Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in North Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Drive | Alone
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in North Dakota

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in North Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in North Dakota

City % Drive Alone vs State vs National
1. Lawton 74.2% 39.4% (+34.8)#1 42.1% (+32.1)#13
2. Edmore 72.2% 39.4% (+32.8)#2 42.1% (+30.1)#22
3. Nekoma 68.0% 39.4% (+28.6)#3 42.1% (+25.9)#69
4. Fredonia 67.5% 39.4% (+28.1)#4 42.1% (+25.4)#76
5. Hague 67.0% 39.4% (+27.6)#5 42.1% (+24.9)#93
6. Loma 66.2% 39.4% (+26.8)#6 42.1% (+24.1)#114
7. Leith 65.6% 39.4% (+26.2)#7 42.1% (+23.5)#131
8. Perth 64.5% 39.4% (+25.1)#8 42.1% (+22.4)#182
9. Ambrose 64.3% 39.4% (+24.9)#9 42.1% (+22.2)#194
10. Spiritwood 64.3% 39.4% (+24.9)#10 42.1% (+22.2)#195
11. Dickey 64.1% 39.4% (+24.7)#11 42.1% (+22.0)#207
12. Martin 63.4% 39.4% (+24.0)#12 42.1% (+21.3)#251
13. Cayuga 63.0% 39.4% (+23.6)#13 42.1% (+20.9)#287
14. Sentinel Butte 62.9% 39.4% (+23.5)#14 42.1% (+20.8)#292
15. Great Bend 62.5% 39.4% (+23.1)#15 42.1% (+20.4)#321
16. Bucyrus 62.0% 39.4% (+22.6)#16 42.1% (+19.9)#378
17. Voltaire 62.0% 39.4% (+22.6)#17 42.1% (+19.9)#379
18. Hamilton 61.5% 39.4% (+22.1)#18 42.1% (+19.4)#420
19. Oriska 61.2% 39.4% (+21.8)#19 42.1% (+19.1)#461
20. Noonan 61.2% 39.4% (+21.8)#20 42.1% (+19.1)#464
21. Leal 60.8% 39.4% (+21.4)#21 42.1% (+18.7)#516
22. Haynes 60.3% 39.4% (+20.9)#22 42.1% (+18.2)#598
23. Hannaford 60.2% 39.4% (+20.8)#23 42.1% (+18.1)#615
24. Crystal 60.0% 39.4% (+20.6)#24 42.1% (+17.9)#644
25. Calvin 60.0% 39.4% (+20.6)#25 42.1% (+17.9)#647
26. Logan 59.6% 39.4% (+20.2)#26 42.1% (+17.5)#688
27. Karlsruhe 59.3% 39.4% (+19.9)#27 42.1% (+17.2)#769
28. Sykeston 59.0% 39.4% (+19.6)#28 42.1% (+16.9)#833
29. Donnybrook 59.0% 39.4% (+19.6)#29 42.1% (+16.9)#835
30. Oberon 58.5% 39.4% (+19.1)#30 42.1% (+16.4)#924
31. Balta 58.4% 39.4% (+19.0)#31 42.1% (+16.3)#951
32. Des Lacs 58.2% 39.4% (+18.8)#32 42.1% (+16.1)#1,002
33. Spiritwood Lake 57.8% 39.4% (+18.4)#33 42.1% (+15.7)#1,074
34. Golva 57.8% 39.4% (+18.4)#34 42.1% (+15.7)#1,076
35. Sanborn 57.7% 39.4% (+18.3)#35 42.1% (+15.6)#1,101
36. Cogswell 57.7% 39.4% (+18.3)#36 42.1% (+15.6)#1,103
37. Edgeley 57.6% 39.4% (+18.2)#37 42.1% (+15.5)#1,111
38. Newburg 57.5% 39.4% (+18.1)#38 42.1% (+15.4)#1,161
39. Bowdon 57.1% 39.4% (+17.7)#39 42.1% (+15.0)#1,279
40. Briarwood 57.1% 39.4% (+17.7)#40 42.1% (+15.0)#1,290
41. Wildrose 56.8% 39.4% (+17.4)#41 42.1% (+14.7)#1,345
42. Ardoch 56.8% 39.4% (+17.4)#42 42.1% (+14.7)#1,352
43. Riverdale 56.5% 39.4% (+17.1)#43 42.1% (+14.4)#1,423
44. Hampden 56.5% 39.4% (+17.1)#44 42.1% (+14.4)#1,444
45. Dodge 56.3% 39.4% (+16.9)#45 42.1% (+14.2)#1,519
46. Columbus 56.3% 39.4% (+16.9)#46 42.1% (+14.2)#1,524
47. Alsen 56.3% 39.4% (+16.9)#47 42.1% (+14.2)#1,531
48. Dawson 56.1% 39.4% (+16.7)#48 42.1% (+14.0)#1,591
49. St John 56.0% 39.4% (+16.6)#49 42.1% (+13.9)#1,611
50. Buchanan 56.0% 39.4% (+16.6)#50 42.1% (+13.9)#1,620
51. Arnegard 55.6% 39.4% (+16.2)#51 42.1% (+13.5)#1,708
52. Courtenay 55.5% 39.4% (+16.1)#52 42.1% (+13.4)#1,761
53. North River 55.5% 39.4% (+16.1)#53 42.1% (+13.4)#1,762
