Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Drive | Alone
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Oklahoma

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Oklahoma

City % Drive Alone vs State vs National
1. Gate 74.2% 40.9% (+33.3)#1 42.1% (+32.1)#12
2. Oakwood 70.0% 40.9% (+29.1)#2 42.1% (+27.9)#42
3. Lake Aluma 69.7% 40.9% (+28.8)#3 42.1% (+27.6)#43
4. Dodge 68.0% 40.9% (+27.1)#4 42.1% (+25.9)#67
5. Mazie 65.5% 40.9% (+24.6)#5 42.1% (+23.4)#136
6. Norge 64.5% 40.9% (+23.6)#6 42.1% (+22.4)#175
7. Douglas 64.0% 40.9% (+23.1)#7 42.1% (+21.9)#218
8. Colony 63.0% 40.9% (+22.1)#8 42.1% (+20.9)#286
9. Sand Point 62.5% 40.9% (+21.6)#9 42.1% (+20.4)#309
10. Old Eucha 62.3% 40.9% (+21.4)#10 42.1% (+20.2)#345
11. Hochatown 61.8% 40.9% (+20.9)#11 42.1% (+19.7)#387
12. Zion 61.8% 40.9% (+20.9)#12 42.1% (+19.7)#390
13. Manitou 61.3% 40.9% (+20.4)#13 42.1% (+19.2)#439
14. Clarita 61.2% 40.9% (+20.3)#14 42.1% (+19.1)#462
15. Pump Back 61.0% 40.9% (+20.1)#15 42.1% (+18.9)#491
16. Willow 60.5% 40.9% (+19.6)#16 42.1% (+18.4)#545
17. Grayson 60.5% 40.9% (+19.6)#17 42.1% (+18.4)#548
18. Paradise Hill 59.5% 40.9% (+18.6)#18 42.1% (+17.4)#703
19. Fallis 59.5% 40.9% (+18.6)#19 42.1% (+17.4)#711
20. Terlton 59.4% 40.9% (+18.5)#20 42.1% (+17.3)#735
21. Dennis 59.3% 40.9% (+18.4)#21 42.1% (+17.2)#753
22. Nash 58.5% 40.9% (+17.6)#22 42.1% (+16.4)#912
23. Tuskahoma 58.5% 40.9% (+17.6)#23 42.1% (+16.4)#918
24. Woodlawn Park 58.3% 40.9% (+17.4)#24 42.1% (+16.2)#974
25. Sparrowhawk 58.2% 40.9% (+17.3)#25 42.1% (+16.1)#1,004
26. Taylor Ferry 58.0% 40.9% (+17.1)#26 42.1% (+15.9)#1,036
27. Osage 57.2% 40.9% (+16.3)#27 42.1% (+15.1)#1,252
28. Manchester 57.1% 40.9% (+16.2)#28 42.1% (+15.0)#1,285
29. Valley Park 57.0% 40.9% (+16.1)#29 42.1% (+14.9)#1,312
30. Hunter 56.9% 40.9% (+16.0)#30 42.1% (+14.8)#1,318
31. Putnam 56.7% 40.9% (+15.8)#31 42.1% (+14.6)#1,369
32. Copeland 56.5% 40.9% (+15.6)#32 42.1% (+14.4)#1,396
33. Lone Wolf 56.5% 40.9% (+15.6)#33 42.1% (+14.4)#1,411
34. Strong City 56.1% 40.9% (+15.2)#34 42.1% (+14.0)#1,594
35. Fair Oaks 55.8% 40.9% (+14.9)#35 42.1% (+13.7)#1,661
36. Cookson 55.6% 40.9% (+14.7)#36 42.1% (+13.5)#1,695
37. Oak Hill-Piney 55.4% 40.9% (+14.5)#37 42.1% (+13.3)#1,787
38. Chance 55.1% 40.9% (+14.2)#38 42.1% (+13.0)#1,898
39. Yeager 55.0% 40.9% (+14.1)#39 42.1% (+12.9)#1,937
40. Murphy 54.9% 40.9% (+14.0)#40 42.1% (+12.8)#1,962
41. Foss 54.8% 40.9% (+13.9)#41 42.1% (+12.7)#1,986
42. Greenfield 54.6% 40.9% (+13.7)#42 42.1% (+12.5)#2,065
43. Erin Springs 54.6% 40.9% (+13.7)#43 42.1% (+12.5)#2,067
44. Carlton Landing 54.5% 40.9% (+13.6)#44 42.1% (+12.4)#2,128
45. Drummond 54.4% 40.9% (+13.5)#45 42.1% (+12.3)#2,154
46. Smith Village 54.4% 40.9% (+13.5)#46 42.1% (+12.3)#2,170
47. Snake Creek 54.3% 40.9% (+13.4)#47 42.1% (+12.2)#2,199
48. Wynona 54.0% 40.9% (+13.1)#48 42.1% (+11.9)#2,331
49. Martha 54.0% 40.9% (+13.1)#49 42.1% (+11.9)#2,336
50. Forest Park 53.9% 40.9% (+13.0)#50 42.1% (+11.8)#2,356
51. Gould 53.8% 40.9% (+12.9)#51 42.1% (+11.7)#2,411
52. Grandview 53.7% 40.9% (+12.8)#52 42.1% (+11.6)#2,429
53. Freedom 53.7% 40.9% (+12.8)#53 42.1% (+11.6)#2,450
