Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Texas

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Drive | Carpool
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Texas
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Texas

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Texas Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Texas

City % Carpool vs State vs National
1. Wolfe City 72.1% 37.6% (+34.5)#1 38.2% (+33.9)#43
2. Copper Canyon 70.3% 37.6% (+32.7)#2 38.2% (+32.1)#55
3. Southside Place 69.0% 37.6% (+31.4)#3 38.2% (+30.8)#72
4. Stockton Bend 67.8% 37.6% (+30.2)#4 38.2% (+29.6)#90
5. Howardwick 67.4% 37.6% (+29.8)#5 38.2% (+29.2)#99
6. Leary 66.9% 37.6% (+29.3)#6 38.2% (+28.7)#113
7. Sanctuary 66.3% 37.6% (+28.7)#7 38.2% (+28.1)#124
8. Sierra Blanca 65.3% 37.6% (+27.7)#8 38.2% (+27.1)#148
9. Cotulla 65.1% 37.6% (+27.5)#9 38.2% (+26.9)#154
10. Clarendon 64.6% 37.6% (+27.0)#10 38.2% (+26.4)#165
11. Redfield 64.6% 37.6% (+27.0)#11 38.2% (+26.4)#167
12. Atlanta 64.3% 37.6% (+26.7)#12 38.2% (+26.1)#177
13. Hale Center 64.1% 37.6% (+26.5)#13 38.2% (+25.9)#191
14. West Lake Hills 64.0% 37.6% (+26.4)#14 38.2% (+25.8)#200
15. Hill Country Village 63.9% 37.6% (+26.3)#15 38.2% (+25.7)#203
16. Blanket 63.3% 37.6% (+25.7)#16 38.2% (+25.1)#226
17. Blooming Grove 63.2% 37.6% (+25.6)#17 38.2% (+25.0)#236
18. Surfside Beach 63.0% 37.6% (+25.4)#18 38.2% (+24.8)#252
19. Hilshire Village 62.5% 37.6% (+24.9)#19 38.2% (+24.3)#270
20. Palisades 62.5% 37.6% (+24.9)#20 38.2% (+24.3)#275
21. Taylor Landing 62.5% 37.6% (+24.9)#21 38.2% (+24.3)#277
22. Bishop Hills 62.0% 37.6% (+24.4)#22 38.2% (+23.8)#326
23. Goodrich 61.4% 37.6% (+23.8)#23 38.2% (+23.2)#375
24. Homestead Meadows South 61.2% 37.6% (+23.6)#24 38.2% (+23.0)#390
25. Justin 61.1% 37.6% (+23.5)#25 38.2% (+22.9)#400
26. Highlands 60.9% 37.6% (+23.3)#26 38.2% (+22.7)#425
27. Mcdade 60.6% 37.6% (+23.0)#27 38.2% (+22.4)#443
28. Westover Hills 60.6% 37.6% (+23.0)#28 38.2% (+22.4)#447
29. Rendon 60.4% 37.6% (+22.8)#29 38.2% (+22.2)#475
30. Lake Tanglewood 60.3% 37.6% (+22.7)#30 38.2% (+22.1)#493
31. Hollywood Park 60.2% 37.6% (+22.6)#31 38.2% (+22.0)#507
32. Estelline 60.2% 37.6% (+22.6)#32 38.2% (+22.0)#519
33. Bayou Vista 60.1% 37.6% (+22.5)#33 38.2% (+21.9)#527
34. Seis Lagos 60.1% 37.6% (+22.5)#34 38.2% (+21.9)#531
35. Chaparrito 60.1% 37.6% (+22.5)#35 38.2% (+21.9)#535
36. Lost Creek 59.7% 37.6% (+22.1)#36 38.2% (+21.5)#564
37. Megargel 59.7% 37.6% (+22.1)#37 38.2% (+21.5)#568
38. Point 59.5% 37.6% (+21.9)#38 38.2% (+21.3)#586
39. El Chaparral 59.4% 37.6% (+21.8)#39 38.2% (+21.2)#623
40. Kingsbury 59.2% 37.6% (+21.6)#40 38.2% (+21.0)#653
41. Winnie 59.0% 37.6% (+21.4)#41 38.2% (+20.8)#672
42. Piney Point Village 58.6% 37.6% (+21.0)#42 38.2% (+20.4)#701
43. Retreat 58.4% 37.6% (+20.8)#43 38.2% (+20.2)#740
44. Lockney 58.3% 37.6% (+20.7)#44 38.2% (+20.1)#757
45. Canyon Creek 58.2% 37.6% (+20.6)#45 38.2% (+20.0)#792
46. Miami 58.2% 37.6% (+20.6)#46 38.2% (+20.0)#796
47. Hudson Oaks 58.1% 37.6% (+20.5)#47 38.2% (+19.9)#804
48. Beach City 57.5% 37.6% (+19.9)#48 38.2% (+19.3)#862
49. Riesel 57.5% 37.6% (+19.9)#49 38.2% (+19.3)#864
50. Winona 57.5% 37.6% (+19.9)#50 38.2% (+19.3)#869
51. Mccamey 57.3% 37.6% (+19.7)#51 38.2% (+19.1)#894
52. Bellaire 57.2% 37.6% (+19.6)#52 38.2% (+19.0)#913
