Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Utah

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Drive | Carpool
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Utah
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Utah

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Utah Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Utah

City % Carpool vs State vs National
1. Holden 65.1% 34.8% (+30.3)#1 38.2% (+26.9)#158
2. Panguitch 63.2% 34.8% (+28.4)#2 38.2% (+25.0)#232
3. Emigration Canyon 61.4% 34.8% (+26.6)#3 38.2% (+23.2)#372
4. Wolf Creek 60.5% 34.8% (+25.7)#4 38.2% (+22.3)#454
5. Erda 59.9% 34.8% (+25.1)#5 38.2% (+21.7)#544
6. Mantua 57.3% 34.8% (+22.5)#6 38.2% (+19.1)#895
7. Hideout 57.2% 34.8% (+22.4)#7 38.2% (+19.0)#924
8. Virgin 57.2% 34.8% (+22.4)#8 38.2% (+19.0)#927
9. Liberty 56.3% 34.8% (+21.5)#9 38.2% (+18.1)#1,078
10. Glenwood 55.8% 34.8% (+21.0)#10 38.2% (+17.6)#1,194
11. Orderville 54.3% 34.8% (+19.5)#11 38.2% (+16.1)#1,523
12. Marion 53.9% 34.8% (+19.1)#12 38.2% (+15.7)#1,624
13. Fruit Heights 53.6% 34.8% (+18.8)#13 38.2% (+15.4)#1,660
14. Silver Summit 53.6% 34.8% (+18.8)#14 38.2% (+15.4)#1,671
15. Ballard 53.3% 34.8% (+18.5)#15 38.2% (+15.1)#1,767
16. Cleveland 53.1% 34.8% (+18.3)#16 38.2% (+14.9)#1,829
17. Eureka 52.0% 34.8% (+17.2)#17 38.2% (+13.8)#2,103
18. Thatcher 51.9% 34.8% (+17.1)#18 38.2% (+13.7)#2,132
19. Santa Clara 51.1% 34.8% (+16.3)#19 38.2% (+12.9)#2,368
20. Green River 50.0% 34.8% (+15.2)#20 38.2% (+11.8)#2,811
21. Kanosh 49.8% 34.8% (+15.0)#21 38.2% (+11.6)#2,865
22. Lynndyl 49.5% 34.8% (+14.7)#22 38.2% (+11.3)#2,985
23. Fairfield 49.5% 34.8% (+14.7)#23 38.2% (+11.3)#2,988
24. Honeyville 48.4% 34.8% (+13.6)#24 38.2% (+10.2)#3,437
25. Leeds 48.3% 34.8% (+13.5)#25 38.2% (+10.1)#3,496
26. Navajo Mountain 48.2% 34.8% (+13.4)#26 38.2% (+10.0)#3,548
27. Annabella 48.0% 34.8% (+13.2)#27 38.2% (+9.80)#3,623
28. Rush Valley 48.0% 34.8% (+13.2)#28 38.2% (+9.80)#3,629
29. Scipio 47.9% 34.8% (+13.1)#29 38.2% (+9.70)#3,668
30. Beaver 47.7% 34.8% (+12.9)#30 38.2% (+9.50)#3,727
31. Lake Shore 46.7% 34.8% (+11.9)#31 38.2% (+8.50)#4,245
32. Salem 46.6% 34.8% (+11.8)#32 38.2% (+8.40)#4,257
33. Summit Park 46.4% 34.8% (+11.6)#33 38.2% (+8.20)#4,372
34. Morgan 46.3% 34.8% (+11.5)#34 38.2% (+8.10)#4,427
35. Richmond 46.2% 34.8% (+11.4)#35 38.2% (+8.00)#4,486
36. East Carbon 46.1% 34.8% (+11.3)#36 38.2% (+7.90)#4,553
37. Manila 46.1% 34.8% (+11.3)#37 38.2% (+7.90)#4,566
38. Grantsville 45.8% 34.8% (+11.0)#38 38.2% (+7.60)#4,666
39. Mendon 45.6% 34.8% (+10.8)#39 38.2% (+7.40)#4,773
40. Delta 45.5% 34.8% (+10.7)#40 38.2% (+7.30)#4,823
41. Kanarraville 45.5% 34.8% (+10.7)#41 38.2% (+7.30)#4,884
42. Henrieville 45.3% 34.8% (+10.5)#42 38.2% (+7.10)#5,025
43. Snyderville 45.2% 34.8% (+10.4)#43 38.2% (+7.00)#5,050
44. Gunnison 45.1% 34.8% (+10.3)#44 38.2% (+6.90)#5,110
45. Woodland Hills 44.9% 34.8% (+10.1)#45 38.2% (+6.70)#5,209
46. Bear River City 44.7% 34.8% (+9.90)#46 38.2% (+6.50)#5,311
47. Loa 44.6% 34.8% (+9.80)#47 38.2% (+6.40)#5,370
48. Elmo 44.4% 34.8% (+9.60)#48 38.2% (+6.20)#5,536
49. Vernon 44.3% 34.8% (+9.50)#49 38.2% (+6.10)#5,605
50. Duchesne 44.2% 34.8% (+9.40)#50 38.2% (+6.00)#5,647
51. Willard 44.1% 34.8% (+9.30)#51 38.2% (+5.90)#5,717
52. Fairview 43.9% 34.8% (+9.10)#52 38.2% (+5.70)#5,831
