Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in North Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Public Administration
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in North Dakota

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in North Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in North Dakota

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Porcupine 70.4% 4.6% (+65.8)#1 4.7% (+65.7)#58
2. Lawton 50.0% 4.6% (+45.4)#2 4.7% (+45.3)#144
3. Nome 44.4% 4.6% (+39.8)#3 4.7% (+39.8)#193
4. Mandaree 43.5% 4.6% (+38.9)#4 4.7% (+38.8)#210
5. Braddock 42.9% 4.6% (+38.3)#5 4.7% (+38.2)#225
6. Ambrose 41.7% 4.6% (+37.1)#6 4.7% (+37.0)#242
7. Tolley 41.7% 4.6% (+37.1)#7 4.7% (+37.0)#243
8. Portal 37.9% 4.6% (+33.3)#8 4.7% (+33.2)#299
9. Mountain 37.5% 4.6% (+32.9)#9 4.7% (+32.8)#305
10. Calvin 33.3% 4.6% (+28.7)#10 4.7% (+28.6)#386
11. Landa 31.7% 4.6% (+27.1)#11 4.7% (+27.0)#424
12. Fort Totten 25.0% 4.6% (+20.4)#12 4.7% (+20.3)#721
13. Amidon 25.0% 4.6% (+20.4)#13 4.7% (+20.3)#740
14. Powers Lake 24.3% 4.6% (+19.7)#14 4.7% (+19.7)#790
15. Reeder 23.1% 4.6% (+18.5)#15 4.7% (+18.4)#894
16. Deering 22.4% 4.6% (+17.8)#16 4.7% (+17.8)#942
17. Pembina 22.2% 4.6% (+17.6)#17 4.7% (+17.5)#960
18. Green Acres 20.9% 4.6% (+16.3)#18 4.7% (+16.2)#1,091
19. Fort Yates 20.0% 4.6% (+15.4)#19 4.7% (+15.3)#1,191
20. Riverdale 19.8% 4.6% (+15.2)#20 4.7% (+15.1)#1,229
21. Balta 19.0% 4.6% (+14.4)#21 4.7% (+14.4)#1,329
22. Robinson 19.0% 4.6% (+14.4)#22 4.7% (+14.4)#1,330
23. Minot Afb 17.7% 4.6% (+13.1)#23 4.7% (+13.0)#1,526
24. Karlsruhe 17.4% 4.6% (+12.8)#24 4.7% (+12.7)#1,589
25. Foxholm 17.2% 4.6% (+12.6)#25 4.7% (+12.6)#1,621
26. Center 16.3% 4.6% (+11.7)#26 4.7% (+11.6)#1,807
27. Driscoll 16.0% 4.6% (+11.4)#27 4.7% (+11.3)#1,865
28. Grand Forks Afb 15.9% 4.6% (+11.3)#28 4.7% (+11.2)#1,885
29. Dodge 15.6% 4.6% (+11.0)#29 4.7% (+10.9)#1,958
30. York 15.4% 4.6% (+10.8)#30 4.7% (+10.7)#2,024
31. Pingree 15.0% 4.6% (+10.4)#31 4.7% (+10.3)#2,128
32. Carpio 14.7% 4.6% (+10.1)#32 4.7% (+9.98)#2,224
33. Mchenry 14.3% 4.6% (+9.68)#33 4.7% (+9.60)#2,377
34. Nekoma 14.3% 4.6% (+9.68)#34 4.7% (+9.60)#2,386
35. Leeds 14.2% 4.6% (+9.56)#35 4.7% (+9.48)#2,420
36. Cannon Ball 14.1% 4.6% (+9.51)#36 4.7% (+9.43)#2,437
37. Belcourt 13.9% 4.6% (+9.28)#37 4.7% (+9.19)#2,515
38. Trenton 13.4% 4.6% (+8.82)#38 4.7% (+8.74)#2,698
39. Forbes 13.3% 4.6% (+8.73)#39 4.7% (+8.65)#2,741
40. Stanley 13.2% 4.6% (+8.60)#40 4.7% (+8.52)#2,776
41. Lignite 13.0% 4.6% (+8.38)#41 4.7% (+8.30)#2,855
42. Underwood 12.8% 4.6% (+8.22)#42 4.7% (+8.14)#2,908
43. Lakota 12.4% 4.6% (+7.81)#43 4.7% (+7.73)#3,065
44. Petersburg 12.2% 4.6% (+7.64)#44 4.7% (+7.56)#3,136
45. Westhope 12.1% 4.6% (+7.48)#45 4.7% (+7.40)#3,231
46. Lehr 11.9% 4.6% (+7.30)#46 4.7% (+7.22)#3,313
47. Walhalla 11.9% 4.6% (+7.29)#47 4.7% (+7.21)#3,314
48. Hillsboro 11.8% 4.6% (+7.16)#48 4.7% (+7.08)#3,371
49. Crosby 11.6% 4.6% (+7.04)#49 4.7% (+6.96)#3,446
50. Brinsmade 11.1% 4.6% (+6.51)#50 4.7% (+6.43)#3,757
51. Lincoln 11.1% 4.6% (+6.47)#51 4.7% (+6.38)#3,773
52. Marmarth 10.8% 4.6% (+6.21)#52 4.7% (+6.13)#3,929
