Cities with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Wisconsin

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Local Government Employees
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Wisconsin
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Wisconsin

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Wisconsin Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Wisconsin

City % Local Government Employees vs State vs National
1. Keshena 62.2% 6.9% (+55.3)#1 7.2% (+55.0)#153
2. Odanah 54.5% 6.9% (+47.6)#2 7.2% (+47.3)#217
3. Dunbar 48.0% 6.9% (+41.1)#3 7.2% (+40.8)#326
4. Lac Du Flambeau 45.3% 6.9% (+38.3)#4 7.2% (+38.0)#371
5. Reserve 44.0% 6.9% (+37.0)#5 7.2% (+36.7)#396
6. Mission 38.3% 6.9% (+31.4)#6 7.2% (+31.1)#521
7. Legend Lake 36.9% 6.9% (+29.9)#7 7.2% (+29.6)#568
8. Middle Village 36.7% 6.9% (+29.7)#8 7.2% (+29.4)#581
9. Herbster 34.5% 6.9% (+27.6)#9 7.2% (+27.3)#670
10. Minocqua 33.5% 6.9% (+26.6)#10 7.2% (+26.3)#705
11. New Odanah 33.1% 6.9% (+26.2)#11 7.2% (+25.9)#744
12. Townsend 31.6% 6.9% (+24.6)#12 7.2% (+24.4)#804
13. Neopit 28.9% 6.9% (+22.0)#13 7.2% (+21.7)#959
14. Dodge 28.8% 6.9% (+21.9)#14 7.2% (+21.6)#965
15. Gordon 27.9% 6.9% (+21.0)#15 7.2% (+20.7)#1,030
16. Park Ridge 27.8% 6.9% (+20.9)#16 7.2% (+20.6)#1,036
17. Little Round Lake 27.3% 6.9% (+20.4)#17 7.2% (+20.1)#1,073
18. Hatfield 26.2% 6.9% (+19.2)#18 7.2% (+18.9)#1,186
19. Powers Lake 26.1% 6.9% (+19.2)#19 7.2% (+18.9)#1,188
20. Arkansaw 26.1% 6.9% (+19.1)#20 7.2% (+18.8)#1,198
21. Lublin 25.5% 6.9% (+18.5)#21 7.2% (+18.2)#1,241
22. Franks Field 25.0% 6.9% (+18.1)#22 7.2% (+17.8)#1,287
23. Drummond 24.4% 6.9% (+17.5)#23 7.2% (+17.2)#1,367
24. Poplar 24.2% 6.9% (+17.2)#24 7.2% (+16.9)#1,387
25. Cornucopia 23.3% 6.9% (+16.4)#25 7.2% (+16.1)#1,475
26. Zoar 23.3% 6.9% (+16.3)#26 7.2% (+16.0)#1,488
27. Clarks Mills 22.6% 6.9% (+15.7)#27 7.2% (+15.4)#1,584
28. Mason 22.6% 6.9% (+15.7)#28 7.2% (+15.4)#1,585
29. Seneca 22.2% 6.9% (+15.3)#29 7.2% (+15.0)#1,650
30. Sand Pillow 22.2% 6.9% (+15.3)#30 7.2% (+15.0)#1,652
31. Lebanon 21.9% 6.9% (+14.9)#31 7.2% (+14.6)#1,709
32. Marengo 21.2% 6.9% (+14.3)#32 7.2% (+14.0)#1,811
33. Crandon 21.1% 6.9% (+14.1)#33 7.2% (+13.8)#1,838
34. Mole Lake 19.2% 6.9% (+12.3)#34 7.2% (+12.0)#2,224
35. Montreal 19.2% 6.9% (+12.2)#35 7.2% (+11.9)#2,235
36. Birch Hill 19.0% 6.9% (+12.0)#36 7.2% (+11.7)#2,289
37. Union Center 18.7% 6.9% (+11.8)#37 7.2% (+11.5)#2,378
38. Curtiss 17.9% 6.9% (+11.0)#38 7.2% (+10.7)#2,590
39. Baldwin 17.9% 6.9% (+11.0)#39 7.2% (+10.7)#2,600
40. Winter 17.6% 6.9% (+10.6)#40 7.2% (+10.3)#2,699
41. Elcho 17.3% 6.9% (+10.4)#41 7.2% (+10.1)#2,787
42. Chief Lake 16.7% 6.9% (+9.74)#42 7.2% (+9.44)#2,998
43. Bowler 16.5% 6.9% (+9.61)#43 7.2% (+9.31)#3,098
44. Greenwood 16.5% 6.9% (+9.56)#44 7.2% (+9.26)#3,114
45. Briggsville 16.3% 6.9% (+9.37)#45 7.2% (+9.08)#3,196
46. Lauderdale Lakes 16.2% 6.9% (+9.22)#46 7.2% (+8.93)#3,264
47. Rochester 16.1% 6.9% (+9.15)#47 7.2% (+8.85)#3,298
48. Ingram 15.8% 6.9% (+8.86)#48 7.2% (+8.56)#3,452
49. Argyle 15.7% 6.9% (+8.80)#49 7.2% (+8.50)#3,477
50. Amberg 15.6% 6.9% (+8.69)#50 7.2% (+8.40)#3,544
51. Merrillan 15.6% 6.9% (+8.64)#51 7.2% (+8.34)#3,571
52. Elderon 15.4% 6.9% (+8.45)#52 7.2% (+8.16)#3,662
