Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in North Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Drive | Alone
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in North Carolina

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in North Carolina Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in North Carolina

City % Drive Alone vs State vs National
1. Grandfather 67.3% 42.2% (+25.1)#1 42.1% (+25.2)#82
2. Columbia 65.5% 42.2% (+23.3)#2 42.1% (+23.4)#134
3. Bakersville 65.1% 42.2% (+22.9)#3 42.1% (+23.0)#149
4. Keener 64.1% 42.2% (+21.9)#4 42.1% (+22.0)#206
5. Leggett 62.5% 42.2% (+20.3)#5 42.1% (+20.4)#320
6. Oak City 62.1% 42.2% (+19.9)#6 42.1% (+20.0)#361
7. St James 61.9% 42.2% (+19.7)#7 42.1% (+19.8)#381
8. Rich Square 61.4% 42.2% (+19.2)#8 42.1% (+19.3)#426
9. Marietta 61.3% 42.2% (+19.1)#9 42.1% (+19.2)#446
10. Maury 61.1% 42.2% (+18.9)#10 42.1% (+19.0)#473
11. Governors Club 60.9% 42.2% (+18.7)#11 42.1% (+18.8)#497
12. White Oak 60.6% 42.2% (+18.4)#12 42.1% (+18.5)#528
13. Topsail Beach 60.5% 42.2% (+18.3)#13 42.1% (+18.4)#537
14. Bowmore 60.5% 42.2% (+18.3)#14 42.1% (+18.4)#555
15. Butters 60.3% 42.2% (+18.1)#15 42.1% (+18.2)#590
16. Fearrington Village 60.2% 42.2% (+18.0)#16 42.1% (+18.1)#600
17. Hamilton 60.1% 42.2% (+17.9)#17 42.1% (+18.0)#625
18. Plymouth 59.6% 42.2% (+17.4)#18 42.1% (+17.5)#682
19. Beech Mountain 59.4% 42.2% (+17.2)#19 42.1% (+17.3)#720
20. Mamers 59.3% 42.2% (+17.1)#20 42.1% (+17.2)#743
21. Holden Beach 59.2% 42.2% (+17.0)#21 42.1% (+17.1)#777
22. Oriental 59.1% 42.2% (+16.9)#22 42.1% (+17.0)#799
23. Trenton 58.6% 42.2% (+16.4)#23 42.1% (+16.5)#887
24. Parmele 58.5% 42.2% (+16.3)#24 42.1% (+16.4)#904
25. Speed 58.5% 42.2% (+16.3)#25 42.1% (+16.4)#920
26. Goldston 58.3% 42.2% (+16.1)#26 42.1% (+16.2)#960
27. Cypress Landing 58.2% 42.2% (+16.0)#27 42.1% (+16.1)#990
28. Frisco 57.8% 42.2% (+15.6)#28 42.1% (+15.7)#1,070
29. Ocean Isle Beach 57.7% 42.2% (+15.5)#29 42.1% (+15.6)#1,087
30. Indian Beach 57.7% 42.2% (+15.5)#30 42.1% (+15.6)#1,094
31. Lake Lure 57.4% 42.2% (+15.2)#31 42.1% (+15.3)#1,173
32. Pine Knoll Shores 57.3% 42.2% (+15.1)#32 42.1% (+15.2)#1,201
33. Star 57.3% 42.2% (+15.1)#33 42.1% (+15.2)#1,203
34. Chowan Beach 57.1% 42.2% (+14.9)#34 42.1% (+15.0)#1,270
35. Vandemere 57.1% 42.2% (+14.9)#35 42.1% (+15.0)#1,277
36. Engelhard 56.8% 42.2% (+14.6)#36 42.1% (+14.7)#1,338
37. Duck 56.5% 42.2% (+14.3)#37 42.1% (+14.4)#1,404
38. Oak Island 56.3% 42.2% (+14.1)#38 42.1% (+14.2)#1,489
39. Macon 56.3% 42.2% (+14.1)#39 42.1% (+14.2)#1,521
40. Godwin 55.8% 42.2% (+13.6)#40 42.1% (+13.7)#1,654
41. Mcfarlan 55.8% 42.2% (+13.6)#41 42.1% (+13.7)#1,657
42. Deep Run 55.6% 42.2% (+13.4)#42 42.1% (+13.5)#1,698
43. Fairplains 55.1% 42.2% (+12.9)#43 42.1% (+13.0)#1,882
44. Lewiston Woodville 55.1% 42.2% (+12.9)#44 42.1% (+13.0)#1,894
45. Falcon 55.1% 42.2% (+12.9)#45 42.1% (+13.0)#1,902
46. Jackson Heights 54.9% 42.2% (+12.7)#46 42.1% (+12.8)#1,952
47. Bethania 54.9% 42.2% (+12.7)#47 42.1% (+12.8)#1,959
48. Castle Hayne 54.8% 42.2% (+12.6)#48 42.1% (+12.7)#1,969
49. Garysburg 54.8% 42.2% (+12.6)#49 42.1% (+12.7)#1,971
50. Germanton 54.7% 42.2% (+12.5)#50 42.1% (+12.6)#2,015
51. Vander 54.6% 42.2% (+12.4)#51 42.1% (+12.5)#2,046
52. Crossnore 54.5% 42.2% (+12.3)#52 42.1% (+12.4)#2,118
53. Woodlawn 54.3% 42.2% (+12.1)#53 42.1% (+12.2)#2,183
