Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in South Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Drive | Alone
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in South Dakota

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in South Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in South Dakota

City % Drive Alone vs State vs National
1. Nunda 69.1% 41.6% (+27.5)#1 42.1% (+27.0)#53
2. Clear Lake 67.2% 41.6% (+25.6)#2 42.1% (+25.1)#85
3. Brant Lake 66.0% 41.6% (+24.4)#3 42.1% (+23.9)#122
4. Peever Flats 65.1% 41.6% (+23.5)#4 42.1% (+23.0)#154
5. Forestburg 64.1% 41.6% (+22.5)#5 42.1% (+22.0)#211
6. Ree Heights 64.0% 41.6% (+22.4)#6 42.1% (+21.9)#217
7. Millerdale Colony 63.5% 41.6% (+21.9)#7 42.1% (+21.4)#240
8. Wasta 62.7% 41.6% (+21.1)#8 42.1% (+20.6)#301
9. Seneca 62.4% 41.6% (+20.8)#9 42.1% (+20.3)#328
10. Boulder Canyon 61.1% 41.6% (+19.5)#10 42.1% (+19.0)#475
11. Olivet 60.8% 41.6% (+19.2)#11 42.1% (+18.7)#513
12. Lake Madison 60.7% 41.6% (+19.1)#12 42.1% (+18.6)#520
13. Eden 60.5% 41.6% (+18.9)#13 42.1% (+18.4)#543
14. Delmont 60.3% 41.6% (+18.7)#14 42.1% (+18.2)#587
15. Vivian 60.3% 41.6% (+18.7)#15 42.1% (+18.2)#596
16. New Witten 60.1% 41.6% (+18.5)#16 42.1% (+18.0)#629
17. Lesterville 60.0% 41.6% (+18.4)#17 42.1% (+17.9)#643
18. Butler 60.0% 41.6% (+18.4)#18 42.1% (+17.9)#648
19. Stephan 59.6% 41.6% (+18.0)#19 42.1% (+17.5)#692
20. Andover 59.3% 41.6% (+17.7)#20 42.1% (+17.2)#771
21. Colonial Pine Hills 59.0% 41.6% (+17.4)#21 42.1% (+16.9)#816
22. Buffalo Gap 59.0% 41.6% (+17.4)#22 42.1% (+16.9)#829
23. Hazel 58.5% 41.6% (+16.9)#23 42.1% (+16.4)#910
24. Oelrichs 58.3% 41.6% (+16.7)#24 42.1% (+16.2)#969
25. Cavour 58.0% 41.6% (+16.4)#25 42.1% (+15.9)#1,047
26. Brentford 57.8% 41.6% (+16.2)#26 42.1% (+15.7)#1,082
27. Lake City 57.8% 41.6% (+16.2)#27 42.1% (+15.7)#1,083
28. Lake Poinsett 57.5% 41.6% (+15.9)#28 42.1% (+15.4)#1,144
29. Rowena 57.5% 41.6% (+15.9)#29 42.1% (+15.4)#1,158
30. Sherman 57.5% 41.6% (+15.9)#30 42.1% (+15.4)#1,164
31. Carthage 57.4% 41.6% (+15.8)#31 42.1% (+15.3)#1,192
32. Oahe Acres 57.3% 41.6% (+15.7)#32 42.1% (+15.2)#1,210
33. Tolstoy 57.3% 41.6% (+15.7)#33 42.1% (+15.2)#1,229
34. Grenville 56.9% 41.6% (+15.3)#34 42.1% (+14.8)#1,323
35. Quinn 56.8% 41.6% (+15.2)#35 42.1% (+14.7)#1,348
36. Draper 56.8% 41.6% (+15.2)#36 42.1% (+14.7)#1,353
37. Pine Lakes Addition 56.5% 41.6% (+14.9)#37 42.1% (+14.4)#1,415
38. Hecla 56.5% 41.6% (+14.9)#38 42.1% (+14.4)#1,418
39. Kenel 56.4% 41.6% (+14.8)#39 42.1% (+14.3)#1,478
40. Wessington Springs 56.2% 41.6% (+14.6)#40 42.1% (+14.1)#1,544
41. Kennebec 56.2% 41.6% (+14.6)#41 42.1% (+14.1)#1,549
42. Doland 56.1% 41.6% (+14.5)#42 42.1% (+14.0)#1,584
43. Rockham 56.1% 41.6% (+14.5)#43 42.1% (+14.0)#1,596
44. Interior 56.0% 41.6% (+14.4)#44 42.1% (+13.9)#1,622
45. Renner Corner 55.9% 41.6% (+14.3)#45 42.1% (+13.8)#1,632
46. Philip 55.8% 41.6% (+14.2)#46 42.1% (+13.7)#1,647
47. Mcintosh 55.8% 41.6% (+14.2)#47 42.1% (+13.7)#1,659
48. Westport 55.8% 41.6% (+14.2)#48 42.1% (+13.7)#1,660
49. Roslyn 55.6% 41.6% (+14.0)#49 42.1% (+13.5)#1,704
50. Wanblee 55.5% 41.6% (+13.9)#50 42.1% (+13.4)#1,732
51. Buffalo 55.5% 41.6% (+13.9)#51 42.1% (+13.4)#1,740
52. Claire City 55.5% 41.6% (+13.9)#52 42.1% (+13.4)#1,758