53. Stockton 43.8% 34.8% (+9.00)#53 38.2% (+5.60)#5,892
54. Millville 43.6% 34.8% (+8.80)#54 38.2% (+5.40)#6,003
55. Mayfield 43.5% 34.8% (+8.70)#55 38.2% (+5.30)#6,095
56. South Ogden 43.4% 34.8% (+8.60)#56 38.2% (+5.20)#6,129
57. Fillmore 43.2% 34.8% (+8.40)#57 38.2% (+5.00)#6,324
58. Wellsville 43.1% 34.8% (+8.30)#58 38.2% (+4.90)#6,380
59. Lewiston 43.1% 34.8% (+8.30)#59 38.2% (+4.90)#6,394
60. South Willard 43.1% 34.8% (+8.30)#60 38.2% (+4.90)#6,400
61. Hurricane 43.0% 34.8% (+8.20)#61 38.2% (+4.80)#6,435
62. Oakley 43.0% 34.8% (+8.20)#62 38.2% (+4.80)#6,465
63. West Haven 42.9% 34.8% (+8.10)#63 38.2% (+4.70)#6,495
64. Ferron 42.9% 34.8% (+8.10)#64 38.2% (+4.70)#6,525
65. Paradise 42.9% 34.8% (+8.10)#65 38.2% (+4.70)#6,532
66. Marriott Slaterville 42.5% 34.8% (+7.70)#66 38.2% (+4.30)#6,781
67. West Mountain 42.5% 34.8% (+7.70)#67 38.2% (+4.30)#6,790
68. Mona 42.4% 34.8% (+7.60)#68 38.2% (+4.20)#6,894
69. Kaysville 42.3% 34.8% (+7.50)#69 38.2% (+4.10)#6,934
70. North Logan 42.3% 34.8% (+7.50)#70 38.2% (+4.10)#6,942
71. Pleasant View 42.3% 34.8% (+7.50)#71 38.2% (+4.10)#6,943
72. Neola 42.3% 34.8% (+7.50)#72 38.2% (+4.10)#7,011
73. Park City 41.9% 34.8% (+7.10)#73 38.2% (+3.70)#7,252
74. Helper 41.8% 34.8% (+7.00)#74 38.2% (+3.60)#7,336
75. Goshen 41.8% 34.8% (+7.00)#75 38.2% (+3.60)#7,357
76. Highland 41.6% 34.8% (+6.80)#76 38.2% (+3.40)#7,465
77. Lindon 41.5% 34.8% (+6.70)#77 38.2% (+3.30)#7,565
78. Amalga 41.5% 34.8% (+6.70)#78 38.2% (+3.30)#7,649
79. Elwood 41.4% 34.8% (+6.60)#79 38.2% (+3.20)#7,742
80. Uintah 41.3% 34.8% (+6.50)#80 38.2% (+3.10)#7,823
81. Ephraim 41.1% 34.8% (+6.30)#81 38.2% (+2.90)#7,957
82. Smithfield 41.0% 34.8% (+6.20)#82 38.2% (+2.80)#8,023
83. Genola 41.0% 34.8% (+6.20)#83 38.2% (+2.80)#8,050
84. Sigurd 40.8% 34.8% (+6.00)#84 38.2% (+2.60)#8,235
85. Moroni 40.7% 34.8% (+5.90)#85 38.2% (+2.50)#8,314
86. Holladay 40.6% 34.8% (+5.80)#86 38.2% (+2.40)#8,341
87. Trenton 40.5% 34.8% (+5.70)#87 38.2% (+2.30)#8,534
88. Stansbury Park 40.4% 34.8% (+5.60)#88 38.2% (+2.20)#8,599
89. Huntington 40.2% 34.8% (+5.40)#89 38.2% (+2.00)#8,833
90. Carbonville 40.2% 34.8% (+5.40)#90 38.2% (+2.00)#8,846
91. Fountain Green 40.2% 34.8% (+5.40)#91 38.2% (+2.00)#8,847
92. Coalville 40.1% 34.8% (+5.30)#92 38.2% (+1.90)#8,924
93. Fielding 40.0% 34.8% (+5.20)#93 38.2% (+1.80)#9,011
94. Spring City 39.8% 34.8% (+5.00)#94 38.2% (+1.60)#9,165
95. Richfield 39.3% 34.8% (+4.50)#95 38.2% (+1.10)#9,662
96. Kamas 39.3% 34.8% (+4.50)#96 38.2% (+1.10)#9,684
97. Hooper 39.0% 34.8% (+4.20)#97 38.2% (+0.800)#9,979
98. Perry 38.8% 34.8% (+4.00)#98 38.2% (+0.600)#10,181
99. Heber 38.7% 34.8% (+3.90)#99 38.2% (+0.500)#10,280
100. Kanab 38.6% 34.8% (+3.80)#100 38.2% (+0.400)#10,384

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Utah?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Utah are:
#1
65.1%
#2
63.2%
#3
61.4%
#4
60.5%
#5
59.9%
#6
57.3%
#7
57.2%
#8
57.2%
#9
56.3%
#10
55.8%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Utah?
Holden has the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Utah with 65.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the State of Utah?
Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Utah is 34.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the United States is 38.2%.