53. East Dunseith 10.7% 4.6% (+6.09)#53 4.7% (+6.01)#4,004
54. Beach 10.6% 4.6% (+5.98)#54 4.7% (+5.90)#4,076
55. Gladstone 10.3% 4.6% (+5.67)#55 4.7% (+5.59)#4,288
56. New Town 10.3% 4.6% (+5.66)#56 4.7% (+5.58)#4,292
57. Regent 9.9% 4.6% (+5.29)#57 4.7% (+5.20)#4,566
58. Carson 9.8% 4.6% (+5.19)#58 4.7% (+5.11)#4,646
59. Dwight 9.7% 4.6% (+5.07)#59 4.7% (+4.99)#4,735
60. Bowbells 9.6% 4.6% (+5.02)#60 4.7% (+4.94)#4,776
61. Benedict 9.5% 4.6% (+4.92)#61 4.7% (+4.84)#4,852
62. St John 9.5% 4.6% (+4.92)#62 4.7% (+4.84)#4,853
63. Edinburg 9.5% 4.6% (+4.92)#63 4.7% (+4.84)#4,855
64. Dunseith 9.5% 4.6% (+4.89)#64 4.7% (+4.81)#4,880
65. New Leipzig 9.4% 4.6% (+4.81)#65 4.7% (+4.73)#4,950
66. Sherwood 9.4% 4.6% (+4.77)#66 4.7% (+4.69)#4,977
67. Mercer 9.4% 4.6% (+4.77)#67 4.7% (+4.69)#4,981
68. Glenburn 9.2% 4.6% (+4.62)#68 4.7% (+4.54)#5,097
69. Alice 9.1% 4.6% (+4.49)#69 4.7% (+4.41)#5,230
70. Hampden 9.1% 4.6% (+4.49)#70 4.7% (+4.41)#5,231
71. Colfax 9.0% 4.6% (+4.40)#71 4.7% (+4.31)#5,296
72. St Thomas 8.8% 4.6% (+4.24)#72 4.7% (+4.16)#5,447
73. Menoken 8.8% 4.6% (+4.22)#73 4.7% (+4.14)#5,466
74. Dawson 8.7% 4.6% (+4.09)#74 4.7% (+4.01)#5,612
75. Great Bend 8.7% 4.6% (+4.09)#75 4.7% (+4.01)#5,615
76. Sawyer 8.7% 4.6% (+4.06)#76 4.7% (+3.98)#5,635
77. Bismarck 8.6% 4.6% (+3.95)#77 4.7% (+3.87)#5,739
78. Cooperstown 8.5% 4.6% (+3.94)#78 4.7% (+3.86)#5,746
79. Cavalier 8.5% 4.6% (+3.91)#79 4.7% (+3.83)#5,783
80. Towner 8.5% 4.6% (+3.90)#80 4.7% (+3.81)#5,803
81. Shell Valley 8.3% 4.6% (+3.65)#81 4.7% (+3.57)#6,074
82. Palermo 8.1% 4.6% (+3.46)#82 4.7% (+3.38)#6,282
83. Cogswell 8.1% 4.6% (+3.46)#83 4.7% (+3.38)#6,283
84. Gackle 8.0% 4.6% (+3.40)#84 4.7% (+3.31)#6,358
85. Surrey 8.0% 4.6% (+3.35)#85 4.7% (+3.27)#6,409
86. Hope 7.9% 4.6% (+3.31)#86 4.7% (+3.23)#6,457
87. Rolette 7.9% 4.6% (+3.31)#87 4.7% (+3.22)#6,462
88. Donnybrook 7.9% 4.6% (+3.29)#88 4.7% (+3.21)#6,480
89. Hannaford 7.8% 4.6% (+3.24)#89 4.7% (+3.16)#6,544
90. Ardoch 7.7% 4.6% (+3.09)#90 4.7% (+3.01)#6,764
91. Wilton 7.6% 4.6% (+3.04)#91 4.7% (+2.96)#6,803
92. Page 7.6% 4.6% (+3.01)#92 4.7% (+2.93)#6,839
93. Anamoose 7.6% 4.6% (+2.96)#93 4.7% (+2.88)#6,897
94. Steele 7.5% 4.6% (+2.91)#94 4.7% (+2.83)#6,980
95. Langdon 7.5% 4.6% (+2.86)#95 4.7% (+2.78)#7,037
96. Minnewaukan 7.3% 4.6% (+2.73)#96 4.7% (+2.65)#7,188
97. Ryder 7.3% 4.6% (+2.71)#97 4.7% (+2.63)#7,236
98. Crary 7.3% 4.6% (+2.67)#98 4.7% (+2.59)#7,284
99. Apple Valley 7.1% 4.6% (+2.54)#99 4.7% (+2.46)#7,456
100. White Earth 7.1% 4.6% (+2.54)#100 4.7% (+2.46)#7,469

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in North Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in North Dakota are:
#1
70.4%
#2
50.0%
#3
44.4%
#4
43.5%
#5
42.9%
#6
41.7%
#7
41.7%
#8
37.9%
#9
37.5%
#10
33.3%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in North Dakota?
Porcupine has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in North Dakota with 70.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in the State of North Dakota?
Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in North Dakota is 4.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in the United States is 4.7%.