Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in North Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Drive | Carpool
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in North Dakota

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in North Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in North Dakota

City % Carpool vs State vs National
1. Mcville 71.5% 35.9% (+35.6)#1 38.2% (+33.3)#45
2. Menoken 69.0% 35.9% (+33.1)#2 38.2% (+30.8)#76
3. Sykeston 67.1% 35.9% (+31.2)#3 38.2% (+28.9)#112
4. New Leipzig 64.0% 35.9% (+28.1)#4 38.2% (+25.8)#201
5. Mooreton 63.6% 35.9% (+27.7)#5 38.2% (+25.4)#212
6. Forest River 63.3% 35.9% (+27.4)#6 38.2% (+25.1)#228
7. St Thomas 62.2% 35.9% (+26.3)#7 38.2% (+24.0)#311
8. Lidgerwood 61.1% 35.9% (+25.2)#8 38.2% (+22.9)#411
9. Halliday 60.5% 35.9% (+24.6)#9 38.2% (+22.3)#466
10. Max 59.4% 35.9% (+23.5)#10 38.2% (+21.2)#622
11. Linton 59.3% 35.9% (+23.4)#11 38.2% (+21.1)#632
12. Davenport 59.3% 35.9% (+23.4)#12 38.2% (+21.1)#639
13. Richardton 58.3% 35.9% (+22.4)#13 38.2% (+20.1)#768
14. Edinburg 58.3% 35.9% (+22.4)#14 38.2% (+20.1)#779
15. Underwood 57.3% 35.9% (+21.4)#15 38.2% (+19.1)#900
16. Washburn 57.1% 35.9% (+21.2)#16 38.2% (+18.9)#938
17. Stanton 57.0% 35.9% (+21.1)#17 38.2% (+18.8)#961
18. Litchville 56.8% 35.9% (+20.9)#18 38.2% (+18.6)#995
19. Munich 56.7% 35.9% (+20.8)#19 38.2% (+18.5)#1,007
20. Walhalla 55.5% 35.9% (+19.6)#20 38.2% (+17.3)#1,237
21. Abercrombie 55.5% 35.9% (+19.6)#21 38.2% (+17.3)#1,256
22. Neche 55.3% 35.9% (+19.4)#22 38.2% (+17.1)#1,298
23. Cooperstown 55.1% 35.9% (+19.2)#23 38.2% (+16.9)#1,348
24. Minnewaukan 54.9% 35.9% (+19.0)#24 38.2% (+16.7)#1,392
25. Bottineau 53.3% 35.9% (+17.4)#25 38.2% (+15.1)#1,764
26. Hamilton 52.5% 35.9% (+16.6)#26 38.2% (+14.3)#1,968
27. Hatton 52.3% 35.9% (+16.4)#27 38.2% (+14.1)#2,014
28. Towner 51.3% 35.9% (+15.4)#28 38.2% (+13.1)#2,322
29. Medina 50.5% 35.9% (+14.6)#29 38.2% (+12.3)#2,614
30. Ardoch 50.2% 35.9% (+14.3)#30 38.2% (+12.0)#2,750
31. Kenmare 49.6% 35.9% (+13.7)#31 38.2% (+11.4)#2,919
32. Reile S Acres 49.5% 35.9% (+13.6)#32 38.2% (+11.3)#2,955
33. Belcourt 48.6% 35.9% (+12.7)#33 38.2% (+10.4)#3,339
34. Cavalier 48.3% 35.9% (+12.4)#34 38.2% (+10.1)#3,484
35. Sanborn 48.3% 35.9% (+12.4)#35 38.2% (+10.1)#3,521
36. St John 48.1% 35.9% (+12.2)#36 38.2% (+9.90)#3,596
37. Hebron 48.0% 35.9% (+12.1)#37 38.2% (+9.80)#3,624
38. Flasher 48.0% 35.9% (+12.1)#38 38.2% (+9.80)#3,639
39. Hazen 47.9% 35.9% (+12.0)#39 38.2% (+9.70)#3,654
40. Manvel 47.5% 35.9% (+11.6)#40 38.2% (+9.30)#3,859
41. Thompson 47.3% 35.9% (+11.4)#41 38.2% (+9.10)#3,972
42. Oxbow 47.0% 35.9% (+11.1)#42 38.2% (+8.80)#4,132
43. Rugby 46.1% 35.9% (+10.2)#43 38.2% (+7.90)#4,541
44. Fairmount 45.7% 35.9% (+9.80)#44 38.2% (+7.50)#4,751
45. Langdon 45.6% 35.9% (+9.70)#45 38.2% (+7.40)#4,771
46. Minto 45.5% 35.9% (+9.60)#46 38.2% (+7.30)#4,865
47. Tower City 45.5% 35.9% (+9.60)#47 38.2% (+7.30)#4,888
48. Carson 45.5% 35.9% (+9.60)#48 38.2% (+7.30)#4,891
49. Westhope 45.3% 35.9% (+9.40)#49 38.2% (+7.10)#5,024
50. Scranton 44.9% 35.9% (+9.00)#50 38.2% (+6.70)#5,216
51. Hankinson 44.8% 35.9% (+8.90)#51 38.2% (+6.60)#5,265
52. Rolla 44.5% 35.9% (+8.60)#52 38.2% (+6.30)#5,434
53. Mandaree 44.5% 35.9% (+8.60)#53 38.2% (+6.30)#5,448
