Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Indiana

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Drive | Alone
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Indiana
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Indiana

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Indiana Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Indiana

City % Drive Alone vs State vs National
1. Sims 67.8% 42.2% (+25.6)#1 42.1% (+25.7)#71
2. Hobbs 67.2% 42.2% (+25.0)#2 42.1% (+25.1)#87
3. Star City 66.7% 42.2% (+24.5)#3 42.1% (+24.6)#97
4. Duneland Beach 66.5% 42.2% (+24.3)#4 42.1% (+24.4)#101
5. Bridgeton 66.1% 42.2% (+23.9)#5 42.1% (+24.0)#117
6. Prairie Creek 64.3% 42.2% (+22.1)#6 42.1% (+22.2)#191
7. Marshfield 64.1% 42.2% (+21.9)#7 42.1% (+22.0)#209
8. Leiters Ford 63.0% 42.2% (+20.8)#8 42.1% (+20.9)#284
9. Spring Hill 62.5% 42.2% (+20.3)#9 42.1% (+20.4)#317
10. New London 61.9% 42.2% (+19.7)#10 42.1% (+19.8)#383
11. Lamb 61.6% 42.2% (+19.4)#11 42.1% (+19.5)#400
12. Foster 61.3% 42.2% (+19.1)#12 42.1% (+19.2)#443
13. Azalia 61.3% 42.2% (+19.1)#13 42.1% (+19.2)#444
14. Snow Lake 61.2% 42.2% (+19.0)#14 42.1% (+19.1)#457
15. West Middleton 61.2% 42.2% (+19.0)#15 42.1% (+19.1)#463
16. Waynesville 60.3% 42.2% (+18.1)#16 42.1% (+18.2)#592
17. Adams 60.1% 42.2% (+17.9)#17 42.1% (+18.0)#623
18. Patricksburg 60.1% 42.2% (+17.9)#18 42.1% (+18.0)#624
19. Long Beach 59.8% 42.2% (+17.6)#19 42.1% (+17.7)#661
20. Liberty Center 59.8% 42.2% (+17.6)#20 42.1% (+17.7)#666
21. Hillsdale 59.7% 42.2% (+17.5)#21 42.1% (+17.6)#675
22. Wawaka 59.5% 42.2% (+17.3)#22 42.1% (+17.4)#704
23. Grantsburg 59.4% 42.2% (+17.2)#23 42.1% (+17.3)#731
24. Van Bibber Lake 58.6% 42.2% (+16.4)#24 42.1% (+16.5)#883
25. Adams Lake 58.5% 42.2% (+16.3)#25 42.1% (+16.4)#902
26. Jalapa 58.3% 42.2% (+16.1)#26 42.1% (+16.2)#988
27. Butlerville 58.2% 42.2% (+16.0)#27 42.1% (+16.1)#1,003
28. Sardinia 57.8% 42.2% (+15.6)#28 42.1% (+15.7)#1,080
29. Bretzville 57.7% 42.2% (+15.5)#29 42.1% (+15.6)#1,095
30. Newberry 57.7% 42.2% (+15.5)#30 42.1% (+15.6)#1,100
31. Mexico 57.6% 42.2% (+15.4)#31 42.1% (+15.5)#1,109
32. Clear Lake 57.6% 42.2% (+15.4)#32 42.1% (+15.5)#1,117
33. Rolling Prairie 57.6% 42.2% (+15.4)#33 42.1% (+15.5)#1,121
34. North Crows Nest 57.6% 42.2% (+15.4)#34 42.1% (+15.5)#1,126
35. Beverly Shores 57.5% 42.2% (+15.3)#35 42.1% (+15.4)#1,141
36. Mount Carmel 57.5% 42.2% (+15.3)#36 42.1% (+15.4)#1,167
37. Waverly 57.4% 42.2% (+15.2)#37 42.1% (+15.3)#1,177
38. Mace 57.4% 42.2% (+15.2)#38 42.1% (+15.3)#1,191
39. Leavenworth 56.5% 42.2% (+14.3)#39 42.1% (+14.4)#1,412
40. Laotto 56.5% 42.2% (+14.3)#40 42.1% (+14.4)#1,425
41. State Line City 56.5% 42.2% (+14.3)#41 42.1% (+14.4)#1,429
42. Idaville 56.4% 42.2% (+14.2)#42 42.1% (+14.3)#1,473
43. Dover Hill 56.3% 42.2% (+14.1)#43 42.1% (+14.2)#1,527
44. Darmstadt 56.2% 42.2% (+14.0)#44 42.1% (+14.1)#1,538
45. Nyona Lake 56.1% 42.2% (+13.9)#45 42.1% (+14.0)#1,586
46. Eminence 56.1% 42.2% (+13.9)#46 42.1% (+14.0)#1,587
47. Dune Acres 55.5% 42.2% (+13.3)#47 42.1% (+13.4)#1,742
48. Beaver Dam 55.5% 42.2% (+13.3)#48 42.1% (+13.4)#1,756
49. Miami 55.4% 42.2% (+13.2)#49 42.1% (+13.3)#1,782
50. Millgrove 55.3% 42.2% (+13.1)#50 42.1% (+13.2)#1,829
51. Bass Lake 55.2% 42.2% (+13.0)#51 42.1% (+13.1)#1,842
52. Harrodsburg 55.1% 42.2% (+12.9)#52 42.1% (+13.0)#1,896
53. Maples 55.0% 42.2% (+12.8)#53 42.1% (+12.9)#1,944
