Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in South Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Public Administration
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in South Dakota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in South Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in South Dakota

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Manderson White Horse Creek 89.1% 4.8% (+84.3)#1 4.7% (+84.4)#35
2. Soldier Creek 53.3% 4.8% (+48.5)#2 4.7% (+48.6)#114
3. Belvidere 52.9% 4.8% (+48.1)#3 4.7% (+48.3)#117
4. Lyons 50.0% 4.8% (+45.2)#4 4.7% (+45.3)#135
5. Wood 47.6% 4.8% (+42.8)#5 4.7% (+42.9)#168
6. Whitehorse 43.5% 4.8% (+38.7)#6 4.7% (+38.9)#209
7. Two Strike 42.3% 4.8% (+37.5)#7 4.7% (+37.6)#230
8. Milltown 40.0% 4.8% (+35.2)#8 4.7% (+35.3)#264
9. Running Water 36.0% 4.8% (+31.2)#9 4.7% (+31.3)#328
10. Peever Flats 35.5% 4.8% (+30.7)#10 4.7% (+30.8)#337
11. Wanblee 34.0% 4.8% (+29.2)#11 4.7% (+29.3)#356
12. Eden 31.7% 4.8% (+26.9)#12 4.7% (+27.0)#423
13. Enemy Swim 30.6% 4.8% (+25.8)#13 4.7% (+25.9)#459
14. Monroe 30.0% 4.8% (+25.2)#14 4.7% (+25.3)#488
15. Reliance 28.2% 4.8% (+23.4)#15 4.7% (+23.5)#555
16. Ashton 27.0% 4.8% (+22.2)#16 4.7% (+22.3)#613
17. Wasta 25.8% 4.8% (+21.0)#17 4.7% (+21.1)#676
18. Olivet 25.7% 4.8% (+20.9)#18 4.7% (+21.0)#681
19. Pine Ridge 25.6% 4.8% (+20.8)#19 4.7% (+20.9)#686
20. Pierre 25.5% 4.8% (+20.7)#20 4.7% (+20.8)#688
21. Oelrichs 25.5% 4.8% (+20.7)#21 4.7% (+20.8)#693
22. West Brule 25.4% 4.8% (+20.6)#22 4.7% (+20.8)#696
23. Eagle Butte 24.9% 4.8% (+20.1)#23 4.7% (+20.2)#751
24. Antelope 24.1% 4.8% (+19.3)#24 4.7% (+19.4)#808
25. Dupree 24.1% 4.8% (+19.3)#25 4.7% (+19.4)#810
26. Rockham 22.2% 4.8% (+17.4)#26 4.7% (+17.5)#971
27. Mcintosh 21.7% 4.8% (+16.9)#27 4.7% (+17.1)#1,001
28. Cow Creek 21.4% 4.8% (+16.6)#28 4.7% (+16.7)#1,022
29. Agency Village 21.4% 4.8% (+16.6)#29 4.7% (+16.7)#1,031
30. Glenham 20.9% 4.8% (+16.1)#30 4.7% (+16.2)#1,090
31. Fairview 19.6% 4.8% (+14.8)#31 4.7% (+15.0)#1,248
32. Fort Pierre 19.6% 4.8% (+14.8)#32 4.7% (+14.9)#1,249
33. North Eagle Butte 19.6% 4.8% (+14.8)#33 4.7% (+14.9)#1,253
34. Delmont 18.2% 4.8% (+13.4)#34 4.7% (+13.5)#1,449
35. Marty 17.2% 4.8% (+12.4)#35 4.7% (+12.6)#1,619
36. Springfield 17.1% 4.8% (+12.3)#36 4.7% (+12.4)#1,645
37. Fort Thompson 16.9% 4.8% (+12.1)#37 4.7% (+12.2)#1,679
38. Selby 16.6% 4.8% (+11.8)#38 4.7% (+11.9)#1,747
39. Lower Brule 16.3% 4.8% (+11.5)#39 4.7% (+11.6)#1,808
40. Pickstown 15.6% 4.8% (+10.7)#40 4.7% (+10.9)#1,970
41. Naples 15.4% 4.8% (+10.6)#41 4.7% (+10.7)#2,019
42. Batesland 15.0% 4.8% (+10.2)#42 4.7% (+10.3)#2,127
43. Blucksberg Mountain 14.2% 4.8% (+9.44)#43 4.7% (+9.56)#2,391
44. Murdo 14.2% 4.8% (+9.39)#44 4.7% (+9.51)#2,407
45. Bullhead 14.0% 4.8% (+9.15)#45 4.7% (+9.27)#2,484
46. Leola 13.9% 4.8% (+9.12)#46 4.7% (+9.25)#2,489
47. Green Valley 13.7% 4.8% (+8.94)#47 4.7% (+9.06)#2,561
48. Rosebud 13.5% 4.8% (+8.70)#48 4.7% (+8.82)#2,661
49. Timber Lake 12.5% 4.8% (+7.74)#49 4.7% (+7.86)#2,994
50. Richland 12.5% 4.8% (+7.69)#50 4.7% (+7.81)#3,024
51. Wall 12.4% 4.8% (+7.57)#51 4.7% (+7.69)#3,075
52. Veblen 12.3% 4.8% (+7.47)#52 4.7% (+7.60)#3,113
