Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Public Administration
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in Oklahoma

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in Oklahoma

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Pontotoc 100.0% 6.2% (+93.8)#1 4.7% (+95.3)#8
2. Jefferson 100.0% 6.2% (+93.8)#2 4.7% (+95.3)#29
3. Dale 54.2% 6.2% (+48.1)#3 4.7% (+49.6)#107
4. Eagle 50.0% 6.2% (+43.8)#4 4.7% (+45.3)#146
5. Lovell 48.0% 6.2% (+41.8)#5 4.7% (+43.3)#163
6. Felt 41.4% 6.2% (+35.2)#6 4.7% (+36.7)#248
7. Caney Ridge 38.5% 6.2% (+32.3)#7 4.7% (+33.8)#289
8. Ixl 38.5% 6.2% (+32.3)#8 4.7% (+33.8)#291
9. Tonkawa Tribal Housing 38.3% 6.2% (+32.1)#9 4.7% (+33.6)#294
10. Hunter 36.5% 6.2% (+30.4)#10 4.7% (+31.9)#321
11. Pumpkin Hollow 36.5% 6.2% (+30.4)#11 4.7% (+31.9)#322
12. Hanna 34.8% 6.2% (+28.6)#12 4.7% (+30.1)#344
13. St Louis 33.3% 6.2% (+27.2)#13 4.7% (+28.6)#373
14. Hitchcock 33.3% 6.2% (+27.2)#14 4.7% (+28.6)#383
15. Latta 30.9% 6.2% (+24.8)#15 4.7% (+26.2)#448
16. Lucien 30.9% 6.2% (+24.7)#16 4.7% (+26.2)#449
17. Sweetwater 30.3% 6.2% (+24.1)#17 4.7% (+25.6)#470
18. Durham 30.0% 6.2% (+23.8)#18 4.7% (+25.3)#491
19. Short 28.9% 6.2% (+22.8)#19 4.7% (+24.3)#519
20. Lawtonka Acres 28.9% 6.2% (+22.8)#20 4.7% (+24.3)#520
21. Roosevelt 28.0% 6.2% (+21.8)#21 4.7% (+23.3)#564
22. Rose 27.6% 6.2% (+21.5)#22 4.7% (+22.9)#583
23. Ashland 26.3% 6.2% (+20.1)#23 4.7% (+21.6)#648
24. Belfonte 26.2% 6.2% (+20.0)#24 4.7% (+21.5)#655
25. Bache 25.9% 6.2% (+19.8)#25 4.7% (+21.2)#668
26. Longdale 25.8% 6.2% (+19.6)#26 4.7% (+21.1)#674
27. Martha 25.5% 6.2% (+19.3)#27 4.7% (+20.8)#695
28. Sasakwa 25.0% 6.2% (+18.8)#28 4.7% (+20.3)#735
29. Rosston 25.0% 6.2% (+18.8)#29 4.7% (+20.3)#741
30. Bell 24.5% 6.2% (+18.3)#30 4.7% (+19.8)#775
31. Milfay 24.5% 6.2% (+18.3)#31 4.7% (+19.8)#776
32. Savanna 24.0% 6.2% (+17.9)#32 4.7% (+19.3)#816
33. Kiowa 23.9% 6.2% (+17.7)#33 4.7% (+19.2)#833
34. Strong City 23.8% 6.2% (+17.6)#34 4.7% (+19.1)#838
35. Pittsburg 23.7% 6.2% (+17.6)#35 4.7% (+19.0)#844
36. Bromide 23.3% 6.2% (+17.1)#36 4.7% (+18.6)#878
37. Granite 22.8% 6.2% (+16.6)#37 4.7% (+18.1)#911
38. Clarita 22.6% 6.2% (+16.4)#38 4.7% (+17.9)#928
39. Bradley 22.6% 6.2% (+16.4)#39 4.7% (+17.9)#929
40. Cookson 22.1% 6.2% (+16.0)#40 4.7% (+17.5)#973
41. Tuskahoma 21.4% 6.2% (+15.3)#41 4.7% (+16.7)#1,023
42. Medford 21.0% 6.2% (+14.8)#42 4.7% (+16.3)#1,086
43. Erick 20.7% 6.2% (+14.5)#43 4.7% (+16.0)#1,105
44. Haywood 20.4% 6.2% (+14.2)#44 4.7% (+15.7)#1,146
45. Grandview 20.0% 6.2% (+13.9)#45 4.7% (+15.4)#1,176
46. Evening Shade 20.0% 6.2% (+13.8)#46 4.7% (+15.3)#1,183
47. Putnam 20.0% 6.2% (+13.8)#47 4.7% (+15.3)#1,200
48. Clearview 20.0% 6.2% (+13.8)#48 4.7% (+15.3)#1,201
49. Choctaw 19.9% 6.2% (+13.7)#49 4.7% (+15.2)#1,218
50. Leach 19.8% 6.2% (+13.6)#50 4.7% (+15.1)#1,231
51. Keys 19.5% 6.2% (+13.3)#51 4.7% (+14.8)#1,273
52. Greenville 19.2% 6.2% (+13.1)#52 4.7% (+14.5)#1,308
53. Shady Grove Cdp Cherokee County 19.1% 6.2% (+13.0)#53 4.7% (+14.5)#1,317
