Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Nebraska

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Drive | Alone
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Nebraska
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Nebraska

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Nebraska Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Nebraska

City % Drive Alone vs State vs National
1. Stockham 75.0% 41.2% (+33.8)#1 42.1% (+32.9)#10
2. Crab Orchard 66.4% 41.2% (+25.2)#2 42.1% (+24.3)#105
3. Boys Town 65.5% 41.2% (+24.3)#3 42.1% (+23.4)#132
4. Sunol 64.8% 41.2% (+23.6)#4 42.1% (+22.7)#164
5. Prosser 64.4% 41.2% (+23.2)#5 42.1% (+22.3)#188
6. Inavale 64.2% 41.2% (+23.0)#6 42.1% (+22.1)#200
7. Obert 63.7% 41.2% (+22.5)#7 42.1% (+21.6)#229
8. Walton 63.6% 41.2% (+22.4)#8 42.1% (+21.5)#231
9. Lynch 63.5% 41.2% (+22.3)#9 42.1% (+21.4)#238
10. Bazile Mills 63.5% 41.2% (+22.3)#10 42.1% (+21.4)#246
11. Goehner 63.1% 41.2% (+21.9)#11 42.1% (+21.0)#274
12. Elsie 61.8% 41.2% (+20.6)#12 42.1% (+19.7)#388
13. Holmesville 61.8% 41.2% (+20.6)#13 42.1% (+19.7)#389
14. Cotesfield 61.7% 41.2% (+20.5)#14 42.1% (+19.6)#397
15. Hamlet 61.5% 41.2% (+20.3)#15 42.1% (+19.4)#418
16. Harbine 60.5% 41.2% (+19.3)#16 42.1% (+18.4)#554
17. Ong 60.5% 41.2% (+19.3)#17 42.1% (+18.4)#557
18. Ruskin 60.4% 41.2% (+19.2)#18 42.1% (+18.3)#569
19. Ericson 60.4% 41.2% (+19.2)#19 42.1% (+18.3)#579
20. Virginia 60.3% 41.2% (+19.1)#20 42.1% (+18.2)#595
21. Shubert 60.2% 41.2% (+19.0)#21 42.1% (+18.1)#609
22. Lewellen 59.7% 41.2% (+18.5)#22 42.1% (+17.6)#672
23. Abie 59.5% 41.2% (+18.3)#23 42.1% (+17.4)#706
24. Elyria 59.5% 41.2% (+18.3)#24 42.1% (+17.4)#710
25. Barneston 59.3% 41.2% (+18.1)#25 42.1% (+17.2)#758
26. Martell 59.3% 41.2% (+18.1)#26 42.1% (+17.2)#759
27. Bushnell 59.2% 41.2% (+18.0)#27 42.1% (+17.1)#790
28. Dixon 59.2% 41.2% (+18.0)#28 42.1% (+17.1)#794
29. Belgrade 59.1% 41.2% (+17.9)#29 42.1% (+17.0)#810
30. Burr 59.1% 41.2% (+17.9)#30 42.1% (+17.0)#815
31. Winnetoon 59.0% 41.2% (+17.8)#31 42.1% (+16.9)#836
32. Gandy 58.8% 41.2% (+17.6)#32 42.1% (+16.7)#864
33. Tryon 58.7% 41.2% (+17.5)#33 42.1% (+16.6)#876
34. Oak 58.5% 41.2% (+17.3)#34 42.1% (+16.4)#921
35. South Bend 58.3% 41.2% (+17.1)#35 42.1% (+16.2)#979
36. Whitney 58.3% 41.2% (+17.1)#36 42.1% (+16.2)#983
37. Dunbar 58.2% 41.2% (+17.0)#37 42.1% (+16.1)#1,000
38. Clinton 58.2% 41.2% (+17.0)#38 42.1% (+16.1)#1,009
39. Royal 57.6% 41.2% (+16.4)#39 42.1% (+15.5)#1,127
40. Spalding 57.5% 41.2% (+16.3)#40 42.1% (+15.4)#1,146
41. Blue Springs 57.5% 41.2% (+16.3)#41 42.1% (+15.4)#1,151
42. Newcastle 57.3% 41.2% (+16.1)#42 42.1% (+15.2)#1,212
43. Ragan 56.5% 41.2% (+15.3)#43 42.1% (+14.4)#1,447
44. Winslow 56.4% 41.2% (+15.2)#44 42.1% (+14.3)#1,483
45. Deweese 56.3% 41.2% (+15.1)#45 42.1% (+14.2)#1,530
46. Jansen 56.2% 41.2% (+15.0)#46 42.1% (+14.1)#1,560
47. Holstein 56.1% 41.2% (+14.9)#47 42.1% (+14.0)#1,585
48. Waco 56.0% 41.2% (+14.8)#48 42.1% (+13.9)#1,613
49. Spencer 55.9% 41.2% (+14.7)#49 42.1% (+13.8)#1,631
50. Holbrook 55.8% 41.2% (+14.6)#50 42.1% (+13.7)#1,649
51. Leshara 55.8% 41.2% (+14.6)#51 42.1% (+13.7)#1,653
52. Lebanon 55.7% 41.2% (+14.5)#52 42.1% (+13.6)#1,688
53. Lodgepole 55.5% 41.2% (+14.3)#53 42.1% (+13.4)#1,745
