1,414
14. Vineyard 16.0% 8.4% (+7.52)#14 7.8% (+8.11)#1,613
15. Huntsville 15.9% 8.4% (+7.43)#15 7.8% (+8.01)#1,636
16. Draper 15.7% 8.4% (+7.25)#16 7.8% (+7.83)#1,692
17. Cedar Hills 15.6% 8.4% (+7.21)#17 7.8% (+7.79)#1,700
18. Marion 15.4% 8.4% (+6.98)#18 7.8% (+7.57)#1,753
19. Benson 15.2% 8.4% (+6.76)#19 7.8% (+7.34)#1,812
20. Snyderville 14.6% 8.4% (+6.20)#20 7.8% (+6.78)#1,978
21. Highland 14.6% 8.4% (+6.13)#21 7.8% (+6.71)#2,001
22. Fayette 14.4% 8.4% (+5.94)#22 7.8% (+6.53)#2,046
23. Elk Ridge 14.3% 8.4% (+5.88)#23 7.8% (+6.47)#2,066
24. Woodland Hills 14.3% 8.4% (+5.83)#24 7.8% (+6.41)#2,091
25. Silver Summit 14.1% 8.4% (+5.69)#25 7.8% (+6.27)#2,140
26. Henrieville 13.8% 8.4% (+5.36)#26 7.8% (+5.95)#2,231
27. New Harmony 13.7% 8.4% (+5.27)#27 7.8% (+5.85)#2,268
28. Alpine 13.7% 8.4% (+5.23)#28 7.8% (+5.82)#2,280
29. Summit Park 13.6% 8.4% (+5.19)#29 7.8% (+5.78)#2,296
30. Salem 13.6% 8.4% (+5.17)#30 7.8% (+5.75)#2,301
31. Cedar Fort 13.6% 8.4% (+5.15)#31 7.8% (+5.73)#2,312
32. Central 13.4% 8.4% (+5.00)#32 7.8% (+5.59)#2,376
33. Ivins 13.0% 8.4% (+4.52)#33 7.8% (+5.10)#2,566
34. Liberty 12.7% 8.4% (+4.30)#34 7.8% (+4.89)#2,651
35. Springdale 12.7% 8.4% (+4.30)#35 7.8% (+4.88)#2,653
36. Cottonwood Heights 12.6% 8.4% (+4.18)#36 7.8% (+4.77)#2,705
37. Vernon 12.0% 8.4% (+3.62)#37 7.8% (+4.20)#2,977
38. Saratoga Springs 11.9% 8.4% (+3.48)#38 7.8% (+4.07)#3,051
39. Centerville 11.9% 8.4% (+3.47)#39 7.8% (+4.05)#3,059
40. Rockville 11.8% 8.4% (+3.33)#40 7.8% (+3.92)#3,129
41. American Fork 11.7% 8.4% (+3.30)#41 7.8% (+3.88)#3,146
42. South Jordan 11.5% 8.4% (+3.09)#42 7.8% (+3.67)#3,248
43. Holladay 11.4% 8.4% (+2.97)#43 7.8% (+3.56)#3,303
44. Cornish 11.3% 8.4% (+2.87)#44 7.8% (+3.46)#3,362
45. Pleasant Grove 11.3% 8.4% (+2.84)#45 7.8% (+3.42)#3,382
46. Eagle Mountain 11.3% 8.4% (+2.84)#46 7.8% (+3.42)#3,383
47. Salt Lake City 11.2% 8.4% (+2.74)#47 7.8% (+3.33)#3,419
48. Mapleton 11.2% 8.4% (+2.73)#48 7.8% (+3.31)#3,428
49. Lindon 11.1% 8.4% (+2.71)#49 7.8% (+3.29)#3,438
50. Sandy 11.1% 8.4% (+2.69)#50 7.8% (+3.28)#3,441
51. Summit 11.1% 8.4% (+2.68)#51 7.8% (+3.26)#3,451
52. Cleveland 11.0% 8.4% (+2.53)#52 7.8% (+3.11)#3,539
53. Jensen 10.9% 8.4% (+2.45)#53 7.8% (+3.04)#3,594
54. Bluffdale 10.9% 8.4% (+2.45)#54 7.8% (+3.03)#3,596
55. Farmington 10.9% 8.4% (+2.44)#55 7.8% (+3.02)#3,608
56. Millcreek 10.8% 8.4% (+2.41)#56 7.8% (+3.00)#3,622
57. Smithfield 10.8% 8.4% (+2.41)#57 7.8% (+2.99)#3,625
58. Kaysville 10.8% 8.4% (+2.32)#58 7.8% (+2.91)#3,673
59. Wallsburg 10.7% 8.4% (+2.28)#59 7.8% (+2.87)#3,702
60. Castle Valley 10.7% 8.4% (+2.26)#60 7.8% (+2.85)#3,719
61. Ballard 10.7% 8.4% (+2.26)#61 7.8% (+2.84)#3,724
