Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Louisiana

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Drive | Carpool
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Louisiana
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Louisiana

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Louisiana Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Louisiana

City % Carpool vs State vs National
1. Chatham 75.1% 37.7% (+37.4)#1 38.2% (+36.9)#24
2. New Roads 66.5% 37.7% (+28.8)#2 38.2% (+28.3)#115
3. Lake Providence 63.4% 37.7% (+25.7)#3 38.2% (+25.2)#217
4. Killian 62.0% 37.7% (+24.3)#4 38.2% (+23.8)#322
5. Norco 61.9% 37.7% (+24.2)#5 38.2% (+23.7)#328
6. North Vacherie 61.4% 37.7% (+23.7)#6 38.2% (+23.2)#371
7. Gueydan 60.5% 37.7% (+22.8)#7 38.2% (+22.3)#457
8. Baldwin 59.5% 37.7% (+21.8)#8 38.2% (+21.3)#580
9. Montz 59.3% 37.7% (+21.6)#9 38.2% (+21.1)#628
10. St Joseph 58.7% 37.7% (+21.0)#10 38.2% (+20.5)#693
11. Bonita 58.5% 37.7% (+20.8)#11 38.2% (+20.3)#728
12. Jonesville 58.2% 37.7% (+20.5)#12 38.2% (+20.0)#790
13. Buras 58.1% 37.7% (+20.4)#13 38.2% (+19.9)#810
14. Plain Dealing 57.5% 37.7% (+19.8)#14 38.2% (+19.3)#865
15. Gilbert 57.5% 37.7% (+19.8)#15 38.2% (+19.3)#875
16. Union 57.0% 37.7% (+19.3)#16 38.2% (+18.8)#962
17. Madisonville 56.5% 37.7% (+18.8)#17 38.2% (+18.3)#1,025
18. Sun 56.3% 37.7% (+18.6)#18 38.2% (+18.1)#1,085
19. Merrydale 56.2% 37.7% (+18.5)#19 38.2% (+18.0)#1,099
20. Lacombe 55.8% 37.7% (+18.1)#20 38.2% (+17.6)#1,180
21. Cullen 55.6% 37.7% (+17.9)#21 38.2% (+17.4)#1,217
22. Cut Off 55.5% 37.7% (+17.8)#22 38.2% (+17.3)#1,227
23. Belcher 55.5% 37.7% (+17.8)#23 38.2% (+17.3)#1,253
24. Lecompte 54.9% 37.7% (+17.2)#24 38.2% (+16.7)#1,390
25. Many 54.7% 37.7% (+17.0)#25 38.2% (+16.5)#1,416
26. Destrehan 54.6% 37.7% (+16.9)#26 38.2% (+16.4)#1,428
27. St Rose 54.5% 37.7% (+16.8)#27 38.2% (+16.3)#1,443
28. Oil City 54.5% 37.7% (+16.8)#28 38.2% (+16.3)#1,461
29. Duson 54.2% 37.7% (+16.5)#29 38.2% (+16.0)#1,556
30. Walker 54.1% 37.7% (+16.4)#30 38.2% (+15.9)#1,569
31. Poydras 54.0% 37.7% (+16.3)#31 38.2% (+15.8)#1,601
32. Carlyss 53.6% 37.7% (+15.9)#32 38.2% (+15.4)#1,661
33. Welsh 53.6% 37.7% (+15.9)#33 38.2% (+15.4)#1,664
34. Eden Isle 53.3% 37.7% (+15.6)#34 38.2% (+15.1)#1,752
35. Shenandoah 52.6% 37.7% (+14.9)#35 38.2% (+14.4)#1,915
36. Jennings 52.6% 37.7% (+14.9)#36 38.2% (+14.4)#1,916
37. Tallulah 52.5% 37.7% (+14.8)#37 38.2% (+14.3)#1,932
38. Bastrop 52.1% 37.7% (+14.4)#38 38.2% (+13.9)#2,056
39. Ossun 52.1% 37.7% (+14.4)#39 38.2% (+13.9)#2,063
40. Raceland 51.9% 37.7% (+14.2)#40 38.2% (+13.7)#2,117
41. Reserve 51.6% 37.7% (+13.9)#41 38.2% (+13.4)#2,188
42. Hosston 51.5% 37.7% (+13.8)#42 38.2% (+13.3)#2,251
43. St Martinville 51.3% 37.7% (+13.6)#43 38.2% (+13.1)#2,296
44. Galliano 51.1% 37.7% (+13.4)#44 38.2% (+12.9)#2,371
45. Woodworth 51.1% 37.7% (+13.4)#45 38.2% (+12.9)#2,383
46. Grand Coteau 50.5% 37.7% (+12.8)#46 38.2% (+12.3)#2,583
47. Cecilia 50.4% 37.7% (+12.7)#47 38.2% (+12.2)#2,643
48. Mcnary 50.2% 37.7% (+12.5)#48 38.2% (+12.0)#2,748
49. Harahan 49.8% 37.7% (+12.1)#49 38.2% (+11.6)#2,844
50. Tickfaw 49.8% 37.7% (+12.1)#50 38.2% (+11.6)#2,862
51. Vienna Bend 49.6% 37.7% (+11.9)#51 38.2% (+11.4)#2,914
52. Jena 49.3% 37.7% (+11.6)#52 38.2% (+11.1)#3,046
