Cities with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Indiana

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Local Government Employees
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Indiana
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Indiana

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Indiana Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Indiana

City % Local Government Employees vs State vs National
1. Scircleville 72.7% 6.2% (+66.6)#1 7.2% (+65.5)#101
2. Hobbs 60.4% 6.2% (+54.2)#2 7.2% (+53.2)#166
3. Scipio 55.9% 6.2% (+49.8)#3 7.2% (+48.7)#199
4. Landess 53.7% 6.2% (+47.5)#4 7.2% (+46.4)#232
5. Big Lake 51.7% 6.2% (+45.6)#5 7.2% (+44.5)#254
6. Taswell 46.4% 6.2% (+40.3)#6 7.2% (+39.2)#351
7. Cowan 45.9% 6.2% (+39.8)#7 7.2% (+38.7)#360
8. Ragsdale 44.4% 6.2% (+38.3)#8 7.2% (+37.2)#382
9. River Forest 44.4% 6.2% (+38.3)#9 7.2% (+37.2)#387
10. Buckskin 42.9% 6.2% (+36.7)#10 7.2% (+35.6)#416
11. Millgrove 42.4% 6.2% (+36.3)#11 7.2% (+35.2)#425
12. Grayford 40.0% 6.2% (+33.8)#12 7.2% (+32.8)#472
13. Sandusky 40.0% 6.2% (+33.8)#13 7.2% (+32.8)#476
14. Blue Ridge 39.3% 6.2% (+33.2)#14 7.2% (+32.1)#486
15. Graysville 36.8% 6.2% (+30.7)#15 7.2% (+29.6)#573
16. Fontanet 35.1% 6.2% (+28.9)#16 7.2% (+27.8)#646
17. Straughn 35.0% 6.2% (+28.8)#17 7.2% (+27.7)#650
18. Wyatt 34.5% 6.2% (+28.4)#18 7.2% (+27.3)#671
19. Gwynneville 34.5% 6.2% (+28.3)#19 7.2% (+27.2)#674
20. Petroleum 34.4% 6.2% (+28.2)#20 7.2% (+27.1)#677
21. Andersonville 33.0% 6.2% (+26.8)#21 7.2% (+25.8)#750
22. Chain-O-Lakes 31.5% 6.2% (+25.3)#22 7.2% (+24.3)#809
23. Bridgeton 31.4% 6.2% (+25.3)#23 7.2% (+24.2)#816
24. New London 31.2% 6.2% (+25.1)#24 7.2% (+24.0)#826
25. Mariah Hill 27.0% 6.2% (+20.8)#25 7.2% (+19.8)#1,110
26. Montmorenci 26.0% 6.2% (+19.8)#26 7.2% (+18.7)#1,200
27. Webster 25.0% 6.2% (+18.8)#27 7.2% (+17.8)#1,285
28. Flat Rock 24.8% 6.2% (+18.6)#28 7.2% (+17.6)#1,328
29. Marion 23.6% 6.2% (+17.4)#29 7.2% (+16.4)#1,445
30. Blairsville 22.9% 6.2% (+16.7)#30 7.2% (+15.6)#1,547
31. Losantville 22.7% 6.2% (+16.6)#31 7.2% (+15.5)#1,559
32. Rob Roy 22.7% 6.2% (+16.6)#32 7.2% (+15.5)#1,562
33. Bennetts Switch 22.6% 6.2% (+16.4)#33 7.2% (+15.3)#1,588
34. Idaville 22.4% 6.2% (+16.3)#34 7.2% (+15.2)#1,611
35. Waynesville 22.4% 6.2% (+16.2)#35 7.2% (+15.1)#1,621
36. North Terre Haute 21.7% 6.2% (+15.5)#36 7.2% (+14.4)#1,736
37. Newport 21.6% 6.2% (+15.4)#37 7.2% (+14.4)#1,749
38. Delaware 21.5% 6.2% (+15.3)#38 7.2% (+14.2)#1,770
39. Union Mills 21.1% 6.2% (+14.9)#39 7.2% (+13.9)#1,832
40. Patricksburg 21.0% 6.2% (+14.8)#40 7.2% (+13.8)#1,856
41. Morris 20.7% 6.2% (+14.5)#41 7.2% (+13.4)#1,923
42. Hillsdale 20.4% 6.2% (+14.2)#42 7.2% (+13.1)#1,983
43. Bloomingdale 20.0% 6.2% (+13.8)#43 7.2% (+12.8)#2,036
44. Mace 20.0% 6.2% (+13.8)#44 7.2% (+12.8)#2,045
45. Everton 19.3% 6.2% (+13.1)#45 7.2% (+12.0)#2,205
46. Owensburg 19.0% 6.2% (+12.9)#46 7.2% (+11.8)#2,264
47. Medaryville 18.9% 6.2% (+12.7)#47 7.2% (+11.6)#2,328
48. Cedar Grove 18.8% 6.2% (+12.6)#48 7.2% (+11.6)#2,344
49. Tipton 18.6% 6.2% (+12.4)#49 7.2% (+11.3)#2,410
50. Bringhurst 18.4% 6.2% (+12.2)#50 7.2% (+11.2)#2,448
51. Chili 18.4% 6.2% (+12.2)#51 7.2% (+11.2)#2,449
52. Burlington 18.2% 6.2% (+12.0)#52 7.2% (+11.0)#2,508
