Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Alabama

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Drive | Alone
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Alabama
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Alabama

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Alabama Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Alabama

City % Drive Alone vs State vs National
1. Nances Creek 68.0% 42.1% (+25.9)#1 42.1% (+25.9)#66
2. Lowndesboro 62.3% 42.1% (+20.2)#2 42.1% (+20.2)#340
3. Vinegar Bend 61.5% 42.1% (+19.4)#3 42.1% (+19.4)#408
4. Belgreen 61.5% 42.1% (+19.4)#4 42.1% (+19.4)#419
5. Benton 61.3% 42.1% (+19.2)#5 42.1% (+19.2)#450
6. Orrville 61.1% 42.1% (+19.0)#6 42.1% (+19.0)#482
7. Putnam 60.2% 42.1% (+18.1)#7 42.1% (+18.1)#616
8. Natural Bridge 59.4% 42.1% (+17.3)#8 42.1% (+17.3)#736
9. Shorter 58.9% 42.1% (+16.8)#9 42.1% (+16.8)#842
10. Deer Park 58.4% 42.1% (+16.3)#10 42.1% (+16.3)#949
11. Reece City 58.3% 42.1% (+16.2)#11 42.1% (+16.2)#955
12. Boykin 58.3% 42.1% (+16.2)#12 42.1% (+16.2)#962
13. Five Points 58.3% 42.1% (+16.2)#13 42.1% (+16.2)#973
14. Morrison Crossroads 57.1% 42.1% (+15.0)#14 42.1% (+15.0)#1,282
15. Pisgah 57.0% 42.1% (+14.9)#15 42.1% (+14.9)#1,298
16. Mooresville 57.0% 42.1% (+14.9)#16 42.1% (+14.9)#1,308
17. River Falls 56.5% 42.1% (+14.4)#17 42.1% (+14.4)#1,408
18. Perdido Beach 56.5% 42.1% (+14.4)#18 42.1% (+14.4)#1,410
19. Blue Ridge 56.4% 42.1% (+14.3)#19 42.1% (+14.3)#1,453
20. Chatom 56.4% 42.1% (+14.3)#20 42.1% (+14.3)#1,463
21. Axis 56.4% 42.1% (+14.3)#21 42.1% (+14.3)#1,474
22. Providence 56.4% 42.1% (+14.3)#22 42.1% (+14.3)#1,479
23. Highland Lake 56.2% 42.1% (+14.1)#23 42.1% (+14.1)#1,547
24. Lakeview 56.1% 42.1% (+14.0)#24 42.1% (+14.0)#1,590
25. Stewartville 55.5% 42.1% (+13.4)#25 42.1% (+13.4)#1,721
26. Langston 55.5% 42.1% (+13.4)#26 42.1% (+13.4)#1,747
27. Waverly 55.3% 42.1% (+13.2)#27 42.1% (+13.2)#1,812
28. Hobson 55.2% 42.1% (+13.1)#28 42.1% (+13.1)#1,862
29. Cuba 54.3% 42.1% (+12.2)#29 42.1% (+12.2)#2,195
30. Rockford 53.7% 42.1% (+11.6)#30 42.1% (+11.6)#2,431
31. Millerville 53.5% 42.1% (+11.4)#31 42.1% (+11.4)#2,524
32. Union Grove 53.5% 42.1% (+11.4)#32 42.1% (+11.4)#2,566
33. Dauphin Island 53.3% 42.1% (+11.2)#33 42.1% (+11.2)#2,648
34. Brilliant 53.1% 42.1% (+11.0)#34 42.1% (+11.0)#2,759
35. Kinston 53.1% 42.1% (+11.0)#35 42.1% (+11.0)#2,769
36. Bellamy 53.1% 42.1% (+11.0)#36 42.1% (+11.0)#2,797
37. Uriah 52.7% 42.1% (+10.6)#37 42.1% (+10.6)#2,953
38. Thomasville 52.5% 42.1% (+10.4)#38 42.1% (+10.4)#3,022
39. Loachapoka 52.5% 42.1% (+10.4)#39 42.1% (+10.4)#3,057
40. Warrior 52.4% 42.1% (+10.3)#40 42.1% (+10.3)#3,100
41. Gallant 52.4% 42.1% (+10.3)#41 42.1% (+10.3)#3,120
42. Shoal Creek 52.1% 42.1% (+10.00)#42 42.1% (+10.00)#3,317
43. Dunnavant 52.1% 42.1% (+10.00)#43 42.1% (+10.00)#3,318
44. Orange Beach 51.6% 42.1% (+9.50)#44 42.1% (+9.50)#3,575
45. Linden 51.6% 42.1% (+9.50)#45 42.1% (+9.50)#3,589
46. New Union 51.6% 42.1% (+9.50)#46 42.1% (+9.50)#3,603
47. Onycha 51.3% 42.1% (+9.20)#47 42.1% (+9.20)#3,848
48. Vredenburgh 51.3% 42.1% (+9.20)#48 42.1% (+9.20)#3,855
49. Wedowee 51.1% 42.1% (+9.00)#49 42.1% (+9.00)#3,974
50. Elkmont 51.1% 42.1% (+9.00)#50 42.1% (+9.00)#3,994
51. Mcintosh 51.1% 42.1% (+9.00)#51 42.1% (+9.00)#3,995
52. Emelle 51.1% 42.1% (+9.00)#52 42.1% (+9.00)#4,017