53. Minden 48.7% 37.7% (+11.0)#53 38.2% (+10.5)#3,285
54. Scott 48.7% 37.7% (+11.0)#54 38.2% (+10.5)#3,287
55. Larose 48.6% 37.7% (+10.9)#55 38.2% (+10.4)#3,319
56. Haughton 48.2% 37.7% (+10.5)#56 38.2% (+10.0)#3,532
57. River Ridge 48.1% 37.7% (+10.4)#57 38.2% (+9.90)#3,555
58. Blanchard 48.1% 37.7% (+10.4)#58 38.2% (+9.90)#3,563
59. Stanley 47.8% 37.7% (+10.1)#59 38.2% (+9.60)#3,710
60. Old Jefferson 47.7% 37.7% (+10.0)#60 38.2% (+9.50)#3,716
61. Cade 47.0% 37.7% (+9.30)#61 38.2% (+8.80)#4,123
62. Wallace 47.0% 37.7% (+9.30)#62 38.2% (+8.80)#4,127
63. Chackbay 46.8% 37.7% (+9.10)#63 38.2% (+8.60)#4,190
64. Simpson 46.3% 37.7% (+8.60)#64 38.2% (+8.10)#4,461
65. Berwick 45.3% 37.7% (+7.60)#65 38.2% (+7.10)#4,978
66. Athens 45.1% 37.7% (+7.40)#66 38.2% (+6.90)#5,136
67. Eunice 44.8% 37.7% (+7.10)#67 38.2% (+6.60)#5,232
68. Marion 44.8% 37.7% (+7.10)#68 38.2% (+6.60)#5,267
69. Bridge City 44.7% 37.7% (+7.00)#69 38.2% (+6.50)#5,289
70. Oak Hills Place 44.6% 37.7% (+6.90)#70 38.2% (+6.40)#5,339
71. Schriever 44.6% 37.7% (+6.90)#71 38.2% (+6.40)#5,347
72. Lakeshore 44.5% 37.7% (+6.80)#72 38.2% (+6.30)#5,420
73. Keachi 44.5% 37.7% (+6.80)#73 38.2% (+6.30)#5,479
74. Patterson 44.3% 37.7% (+6.60)#74 38.2% (+6.10)#5,562
75. Lydia 44.3% 37.7% (+6.60)#75 38.2% (+6.10)#5,586
76. Cankton 44.2% 37.7% (+6.50)#76 38.2% (+6.00)#5,668
77. Port Allen 44.1% 37.7% (+6.40)#77 38.2% (+5.90)#5,698
78. Avondale 44.1% 37.7% (+6.40)#78 38.2% (+5.90)#5,699
79. Alexandria 44.0% 37.7% (+6.30)#79 38.2% (+5.80)#5,734
80. Jeanerette 43.9% 37.7% (+6.20)#80 38.2% (+5.70)#5,819
81. Charenton 43.9% 37.7% (+6.20)#81 38.2% (+5.70)#5,836
82. Newellton 43.8% 37.7% (+6.10)#82 38.2% (+5.60)#5,893
83. Norwood 43.8% 37.7% (+6.10)#83 38.2% (+5.60)#5,908
84. Plaquemine 43.3% 37.7% (+5.60)#84 38.2% (+5.10)#6,218
85. Homer 43.1% 37.7% (+5.40)#85 38.2% (+4.90)#6,390
86. Sunset 43.0% 37.7% (+5.30)#86 38.2% (+4.80)#6,460
87. Pearl River 42.8% 37.7% (+5.10)#87 38.2% (+4.60)#6,580
88. Morse 42.7% 37.7% (+5.00)#88 38.2% (+4.50)#6,656
89. Violet 42.6% 37.7% (+4.90)#89 38.2% (+4.40)#6,703
90. Lafourche Crossing 42.6% 37.7% (+4.90)#90 38.2% (+4.40)#6,718
91. Port Sulphur 42.6% 37.7% (+4.90)#91 38.2% (+4.40)#6,722
92. Elton 42.6% 37.7% (+4.90)#92 38.2% (+4.40)#6,726
93. Youngsville 42.4% 37.7% (+4.70)#93 38.2% (+4.20)#6,857
94. Winnsboro 42.4% 37.7% (+4.70)#94 38.2% (+4.20)#6,877
95. Marksville 42.3% 37.7% (+4.60)#95 38.2% (+4.10)#6,960
96. Center Point 42.2% 37.7% (+4.50)#96 38.2% (+4.00)#7,075
97. Zachary 42.1% 37.7% (+4.40)#97 38.2% (+3.90)#7,103
98. West Monroe 42.1% 37.7% (+4.40)#98 38.2% (+3.90)#7,112
99. Simsboro 42.1% 37.7% (+4.40)#99 38.2% (+3.90)#7,159
100. Franklin 42.0% 37.7% (+4.30)#100 38.2% (+3.80)#7,195

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Louisiana?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Louisiana are:
#1
75.1%
#2
66.5%
#3
63.4%
#4
62.0%
#5
61.9%
#6
61.4%
#7
60.5%
#8
59.5%
#9
59.3%
#10
58.7%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Louisiana?
Chatham has the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Louisiana with 75.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the State of Louisiana?
Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Louisiana is 37.7%.
What is the Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the United States is 38.2%.