Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Texas

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Drive | Alone
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Texas
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Texas

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Texas Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Texas

City % Drive Alone vs State vs National
1. Sheffield 77.3% 40.8% (+36.5)#1 42.1% (+35.2)#4
2. Browndell 67.1% 40.8% (+26.3)#2 42.1% (+25.0)#91
3. Rowena 66.6% 40.8% (+25.8)#3 42.1% (+24.5)#98
4. Quail 66.3% 40.8% (+25.5)#4 42.1% (+24.2)#109
5. O Brien 65.3% 40.8% (+24.5)#5 42.1% (+23.2)#142
6. Leakey 65.0% 40.8% (+24.2)#6 42.1% (+22.9)#156
7. Kopperl 64.9% 40.8% (+24.1)#7 42.1% (+22.8)#159
8. Shiro 64.6% 40.8% (+23.8)#8 42.1% (+22.5)#171
9. Tow 64.4% 40.8% (+23.6)#9 42.1% (+22.3)#187
10. Cedar Point 64.0% 40.8% (+23.2)#10 42.1% (+21.9)#215
11. Sargent 63.7% 40.8% (+22.9)#11 42.1% (+21.6)#228
12. Buchanan Lake Village 62.3% 40.8% (+21.5)#12 42.1% (+20.2)#333
13. Redfield 62.3% 40.8% (+21.5)#13 42.1% (+20.2)#336
14. Pecan Gap 62.3% 40.8% (+21.5)#14 42.1% (+20.2)#338
15. Balmorhea 61.6% 40.8% (+20.8)#15 42.1% (+19.5)#399
16. Roaring Springs 61.4% 40.8% (+20.6)#16 42.1% (+19.3)#429
17. Indian Springs 61.3% 40.8% (+20.5)#17 42.1% (+19.2)#434
18. Enchanted Oaks 61.3% 40.8% (+20.5)#18 42.1% (+19.2)#438
19. K Bar Ranch 61.2% 40.8% (+20.4)#19 42.1% (+19.1)#452
20. Cape Royale 61.2% 40.8% (+20.4)#20 42.1% (+19.1)#456
21. Villarreal 61.2% 40.8% (+20.4)#21 42.1% (+19.1)#467
22. Bolivar Peninsula 61.1% 40.8% (+20.3)#22 42.1% (+19.0)#469
23. Lopezville 61.1% 40.8% (+20.3)#23 42.1% (+19.0)#470
24. Toco 60.8% 40.8% (+20.0)#24 42.1% (+18.7)#514
25. Sunrise Beach Village 60.6% 40.8% (+19.8)#25 42.1% (+18.5)#525
26. Seven Oaks 60.5% 40.8% (+19.7)#26 42.1% (+18.4)#547
27. Dorchester 60.5% 40.8% (+19.7)#27 42.1% (+18.4)#561
28. Dickens 60.3% 40.8% (+19.5)#28 42.1% (+18.2)#589
29. Holly Lake Ranch 60.1% 40.8% (+19.3)#29 42.1% (+18.0)#618
30. Fulton 60.0% 40.8% (+19.2)#30 42.1% (+17.9)#634
31. Stockton Bend 59.9% 40.8% (+19.1)#31 42.1% (+17.8)#651
32. Alanreed 59.6% 40.8% (+18.8)#32 42.1% (+17.5)#693
33. Highland Haven 59.4% 40.8% (+18.6)#33 42.1% (+17.3)#722
34. Nocona Hills 59.3% 40.8% (+18.5)#34 42.1% (+17.2)#745
35. Normangee 59.2% 40.8% (+18.4)#35 42.1% (+17.1)#778
36. La Feria North 59.2% 40.8% (+18.4)#36 42.1% (+17.1)#787
37. Shady Hollow 59.1% 40.8% (+18.3)#37 42.1% (+17.0)#796
38. Westover Hills 58.7% 40.8% (+17.9)#38 42.1% (+16.6)#867
39. Adrian 58.5% 40.8% (+17.7)#39 42.1% (+16.4)#908
40. Tilden 58.4% 40.8% (+17.6)#40 42.1% (+16.3)#942
41. North Cleveland 57.9% 40.8% (+17.1)#41 42.1% (+15.8)#1,058
42. Ross 57.9% 40.8% (+17.1)#42 42.1% (+15.8)#1,060
43. Creedmoor 57.7% 40.8% (+16.9)#43 42.1% (+15.6)#1,090
44. Round Mountain 57.7% 40.8% (+16.9)#44 42.1% (+15.6)#1,104
45. Uncertain 57.6% 40.8% (+16.8)#45 42.1% (+15.5)#1,124
46. Tivoli 57.5% 40.8% (+16.7)#46 42.1% (+15.4)#1,138
47. Lake Tanglewood 57.4% 40.8% (+16.6)#47 42.1% (+15.3)#1,178
48. Big Thicket Lake Estates 57.4% 40.8% (+16.6)#48 42.1% (+15.3)#1,179
49. Powell 57.4% 40.8% (+16.6)#49 42.1% (+15.3)#1,193
50. Grey Forest 57.3% 40.8% (+16.5)#50 42.1% (+15.2)#1,208
51. Holiday Beach 57.3% 40.8% (+16.5)#51 42.1% (+15.2)#1,216
52. Industry 57.3% 40.8% (+16.5)#52 42.1% (+15.2)#1,217
53. Alamo Beach 57.3% 40.8% (+16.5)#53 42.1% (+15.2)#1,222
