Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Ohio

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Drive | Carpool
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Ohio
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Ohio

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Ohio Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Ohio

City % Carpool vs State vs National
1. Fayetteville 81.1% 36.5% (+44.6)#1 38.2% (+42.9)#8
2. Day Heights 72.2% 36.5% (+35.7)#2 38.2% (+34.0)#41
3. Caldwell 70.8% 36.5% (+34.3)#3 38.2% (+32.6)#50
4. Devola 69.1% 36.5% (+32.6)#4 38.2% (+30.9)#70
5. Grand Rapids 65.5% 36.5% (+29.0)#5 38.2% (+27.3)#141
6. Valley City 63.7% 36.5% (+27.2)#6 38.2% (+25.5)#210
7. Oak Harbor 63.1% 36.5% (+26.6)#7 38.2% (+24.9)#243
8. Bairdstown 63.1% 36.5% (+26.6)#8 38.2% (+24.9)#248
9. Clarktown 63.0% 36.5% (+26.5)#9 38.2% (+24.8)#251
10. Candlewood Lake 62.9% 36.5% (+26.4)#10 38.2% (+24.7)#255
11. Sterling 62.8% 36.5% (+26.3)#11 38.2% (+24.6)#261
12. Waverly 62.1% 36.5% (+25.6)#12 38.2% (+23.9)#313
13. Castine 61.5% 36.5% (+25.0)#13 38.2% (+23.3)#365
14. Buckland 61.0% 36.5% (+24.5)#14 38.2% (+22.8)#421
15. Kirtland Hills 60.8% 36.5% (+24.3)#15 38.2% (+22.6)#430
16. Orange 60.5% 36.5% (+24.0)#16 38.2% (+22.3)#451
17. New Knoxville 60.5% 36.5% (+24.0)#17 38.2% (+22.3)#459
18. Glendale 60.1% 36.5% (+23.6)#18 38.2% (+21.9)#526
19. Lordstown 59.7% 36.5% (+23.2)#19 38.2% (+21.5)#563
20. Alexandria 59.5% 36.5% (+23.0)#20 38.2% (+21.3)#592
21. Rochester 59.3% 36.5% (+22.8)#21 38.2% (+21.1)#641
22. Holland 59.2% 36.5% (+22.7)#22 38.2% (+21.0)#647
23. Shawnee Hills 59.0% 36.5% (+22.5)#23 38.2% (+20.8)#671
24. Paulding 58.6% 36.5% (+22.1)#24 38.2% (+20.4)#699
25. Golf Manor 58.3% 36.5% (+21.8)#25 38.2% (+20.1)#753
26. Pleasantville 58.2% 36.5% (+21.7)#26 38.2% (+20.0)#794
27. Ontario 57.5% 36.5% (+21.0)#27 38.2% (+19.3)#860
28. Hamden 57.5% 36.5% (+21.0)#28 38.2% (+19.3)#867
29. Hartville 57.4% 36.5% (+20.9)#29 38.2% (+19.2)#881
30. Yellow Springs 57.2% 36.5% (+20.7)#30 38.2% (+19.0)#915
31. Ottawa 56.3% 36.5% (+19.8)#31 38.2% (+18.1)#1,069
32. Winchester 56.1% 36.5% (+19.6)#32 38.2% (+17.9)#1,136
33. Thornport 55.9% 36.5% (+19.4)#33 38.2% (+17.7)#1,173
34. Port Washington 55.8% 36.5% (+19.3)#34 38.2% (+17.6)#1,193
35. Shawnee 55.5% 36.5% (+19.0)#35 38.2% (+17.3)#1,248
36. Brecksville 55.4% 36.5% (+18.9)#36 38.2% (+17.2)#1,264
37. Malinta 55.4% 36.5% (+18.9)#37 38.2% (+17.2)#1,276
38. Nashville 55.0% 36.5% (+18.5)#38 38.2% (+16.8)#1,371
39. Enon 54.9% 36.5% (+18.4)#39 38.2% (+16.7)#1,379
40. Kenwood 54.8% 36.5% (+18.3)#40 38.2% (+16.6)#1,395
41. Marble Cliff 54.8% 36.5% (+18.3)#41 38.2% (+16.6)#1,402
42. Rosemount 54.7% 36.5% (+18.2)#42 38.2% (+16.5)#1,417
43. Hanging Rock 54.5% 36.5% (+18.0)#43 38.2% (+16.3)#1,477
44. Parral 54.2% 36.5% (+17.7)#44 38.2% (+16.0)#1,564
45. Marne 54.0% 36.5% (+17.5)#45 38.2% (+15.8)#1,611
46. Tiltonsville 53.9% 36.5% (+17.4)#46 38.2% (+15.7)#1,620
47. Sharon Center 53.8% 36.5% (+17.3)#47 38.2% (+15.6)#1,630
48. St Louisville 53.8% 36.5% (+17.3)#48 38.2% (+15.6)#1,639
49. Sabina 53.6% 36.5% (+17.1)#49 38.2% (+15.4)#1,667
50. Amanda 53.5% 36.5% (+17.0)#50 38.2% (+15.3)#1,698
51. Canal Lewisville 53.5% 36.5% (+17.0)#51 38.2% (+15.3)#1,700
52. Amberley 53.2% 36.5% (+16.7)#52 38.2% (+15.0)#1,794
53. Rayland 52.5% 36.5% (+16.0)#53 38.2% (+14.3)#1,957