62. Mountain Green 10.6% 8.4% (+2.17)#62 7.8% (+2.75)#3,778
63. Pine Valley 10.5% 8.4% (+2.09)#63 7.8% (+2.68)#3,827
64. Leeds 10.5% 8.4% (+2.04)#64 7.8% (+2.63)#3,858
65. West Point 10.4% 8.4% (+2.01)#65 7.8% (+2.59)#3,882
66. West Bountiful 10.4% 8.4% (+2.00)#66 7.8% (+2.58)#3,890
67. Murray 10.3% 8.4% (+1.85)#67 7.8% (+2.43)#3,991
68. Herriman 10.3% 8.4% (+1.82)#68 7.8% (+2.41)#4,009
69. Orem 10.2% 8.4% (+1.73)#69 7.8% (+2.31)#4,066
70. Morgan 10.0% 8.4% (+1.61)#70 7.8% (+2.20)#4,124
71. North Logan 10.0% 8.4% (+1.60)#71 7.8% (+2.19)#4,131
72. Enterprise 10.0% 8.4% (+1.57)#72 7.8% (+2.15)#4,152
73. Bountiful 10.0% 8.4% (+1.55)#73 7.8% (+2.13)#4,175
74. South Weber 10.0% 8.4% (+1.54)#74 7.8% (+2.12)#4,181
75. Stansbury Park 10.0% 8.4% (+1.53)#75 7.8% (+2.12)#4,184
76. Wolf Creek 9.9% 8.4% (+1.47)#76 7.8% (+2.06)#4,218
77. Clinton 9.9% 8.4% (+1.47)#77 7.8% (+2.05)#4,227
78. Hyde Park 9.9% 8.4% (+1.43)#78 7.8% (+2.01)#4,253
79. North Salt Lake 9.6% 8.4% (+1.20)#79 7.8% (+1.78)#4,423
80. Springville 9.5% 8.4% (+1.06)#80 7.8% (+1.65)#4,538
81. Elmo 9.4% 8.4% (+0.921)#81 7.8% (+1.50)#4,656
82. Hideout 9.3% 8.4% (+0.853)#82 7.8% (+1.44)#4,715
83. Mantua 9.3% 8.4% (+0.845)#83 7.8% (+1.43)#4,720
84. Amalga 9.2% 8.4% (+0.768)#84 7.8% (+1.35)#4,781
85. Paradise 9.2% 8.4% (+0.731)#85 7.8% (+1.31)#4,812
86. Trenton 9.0% 8.4% (+0.568)#86 7.8% (+1.15)#4,960
87. Millville 9.0% 8.4% (+0.529)#87 7.8% (+1.11)#4,991
88. Layton 8.9% 8.4% (+0.515)#88 7.8% (+1.10)#5,008
89. Nibley 8.9% 8.4% (+0.508)#89 7.8% (+1.09)#5,015
90. Midway 8.9% 8.4% (+0.506)#90 7.8% (+1.09)#5,018
91. East Basin 8.9% 8.4% (+0.475)#91 7.8% (+1.06)#5,052
92. Fruit Heights 8.5% 8.4% (+0.071)#92 7.8% (+0.656)#5,404
93. South Willard 8.5% 8.4% (+0.029)#93 7.8% (+0.613)#5,438
94. Santa Clara 8.4% 8.4% (-0.080)#94 7.8% (+0.504)#5,539
95. Payson 8.3% 8.4% (-0.094)#95 7.8% (+0.490)#5,550
96. Holden 8.3% 8.4% (-0.098)#96 7.8% (+0.486)#5,559
97. Independence 8.3% 8.4% (-0.098)#97 7.8% (+0.486)#5,572
98. West Haven 8.3% 8.4% (-0.129)#98 7.8% (+0.455)#5,597
99. Provo 8.1% 8.4% (-0.316)#99 7.8% (+0.269)#5,772
100. Hyrum 8.1% 8.4% (-0.318)#100 7.8% (+0.266)#5,780

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Utah?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Utah are:
#1
100.0%
#2
79.7%
#3
40.3%
#4
24.0%
#5
23.3%
#6
22.0%
#7
21.5%
#8
19.0%
#9
18.2%
#10
17.3%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Utah?
Cedar Highlands has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Utah with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in the State of Utah?
Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Utah is 8.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in the United States is 7.8%.