54. Johnson 54.9% 42.2% (+12.7)#54 42.1% (+12.8)#1,958
55. River Forest 54.9% 42.2% (+12.7)#55 42.1% (+12.8)#1,965
56. Hoffman Lake 54.4% 42.2% (+12.2)#56 42.1% (+12.3)#2,158
57. Bringhurst 54.4% 42.2% (+12.2)#57 42.1% (+12.3)#2,169
58. Stilesville 54.3% 42.2% (+12.1)#58 42.1% (+12.2)#2,205
59. Toad Hop 54.3% 42.2% (+12.1)#59 42.1% (+12.2)#2,217
60. Avoca 54.0% 42.2% (+11.8)#60 42.1% (+11.9)#2,327
61. Prince S Lakes 53.8% 42.2% (+11.6)#61 42.1% (+11.7)#2,384
62. Delaware 53.8% 42.2% (+11.6)#62 42.1% (+11.7)#2,397
63. Wynnedale 53.8% 42.2% (+11.6)#63 42.1% (+11.7)#2,405
64. Alfordsville 53.8% 42.2% (+11.6)#64 42.1% (+11.7)#2,414
65. Ogden Dunes 53.6% 42.2% (+11.4)#65 42.1% (+11.5)#2,469
66. Painted Hills 53.5% 42.2% (+11.3)#66 42.1% (+11.4)#2,509
67. Somerset 53.5% 42.2% (+11.3)#67 42.1% (+11.4)#2,538
68. Country Club Heights 53.5% 42.2% (+11.3)#68 42.1% (+11.4)#2,550
69. Grandview Lake 53.4% 42.2% (+11.2)#69 42.1% (+11.3)#2,614
70. Burket 53.4% 42.2% (+11.2)#70 42.1% (+11.3)#2,627
71. Jimmerson Lake 53.3% 42.2% (+11.1)#71 42.1% (+11.2)#2,653
72. Laketon 53.3% 42.2% (+11.1)#72 42.1% (+11.2)#2,685
73. Hessen Cassel 53.0% 42.2% (+10.8)#73 42.1% (+10.9)#2,832
74. Lake Everett 52.8% 42.2% (+10.6)#74 42.1% (+10.7)#2,917
75. Enchanted Hills 52.7% 42.2% (+10.5)#75 42.1% (+10.6)#2,941
76. Lake Of The Woods 52.7% 42.2% (+10.5)#76 42.1% (+10.6)#2,950
77. Nashville 52.6% 42.2% (+10.4)#77 42.1% (+10.5)#2,976
78. St Meinrad 52.6% 42.2% (+10.4)#78 42.1% (+10.5)#2,985
79. Bowling Green 52.6% 42.2% (+10.4)#79 42.1% (+10.5)#3,002
80. Deer Creek 52.6% 42.2% (+10.4)#80 42.1% (+10.5)#3,007
81. Indian Village 52.6% 42.2% (+10.4)#81 42.1% (+10.5)#3,010
82. Lake Holiday 52.5% 42.2% (+10.3)#82 42.1% (+10.4)#3,031
83. Carlisle 52.5% 42.2% (+10.3)#83 42.1% (+10.4)#3,045
84. Solsberry 52.5% 42.2% (+10.3)#84 42.1% (+10.4)#3,058
85. Williams Creek 52.4% 42.2% (+10.2)#85 42.1% (+10.3)#3,136
86. Hortonville 52.4% 42.2% (+10.2)#86 42.1% (+10.3)#3,149
87. Wheeler 52.4% 42.2% (+10.2)#87 42.1% (+10.3)#3,152
88. Shorewood Forest 52.2% 42.2% (+10.00)#88 42.1% (+10.1)#3,238
89. Blue Ridge 52.2% 42.2% (+10.00)#89 42.1% (+10.1)#3,287
90. Fishersburg 52.2% 42.2% (+10.00)#90 42.1% (+10.1)#3,288
91. Francisco 52.1% 42.2% (+9.90)#91 42.1% (+10.00)#3,328
92. Wellsboro 52.1% 42.2% (+9.90)#92 42.1% (+10.00)#3,330
93. Aberdeen 52.0% 42.2% (+9.80)#93 42.1% (+9.90)#3,369
94. Earl Park 51.7% 42.2% (+9.50)#94 42.1% (+9.60)#3,554
95. Warren Park 51.6% 42.2% (+9.40)#95 42.1% (+9.50)#3,595
96. Newtonville 51.6% 42.2% (+9.40)#96 42.1% (+9.50)#3,622
97. Hamilton 51.5% 42.2% (+9.30)#97 42.1% (+9.40)#3,650
98. North Terre Haute 51.4% 42.2% (+9.20)#98 42.1% (+9.30)#3,722
99. Middlebury 51.4% 42.2% (+9.20)#99 42.1% (+9.30)#3,723
100. Tippecanoe 51.4% 42.2% (+9.20)#100 42.1% (+9.30)#3,762

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Indiana?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Indiana are:
#1
67.8%
#2
66.7%
#3
62.5%
#4
59.8%
#5
58.6%
#6
58.3%
#7
58.2%
#8
57.7%
#9
57.6%
#10
57.6%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Indiana?
Sims has the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Indiana with 67.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in the State of Indiana?
Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Indiana is 42.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in the United States is 42.1%.