54. Riverlea 52.4% 36.5% (+15.9)#54 38.2% (+14.2)#1,984
55. Glenwillow 52.3% 36.5% (+15.8)#55 38.2% (+14.1)#2,011
56. Zanesfield 52.3% 36.5% (+15.8)#56 38.2% (+14.1)#2,025
57. Rossburg 52.2% 36.5% (+15.7)#57 38.2% (+14.0)#2,051
58. Highland Hills 52.1% 36.5% (+15.6)#58 38.2% (+13.9)#2,082
59. Vanlue 52.1% 36.5% (+15.6)#59 38.2% (+13.9)#2,084
60. Bedford 52.0% 36.5% (+15.5)#60 38.2% (+13.8)#2,088
61. South Zanesville 52.0% 36.5% (+15.5)#61 38.2% (+13.8)#2,099
62. Magnetic Springs 52.0% 36.5% (+15.5)#62 38.2% (+13.8)#2,112
63. Sixteen Mile Stand 51.5% 36.5% (+15.0)#63 38.2% (+13.3)#2,217
64. Covington 51.5% 36.5% (+15.0)#64 38.2% (+13.3)#2,220
65. New Albany 51.3% 36.5% (+14.8)#65 38.2% (+13.1)#2,291
66. Elmwood Place 51.3% 36.5% (+14.8)#66 38.2% (+13.1)#2,305
67. West Hill 51.3% 36.5% (+14.8)#67 38.2% (+13.1)#2,306
68. Spring Valley 51.3% 36.5% (+14.8)#68 38.2% (+13.1)#2,319
69. Mount Cory 51.3% 36.5% (+14.8)#69 38.2% (+13.1)#2,325
70. New Boston 51.2% 36.5% (+14.7)#70 38.2% (+13.0)#2,345
71. Burbank 51.1% 36.5% (+14.6)#71 38.2% (+12.9)#2,406
72. Kalida 51.0% 36.5% (+14.5)#72 38.2% (+12.8)#2,417
73. Arcadia 51.0% 36.5% (+14.5)#73 38.2% (+12.8)#2,428
74. West Logan 51.0% 36.5% (+14.5)#74 38.2% (+12.8)#2,432
75. Moreland Hills 50.8% 36.5% (+14.3)#75 38.2% (+12.6)#2,474
76. Osgood 50.8% 36.5% (+14.3)#76 38.2% (+12.6)#2,497
77. Roswell 50.8% 36.5% (+14.3)#77 38.2% (+12.6)#2,502
78. New Holland 50.7% 36.5% (+14.2)#78 38.2% (+12.5)#2,525
79. Pekin 50.6% 36.5% (+14.1)#79 38.2% (+12.4)#2,547
80. Syracuse 50.5% 36.5% (+14.0)#80 38.2% (+12.3)#2,593
81. Belmore 50.5% 36.5% (+14.0)#81 38.2% (+12.3)#2,626
82. Fairport Harbor 50.4% 36.5% (+13.9)#82 38.2% (+12.2)#2,635
83. Roaming Shores 50.4% 36.5% (+13.9)#83 38.2% (+12.2)#2,639
84. North Kingsville 50.3% 36.5% (+13.8)#84 38.2% (+12.1)#2,678
85. Lucasville 50.3% 36.5% (+13.8)#85 38.2% (+12.1)#2,684
86. Norton 50.1% 36.5% (+13.6)#86 38.2% (+11.9)#2,755
87. North Industry 50.1% 36.5% (+13.6)#87 38.2% (+11.9)#2,773
88. Wetherington 50.1% 36.5% (+13.6)#88 38.2% (+11.9)#2,777
89. Chagrin Falls 49.9% 36.5% (+13.4)#89 38.2% (+11.7)#2,827
90. Washingtonville 49.8% 36.5% (+13.3)#90 38.2% (+11.6)#2,864
91. Carrollton 49.6% 36.5% (+13.1)#91 38.2% (+11.4)#2,905
92. Sciotodale 49.6% 36.5% (+13.1)#92 38.2% (+11.4)#2,920
93. Edgewood 49.5% 36.5% (+13.0)#93 38.2% (+11.3)#2,938
94. Mount Victory 49.5% 36.5% (+13.0)#94 38.2% (+11.3)#2,963
95. New Baltimore 49.3% 36.5% (+12.8)#95 38.2% (+11.1)#3,061
96. Solon 49.2% 36.5% (+12.7)#96 38.2% (+11.0)#3,092
97. Mingo Junction 49.1% 36.5% (+12.6)#97 38.2% (+10.9)#3,139
98. Carroll 49.1% 36.5% (+12.6)#98 38.2% (+10.9)#3,170
99. Hudson 48.9% 36.5% (+12.4)#99 38.2% (+10.7)#3,206
100. Macedonia 48.8% 36.5% (+12.3)#100 38.2% (+10.6)#3,237

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Ohio?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Ohio are:
#1
81.1%
#2
72.2%
#3
70.8%
#4
69.1%
#5
65.5%
#6
63.7%
#7
63.1%
#8
63.1%
#9
63.0%
#10
62.9%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Ohio?
Fayetteville has the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Ohio with 81.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the State of Ohio?
Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Ohio is 36.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the United States is 38.2%.