54. Indianola 18.9% 6.2% (+12.8)#54 4.7% (+14.2)#1,348
55. Gracemont 18.8% 6.2% (+12.6)#55 4.7% (+14.1)#1,365
56. Dewar 18.7% 6.2% (+12.5)#56 4.7% (+14.0)#1,381
57. White Oak 18.3% 6.2% (+12.1)#57 4.7% (+13.6)#1,426
58. Buffalo 18.3% 6.2% (+12.1)#58 4.7% (+13.6)#1,436
59. Monroe 18.2% 6.2% (+12.0)#59 4.7% (+13.5)#1,451
60. Hitchita 18.2% 6.2% (+12.0)#60 4.7% (+13.5)#1,458
61. Empire City 18.2% 6.2% (+12.0)#61 4.7% (+13.5)#1,465
62. Pawnee 17.7% 6.2% (+11.6)#62 4.7% (+13.0)#1,525
63. Fort Coffee 17.6% 6.2% (+11.5)#63 4.7% (+13.0)#1,536
64. Francis 17.4% 6.2% (+11.2)#64 4.7% (+12.7)#1,593
65. Zeb 17.3% 6.2% (+11.1)#65 4.7% (+12.6)#1,608
66. Lookeba 17.1% 6.2% (+10.9)#66 4.7% (+12.4)#1,659
67. Mcloud 16.9% 6.2% (+10.8)#67 4.7% (+12.2)#1,677
68. Harrah 16.9% 6.2% (+10.7)#68 4.7% (+12.2)#1,687
69. Friendship 16.7% 6.2% (+10.5)#69 4.7% (+12.0)#1,744
70. Avard 16.7% 6.2% (+10.5)#70 4.7% (+12.0)#1,745
71. Scipio 16.1% 6.2% (+9.96)#71 4.7% (+11.4)#1,838
72. White Eagle 16.1% 6.2% (+9.94)#72 4.7% (+11.4)#1,845
73. Gate 15.9% 6.2% (+9.74)#73 4.7% (+11.2)#1,881
74. Swink 15.8% 6.2% (+9.62)#74 4.7% (+11.1)#1,918
75. Nashoba 15.8% 6.2% (+9.62)#75 4.7% (+11.1)#1,919
76. Chattanooga 15.6% 6.2% (+9.40)#76 4.7% (+10.9)#1,968
77. Byng 15.6% 6.2% (+9.40)#77 4.7% (+10.9)#1,969
78. Wynona 15.5% 6.2% (+9.34)#78 4.7% (+10.8)#1,982
79. Olustee 15.4% 6.2% (+9.25)#79 4.7% (+10.7)#2,002
80. Stuart 15.4% 6.2% (+9.22)#80 4.7% (+10.7)#2,015
81. Lima 15.4% 6.2% (+9.22)#81 4.7% (+10.7)#2,020
82. Bug Tussle 15.3% 6.2% (+9.11)#82 4.7% (+10.6)#2,041
83. Dustin 15.3% 6.2% (+9.09)#83 4.7% (+10.6)#2,048
84. Paden 15.2% 6.2% (+9.08)#84 4.7% (+10.6)#2,053
85. Stringtown 15.2% 6.2% (+9.00)#85 4.7% (+10.5)#2,071
86. Bennington 15.2% 6.2% (+8.98)#86 4.7% (+10.5)#2,075
87. Middleberg 15.2% 6.2% (+8.98)#87 4.7% (+10.5)#2,077
88. Hominy 15.0% 6.2% (+8.79)#88 4.7% (+10.3)#2,136
89. Binger 14.9% 6.2% (+8.69)#89 4.7% (+10.2)#2,166
90. Welling 14.8% 6.2% (+8.66)#90 4.7% (+10.1)#2,171
91. Cloud Creek 14.8% 6.2% (+8.65)#91 4.7% (+10.1)#2,176
92. Jones 14.8% 6.2% (+8.63)#92 4.7% (+10.1)#2,185
93. Brent 14.7% 6.2% (+8.54)#93 4.7% (+10.0)#2,211
94. Mcalester 14.7% 6.2% (+8.52)#94 4.7% (+10.0)#2,216
95. Cherry Tree 14.5% 6.2% (+8.33)#95 4.7% (+9.81)#2,279
96. Dougherty 14.5% 6.2% (+8.31)#96 4.7% (+9.79)#2,289
97. Red Rock 14.4% 6.2% (+8.28)#97 4.7% (+9.76)#2,299
98. Calvin 14.4% 6.2% (+8.23)#98 4.7% (+9.71)#2,310
99. Mountain Park 14.4% 6.2% (+8.23)#99 4.7% (+9.71)#2,311
100. Okarche 14.3% 6.2% (+8.14)#100 4.7% (+9.62)#2,335

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in Oklahoma are:
#1
100.0%
#2
54.2%
#3
41.4%
#4
38.5%
#5
36.5%
#6
34.8%
#7
33.3%
#8
33.3%
#9
30.9%
#10
30.9%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in Oklahoma?
Jefferson has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in Oklahoma with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in the State of Oklahoma?
Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in Oklahoma is 6.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in the United States is 4.7%.