Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Ohio

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Professional & Scientific Services
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Ohio
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Ohio

0.0%
60.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Ohio Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Ohio

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Rosewood 58.2% 6.1% (+52.2)#1 7.8% (+50.4)#44
2. Plainville 39.3% 6.1% (+33.2)#2 7.8% (+31.4)#136
3. Sherwood 30.0% 6.1% (+24.0)#3 7.8% (+22.2)#275
4. Five Points 28.0% 6.1% (+22.0)#4 7.8% (+20.2)#337
5. Madison Place 26.9% 6.1% (+20.8)#5 7.8% (+19.0)#386
6. East Fultonham 26.8% 6.1% (+20.7)#6 7.8% (+18.9)#387
7. Hills And Dales 26.0% 6.1% (+20.0)#7 7.8% (+18.2)#420
8. Richmond Dale 26.0% 6.1% (+19.9)#8 7.8% (+18.1)#425
9. Bowerston 24.8% 6.1% (+18.8)#9 7.8% (+17.0)#477
10. Day Heights 23.0% 6.1% (+17.0)#10 7.8% (+15.2)#585
11. Coldstream 22.8% 6.1% (+16.7)#11 7.8% (+14.9)#605
12. Bentleyville 22.2% 6.1% (+16.2)#12 7.8% (+14.4)#643
13. Sixteen Mile Stand 21.9% 6.1% (+15.8)#13 7.8% (+14.0)#679
14. Austinburg 21.1% 6.1% (+15.0)#14 7.8% (+13.2)#770
15. Lake Milton 21.0% 6.1% (+15.0)#15 7.8% (+13.2)#778
16. Damascus 19.8% 6.1% (+13.8)#16 7.8% (+12.0)#914
17. New California 19.3% 6.1% (+13.2)#17 7.8% (+11.4)#972
18. Concorde Hills 19.1% 6.1% (+13.0)#18 7.8% (+11.2)#1,006
19. Fruit Hill 19.0% 6.1% (+13.0)#19 7.8% (+11.2)#1,016
20. Birmingham 18.9% 6.1% (+12.9)#20 7.8% (+11.1)#1,038
21. Yellow Springs 18.9% 6.1% (+12.8)#21 7.8% (+11.0)#1,048
22. Lakeside 18.8% 6.1% (+12.7)#22 7.8% (+10.9)#1,052
23. Hamburg 18.5% 6.1% (+12.4)#23 7.8% (+10.6)#1,088
24. Valley City 18.0% 6.1% (+11.9)#24 7.8% (+10.1)#1,168
25. Walton Hills 17.8% 6.1% (+11.8)#25 7.8% (+9.99)#1,191
26. Grandview Heights 17.8% 6.1% (+11.7)#26 7.8% (+9.95)#1,202
27. Kirtland 17.8% 6.1% (+11.7)#27 7.8% (+9.92)#1,208
28. Salem Heights 17.6% 6.1% (+11.6)#28 7.8% (+9.78)#1,241
29. Powell 17.5% 6.1% (+11.5)#29 7.8% (+9.67)#1,265
30. Brice 17.0% 6.1% (+11.0)#30 7.8% (+9.17)#1,368
31. Amberley 16.8% 6.1% (+10.8)#31 7.8% (+8.99)#1,410
32. Riverlea 16.8% 6.1% (+10.7)#32 7.8% (+8.94)#1,421
33. Pigeon Creek 16.7% 6.1% (+10.7)#33 7.8% (+8.86)#1,435
34. Zanesfield 16.7% 6.1% (+10.6)#34 7.8% (+8.82)#1,445
35. Madeira 16.5% 6.1% (+10.4)#35 7.8% (+8.65)#1,492
36. The Village Of Indian Hill 16.1% 6.1% (+10.1)#36 7.8% (+8.29)#1,570
37. Hanging Rock 16.0% 6.1% (+9.94)#37 7.8% (+8.15)#1,603
38. Mason 15.8% 6.1% (+9.78)#38 7.8% (+7.99)#1,641
39. Williamsdale 15.6% 6.1% (+9.53)#39 7.8% (+7.74)#1,718
40. Remington 15.5% 6.1% (+9.42)#40 7.8% (+7.63)#1,735
41. Gates Mills 15.3% 6.1% (+9.26)#41 7.8% (+7.47)#1,790
42. Turpin Hills 15.2% 6.1% (+9.11)#42 7.8% (+7.32)#1,818
43. Blue Ash 15.2% 6.1% (+9.10)#43 7.8% (+7.31)#1,824
44. Waite Hill 15.0% 6.1% (+8.94)#44 7.8% (+7.15)#1,857
45. Valley Hi 14.9% 6.1% (+8.89)#45 7.8% (+7.09)#1,876
46. Landen 14.9% 6.1% (+8.88)#46 7.8% (+7.09)#1,880
47. Upper Arlington 14.8% 6.1% (+8.72)#47 7.8% (+6.93)#1,941
48. Chagrin Falls 14.7% 6.1% (+8.63)#48 7.8% (+6.84)#1,962
49. Timberlake 14.6% 6.1% (+8.59)#49 7.8% (+6.79)#1,974
50. Worthington 14.6% 6.1% (+8.53)#50 7.8% (+6.73)#1,991
51. Radnor 14.5% 6.1% (+8.47)#51 7.8% (+6.68)#2,014