53. Sisseton 12.2% 4.8% (+7.43)#53 4.7% (+7.55)#3,139
54. Lake City 12.1% 4.8% (+7.31)#54 4.7% (+7.44)#3,215
55. Blunt 12.0% 4.8% (+7.16)#55 4.7% (+7.28)#3,281
56. Winner 11.8% 4.8% (+6.99)#56 4.7% (+7.11)#3,362
57. Westport 11.8% 4.8% (+6.96)#57 4.7% (+7.08)#3,382
58. Fairburn 11.8% 4.8% (+6.96)#58 4.7% (+7.08)#3,386
59. Lesterville 11.7% 4.8% (+6.88)#59 4.7% (+7.00)#3,421
60. Brandt 11.7% 4.8% (+6.86)#60 4.7% (+6.98)#3,433
61. Wakpala 11.4% 4.8% (+6.62)#61 4.7% (+6.74)#3,573
62. Lake Andes 11.3% 4.8% (+6.52)#62 4.7% (+6.65)#3,619
63. Box Elder 11.3% 4.8% (+6.50)#63 4.7% (+6.62)#3,630
64. Kenel 11.3% 4.8% (+6.48)#64 4.7% (+6.61)#3,638
65. Prairiewood 10.7% 4.8% (+5.87)#65 4.7% (+5.99)#4,011
66. Tyndall 10.3% 4.8% (+5.54)#66 4.7% (+5.66)#4,235
67. Kennebec 10.1% 4.8% (+5.32)#67 4.7% (+5.44)#4,395
68. Bonesteel 10.1% 4.8% (+5.30)#68 4.7% (+5.43)#4,406
69. Bushnell 10.0% 4.8% (+5.19)#69 4.7% (+5.31)#4,488
70. Mountain Plains 9.9% 4.8% (+5.10)#70 4.7% (+5.23)#4,543
71. Geddes 9.9% 4.8% (+5.05)#71 4.7% (+5.17)#4,589
72. Centerville 9.8% 4.8% (+5.04)#72 4.7% (+5.16)#4,596
73. Tulare 9.8% 4.8% (+4.95)#73 4.7% (+5.07)#4,679
74. Redfield 9.7% 4.8% (+4.91)#74 4.7% (+5.03)#4,704
75. Langford 9.6% 4.8% (+4.80)#75 4.7% (+4.92)#4,786
76. Wagner 9.5% 4.8% (+4.65)#76 4.7% (+4.77)#4,912
77. New Effington 9.4% 4.8% (+4.60)#77 4.7% (+4.73)#4,949
78. Mission 9.4% 4.8% (+4.57)#78 4.7% (+4.69)#4,974
79. Doland 9.3% 4.8% (+4.52)#79 4.7% (+4.65)#5,015
80. Lead 9.2% 4.8% (+4.44)#80 4.7% (+4.56)#5,081
81. White River 9.2% 4.8% (+4.35)#81 4.7% (+4.47)#5,150
82. Woonsocket 9.1% 4.8% (+4.26)#82 4.7% (+4.38)#5,247
83. Cherry Creek 8.9% 4.8% (+4.08)#83 4.7% (+4.20)#5,399
84. Bradley 8.9% 4.8% (+4.08)#84 4.7% (+4.20)#5,405
85. Sturgis 8.8% 4.8% (+4.04)#85 4.7% (+4.16)#5,449
86. Newell 8.8% 4.8% (+3.98)#86 4.7% (+4.11)#5,497
87. Summerset 8.7% 4.8% (+3.92)#87 4.7% (+4.04)#5,565
88. Mclaughlin 8.5% 4.8% (+3.73)#88 4.7% (+3.85)#5,760
89. Draper 8.3% 4.8% (+3.52)#89 4.7% (+3.65)#6,021
90. Letcher 8.1% 4.8% (+3.33)#90 4.7% (+3.45)#6,207
91. Piedmont 8.1% 4.8% (+3.24)#91 4.7% (+3.36)#6,299
92. Flandreau 8.0% 4.8% (+3.21)#92 4.7% (+3.33)#6,335
93. Toronto 7.9% 4.8% (+3.11)#93 4.7% (+3.23)#6,456
94. Buffalo 7.8% 4.8% (+3.03)#94 4.7% (+3.16)#6,536
95. Martin 7.8% 4.8% (+3.02)#95 4.7% (+3.14)#6,563
96. Dante 7.7% 4.8% (+2.88)#96 4.7% (+3.01)#6,750
97. Onida 7.6% 4.8% (+2.84)#97 4.7% (+2.96)#6,804
98. Corsica 7.6% 4.8% (+2.82)#98 4.7% (+2.94)#6,827
99. Isabel 7.6% 4.8% (+2.80)#99 4.7% (+2.92)#6,857
100. De Smet 7.6% 4.8% (+2.79)#100 4.7% (+2.92)#6,861

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in South Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in South Dakota are:
#1
89.1%
#2
53.3%
#3
52.9%
#4
47.6%
#5
43.5%
#6
42.3%
#7
40.0%
#8
36.0%
#9
34.0%
#10
31.7%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in South Dakota?
Manderson White Horse Creek has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in South Dakota with 89.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in the State of South Dakota?
Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in South Dakota is 4.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in the United States is 4.7%.