53. Cadiz 18.2% 6.2% (+12.0)#53 7.2% (+11.0)#2,519
54. Van Bibber Lake 17.7% 6.2% (+11.5)#54 7.2% (+10.5)#2,649
55. Deer Creek 17.5% 6.2% (+11.4)#55 7.2% (+10.3)#2,706
56. Homer 17.5% 6.2% (+11.3)#56 7.2% (+10.2)#2,741
57. Fairbanks 17.2% 6.2% (+11.0)#57 7.2% (+9.97)#2,829
58. Carrollton 17.0% 6.2% (+10.9)#58 7.2% (+9.81)#2,873
59. Alford 17.0% 6.2% (+10.8)#59 7.2% (+9.79)#2,878
60. English 16.7% 6.2% (+10.5)#60 7.2% (+9.44)#2,994
61. Glezen 16.7% 6.2% (+10.5)#61 7.2% (+9.44)#3,010
62. Covington 16.6% 6.2% (+10.4)#62 7.2% (+9.38)#3,065
63. Dugger 16.4% 6.2% (+10.3)#63 7.2% (+9.22)#3,128
64. Needmore 16.3% 6.2% (+10.1)#64 7.2% (+9.05)#3,209
65. Walkerton 16.1% 6.2% (+9.92)#65 7.2% (+8.87)#3,290
66. Butlerville 16.0% 6.2% (+9.88)#66 7.2% (+8.82)#3,316
67. St. Anthony 15.8% 6.2% (+9.65)#67 7.2% (+8.60)#3,423
68. Folsomville 15.5% 6.2% (+9.29)#68 7.2% (+8.24)#3,619
69. Wawaka 15.4% 6.2% (+9.21)#69 7.2% (+8.16)#3,663
70. Greendale 15.3% 6.2% (+9.15)#70 7.2% (+8.10)#3,686
71. Sweetser 15.1% 6.2% (+8.96)#71 7.2% (+7.90)#3,804
72. Mulberry 15.1% 6.2% (+8.92)#72 7.2% (+7.87)#3,826
73. Lyford 15.0% 6.2% (+8.87)#73 7.2% (+7.81)#3,864
74. Newberry 14.9% 6.2% (+8.72)#74 7.2% (+7.67)#3,954
75. Union City 14.8% 6.2% (+8.67)#75 7.2% (+7.62)#3,977
76. Blountsville 14.7% 6.2% (+8.53)#76 7.2% (+7.48)#4,056
77. Oxford 14.6% 6.2% (+8.47)#77 7.2% (+7.42)#4,088
78. Highland 14.5% 6.2% (+8.34)#78 7.2% (+7.29)#4,188
79. Monroe 14.5% 6.2% (+8.31)#79 7.2% (+7.26)#4,213
80. Pleasant Lake 14.5% 6.2% (+8.30)#80 7.2% (+7.24)#4,225
81. New Whiteland 14.5% 6.2% (+8.29)#81 7.2% (+7.23)#4,229
82. Spring Grove 14.4% 6.2% (+8.20)#82 7.2% (+7.14)#4,284
83. Belleville 14.3% 6.2% (+8.11)#83 7.2% (+7.06)#4,328
84. Bethany 14.3% 6.2% (+8.11)#84 7.2% (+7.06)#4,382
85. Markleville 14.2% 6.2% (+8.01)#85 7.2% (+6.96)#4,435
86. Rockford 13.8% 6.2% (+7.66)#86 7.2% (+6.61)#4,695
87. Newbern 13.8% 6.2% (+7.66)#87 7.2% (+6.60)#4,701
88. Staunton 13.7% 6.2% (+7.55)#88 7.2% (+6.50)#4,774
89. Schneider 13.6% 6.2% (+7.46)#89 7.2% (+6.41)#4,849
90. Merom 13.6% 6.2% (+7.39)#90 7.2% (+6.33)#4,898
91. Newtown 13.5% 6.2% (+7.34)#91 7.2% (+6.29)#4,934
92. Bass Lake 13.5% 6.2% (+7.28)#92 7.2% (+6.23)#4,978
93. Clayton 13.4% 6.2% (+7.18)#93 7.2% (+6.13)#5,058
94. Owensville 13.3% 6.2% (+7.15)#94 7.2% (+6.09)#5,100
95. Charlestown 13.3% 6.2% (+7.12)#95 7.2% (+6.06)#5,119
96. Stilesville 13.2% 6.2% (+7.06)#96 7.2% (+6.01)#5,153
97. Lake Holiday 13.2% 6.2% (+7.05)#97 7.2% (+6.00)#5,160
98. New Carlisle 13.1% 6.2% (+6.91)#98 7.2% (+5.86)#5,267
99. New Trenton 13.0% 6.2% (+6.87)#99 7.2% (+5.82)#5,295
100. North Salem 13.0% 6.2% (+6.86)#100 7.2% (+5.80)#5,316

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Indiana?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Indiana are:
#1
55.9%
#2
53.7%
#3
44.4%
#4
44.4%
#5
35.1%
#6
35.0%
#7
26.0%
#8
23.6%
#9
22.7%
#10
22.4%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Indiana?
Scipio has the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Indiana with 55.9%.
What is the Percentage of Local Government Employees in the State of Indiana?
Percentage of Local Government Employees in Indiana is 6.2%.
What is the Percentage of Local Government Employees in the United States?
Percentage of Local Government Employees in the United States is 7.2%.