53. Wallace 55.5% 41.6% (+13.9)#53 42.1% (+13.4)#1,759
54. Twin Brooks 55.5% 41.6% (+13.9)#54 42.1% (+13.4)#1,763
55. Hudson 55.3% 41.6% (+13.7)#55 42.1% (+13.2)#1,801
56. Faith 55.3% 41.6% (+13.7)#56 42.1% (+13.2)#1,807
57. Egan 55.3% 41.6% (+13.7)#57 42.1% (+13.2)#1,813
58. Goodwin 55.3% 41.6% (+13.7)#58 42.1% (+13.2)#1,825
59. Pickstown 55.1% 41.6% (+13.5)#59 42.1% (+13.0)#1,900
60. Mina 54.7% 41.6% (+13.1)#60 42.1% (+12.6)#2,016
61. South Shore 54.7% 41.6% (+13.1)#61 42.1% (+12.6)#2,026
62. Ashland Heights 54.3% 41.6% (+12.7)#62 42.1% (+12.2)#2,180
63. Oacoma 54.3% 41.6% (+12.7)#63 42.1% (+12.2)#2,193
64. St Lawrence 54.2% 41.6% (+12.6)#64 42.1% (+12.1)#2,257
65. Onida 53.8% 41.6% (+12.2)#65 42.1% (+11.7)#2,393
66. Highmore 53.5% 41.6% (+11.9)#66 42.1% (+11.4)#2,514
67. Lake Preston 53.5% 41.6% (+11.9)#67 42.1% (+11.4)#2,522
68. Tulare 53.5% 41.6% (+11.9)#68 42.1% (+11.4)#2,549
69. Herrick 53.5% 41.6% (+11.9)#69 42.1% (+11.4)#2,570
70. Marvin 53.5% 41.6% (+11.9)#70 42.1% (+11.4)#2,579
71. Morristown 53.4% 41.6% (+11.8)#71 42.1% (+11.3)#2,640
72. Valley Springs 53.3% 41.6% (+11.7)#72 42.1% (+11.2)#2,661
73. Leola 53.2% 41.6% (+11.6)#73 42.1% (+11.1)#2,727
74. Kranzburg 53.2% 41.6% (+11.6)#74 42.1% (+11.1)#2,733
75. Anderson 53.1% 41.6% (+11.5)#75 42.1% (+11.0)#2,781
76. Fairfax 53.1% 41.6% (+11.5)#76 42.1% (+11.0)#2,796
77. Dolton 52.5% 41.6% (+10.9)#77 42.1% (+10.4)#3,088
78. Broadland 52.5% 41.6% (+10.9)#78 42.1% (+10.4)#3,094
79. Hitchcock 52.4% 41.6% (+10.8)#79 42.1% (+10.3)#3,155
80. Belvidere 52.4% 41.6% (+10.8)#80 42.1% (+10.3)#3,156
81. Tyndall 52.3% 41.6% (+10.7)#81 42.1% (+10.2)#3,179
82. Pollock 52.3% 41.6% (+10.7)#82 42.1% (+10.2)#3,208
83. Strandburg 52.1% 41.6% (+10.5)#83 42.1% (+10.00)#3,355
84. Frankfort 52.0% 41.6% (+10.4)#84 42.1% (+9.90)#3,404
85. Wood 51.8% 41.6% (+10.2)#85 42.1% (+9.70)#3,514
86. Florence 51.7% 41.6% (+10.1)#86 42.1% (+9.60)#3,555
87. Blunt 51.6% 41.6% (+10.00)#87 42.1% (+9.50)#3,621
88. Utica 51.5% 41.6% (+9.90)#88 42.1% (+9.40)#3,707
89. Akaska 51.5% 41.6% (+9.90)#89 42.1% (+9.40)#3,708
90. White Lake 51.4% 41.6% (+9.80)#90 42.1% (+9.30)#3,760
91. Fairview 51.4% 41.6% (+9.80)#91 42.1% (+9.30)#3,783
92. Dimock 51.3% 41.6% (+9.70)#92 42.1% (+9.20)#3,868
93. Marion 51.1% 41.6% (+9.50)#93 42.1% (+9.00)#3,972
94. Corsica 51.1% 41.6% (+9.50)#94 42.1% (+9.00)#3,981
95. Winner 50.9% 41.6% (+9.30)#95 42.1% (+8.80)#4,110
96. Alcester 50.9% 41.6% (+9.30)#96 42.1% (+8.80)#4,120
97. Bison 50.8% 41.6% (+9.20)#97 42.1% (+8.70)#4,196
98. Frederick 50.7% 41.6% (+9.10)#98 42.1% (+8.60)#4,266
99. Herreid 50.6% 41.6% (+9.00)#99 42.1% (+8.50)#4,312
100. Kimball 50.6% 41.6% (+9.00)#100 42.1% (+8.50)#4,313

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in South Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in South Dakota are:
#1
69.1%
#2
67.2%
#3
66.0%
#4
64.1%
#5
64.0%
#6
62.7%
#7
62.4%
#8
60.8%
#9
60.7%
#10
60.5%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in South Dakota?
Nunda has the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in South Dakota with 69.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in the State of South Dakota?
Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in South Dakota is 41.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in the United States is 42.1%.