53. Kennedy 51.0% 42.1% (+8.90)#53 42.1% (+8.90)#4,060
54. Detroit 51.0% 42.1% (+8.90)#54 42.1% (+8.90)#4,070
55. Geiger 51.0% 42.1% (+8.90)#55 42.1% (+8.90)#4,073
56. Ray 50.9% 42.1% (+8.80)#56 42.1% (+8.80)#4,128
57. Haleburg 50.8% 42.1% (+8.70)#57 42.1% (+8.70)#4,215
58. Pine Hill 50.7% 42.1% (+8.60)#58 42.1% (+8.60)#4,244
59. Edgewater 50.7% 42.1% (+8.60)#59 42.1% (+8.60)#4,246
60. Nixburg 50.7% 42.1% (+8.60)#60 42.1% (+8.60)#4,255
61. Myrtlewood 50.7% 42.1% (+8.60)#61 42.1% (+8.60)#4,272
62. Rock Creek 50.6% 42.1% (+8.50)#62 42.1% (+8.50)#4,296
63. Hokes Bluff 50.5% 42.1% (+8.40)#63 42.1% (+8.40)#4,353
64. Elberta 50.4% 42.1% (+8.30)#64 42.1% (+8.30)#4,468
65. Hatton 50.3% 42.1% (+8.20)#65 42.1% (+8.20)#4,599
66. Twin 50.2% 42.1% (+8.10)#66 42.1% (+8.10)#4,695
67. Lookout Mountain 50.0% 42.1% (+7.90)#67 42.1% (+7.90)#4,847
68. Ridgeville 50.0% 42.1% (+7.90)#68 42.1% (+7.90)#4,895
69. Belle Fontaine 49.9% 42.1% (+7.80)#69 42.1% (+7.80)#4,957
70. Grimes 49.9% 42.1% (+7.80)#70 42.1% (+7.80)#4,962
71. Lockhart 49.9% 42.1% (+7.80)#71 42.1% (+7.80)#4,973
72. Sand Rock 49.8% 42.1% (+7.70)#72 42.1% (+7.70)#5,050
73. Chunchula 49.8% 42.1% (+7.70)#73 42.1% (+7.70)#5,069
74. Baileyton 49.7% 42.1% (+7.60)#74 42.1% (+7.60)#5,121
75. Vincent 49.5% 42.1% (+7.40)#75 42.1% (+7.40)#5,299
76. Black 49.5% 42.1% (+7.40)#76 42.1% (+7.40)#5,346
77. Sweet Water 49.5% 42.1% (+7.40)#77 42.1% (+7.40)#5,358
78. Gantt 49.5% 42.1% (+7.40)#78 42.1% (+7.40)#5,361
79. Redstone Arsenal 49.3% 42.1% (+7.20)#79 42.1% (+7.20)#5,538
80. Phil Campbell 49.3% 42.1% (+7.20)#80 42.1% (+7.20)#5,545
81. Castleberry 49.3% 42.1% (+7.20)#81 42.1% (+7.20)#5,571
82. Cusseta 49.3% 42.1% (+7.20)#82 42.1% (+7.20)#5,595
83. Our Town 49.2% 42.1% (+7.10)#83 42.1% (+7.10)#5,651
84. St Florian 49.2% 42.1% (+7.10)#84 42.1% (+7.10)#5,656
85. Cedar Bluff 49.1% 42.1% (+7.00)#85 42.1% (+7.00)#5,716
86. Hobson City 49.1% 42.1% (+7.00)#86 42.1% (+7.00)#5,736
87. Needham 49.1% 42.1% (+7.00)#87 42.1% (+7.00)#5,784
88. Brundidge 48.9% 42.1% (+6.80)#88 42.1% (+6.80)#5,914
89. Coats Bend 48.9% 42.1% (+6.80)#89 42.1% (+6.80)#5,926
90. Hollywood 48.9% 42.1% (+6.80)#90 42.1% (+6.80)#5,938
91. Ohatchee 48.8% 42.1% (+6.70)#91 42.1% (+6.70)#6,028
92. Hillsboro 48.8% 42.1% (+6.70)#92 42.1% (+6.70)#6,045
93. Hayneville 48.6% 42.1% (+6.50)#93 42.1% (+6.50)#6,242
94. Hammondville 48.6% 42.1% (+6.50)#94 42.1% (+6.50)#6,253
95. Waterloo 48.6% 42.1% (+6.50)#95 42.1% (+6.50)#6,276
96. Centre 48.5% 42.1% (+6.40)#96 42.1% (+6.40)#6,302
97. Elba 48.5% 42.1% (+6.40)#97 42.1% (+6.40)#6,304
98. Oak Grove 48.5% 42.1% (+6.40)#98 42.1% (+6.40)#6,332
99. Stockton 48.5% 42.1% (+6.40)#99 42.1% (+6.40)#6,365
100. Mentone 48.5% 42.1% (+6.40)#100 42.1% (+6.40)#6,374

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Alabama?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Alabama are:
#1
68.0%
#2
62.3%
#3
61.5%
#4
61.5%
#5
61.3%
#6
61.1%
#7
60.2%
#8
59.4%
#9
58.9%
#10
58.4%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Alabama?
Nances Creek has the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Alabama with 68.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in the State of Alabama?
Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Alabama is 42.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in the United States is 42.1%.