54. Milwaukee 54.3% 42.2% (+12.1)#54 42.1% (+12.2)#2,208
55. Carolina Shores 53.9% 42.2% (+11.7)#55 42.1% (+11.8)#2,346
56. Marble 53.9% 42.2% (+11.7)#56 42.1% (+11.8)#2,365
57. White Plains 53.7% 42.2% (+11.5)#57 42.1% (+11.6)#2,433
58. Halifax 53.6% 42.2% (+11.4)#58 42.1% (+11.5)#2,484
59. Pinnacle 53.5% 42.2% (+11.3)#59 42.1% (+11.4)#2,515
60. Scotch Meadows 53.4% 42.2% (+11.2)#60 42.1% (+11.3)#2,607
61. Peachland 53.4% 42.2% (+11.2)#61 42.1% (+11.3)#2,613
62. Marshallberg 53.3% 42.2% (+11.1)#62 42.1% (+11.2)#2,673
63. Wallace 53.1% 42.2% (+10.9)#63 42.1% (+11.0)#2,750
64. Efland 53.1% 42.2% (+10.9)#64 42.1% (+11.0)#2,765
65. Lake Waccamaw 53.0% 42.2% (+10.8)#65 42.1% (+10.9)#2,810
66. Atlantic Beach 52.9% 42.2% (+10.7)#66 42.1% (+10.8)#2,852
67. Caroleen 52.9% 42.2% (+10.7)#67 42.1% (+10.8)#2,865
68. Emerald Isle 52.8% 42.2% (+10.6)#68 42.1% (+10.7)#2,881
69. Maiden 52.8% 42.2% (+10.6)#69 42.1% (+10.7)#2,882
70. Brandywine Bay 52.6% 42.2% (+10.4)#70 42.1% (+10.5)#2,978
71. Avon 52.6% 42.2% (+10.4)#71 42.1% (+10.5)#3,001
72. Cliffside 52.4% 42.2% (+10.2)#72 42.1% (+10.3)#3,138
73. Linville 52.3% 42.2% (+10.1)#73 42.1% (+10.2)#3,203
74. Northwest 52.2% 42.2% (+10.00)#74 42.1% (+10.1)#3,264
75. Stokes 52.2% 42.2% (+10.00)#75 42.1% (+10.1)#3,279
76. Columbus 52.1% 42.2% (+9.90)#76 42.1% (+10.00)#3,320
77. Fair Bluff 52.1% 42.2% (+9.90)#77 42.1% (+10.00)#3,334
78. Tar Heel 52.1% 42.2% (+9.90)#78 42.1% (+10.00)#3,353
79. Washington Park 52.0% 42.2% (+9.80)#79 42.1% (+9.90)#3,391
80. Raynham 52.0% 42.2% (+9.80)#80 42.1% (+9.90)#3,413
81. Red Oak 51.8% 42.2% (+9.60)#81 42.1% (+9.70)#3,455
82. Nags Head 51.8% 42.2% (+9.60)#82 42.1% (+9.70)#3,456
83. Belhaven 51.8% 42.2% (+9.60)#83 42.1% (+9.70)#3,466
84. White Lake 51.8% 42.2% (+9.60)#84 42.1% (+9.70)#3,471
85. Lasker 51.5% 42.2% (+9.30)#85 42.1% (+9.40)#3,692
86. Woodland 51.4% 42.2% (+9.20)#86 42.1% (+9.30)#3,748
87. Mesic 51.4% 42.2% (+9.20)#87 42.1% (+9.30)#3,775
88. Elizabethtown 51.3% 42.2% (+9.10)#88 42.1% (+9.20)#3,792
89. Elm City 51.3% 42.2% (+9.10)#89 42.1% (+9.20)#3,807
90. Mcdonald 51.3% 42.2% (+9.10)#90 42.1% (+9.20)#3,862
91. Kitty Hawk 51.2% 42.2% (+9.00)#91 42.1% (+9.10)#3,883
92. Millers Creek 51.2% 42.2% (+9.00)#92 42.1% (+9.10)#3,895
93. Northlakes 51.2% 42.2% (+9.00)#93 42.1% (+9.10)#3,897
94. Walstonburg 51.1% 42.2% (+8.90)#94 42.1% (+9.00)#4,005
95. Newton Grove 51.0% 42.2% (+8.80)#95 42.1% (+8.90)#4,057
96. Whitsett 50.9% 42.2% (+8.70)#96 42.1% (+8.80)#4,124
97. Alliance 50.8% 42.2% (+8.60)#97 42.1% (+8.70)#4,177
98. South Mills 50.8% 42.2% (+8.60)#98 42.1% (+8.70)#4,181
99. Tabor City 50.7% 42.2% (+8.50)#99 42.1% (+8.60)#4,236
100. Bermuda Run 50.5% 42.2% (+8.30)#100 42.1% (+8.40)#4,361

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in North Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in North Carolina are:
#1
65.5%
#2
65.1%
#3
64.1%
#4
62.5%
#5
62.1%
#6
61.9%
#7
61.4%
#8
61.3%
#9
61.1%
#10
60.6%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in North Carolina?
Columbia has the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in North Carolina with 65.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in the State of North Carolina?
Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in North Carolina is 42.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in the United States is 42.1%.