54. Hough 53.7% 40.9% (+12.8)#54 42.1% (+11.6)#2,458
55. Short 53.6% 40.9% (+12.7)#55 42.1% (+11.5)#2,483
56. Hallett 53.6% 40.9% (+12.7)#56 42.1% (+11.5)#2,492
57. Titanic 53.3% 40.9% (+12.4)#57 42.1% (+11.2)#2,675
58. Cowlington 53.3% 40.9% (+12.4)#58 42.1% (+11.2)#2,696
59. Lone Chimney 53.3% 40.9% (+12.4)#59 42.1% (+11.2)#2,699
60. Avard 53.3% 40.9% (+12.4)#60 42.1% (+11.2)#2,701
61. Cleora 53.2% 40.9% (+12.3)#61 42.1% (+11.1)#2,712
62. Velma 53.2% 40.9% (+12.3)#62 42.1% (+11.1)#2,721
63. Steely Hollow 53.2% 40.9% (+12.3)#63 42.1% (+11.1)#2,732
64. Sand Hill 53.1% 40.9% (+12.2)#64 42.1% (+11.0)#2,786
65. Longtown 52.8% 40.9% (+11.9)#65 42.1% (+10.7)#2,885
66. Cumberland 52.8% 40.9% (+11.9)#66 42.1% (+10.7)#2,901
67. Dotyville 52.7% 40.9% (+11.8)#67 42.1% (+10.6)#2,963
68. Sasakwa 52.5% 40.9% (+11.6)#68 42.1% (+10.4)#3,082
69. Boley 52.2% 40.9% (+11.3)#69 42.1% (+10.1)#3,254
70. Arpelar 52.1% 40.9% (+11.2)#70 42.1% (+10.00)#3,338
71. Norwood 51.8% 40.9% (+10.9)#71 42.1% (+9.70)#3,463
72. Burneyville 51.8% 40.9% (+10.9)#72 42.1% (+9.70)#3,473
73. Blackburn 51.8% 40.9% (+10.9)#73 42.1% (+9.70)#3,508
74. Chester 51.8% 40.9% (+10.9)#74 42.1% (+9.70)#3,513
75. Peckham 51.8% 40.9% (+10.9)#75 42.1% (+9.70)#3,515
76. Bluejacket 51.7% 40.9% (+10.8)#76 42.1% (+9.60)#3,557
77. Lucien 51.7% 40.9% (+10.8)#77 42.1% (+9.60)#3,563
78. Clearview 51.6% 40.9% (+10.7)#78 42.1% (+9.50)#3,629
79. Notchietown 51.5% 40.9% (+10.6)#79 42.1% (+9.40)#3,678
80. Sugden 51.5% 40.9% (+10.6)#80 42.1% (+9.40)#3,711
81. Glencoe 51.4% 40.9% (+10.5)#81 42.1% (+9.30)#3,753
82. Tenkiller 51.4% 40.9% (+10.5)#82 42.1% (+9.30)#3,766
83. Nichols Hills 51.3% 40.9% (+10.4)#83 42.1% (+9.20)#3,789
84. Texanna 51.3% 40.9% (+10.4)#84 42.1% (+9.20)#3,798
85. Sequoyah 51.3% 40.9% (+10.4)#85 42.1% (+9.20)#3,818
86. Mill Creek 51.3% 40.9% (+10.4)#86 42.1% (+9.20)#3,845
87. Turley 51.2% 40.9% (+10.3)#87 42.1% (+9.10)#3,885
88. Fittstown 51.1% 40.9% (+10.2)#88 42.1% (+9.00)#4,018
89. Fort Towson 51.0% 40.9% (+10.1)#89 42.1% (+8.90)#4,058
90. Dill City 51.0% 40.9% (+10.1)#90 42.1% (+8.90)#4,069
91. Cedar Valley 50.9% 40.9% (+10.0)#91 42.1% (+8.80)#4,127
92. Tiawah 50.9% 40.9% (+10.0)#92 42.1% (+8.80)#4,140
93. Arnett 50.8% 40.9% (+9.90)#93 42.1% (+8.70)#4,186
94. Belfonte 50.8% 40.9% (+9.90)#94 42.1% (+8.70)#4,206
95. Blue 50.8% 40.9% (+9.90)#95 42.1% (+8.70)#4,224
96. Fox 50.8% 40.9% (+9.90)#96 42.1% (+8.70)#4,226
97. Gregory 50.7% 40.9% (+9.80)#97 42.1% (+8.60)#4,257
98. Boynton 50.7% 40.9% (+9.80)#98 42.1% (+8.60)#4,270
99. Whitesboro 50.7% 40.9% (+9.80)#99 42.1% (+8.60)#4,271
100. Akins 50.6% 40.9% (+9.70)#100 42.1% (+8.50)#4,316

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Oklahoma are:
#1
74.2%
#2
70.0%
#3
69.7%
#4
68.0%
#5
65.5%
#6
64.5%
#7
64.0%
#8
63.0%
#9
62.3%
#10
61.8%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Oklahoma?
Gate has the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Oklahoma with 74.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in the State of Oklahoma?
Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Oklahoma is 40.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in the United States is 42.1%.