52. Kelleys Island 14.5% 6.1% (+8.40)#52 7.8% (+6.61)#2,034
53. Hunting Valley 14.4% 6.1% (+8.33)#53 7.8% (+6.54)#2,045
54. Dublin 14.4% 6.1% (+8.31)#54 7.8% (+6.52)#2,051
55. Clarktown 14.3% 6.1% (+8.23)#55 7.8% (+6.44)#2,074
56. Miamiville 14.3% 6.1% (+8.23)#56 7.8% (+6.44)#2,076
57. Montgomery 14.3% 6.1% (+8.20)#57 7.8% (+6.41)#2,095
58. Peninsula 14.0% 6.1% (+7.95)#58 7.8% (+6.16)#2,173
59. Lyndhurst 14.0% 6.1% (+7.94)#59 7.8% (+6.15)#2,180
60. Evendale 14.0% 6.1% (+7.94)#60 7.8% (+6.15)#2,181
61. Montrose Ghent 13.8% 6.1% (+7.77)#61 7.8% (+5.97)#2,223
62. Ridgewood 13.7% 6.1% (+7.65)#62 7.8% (+5.86)#2,267
63. Mariemont 13.5% 6.1% (+7.47)#63 7.8% (+5.68)#2,335
64. South Russell 13.5% 6.1% (+7.46)#64 7.8% (+5.67)#2,336
65. Highland Heights 13.4% 6.1% (+7.34)#65 7.8% (+5.55)#2,389
66. Lake Mohawk 13.4% 6.1% (+7.33)#66 7.8% (+5.54)#2,390
67. Moreland Hills 13.4% 6.1% (+7.30)#67 7.8% (+5.51)#2,400
68. Willoughby Hills 13.3% 6.1% (+7.28)#68 7.8% (+5.49)#2,406
69. Hudson 13.3% 6.1% (+7.21)#69 7.8% (+5.42)#2,438
70. Silver Lake 13.3% 6.1% (+7.20)#70 7.8% (+5.41)#2,442
71. Waterville 13.3% 6.1% (+7.19)#71 7.8% (+5.40)#2,445
72. Chesapeake 12.9% 6.1% (+6.86)#72 7.8% (+5.07)#2,581
73. Wright Patterson Afb 12.9% 6.1% (+6.86)#73 7.8% (+5.07)#2,583
74. Middleburg Heights 12.8% 6.1% (+6.75)#74 7.8% (+4.96)#2,617
75. Beavercreek 12.7% 6.1% (+6.67)#75 7.8% (+4.88)#2,656
76. Meyers Lake 12.7% 6.1% (+6.66)#76 7.8% (+4.86)#2,661
77. Richfield 12.7% 6.1% (+6.60)#77 7.8% (+4.81)#2,688
78. Oakwood 12.7% 6.1% (+6.60)#78 7.8% (+4.81)#2,691
79. Bratenahl 12.6% 6.1% (+6.51)#79 7.8% (+4.72)#2,726
80. New Pittsburg 12.5% 6.1% (+6.44)#80 7.8% (+4.65)#2,757
81. Terrace Park 12.4% 6.1% (+6.30)#81 7.8% (+4.51)#2,825
82. New Albany 12.3% 6.1% (+6.29)#82 7.8% (+4.50)#2,829
83. Kirtland Hills 12.3% 6.1% (+6.21)#83 7.8% (+4.42)#2,871
84. Risingsun 12.2% 6.1% (+6.19)#84 7.8% (+4.40)#2,878
85. Dry Run 12.2% 6.1% (+6.18)#85 7.8% (+4.39)#2,881
86. Centerville 12.2% 6.1% (+6.18)#86 7.8% (+4.39)#2,883
87. Mack 12.2% 6.1% (+6.16)#87 7.8% (+4.37)#2,892
88. North Robinson 12.2% 6.1% (+6.14)#88 7.8% (+4.35)#2,907
89. Brecksville 12.2% 6.1% (+6.11)#89 7.8% (+4.31)#2,919
90. Westlake 12.1% 6.1% (+6.05)#90 7.8% (+4.26)#2,953
91. Avon 12.1% 6.1% (+6.03)#91 7.8% (+4.24)#2,963
92. Lakewood 12.0% 6.1% (+5.96)#92 7.8% (+4.17)#2,988
93. Rocky River 12.0% 6.1% (+5.91)#93 7.8% (+4.12)#3,020
94. Shaker Heights 12.0% 6.1% (+5.91)#94 7.8% (+4.12)#3,021
95. Bellbrook 11.9% 6.1% (+5.81)#95 7.8% (+4.02)#3,074
96. Buchtel 11.8% 6.1% (+5.74)#96 7.8% (+3.95)#3,117
97. Blaine 11.8% 6.1% (+5.71)#97 7.8% (+3.92)#3,127
98. Batesville 11.8% 6.1% (+5.71)#98 7.8% (+3.92)#3,132
99. Hide A Way Hills 11.7% 6.1% (+5.65)#99 7.8% (+3.85)#3,158
100. Orange 11.6% 6.1% (+5.59)#100 7.8% (+3.80)#3,183

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Ohio?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Ohio are:
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Ohio?
Rosewood has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Ohio with 58.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in the State of Ohio?
Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Ohio is 6.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in the United States is 7.8%.