53. Soldiers Grove 15.2% 6.9% (+8.31)#53 7.2% (+8.01)#3,740
54. Argonne 15.2% 6.9% (+8.29)#54 7.2% (+7.99)#3,756
55. Port Wing 15.1% 6.9% (+8.19)#55 7.2% (+7.89)#3,816
56. Springfield 15.1% 6.9% (+8.19)#56 7.2% (+7.89)#3,817
57. Allenton 15.1% 6.9% (+8.15)#57 7.2% (+7.86)#3,835
58. Adams 15.1% 6.9% (+8.14)#58 7.2% (+7.84)#3,842
59. Durand 14.9% 6.9% (+7.98)#59 7.2% (+7.68)#3,946
60. Spring Valley 14.8% 6.9% (+7.84)#60 7.2% (+7.54)#4,022
61. Packwaukee 14.7% 6.9% (+7.78)#61 7.2% (+7.48)#4,053
62. Lyndon Station 14.7% 6.9% (+7.77)#62 7.2% (+7.47)#4,060
63. Sayner 14.6% 6.9% (+7.70)#63 7.2% (+7.41)#4,097
64. Jim Falls 14.5% 6.9% (+7.57)#64 7.2% (+7.28)#4,194
65. Mauston 14.5% 6.9% (+7.55)#65 7.2% (+7.25)#4,221
66. Lake Wazeecha 14.4% 6.9% (+7.45)#66 7.2% (+7.16)#4,270
67. Mosinee 14.3% 6.9% (+7.40)#67 7.2% (+7.11)#4,301
68. Babcock 14.3% 6.9% (+7.36)#68 7.2% (+7.06)#4,368
69. Waumandee 14.3% 6.9% (+7.36)#69 7.2% (+7.06)#4,370
70. Exeland 14.1% 6.9% (+7.19)#70 7.2% (+6.89)#4,507
71. Shawano 14.0% 6.9% (+7.04)#71 7.2% (+6.74)#4,599
72. Lake Ripley 13.9% 6.9% (+6.95)#72 7.2% (+6.65)#4,677
73. Nashotah 13.9% 6.9% (+6.94)#73 7.2% (+6.65)#4,680
74. North Freedom 13.7% 6.9% (+6.78)#74 7.2% (+6.48)#4,788
75. Laona 13.7% 6.9% (+6.75)#75 7.2% (+6.45)#4,815
76. Pepin 13.6% 6.9% (+6.65)#76 7.2% (+6.35)#4,887
77. Lake Delton 13.5% 6.9% (+6.59)#77 7.2% (+6.29)#4,921
78. South Wayne 13.4% 6.9% (+6.46)#78 7.2% (+6.17)#5,030
79. Leopolis 13.3% 6.9% (+6.40)#79 7.2% (+6.11)#5,089
80. Lily Lake 13.3% 6.9% (+6.35)#80 7.2% (+6.05)#5,124
81. Cassville 13.1% 6.9% (+6.20)#81 7.2% (+5.91)#5,232
82. Luxemburg 13.0% 6.9% (+6.06)#82 7.2% (+5.77)#5,350
83. Fall Creek 12.8% 6.9% (+5.91)#83 7.2% (+5.62)#5,468
84. Cable 12.8% 6.9% (+5.91)#84 7.2% (+5.62)#5,471
85. Okauchee Lake 12.8% 6.9% (+5.87)#85 7.2% (+5.57)#5,524
86. Centuria 12.7% 6.9% (+5.78)#86 7.2% (+5.48)#5,598
87. Francis Creek 12.7% 6.9% (+5.77)#87 7.2% (+5.48)#5,601
88. Milton 12.6% 6.9% (+5.63)#88 7.2% (+5.33)#5,726
89. Rock Falls 12.5% 6.9% (+5.57)#89 7.2% (+5.27)#5,788
90. Saxon 12.5% 6.9% (+5.57)#90 7.2% (+5.27)#5,805
91. Prentice 12.4% 6.9% (+5.51)#91 7.2% (+5.21)#5,843
92. Montello 12.4% 6.9% (+5.47)#92 7.2% (+5.17)#5,868
93. Taylor 12.2% 6.9% (+5.30)#93 7.2% (+5.01)#6,047
94. Ettrick 12.2% 6.9% (+5.26)#94 7.2% (+4.97)#6,088
95. Lake Camelot 12.2% 6.9% (+5.24)#95 7.2% (+4.94)#6,124
96. Glidden 12.2% 6.9% (+5.23)#96 7.2% (+4.93)#6,140
97. Fairwater 12.1% 6.9% (+5.21)#97 7.2% (+4.91)#6,170
98. Ladysmith 12.1% 6.9% (+5.21)#98 7.2% (+4.91)#6,171
99. North Prairie 12.1% 6.9% (+5.20)#99 7.2% (+4.91)#6,174
100. Danbury 12.1% 6.9% (+5.19)#101 7.2% (+4.89)#6,197

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Wisconsin?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Wisconsin are:
#1
62.2%
#2
54.5%
#3
48.0%
#4
45.3%
#5
44.0%
#6
36.9%
#7
36.7%
#8
34.5%
#9
33.5%
#10
33.1%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Wisconsin?
Keshena has the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Wisconsin with 62.2%.
What is the Percentage of Local Government Employees in the State of Wisconsin?
Percentage of Local Government Employees in Wisconsin is 6.9%.
What is the Percentage of Local Government Employees in the United States?
Percentage of Local Government Employees in the United States is 7.2%.