54. Encantada Ranchito El Calaboz 57.2% 40.8% (+16.4)#54 42.1% (+15.1)#1,234
55. Taft Southwest 57.1% 40.8% (+16.3)#55 42.1% (+15.0)#1,258
56. Sandia 57.1% 40.8% (+16.3)#56 42.1% (+15.0)#1,272
57. Caney City 57.1% 40.8% (+16.3)#57 42.1% (+15.0)#1,284
58. Port O Connor 57.0% 40.8% (+16.2)#58 42.1% (+14.9)#1,299
59. Lake Medina Shores 56.9% 40.8% (+16.1)#59 42.1% (+14.8)#1,315
60. Sabinal 56.8% 40.8% (+16.0)#60 42.1% (+14.7)#1,331
61. Weston 56.8% 40.8% (+16.0)#61 42.1% (+14.7)#1,341
62. Fort Clark Springs 56.7% 40.8% (+15.9)#62 42.1% (+14.6)#1,357
63. Surfside Beach 56.2% 40.8% (+15.4)#63 42.1% (+14.1)#1,545
64. Eureka 56.2% 40.8% (+15.4)#64 42.1% (+14.1)#1,554
65. Stonewall 56.0% 40.8% (+15.2)#65 42.1% (+13.9)#1,604
66. Richland Springs 55.7% 40.8% (+14.9)#66 42.1% (+13.6)#1,684
67. South Padre Island 55.6% 40.8% (+14.8)#67 42.1% (+13.5)#1,693
68. Moran 55.6% 40.8% (+14.8)#68 42.1% (+13.5)#1,706
69. Porter Heights 55.4% 40.8% (+14.6)#69 42.1% (+13.3)#1,773
70. Hilltop Lakes 55.3% 40.8% (+14.5)#70 42.1% (+13.2)#1,797
71. Copper Canyon 55.2% 40.8% (+14.4)#71 42.1% (+13.1)#1,837
72. Nome 55.2% 40.8% (+14.4)#72 42.1% (+13.1)#1,855
73. Grangerland 55.0% 40.8% (+14.2)#73 42.1% (+12.9)#1,920
74. Mobeetie 55.0% 40.8% (+14.2)#74 42.1% (+12.9)#1,940
75. Blackwell 54.8% 40.8% (+14.0)#75 42.1% (+12.7)#1,984
76. Quintana 54.7% 40.8% (+13.9)#76 42.1% (+12.6)#2,035
77. Ladonia 54.5% 40.8% (+13.7)#77 42.1% (+12.4)#2,090
78. Sheridan 54.5% 40.8% (+13.7)#78 42.1% (+12.4)#2,110
79. Lakeview 54.5% 40.8% (+13.7)#79 42.1% (+12.4)#2,129
80. Round Top 54.3% 40.8% (+13.5)#80 42.1% (+12.2)#2,219
81. Bayou Vista 54.2% 40.8% (+13.4)#81 42.1% (+12.1)#2,233
82. Fronton Ranchettes 54.2% 40.8% (+13.4)#82 42.1% (+12.1)#2,258
83. Buchanan Dam 54.1% 40.8% (+13.3)#83 42.1% (+12.0)#2,271
84. Riverside 54.1% 40.8% (+13.3)#84 42.1% (+12.0)#2,278
85. Fruitvale 54.1% 40.8% (+13.3)#85 42.1% (+12.0)#2,282
86. Cade Lakes 54.1% 40.8% (+13.3)#86 42.1% (+12.0)#2,286
87. Coyote Flats 54.1% 40.8% (+13.3)#87 42.1% (+12.0)#2,288
88. Sherwood Shores 54.0% 40.8% (+13.2)#88 42.1% (+11.9)#2,321
89. Timbercreek Canyon 54.0% 40.8% (+13.2)#89 42.1% (+11.9)#2,325
90. Matagorda 54.0% 40.8% (+13.2)#90 42.1% (+11.9)#2,329
91. Meadowlakes 53.9% 40.8% (+13.1)#91 42.1% (+11.8)#2,350
92. Piney Point Village 53.8% 40.8% (+13.0)#92 42.1% (+11.7)#2,375
93. Circle D Kc Estates 53.8% 40.8% (+13.0)#93 42.1% (+11.7)#2,376
94. Eustace 53.8% 40.8% (+13.0)#94 42.1% (+11.7)#2,382
95. Carl S Corner 53.8% 40.8% (+13.0)#95 42.1% (+11.7)#2,401
96. Stagecoach 53.7% 40.8% (+12.9)#96 42.1% (+11.6)#2,436
97. Carmine 53.7% 40.8% (+12.9)#97 42.1% (+11.6)#2,447
98. Baird 53.4% 40.8% (+12.6)#98 42.1% (+11.3)#2,590
99. Daisetta 53.4% 40.8% (+12.6)#99 42.1% (+11.3)#2,598
100. Thompsons 53.4% 40.8% (+12.6)#100 42.1% (+11.3)#2,619

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Texas?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Texas are:
#1
67.1%
#2
66.3%
#3
65.3%
#4
65.0%
#5
64.0%
#6
62.3%
#7
62.3%
#8
62.3%
#9
61.6%
#10
61.4%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Texas?
Browndell has the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Texas with 67.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in the State of Texas?
Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Texas is 40.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in the United States is 42.1%.