54. Flaxton 55.3% 39.4% (+15.9)#54 42.1% (+13.2)#1,830
55. Osnabrock 55.2% 39.4% (+15.8)#55 42.1% (+13.1)#1,859
56. Barney 55.2% 39.4% (+15.8)#56 42.1% (+13.1)#1,867
57. Dunseith 55.1% 39.4% (+15.7)#57 42.1% (+13.0)#1,889
58. Portland 55.0% 39.4% (+15.6)#58 42.1% (+12.9)#1,922
59. Mcleod 54.8% 39.4% (+15.4)#59 42.1% (+12.7)#1,998
60. Forbes 54.8% 39.4% (+15.4)#60 42.1% (+12.7)#1,999
61. Bathgate 54.6% 39.4% (+15.2)#61 42.1% (+12.5)#2,070
62. Lehr 54.5% 39.4% (+15.1)#62 42.1% (+12.4)#2,125
63. Frontier 54.4% 39.4% (+15.0)#63 42.1% (+12.3)#2,161
64. Medora 54.4% 39.4% (+15.0)#64 42.1% (+12.3)#2,162
65. Grenora 54.3% 39.4% (+14.9)#65 42.1% (+12.2)#2,194
66. Conway 54.3% 39.4% (+14.9)#66 42.1% (+12.2)#2,225
67. Westhope 54.2% 39.4% (+14.8)#67 42.1% (+12.1)#2,251
68. Montpelier 53.9% 39.4% (+14.5)#68 42.1% (+11.8)#2,370
69. Jud 53.9% 39.4% (+14.5)#69 42.1% (+11.8)#2,372
70. Sheyenne 53.8% 39.4% (+14.4)#70 42.1% (+11.7)#2,404
71. Brocket 53.7% 39.4% (+14.3)#71 42.1% (+11.6)#2,457
72. Rocklake 53.5% 39.4% (+14.1)#72 42.1% (+11.4)#2,562
73. Makoti 53.5% 39.4% (+14.1)#73 42.1% (+11.4)#2,565
74. Streeter 52.8% 39.4% (+13.4)#74 42.1% (+10.7)#2,923
75. Forest River 52.5% 39.4% (+13.1)#75 42.1% (+10.4)#3,071
76. Pekin 52.5% 39.4% (+13.1)#76 42.1% (+10.4)#3,081
77. Hamberg 52.5% 39.4% (+13.1)#77 42.1% (+10.4)#3,093
78. Trenton 52.3% 39.4% (+12.9)#78 42.1% (+10.2)#3,194
79. Brinsmade 52.3% 39.4% (+12.9)#79 42.1% (+10.2)#3,228
80. Hatton 52.1% 39.4% (+12.7)#80 42.1% (+10.00)#3,325
81. St Thomas 52.0% 39.4% (+12.6)#81 42.1% (+9.90)#3,396
82. Rutland 51.8% 39.4% (+12.4)#82 42.1% (+9.70)#3,511
83. Carpio 51.7% 39.4% (+12.3)#83 42.1% (+9.60)#3,561
84. Medina 51.4% 39.4% (+12.0)#84 42.1% (+9.30)#3,770
85. Epping 51.4% 39.4% (+12.0)#85 42.1% (+9.30)#3,781
86. Gackle 51.3% 39.4% (+11.9)#86 42.1% (+9.20)#3,841
87. Taylor 51.3% 39.4% (+11.9)#87 42.1% (+9.20)#3,849
88. Reeder 51.3% 39.4% (+11.9)#88 42.1% (+9.20)#3,866
89. Towner 51.2% 39.4% (+11.8)#89 42.1% (+9.10)#3,917
90. Cando 51.1% 39.4% (+11.7)#90 42.1% (+9.00)#3,965
91. Apple Valley 51.1% 39.4% (+11.7)#91 42.1% (+9.00)#3,999
92. Douglas 51.1% 39.4% (+11.7)#92 42.1% (+9.00)#4,015
93. Lamoure 50.9% 39.4% (+11.5)#93 42.1% (+8.80)#4,123
94. Minto 50.8% 39.4% (+11.4)#94 42.1% (+8.70)#4,184
95. Edinburg 50.8% 39.4% (+11.4)#95 42.1% (+8.70)#4,210
96. Portal 50.8% 39.4% (+11.4)#96 42.1% (+8.70)#4,219
97. Fullerton 50.8% 39.4% (+11.4)#97 42.1% (+8.70)#4,225
98. Caledonia 50.6% 39.4% (+11.2)#98 42.1% (+8.50)#4,339
99. Finley 50.3% 39.4% (+10.9)#99 42.1% (+8.20)#4,604
100. Oxbow 50.0% 39.4% (+10.6)#100 42.1% (+7.90)#4,884

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in North Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in North Dakota are:
#1
74.2%
#2
72.2%
#3
68.0%
#4
67.5%
#5
67.0%
#6
66.2%
#7
65.6%
#8
64.5%
#9
64.3%
#10
64.3%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in North Dakota?
Lawton has the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in North Dakota with 74.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in the State of North Dakota?
Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in North Dakota is 39.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in the United States is 42.1%.