54. Cordova 55.5% 41.2% (+14.3)#54 42.1% (+13.4)#1,755
55. Tarnov 55.5% 41.2% (+14.3)#55 42.1% (+13.4)#1,766
56. Raymond 55.3% 41.2% (+14.1)#56 42.1% (+13.2)#1,811
57. Naponee 55.3% 41.2% (+14.1)#57 42.1% (+13.2)#1,822
58. Nelson 55.2% 41.2% (+14.0)#58 42.1% (+13.1)#1,854
59. Hayes Center 55.0% 41.2% (+13.8)#59 42.1% (+12.9)#1,932
60. Johnson 54.9% 41.2% (+13.7)#60 42.1% (+12.8)#1,961
61. Bartlett 54.8% 41.2% (+13.6)#61 42.1% (+12.7)#1,987
62. Filley 54.8% 41.2% (+13.6)#62 42.1% (+12.7)#1,990
63. Harrisburg 54.8% 41.2% (+13.6)#63 42.1% (+12.7)#1,995
64. Wynot 54.7% 41.2% (+13.5)#64 42.1% (+12.6)#2,027
65. Clarks 54.6% 41.2% (+13.4)#65 42.1% (+12.5)#2,056
66. Panama 54.6% 41.2% (+13.4)#66 42.1% (+12.5)#2,059
67. Maskell 54.5% 41.2% (+13.3)#67 42.1% (+12.4)#2,127
68. Arapahoe 54.4% 41.2% (+13.2)#68 42.1% (+12.3)#2,146
69. Lorton 54.2% 41.2% (+13.0)#69 42.1% (+12.1)#2,261
70. Barada 54.0% 41.2% (+12.8)#70 42.1% (+11.9)#2,342
71. Niobrara 53.9% 41.2% (+12.7)#71 42.1% (+11.8)#2,363
72. Mcgrew 53.7% 41.2% (+12.5)#72 42.1% (+11.6)#2,453
73. Dawson 53.6% 41.2% (+12.4)#73 42.1% (+11.5)#2,489
74. Lyman 53.5% 41.2% (+12.3)#74 42.1% (+11.4)#2,533
75. Odessa 53.5% 41.2% (+12.3)#75 42.1% (+11.4)#2,557
76. Upland 53.5% 41.2% (+12.3)#76 42.1% (+11.4)#2,559
77. Moorefield 53.5% 41.2% (+12.3)#77 42.1% (+11.4)#2,576
78. Rulo 53.4% 41.2% (+12.2)#78 42.1% (+11.3)#2,636
79. Stratton 53.1% 41.2% (+11.9)#79 42.1% (+11.0)#2,784
80. Hardy 53.1% 41.2% (+11.9)#80 42.1% (+11.0)#2,795
81. Elgin 53.0% 41.2% (+11.8)#81 42.1% (+10.9)#2,822
82. Lyons 52.8% 41.2% (+11.6)#82 42.1% (+10.7)#2,897
83. Morse Bluff 52.8% 41.2% (+11.6)#83 42.1% (+10.7)#2,924
84. Hay Springs 52.6% 41.2% (+11.4)#84 42.1% (+10.5)#2,988
85. Salem 52.6% 41.2% (+11.4)#85 42.1% (+10.5)#3,014
86. Osmond 52.5% 41.2% (+11.3)#86 42.1% (+10.4)#3,040
87. Exeter 52.5% 41.2% (+11.3)#87 42.1% (+10.4)#3,044
88. Naper 52.5% 41.2% (+11.3)#88 42.1% (+10.4)#3,067
89. Fairmont 52.3% 41.2% (+11.1)#89 42.1% (+10.2)#3,192
90. Kilgore 52.3% 41.2% (+11.1)#90 42.1% (+10.2)#3,220
91. Brownville 52.0% 41.2% (+10.8)#91 42.1% (+9.90)#3,403
92. Byron 52.0% 41.2% (+10.8)#92 42.1% (+9.90)#3,411
93. Butte 51.9% 41.2% (+10.7)#93 42.1% (+9.80)#3,438
94. Dannebrog 51.7% 41.2% (+10.5)#94 42.1% (+9.60)#3,559
95. Howard City Boelus 51.7% 41.2% (+10.5)#95 42.1% (+9.60)#3,560
96. Davey 51.5% 41.2% (+10.3)#96 42.1% (+9.40)#3,695
97. Eddyville 51.5% 41.2% (+10.3)#97 42.1% (+9.40)#3,702
98. Crawford 51.4% 41.2% (+10.2)#98 42.1% (+9.30)#3,739
99. Fairfield 51.3% 41.2% (+10.1)#99 42.1% (+9.20)#3,837
100. Linwood 51.3% 41.2% (+10.1)#100 42.1% (+9.20)#3,860

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Nebraska?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Nebraska are:
#1
75.0%
#2
66.4%
#3
65.5%
#4
64.8%
#5
64.4%
#6
64.2%
#7
63.7%
#8
63.6%
#9
63.5%
#10
63.5%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Nebraska?
Stockham has the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Nebraska with 75.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in the State of Nebraska?
Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Nebraska is 41.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in the United States is 42.1%.