54. Pembina 44.5% 35.9% (+8.60)#54 38.2% (+6.30)#5,455
55. Wing 44.5% 35.9% (+8.60)#55 38.2% (+6.30)#5,478
56. Souris 44.5% 35.9% (+8.60)#56 38.2% (+6.30)#5,485
57. Cando 44.3% 35.9% (+8.40)#57 38.2% (+6.10)#5,583
58. New Town 44.2% 35.9% (+8.30)#58 38.2% (+6.00)#5,644
59. Parshall 43.9% 35.9% (+8.00)#59 38.2% (+5.70)#5,832
60. Leonard 43.4% 35.9% (+7.50)#60 38.2% (+5.20)#6,192
61. Drake 43.3% 35.9% (+7.40)#61 38.2% (+5.10)#6,278
62. Oakes 42.8% 35.9% (+6.90)#62 38.2% (+4.60)#6,584
63. South Heart 42.6% 35.9% (+6.70)#63 38.2% (+4.40)#6,735
64. Cannon Ball 42.4% 35.9% (+6.50)#64 38.2% (+4.20)#6,911
65. Wyndmere 42.4% 35.9% (+6.50)#65 38.2% (+4.20)#6,918
66. Dwight 42.0% 35.9% (+6.10)#66 38.2% (+3.80)#7,233
67. Fullerton 41.8% 35.9% (+5.90)#67 38.2% (+3.60)#7,380
68. Shell Valley 41.6% 35.9% (+5.70)#68 38.2% (+3.40)#7,518
69. Bowman 41.5% 35.9% (+5.60)#69 38.2% (+3.30)#7,616
70. Valley City 41.2% 35.9% (+5.30)#70 38.2% (+3.00)#7,881
71. Fort Ransom 41.0% 35.9% (+5.10)#71 38.2% (+2.80)#8,083
72. Argusville 40.8% 35.9% (+4.90)#72 38.2% (+2.60)#8,233
73. Maddock 40.5% 35.9% (+4.60)#73 38.2% (+2.30)#8,548
74. Hoople 40.5% 35.9% (+4.60)#74 38.2% (+2.30)#8,557
75. Casselton 40.4% 35.9% (+4.50)#75 38.2% (+2.20)#8,634
76. Arthur 40.3% 35.9% (+4.40)#76 38.2% (+2.10)#8,768
77. Lincoln 40.1% 35.9% (+4.20)#77 38.2% (+1.90)#8,902
78. Reynolds 39.3% 35.9% (+3.40)#78 38.2% (+1.10)#9,731
79. Tappen 39.3% 35.9% (+3.40)#79 38.2% (+1.10)#9,737
80. Garrison 39.2% 35.9% (+3.30)#80 38.2% (+1.00)#9,821
81. Steele 38.9% 35.9% (+3.00)#81 38.2% (+0.700)#10,116
82. Gardner 38.5% 35.9% (+2.60)#82 38.2% (+0.300)#10,597
83. Harvey 38.4% 35.9% (+2.50)#83 38.2% (+0.200)#10,667
84. Sheldon 38.3% 35.9% (+2.40)#84 38.2% (+0.100)#10,809
85. Mapleton 38.1% 35.9% (+2.20)#85 38.2% (-0.100)#10,980
86. Beulah 38.0% 35.9% (+2.10)#86 38.2% (-0.200)#11,054
87. Plaza 38.0% 35.9% (+2.10)#87 38.2% (-0.200)#11,097
88. Grandin 38.0% 35.9% (+2.10)#88 38.2% (-0.200)#11,100
89. Taylor 37.8% 35.9% (+1.90)#89 38.2% (-0.400)#11,310
90. Park River 37.7% 35.9% (+1.80)#90 38.2% (-0.500)#11,381
91. Elgin 37.5% 35.9% (+1.60)#91 38.2% (-0.700)#11,602
92. Aneta 37.5% 35.9% (+1.60)#92 38.2% (-0.700)#11,635
93. Fingal 37.4% 35.9% (+1.50)#93 38.2% (-0.800)#11,735
94. Surrey 37.3% 35.9% (+1.40)#94 38.2% (-0.900)#11,818
95. Walcott 37.3% 35.9% (+1.40)#95 38.2% (-0.900)#11,852
96. Bismarck 37.2% 35.9% (+1.30)#96 38.2% (-1.000)#11,861
97. Carrington 37.2% 35.9% (+1.30)#97 38.2% (-1.000)#11,918
98. Dawson 37.0% 35.9% (+1.10)#98 38.2% (-1.20)#12,090
99. Napoleon 36.9% 35.9% (+1.00)#99 38.2% (-1.30)#12,183
100. Horace 36.8% 35.9% (+0.900)#100 38.2% (-1.40)#12,245

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in North Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in North Dakota are:
#1
71.5%
#2
69.0%
#3
67.1%
#4
64.0%
#5
63.6%
#6
63.3%
#7
62.2%
#8
61.1%
#9
60.5%
#10
59.4%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in North Dakota?
Mcville has the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in North Dakota with 71.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the State of North Dakota?
Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in North Dakota is 35.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the United States is 38.2%.