53. Sunset Valley 57.2% 37.6% (+19.6)#53 38.2% (+19.0)#929
54. Tye 57.1% 37.6% (+19.5)#54 38.2% (+18.9)#941
55. Thrall 57.1% 37.6% (+19.5)#55 38.2% (+18.9)#942
56. Follett 57.1% 37.6% (+19.5)#56 38.2% (+18.9)#946
57. Morgan 56.6% 37.6% (+19.0)#57 38.2% (+18.4)#1,013
58. Hallsburg 56.5% 37.6% (+18.9)#58 38.2% (+18.3)#1,031
59. Carrizo Springs 56.4% 37.6% (+18.8)#59 38.2% (+18.2)#1,046
60. Annetta North 56.3% 37.6% (+18.7)#60 38.2% (+18.1)#1,083
61. Sanderson 56.2% 37.6% (+18.6)#61 38.2% (+18.0)#1,114
62. Huxley 56.2% 37.6% (+18.6)#62 38.2% (+18.0)#1,120
63. Castroville 56.1% 37.6% (+18.5)#63 38.2% (+17.9)#1,129
64. Kemp 56.1% 37.6% (+18.5)#64 38.2% (+17.9)#1,133
65. Payne Springs 56.1% 37.6% (+18.5)#65 38.2% (+17.9)#1,142
66. Enchanted Oaks 56.1% 37.6% (+18.5)#66 38.2% (+17.9)#1,148
67. Gun Barrel City 56.0% 37.6% (+18.4)#67 38.2% (+17.8)#1,155
68. Cameron 56.0% 37.6% (+18.4)#68 38.2% (+17.8)#1,156
69. Jefferson 55.2% 37.6% (+17.6)#69 38.2% (+17.0)#1,315
70. Hamshire 55.1% 37.6% (+17.5)#70 38.2% (+16.9)#1,340
71. Barry 55.1% 37.6% (+17.5)#71 38.2% (+16.9)#1,354
72. Lantana 55.0% 37.6% (+17.4)#72 38.2% (+16.8)#1,359
73. Palmhurst 55.0% 37.6% (+17.4)#73 38.2% (+16.8)#1,363
74. San Diego 54.9% 37.6% (+17.3)#74 38.2% (+16.7)#1,377
75. Reklaw 54.8% 37.6% (+17.2)#75 38.2% (+16.6)#1,411
76. Post Oak Bend City 54.6% 37.6% (+17.0)#76 38.2% (+16.4)#1,440
77. Siesta Acres 54.4% 37.6% (+16.8)#77 38.2% (+16.2)#1,492
78. Tilden 54.3% 37.6% (+16.7)#78 38.2% (+16.1)#1,537
79. Johnson City 54.2% 37.6% (+16.6)#79 38.2% (+16.0)#1,553
80. Holliday 54.2% 37.6% (+16.6)#80 38.2% (+16.0)#1,554
81. Kerens 54.1% 37.6% (+16.5)#81 38.2% (+15.9)#1,575
82. Rankin 54.1% 37.6% (+16.5)#82 38.2% (+15.9)#1,586
83. Terrell Hills 54.0% 37.6% (+16.4)#83 38.2% (+15.8)#1,598
84. Western Lake 53.9% 37.6% (+16.3)#84 38.2% (+15.7)#1,621
85. South Mountain 53.8% 37.6% (+16.2)#85 38.2% (+15.6)#1,638
86. Lago Vista 53.6% 37.6% (+16.0)#86 38.2% (+15.4)#1,656
87. Edom 53.5% 37.6% (+15.9)#87 38.2% (+15.3)#1,715
88. Lake Cherokee 53.4% 37.6% (+15.8)#88 38.2% (+15.2)#1,733
89. Murphy 53.3% 37.6% (+15.7)#89 38.2% (+15.1)#1,751
90. Canton 53.3% 37.6% (+15.7)#90 38.2% (+15.1)#1,756
91. Smithville 53.3% 37.6% (+15.7)#91 38.2% (+15.1)#1,758
92. Campbell 53.3% 37.6% (+15.7)#92 38.2% (+15.1)#1,775
93. Daingerfield 53.2% 37.6% (+15.6)#93 38.2% (+15.0)#1,795
94. Highland Haven 53.2% 37.6% (+15.6)#94 38.2% (+15.0)#1,809
95. Lake Bridgeport 53.2% 37.6% (+15.6)#95 38.2% (+15.0)#1,811
96. Colleyville 53.1% 37.6% (+15.5)#96 38.2% (+14.9)#1,814
97. Gregory 53.1% 37.6% (+15.5)#97 38.2% (+14.9)#1,820
98. Quitaque 53.1% 37.6% (+15.5)#98 38.2% (+14.9)#1,832
99. Linden 53.0% 37.6% (+15.4)#99 38.2% (+14.8)#1,846
100. Moulton 53.0% 37.6% (+15.4)#100 38.2% (+14.8)#1,851

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Texas?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Texas are:
#1
72.1%
#2
70.3%
#3
69.0%
#4
67.4%
#5
66.9%
#6
66.3%
#7
65.3%
#8
65.1%
#9
64.6%
#10
64.6%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Texas?
Wolfe City has the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Texas with 72.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the State of Texas?
Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Texas is 37.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the United States is 38.2%.